ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03736447POSEIDONUpdated Mar 2, 2023Results posted

Peanut Oral Immunotherapy Study of Early Intervention for Desensitization

A Phase 3 interventional study of AR101 powder provided in capsules & sachets and Placebo powder provided in capsules & sachets in Peanut Allergy, sponsored by Aimmune Therapeutics, Inc.. Completed at 23 sites in 4 countries. Open to participants aged 1 Year to 3 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-03-02.

Sponsored by Aimmune Therapeutics, Inc. · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
146
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
1 Year to 3 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy and safety of AR101 in peanut-allergic children aged 1 to \< 4 years.

Read the detailed description

This is a Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study conducted at 14 study sites in North America and 9 in Europe to evaluate the efficacy and safety of AR101 in a characterized oral desensitization immunotherapy (CODIT™) regimen compared with placebo in peanut-allergic children aged 1 to \< 4 years.

02

Conditions studied

  • Peanut Allergy

Keywords

  • CODIT™ (characterized oral desensitization immunotherapy™)
  • Peanut-Allergic Children
  • CPNA (Characterized Peanut Allergen)
  • Desensitization
  • AR101
  • Allergy
  • Peanut Allergy
  • Characterized Peanut Allergen
  • Oral Immunotherapy
03

In context

Peanut Hypersensitivity

166 studies on the registry are indexed under Peanut Hypersensitivity; 27 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 146 is above the median of 50 across 127 interventional studies indexed under Peanut Hypersensitivity.

Browse Peanut Hypersensitivity studies →

Lead sponsor

Aimmune Therapeutics, Inc. is the lead sponsor of 12 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Of its 11 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 11 (100%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
1 Year to 3 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Aged 1 to \< 4 years at randomization.
  • Written from the legal guardian/parent (or both parents where required by local authorities). Provide assent where required and as appropriate per local requirements.
  • Sensitivity to peanut, defined as one of the following:

    • No known history of peanut ingestion and has serum IgE to peanut ≥ 5 kUA/L within 12 months before randomization.
    • Documented history of physician-diagnosed IgE-mediated peanut allergy that includes the onset of characteristic* signs and symptoms of allergy within 2 hours of known oral exposure to peanut or peanut-containing food, and has a mean wheal diameter on skin prick test (SPT) to peanut of at least 3 mm greater than the negative control (diluent) or serum IgE to peanut ≥ 0.35 kUA/L, obtained within 12 months before randomization.
  • Development of age-appropriate dose-limiting allergy symptoms after consuming single doses of peanut protein > 3 mg to ≤ 300 mg in a screening DBPCFC.
  • A palatable vehicle food to which the subject is not allergic must be available for administering study product.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of severe or life-threatening anaphylaxis anytime before the screening DBPCFC.
  • History of hemodynamically significant cardiovascular or renovascular disease, including uncontrolled or inadequately controlled hypertension.
  • History of -confirmed diagnosis of EoE; other eosinophilic GI disease; chronic, recurrent, or severe gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD); or symptoms of dysphagia (eg, difficulty swallowing, food "getting stuck").
  • Recurrent GI symptoms considered in the opinion of the investigator.
  • History of a mast cell disorder including mastocytosis, urticaria pigmentosa, chronic idiopathic or chronic physical urticaria beyond simple dermatographism (eg, cold urticaria, cholinergic urticaria), and hereditary or idiopathic angioedema.
  • Moderate or severe persistent asthma (criteria steps 3-6; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [NHLBI], 2007).
  • Mild asthma (criteria steps 1-2; NHLBI, 2007) that is uncontrolled or difficult to control based on NHLBI 2007 criteria.
  • History of high-dose use (eg, 1-2 mg/kg prednisone or equivalent for > 3 days) by any route of administration as defined by any of the following:

