ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03337542Updated Nov 2, 2021Results posted

AR101 Real-World Open-Label Extension Study

A Phase 3 interventional study of AR101 in Peanut Allergy, sponsored by Aimmune Therapeutics, Inc.. Completed at 60 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 4 Years to 17 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-11-02.

Sponsored by Aimmune Therapeutics, Inc. · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
243
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
4 Years to 17 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study is enrolling participants by invitation only. This is an open-label, safety extension study for subjects who participated in the ARC007 study.

Read the detailed description

This is a Phase 3, multi-center, North American, open-label, long-term, safety extension study for eligible subjects who received AR101 therapy in the ARC007 trial (NCT03126227) and completed the study.

02

Conditions studied

  • Peanut Allergy

Keywords

  • AR101
  • Characterized Peanut Allergen
  • CPNA (Characterized Peanut Allergen)
  • OIT (oral immunotherapy)
  • Peanut Allergy
  • Peanut-Allergic Children
  • Desensitization
  • Food Allergy
03

In context

Peanut Hypersensitivity

166 studies on the registry are indexed under Peanut Hypersensitivity; 27 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 243 is above the median of 50 across 127 interventional studies indexed under Peanut Hypersensitivity.

Browse Peanut Hypersensitivity studies →

Lead sponsor

Aimmune Therapeutics, Inc. is the lead sponsor of 12 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Of its 11 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 11 (100%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
4 Years to 17 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  • Received AR101 in study ARC007
  • Completed the ARC007 study
  • Use of effective by sexually active female subjects of

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  • Developed a change in health status during the ARC007 study which in the opinion of the investigator would make the subject unsuitable for participation in this study.
  • Receiving a prohibited medication or anticipated use of a prohibited medication [e.g., angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin-receptor blockers or calcium channel blockers], any monoclonal antibody, any peanut immunotherapy, or any other immunomodulatory therapy.
  • Currently in the build-up phase of immunotherapy for any nonfood allergen.
  • Currently participating in any other interventional clinical study outside of the ARC007 study that was just completed.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
243 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    Treatment arm description

    Subjects will receive maintenance dosing with AR101. Maintenance doses are provided in sachets, where each sachet contains 300 mg of peanut protein. Subjects are to ingest 300 mg orally once a day during maintenance.

    Biological: AR101

Interventions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (Safety and Tolerability)

    Number of participants with treatment-emergent adverse events including serious adverse events during the overall study period (safety and tolerability)

    Time frame: Approximately 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Premature Discontinuation of Dosing Due to Adverse Events

    Time frame: Approximately 6 months

  2. Number of Participants With Early Discontinuation of Dosing Due to Chronic/Recurrent GI Adverse Events

    Time frame: Approximately 6 months

  3. Percentage of Subjects With Chronic/Recurrent GI Adverse Events Resolving Before 2, Between 2 and 4, Between 4 and 12, and ≥ 12 Weeks After Discontinuation of Dosing

    Time frame: Approximately 6 months

  4. Number of Participants With Allergic Hypersensitivity Adverse Events

    Time frame: Approximately 6 months

  5. Number of Participants With of Anaphylaxis as Defined in the Protocol

    Anaphylaxis is likely when any 1 of the 3 following sets of criteria is fulfilled: 1. Acute onset of an illness (minutes to hours) with involvement of: (a) Skin/mucosal tissue (eg, generalized hives, itch/flush, swollen lips/tongue/uvula); AND (b) Airway compromise (eg, dyspnea, stridor, wheeze/bronchospasm, hypoxia, reduced PEFR); AND/OR (c) Reduced BP or associated symptoms (eg, hypotonia, syncope, incontinence). 2. Two or more of the following that occur rapidly after exposure to the allergen (minutes to hours): (a) Skin/mucosal tissue; (b) Airway compromise; (c) Reduced BP or associated symptoms; (d) Persistent GI symptoms (eg, nausea, vomiting, crampy abdominal pain). 3. Reduced BP after exposure to the allergen (minutes to hours). Infants and children: low systolic BP (age-specific) or \> 30% drop in systolic BP; Adults: systolic BP \< 90 mm Hg or \> 30% drop from their baseline.

    Time frame: Approximately 6 months

  6. Number of Participants With Epinephrine Use as Rescue Medication

    Time frame: Approximately 6 months

  7. Number of Participants With Accidental/Nonaccidental Ingestion of Peanut and Other Allergenic Foods

    Number of participants with accidental/nonaccidental ingestion of peanut (not AR101 or food challenge material) and other allergenic foods.

    Time frame: Approximately 6 months

  8. Assessment of Asthma Control Using the Childhood Asthma Control Test (C-ACT) Questionnaire Total Score From Baseline, Every 4 Weeks, Early Discontinuation and Study Exit, Ages 4-11

    The C-ACT for subjects aged 4 to 11 years included 4 questions for the subject and 3 questions for the parent/caregiver; the total score (sum of 7 questions) ranged from 0 (worst control) to 27 (total control).

    Time frame: Baseline, Maintenance Visit 1 (Wk 4), Maintenance Visit 2 (Wk 8), Maintenance Visit 3 (Wk 12), Maintenance Visit 4 (Wk 16), Maintenance Visit 5 (Wk 20), Maintenance Visit 6 (Wk 24), Early Discontinuation (14 days after last dose), Study Exit (~6 months)

  9. Assessment of Asthma Control Using the Asthma Control Test (ACT) Questionnaire Total Score From Baseline, Every 4 Weeks, Early Discontinuation and Study Exit, Ages 12-17

    The ACT for subjects aged 12 to 17 years consisted of 5 questions, and the total score (sum of 5 questions) ranged from 5 (worst control) to 25 (total control).

    Time frame: Baseline, Maintenance Visit 1 (Wk 4), Maintenance Visit 2 (Wk 8), Maintenance Visit 3 (Wk 12), Maintenance Visit 4 (Wk 16), Maintenance Visit 5 (Wk 20), Maintenance Visit 6 (Wk 24), Early Discontinuation (14 days after last dose), Study Exit (~6 months)

  10. Number of Participants With Adverse Events That Led to Early Withdrawal

    Time frame: Approximately 6 months

07

Results

Posted Nov 2, 2021

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneAR101
Started243
Safety population242
Completed222
Not completed21
Withdrew: Withdrew consent17
Withdrew: Allergic adverse event1
Withdrew: Chronic /recurrent gi adverse event/symptoms1
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up1
Withdrew: Unable to participate in study due to relocation1

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (Safety and Tolerability)

Number of participants with treatment-emergent adverse events including serious adverse events during the overall study period (safety and tolerability)

Time frame:
Approximately 6 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (Safety and Tolerability)
ParticipantsAR101
Subjects with at least 1 Adverse Event (AE)219
Mild AE176
Moderate AE43
Severe AE0
Life-threatening AE0
Death AE0
Subjects with at least 1 Serious Adverse Event (SAE)1
Mild SAE0
Moderate SAE1
Severe SAE0
Life-threatening SAE0
Death SAE0
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Premature Discontinuation of Dosing Due to Adverse Events
Time frame:
Approximately 6 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Premature Discontinuation of Dosing Due to Adverse Events
ParticipantsAR101
Number of Participants With Premature Discontinuation of Dosing Due to Adverse Events1
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Early Discontinuation of Dosing Due to Chronic/Recurrent GI Adverse Events
Time frame:
Approximately 6 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Early Discontinuation of Dosing Due to Chronic/Recurrent GI Adverse Events
ParticipantsAR101
Number of Participants With Early Discontinuation of Dosing Due to Chronic/Recurrent GI Adverse Events1
SecondaryPercentage of Subjects With Chronic/Recurrent GI Adverse Events Resolving Before 2, Between 2 and 4, Between 4 and 12, and ≥ 12 Weeks After Discontinuation of Dosing
Time frame:
Approximately 6 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Percentage of Subjects With Chronic/Recurrent GI Adverse Events Resolving Before 2, Between 2 and 4, Between 4 and 12, and ≥ 12 Weeks After Discontinuation of Dosing
ParticipantsAR101
< 2 weeks1
2-4 weeks0
4-12 weeks0
≥ 12 weeks0
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Allergic Hypersensitivity Adverse Events
Time frame:
Approximately 6 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Allergic Hypersensitivity Adverse Events
ParticipantsAR101
Throat irritation43
Pruritus39
Abdominal pain30
Abdominal discomfort28
Urticaria27
Cough24
Anaphylactic reaction21
Nausea19
Vomiting19
Rash17
Oral pruritus14
Rhinorrhoea14
SecondaryNumber of Participants With of Anaphylaxis as Defined in the Protocol