    • Steroid administered daily for > 1 month within 1 year before screening
    • One steroid course within 6 months before screening
    • More than 2 steroid courses ≥ 1 week in duration within 1 year before screening
  • History of food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome (FPIES) within 12 months before screening.
  • Recurrent urticaria.
  • History of failure to thrive or any other form of abnormal growth, or developmental or speech delay that precludes age-appropriate communication.
  • History of chronic disease (except mild intermittent asthma, mild persistent asthma that is controlled, atopic dermatitis, or allergic rhinitis) that is or is at significant risk of becoming unstable or requiring a change in a chronic therapeutic regimen.
  • Unable to discontinue antihistamines and other medications that could interfere with the assessment of an allergic reaction for 5 half-lives of the medication before the screening SPT, first day of dose escalation, and DBPCFCs.
  • Use or anticipated use of a prohibited medication (eg, beta blockers [oral], angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, calcium channel blockers, or tricyclic antidepressants), monoclonal antibody, or any other immunomodulatory therapy (including medications).
  • Treatment with any form of immunotherapy for any food allergy anytime before screening.
  • Participation in another clinical trial within 30 days or 5 half-lives of the product, whichever is longer, before screening.
  • Allergy to oat or rice.
  • to epinephrine or any of the in the epinephrine auto-injector.
  • Parent/caregiver unable or unwilling to use epinephrine auto-injectors.
  • Unable to follow the protocol requirements.
  • Any other condition (concurrent disease, infection, comorbidity, or psychiatric or psychological disorders) or reason that may interfere with the ability to participate in the study, cause undue risk, or complicate the interpretation of data, in the opinion of the investigator or medical monitor.
  • Resides at the same place as another subject in any AR101 interventional trial.
  • Lives in the same household and/or is a family member of a sponsor employee or site staff involved in conducting this study.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(8)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Excipients

The other ingredients in a medicine besides the active drug, such as fillers, colours or preservatives.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
146 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    AR101 powder provided in capsules & sachets

    Study product provided as peanut protein in pull-apart capsules or sachets

    Biological: AR101 powder provided in capsules & sachets

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo powder provided in capsules & sachets

    Placebo formulation in pull-apart capsules or sachets containing only inactive ingredients

    Biological: Placebo powder provided in capsules & sachets

Interventions

  • BiologicalAR101 powder provided in capsules & sachets

    Study product formulated to contain peanut protein at different dosage strengths for use as defined in the protocol

  • BiologicalPlacebo powder provided in capsules & sachets

    Study product formulated to contain only inactive ingredients for use as defined in the protocol

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Subjects Who Tolerated a Single Highest Dose of at Least 600 mg in the Exit Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Food Challenge (DBPCFC)

    The percentage of subjects in the ITT population who achieve desensitization as determined by tolerating specified challenge doses of peanut protein with no more than mild allergy symptoms during the exit double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC).

    Time frame: 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Subjects Who Tolerated a Single Highest Dose of at Least 1000 mg in the Exit Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Food Challenge (DBPCFC) [Time Frame: 12 Months]

    The percentage of subjects in the ITT population who achieve desensitization as determined by tolerating specified challenge doses of peanut protein with no more than mild allergy symptoms during the exit double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC).

    Time frame: 12 months

  2. Percentage of Subjects Who Tolerated a Single Highest Dose of at Least 300 mg in the Exit Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Food Challenge (DBPCFC)

    The percentage of subjects in the ITT population who achieve desensitization as determined by tolerating specified challenge doses of peanut protein with no more than mild allergy symptoms during the exit double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC).

    Time frame: 12 months

  3. Maximum Severity of Symptoms in Participants at Any Challenge Dose During the Exit Double-blind Placebo Controlled Food Challenge (DBPCFC)

    The maximum severity of symptoms that occurred at any challenge dose of peanut protein during the exit DBPCFC.