Anaphylaxis is likely when any 1 of the 3 following sets of criteria is fulfilled: 1. Acute onset of an illness (minutes to hours) with involvement of: (a) Skin/mucosal tissue (eg, generalized hives, itch/flush, swollen lips/tongue/uvula); AND (b) Airway compromise (eg, dyspnea, stridor, wheeze/bronchospasm, hypoxia, reduced PEFR); AND/OR (c) Reduced BP or associated symptoms (eg, hypotonia, syncope, incontinence). 2. Two or more of the following that occur rapidly after exposure to the allergen (minutes to hours): (a) Skin/mucosal tissue; (b) Airway compromise; (c) Reduced BP or associated symptoms; (d) Persistent GI symptoms (eg, nausea, vomiting, crampy abdominal pain). 3. Reduced BP after exposure to the allergen (minutes to hours). Infants and children: low systolic BP (age-specific) or \> 30% drop in systolic BP; Adults: systolic BP \< 90 mm Hg or \> 30% drop from their baseline.

Time frame:
Approximately 6 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With of Anaphylaxis as Defined in the Protocol
ParticipantsAR101
Number of Participants With of Anaphylaxis as Defined in the Protocol21
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Epinephrine Use as Rescue Medication
Time frame:
Approximately 6 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Epinephrine Use as Rescue Medication
ParticipantsAR101
Number of Participants With Epinephrine Use as Rescue Medication19
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Accidental/Nonaccidental Ingestion of Peanut and Other Allergenic Foods

Number of participants with accidental/nonaccidental ingestion of peanut (not AR101 or food challenge material) and other allergenic foods.

Time frame:
Approximately 6 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Accidental/Nonaccidental Ingestion of Peanut and Other Allergenic Foods
ParticipantsAR101
Number of Participants With Accidental/Nonaccidental Ingestion of Peanut and Other Allergenic Foods33
SecondaryAssessment of Asthma Control Using the Childhood Asthma Control Test (C-ACT) Questionnaire Total Score From Baseline, Every 4 Weeks, Early Discontinuation and Study Exit, Ages 4-11

The C-ACT for subjects aged 4 to 11 years included 4 questions for the subject and 3 questions for the parent/caregiver; the total score (sum of 7 questions) ranged from 0 (worst control) to 27 (total control).

Time frame:
Baseline, Maintenance Visit 1 (Wk 4), Maintenance Visit 2 (Wk 8), Maintenance Visit 3 (Wk 12), Maintenance Visit 4 (Wk 16), Maintenance Visit 5 (Wk 20), Maintenance Visit 6 (Wk 24), Early Discontinuation (14 days after last dose), Study Exit (~6 months)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Assessment of Asthma Control Using the Childhood Asthma Control Test (C-ACT) Questionnaire Total Score From Baseline, Every 4 Weeks, Early Discontinuation and Study Exit, Ages 4-11
score on a scaleAR101
Baseline24 ± 2.58
Maintenance Visit 124.4 ± 2.70
Maintenance Visit 225.0 ± 1.97
Maintenance Visit 325.0 ± 2.49
Maintenance Visit 425.3 ± 1.88
Maintenance Visit 524.8 ± 2.36
Maintenance Visit 624.9 ± 2.31
Early Discontinuation26.4 ± 0.89
Exit Visit24.2 ± 3.15
Change from Baseline to Study Exit0.5 ± 2.94
SecondaryAssessment of Asthma Control Using the Asthma Control Test (ACT) Questionnaire Total Score From Baseline, Every 4 Weeks, Early Discontinuation and Study Exit, Ages 12-17

The ACT for subjects aged 12 to 17 years consisted of 5 questions, and the total score (sum of 5 questions) ranged from 5 (worst control) to 25 (total control).

Time frame:
Baseline, Maintenance Visit 1 (Wk 4), Maintenance Visit 2 (Wk 8), Maintenance Visit 3 (Wk 12), Maintenance Visit 4 (Wk 16), Maintenance Visit 5 (Wk 20), Maintenance Visit 6 (Wk 24), Early Discontinuation (14 days after last dose), Study Exit (~6 months)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Assessment of Asthma Control Using the Asthma Control Test (ACT) Questionnaire Total Score From Baseline, Every 4 Weeks, Early Discontinuation and Study Exit, Ages 12-17
score on a scaleAR101
Baseline23.3 ± 1.92
Maintenance Visit 123.8 ± 1.70
Maintenance Visit 223.9 ± 1.65
Maintenance Visit 323.7 ± 2.32
Maintenance Visit 423.3 ± 2.72
Maintenance Visit 523.6 ± 2.14
Maintenance Visit 623.8 ± 2.19
Early Discontinuation21.5 ± 4.95
Exit Visit23.5 ± 2.58
Change from Baseline to Study Exit0.3 ± 2.68
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Adverse Events That Led to Early Withdrawal
Time frame:
Approximately 6 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Adverse Events That Led to Early Withdrawal
ParticipantsAR101
Number of Participants With Adverse Events That Led to Early Withdrawal1

Adverse events

Collected over 6 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Treatment Arm Description0/242 (0%)1/242 (0.4%)219/242 (90.5%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventTreatment Arm Description
Anaphylactic reactionImmune system disorders1/242
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 23
Most frequent other events
EventTreatment Arm Description
CoughRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders47/242
Abdominal discomfortGastrointestinal disorders45/242
Throat irritationRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders43/242
Upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations42/242
PruritusSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders41/242
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders39/242
Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders34/242
UrticariaSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders33/242
HeadacheNervous system disorders31/242
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders30/242

Baseline characteristics

A total of 243 subjects were enrolled. However, only 242 subjects were included in Safety Population. The Safety Population is defined as all subjects who received at least 1 dose of AR101.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)AR101
Median9 (4 to 17)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)AR101
Female84
Male158
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)AR101
Hispanic or Latino15
Not Hispanic or Latino227
Unknown or Not Reported0
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)AR101
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian31
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander2
Black or African American7
White174
More than one race25
Unknown or Not Reported3
08