    Time frame: 12 months

07

Results

Posted Mar 2, 2023

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneAR101Placebo
Started9848
Completed8345
Not completed153
Withdrew: Adverse event51
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject51
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up10
Withdrew: Physician decision10
Withdrew: Continued commitment to study treatment30
Withdrew: Taste aversion to study product01

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of Subjects Who Tolerated a Single Highest Dose of at Least 600 mg in the Exit Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Food Challenge (DBPCFC)

The percentage of subjects in the ITT population who achieve desensitization as determined by tolerating specified challenge doses of peanut protein with no more than mild allergy symptoms during the exit double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC).

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of subjects
Percentage of Subjects Who Tolerated a Single Highest Dose of at Least 600 mg in the Exit Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Food Challenge (DBPCFC)
Percentage of subjectsAR101Placebo
Percentage of Subjects Who Tolerated a Single Highest Dose of at Least 600 mg in the Exit Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Food Challenge (DBPCFC)73.5 (63.6 to 81.9)6.3 (1.3 to 17.2)
Statistical analysis
  • AR101 vs Placebo · Farrington-Manning test · p = <0.0001 · Risk difference (rd): 67.2 · 95% CI 50.0 to 84.5
SecondaryPercentage of Subjects Who Tolerated a Single Highest Dose of at Least 1000 mg in the Exit Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Food Challenge (DBPCFC) [Time Frame: 12 Months]

The percentage of subjects in the ITT population who achieve desensitization as determined by tolerating specified challenge doses of peanut protein with no more than mild allergy symptoms during the exit double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC).

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Number · Percent of participants
Percentage of Subjects Who Tolerated a Single Highest Dose of at Least 1000 mg in the Exit Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Food Challenge (DBPCFC) [Time Frame: 12 Months]
Percent of participantsAR101Placebo
Percentage of Subjects Who Tolerated a Single Highest Dose of at Least 1000 mg in the Exit Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Food Challenge (DBPCFC) [Time Frame: 12 Months]68.4 (58.2 to 77.4)4.2 (0.5 to 14.3)
Statistical analysis
  • AR101 vs Placebo · Farrington-Manning test · p = <0.0001 · Risk difference (rd): 64.2 · 95% CI 47.0 to 81.4
SecondaryPercentage of Subjects Who Tolerated a Single Highest Dose of at Least 300 mg in the Exit Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Food Challenge (DBPCFC)

The percentage of subjects in the ITT population who achieve desensitization as determined by tolerating specified challenge doses of peanut protein with no more than mild allergy symptoms during the exit double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC).

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of subjects
Percentage of Subjects Who Tolerated a Single Highest Dose of at Least 300 mg in the Exit Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Food Challenge (DBPCFC)
Percentage of subjectsAR101Placebo
Percentage of Subjects Who Tolerated a Single Highest Dose of at Least 300 mg in the Exit Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Food Challenge (DBPCFC)79.6 (70.3 to 87.1)22.9 (12.0 to 37.3)
Statistical analysis
  • AR101 vs Placebo · Farrington-Manning test · p = <0.0001 · Risk difference (rd): 56.7 · 95% CI 39.8 to 73.5
SecondaryMaximum Severity of Symptoms in Participants at Any Challenge Dose During the Exit Double-blind Placebo Controlled Food Challenge (DBPCFC)

The maximum severity of symptoms that occurred at any challenge dose of peanut protein during the exit DBPCFC.

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Maximum Severity of Symptoms in Participants at Any Challenge Dose During the Exit Double-blind Placebo Controlled Food Challenge (DBPCFC)
ParticipantsAR101Placebo
None502
Mild2923
Moderate1721
Severe22
Life-threatening or fatal00

Adverse events

Collected over 12 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
AR1010/98 (0%)7/98 (7.1%)96/98 (98%)
Placebo0/48 (0%)2/48 (4.2%)47/48 (97.9%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventAR101Placebo
AsthmaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders2/981/48
Carbon monoxide poisoningInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/981/48
Enterovirus infectionInfections and infestations1/980/48
InfluenzaInfections and infestations1/980/48
Respiratory syncytial virus bronchiolitisInfections and infestations1/980/48
Viral infectionInfections and infestations1/980/48
Status asthmaticusInfections and infestations1/980/48
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 56
Most frequent other events
EventAR101Placebo
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders52/9815/48
CoughRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders52/9821/48
UrticariaSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders51/9824/48
PyrexiaGeneral disorders50/9820/48
RhinorrhoeaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders42/9815/48
Upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations35/9813/48
ErythemaSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders34/9817/48
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders34/9813/48
PruritusSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders27/9815/48
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations28/9813/48