Study locations

60 sites
  • Clinical Research Center of Alabama
    Birmingham, Alabama 35209, United States
  • Medical Research of Arizona
    Scottsdale, Arizona 85251, United States
  • Banner University of Arizona Medical Center
    Tucson, Arizona 85724, United States
  • Arkansas Children's Hospital
    Little Rock, Arkansas 72202, United States
  • Jonathan Corren, M.D., Inc.
    Los Angeles, California 90025, United States
  • Allergy & Asthma Associates of Southern California
    Mission Viejo, California 92691, United States
  • Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy Research at Stanford University - Packard-El Camino Hospital
    Mountain View, California 94040, United States
  • Peninsula Research Associates
    Rolling Hills Estates, California 90274, United States
  • Allergy & Asthma Medical Group and Research Center
    San Diego, California 92123, United States
  • Rady Children's Hospital, Div. Allergy & Immunology, UC San Diego
    San Diego, California 92123, United States
  • UCSF, Benioff Children's Hospital - Allergy and Immunology
    San Francisco, California 95148, United States
  • Allergy & Asthma Associates of Santa Clara Valley Research Center
    San Jose, California 95117, United States
  • UCLA Medical Center, Santa Monica
    Santa Monica, California 90404, United States
  • Bay Area Allergy
    Walnut Creek, California 94598, United States
  • Children's Hospital Colorado
    Aurora, Colorado 80045, United States
  • Asthma & Allergy Associates
    Colorado Springs, Colorado 80907, United States
  • National Jewish Health
    Denver, Colorado 80206, United States
  • Colorado Allergy & Asthma Centers, P.C.
    Denver, Colorado 80230, United States
  • Children's National Medical Center
    Washington, District of Columbia 20010, United States
  • Sher Allergy Specialists - Center for Cough
    Largo, Florida 33778, United States
  • Allergy Associates of the Palm Beaches
    North Palm Beach, Florida 33408, United States
  • Sarasota Clinical Research Windom Allergy, Asthma and Sinus
    Sarasota, Florida 34239, United States
  • University of South Florida Asthma, Allergy, and Immunology Clinical Research Unit
    Tampa, Florida 33613, United States
  • Atlanta Allergy & Asthma Clinic
    Marietta, Georgia 30060, United States
  • Idaho Allergy and Research
    Eagle, Idaho 83616, United States
  • Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago
    Chicago, Illinois 60611-2605, United States
  • The University of Chicago Medicine, Comer Children's Hospital
    Chicago, Illinois 60637, United States
  • Sneeze, Wheeze, & Itch Associates, LLC
    Normal, Illinois 61761, United States
  • Deaconess Clinic Downtown
    Evansville, Indiana 47713, United States
  • Family Allergy & Asthma Research Institute
    Louisville, Kentucky 40215, United States
  • Chesapeake Clinical Research, Inc.
    Baltimore, Maryland 21236, United States
  • Johns Hopkins Hospital, Pediatric Clinical Research Unit
    Baltimore, Maryland 21287, United States
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
    Boston, Massachusetts 02114, United States
  • Boston Children's Hospital
    Boston, Massachusetts 02115, United States
  • University of Michigan Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
    Ann Arbor, Michigan 48106, United States
  • Clinical Research Institute, Inc.
    Plymouth, Minnesota 55441, United States
  • Children's Mercy on Broadway
    Kansas City, Missouri 64111, United States
  • Atlantic Research Center
    Ocean City, New Jersey 07712, United States
  • Princeton Center for Clinical Research
    Skillman, New Jersey 08558, United States
  • Northwell Health System
    Great Neck, New York 11021, United States
  • Univ. of Rochester Medical Center, Golisano Children's Hosp.
    Rochester, New York 14642, United States
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Clinical & Translational Research Center
    Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, United States
  • Clinical Research of Charlotte
    Charlotte, North Carolina 28277, United States
  • Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
    Cincinnati, Ohio 45229, United States
  • Bernstein Clinical Research Center
    Cincinnati, Ohio 45231, United States
  • Oklahoma Institute of Allergy and Asthma Clinical Research, LLC
    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73131, United States
  • Columbia Asthma & Allergy Clinic
    Clackamas, Oregon 97015, United States
  • The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States
  • National Allergy and Asthma Research, LLC
    North Charleston, South Carolina 29420, United States
  • Specially for Children Allergy, Asthma and Immunology Clinic
    Austin, Texas 78723, United States
  • Children's Health
    Dallas, Texas 75235, United States
  • Western Sky Medical Research
    El Paso, Texas 79903, United States
  • Texas Children's Hospital, Baylor College of Medicine
    Houston, Texas 77030, United States
  • Virginia Mason Medical Center
    Seattle, Washington 98101, United States
  • ASTHMA Inc. Clinical Research Center
    Seattle, Washington 98115-2024, United States
  • McMaster University Medical Center
    Hamilton, Ontario L8N 3Z5, Canada
  • Triple A Lab / Hamilton Allergy
    Hamilton, Ontario L8S 1G5, Canada
  • Cheema Research Inc. (CRI)
    Mississauga, Ontario L5A 3V4, Canada
  • Ottawa Allergy Research Corp
    Ottawa, Ontario K1G 6C6, Canada
  • Gordon Sussman Clinical Research
    Toronto, Ontario M4V 1R2, Canada
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Nilsson C, Scurlock AM, Dellon ES, Brostoff JM, Pham T, Ryan R, Brown KR, Adelman DC, Aceves SS. Onset of eosinophilic esophagitis during a clinical trial program of oral immunotherapy for peanut allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2021 Dec;9(12):4496-4501. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2021.07.048. Epub 2021 Aug 11. No abstract available. PubMed 34389504 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 2, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03337542
Lead sponsor
Aimmune Therapeutics, Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 9, 2017
Start date
Oct 18, 2017
Primary completion
Sep 20, 2019
Completion
Sep 20, 2019
Results posted
Nov 2, 2021
Last update
Nov 2, 2021

Study contacts

Director of Regulatory Affairs
study director · Aimmune Therapeutics

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drugs tested here: Panobacumab · Iclaprim, (r)-

Start the discussion