Baseline characteristics

Age, Customized
Age, Customized(Participants)AR101PlaceboTotal
1-<2 years331649
2-<3 years351550
3-<4 years301747
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)AR101PlaceboTotal
Female412061
Male572885
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)AR101PlaceboTotal
Hispanic or Latino538
Not Hispanic or Latino7531106
Unknown or Not Reported181432
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)AR101PlaceboTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian16824
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American325
White652893
More than one race246
Unknown or Not Reported12618
08

Study locations

23 sites
  • Arkansas Children's Hospital
    Little Rock, Arkansas 72202, United States
  • Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy & Asthma Reseach, LPCH at El Camino Hospital
    Mountain View, California 94040, United States
  • Peninsula Research Associates, Inc.
    Rolling Hills Estates, California 90274, United States
  • Allergy & Asthma Medical Group and Research Center
    San Diego, California 92123, United States
  • Children's Center for Advanced Pediatrics Clinical Research Lab
    Atlanta, Georgia 30329, United States
  • Atlanta Allergy & Asthma Clinic
    Marietta, Georgia 30060, United States
  • Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago
    Chicago, Illinois 60611, United States
  • The John Hopkins Hospital
    Baltimore, Maryland 21287, United States
  • University of Michigan Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
    Ann Arbor, Michigan 48106, United States
  • Atlantic Research Center
    Ocean City, New Jersey 07712, United States
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
    New York, New York 10029, United States
  • UNC-CH School of Medicine, Pediatric Allergy, Immunology & Rheumatology, Food Allergy
    Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, United States
  • Clinical Research of Charlotte
    Charlotte, North Carolina 28277, United States
  • Virginia Mason Medical Center
    Seattle, Washington 98101, United States
  • Jeanne de Flandre Hospital
    Lille, France
  • Charité Universitaetsmedizin Berlin
    Berlin, 13353, Germany
  • University of Frankfurt
    Frankfurt am Main, 60590, Germany
  • James Paget University Hospital
    Gorleston-on-Sea, Norfolk NR31 6LA, United Kingdom
  • Leicester Royal Infirmary
    Leicester, LE1 5WW, United Kingdom
  • Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Snowy Owl, First Floor, Evelina Children's Hospital
    London, SEI 7EH, United Kingdom
  • Royal Manchester Children's Hospital Central Manchester University Hospitals
    Manchester, M13 9WL, United Kingdom
  • Sheffield Children's Hospital
    Sheffield, S10 2TH, United Kingdom
  • University Hospital Southampton Foundation NHS Trust Southampton General Hospital
    Southampton, SO16 6YD, United Kingdom
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Dec 2018 to primary completion in Jul 2022, 42 months.

Results were first posted in Mar 2023, 7 months after primary completion.

Of 15 phase 3 interventional studies under Peanut Hypersensitivity, half reached primary completion within 29 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 23 and three quarters within 42. This study's 42 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 7, 2018
First posted
Nov 9, 2018
StartActual
Dec 27, 2018
Primary completionActual
Jul 5, 2022
CompletionActual
Jul 5, 2022
Results first posted
Mar 2, 2023
Last update
Mar 2, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 2, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03736447
Lead sponsor
Aimmune Therapeutics, Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 9, 2018
Start date
Dec 27, 2018
Primary completion
Jul 5, 2022
Completion
Jul 5, 2022
Results posted
Mar 2, 2023
Last update
Mar 2, 2023

Study contacts

Director of Regulatory Affairs
study director · Aimmune Therapeutics

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion