CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03292484Updated Dec 19, 2024Results posted

Longer-term Study of AR101 in Subjects Who Participated in a Prior AR101 Study (ARC008)

A Phase 3 interventional study of AR101 in Peanut Allergy, sponsored by Aimmune Therapeutics, Inc.. Completed at 93 sites in 10 countries. Open to participants aged 1 Year to 55 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-12-19.

Sponsored by Aimmune Therapeutics, Inc. · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
911
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
1 Year to 55 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to assess AR101's safety, tolerability and efficacy over an extended dosing period.

Read the detailed description

This study is enrolling participants by invitation only. This is an open-label, international, longer-term extension study for eligible subjects who have participated in one of the Aimmune AR101 clinical studies.

02

Conditions studied

  • Peanut Allergy

Keywords

  • AR101
  • Characterized Peanut Allergen
  • OIT (oral immunotherapy)
  • Peanut Allergy
  • Allergy
  • Peanut-Allergic Children
  • Peanut-Allergic Adults
  • Desensitization
  • CPNA (Characterized Peanut Allergen)
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
1 Year to 55 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  • Prior participation in an Aimmune AR101 clinical study or any future clinical study that identifies ARC008 as a follow-on study option in the protocol
  • Written informed consent and/or assent from subjects/guardians as appropriate
  • Use of effective birth control by sexually active female subjects of childbearing potential

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  • Did not complete a minimum of 3 months of AR101 maintenance therapy if the subject was assigned to AR101 in the parent study
  • Currently receiving or received within 5 years prior to Screening any type of peanut or other food allergen immunotherapy, except AR101 or unless allowed in the parent study, and except during the follow-up observation period in this study
  • Discontinued early from the parent study
04

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
911 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    AR101

    Eligible participants who participated in a prior AR101 study received or continued initial dose escalation, up-dosing, and maintenance of AR101 at 300 milligrams (mg) per day until discontinuation criteria was met (maximum exposure: 4.8 years).

    Biological: AR101

Interventions

  • BiologicalAR101

    AR101

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)

    An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in humans, whether or not considered related to the investigational product (IP), that occurred during the conduct of a clinical study. A SAE was any event that resulted in any of the following: death, life-threatening AE, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant incapacity or substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions, congenital abnormality or birth defect, or important medical event that did not result in one of the above outcomes, but jeopardized the health of the study participant or required medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above. TEAEs were defined as those AEs with onset after the first dose of AR101 in ARC008 and no more than 30 days after the last dose of study drug.

    Time frame: From first dose of study drug through 30 days after last dose of study drug, up to 59 months

  2. Number of Participants With Premature Discontinuation of AR101 Dosing Due to TEAEs

    An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in humans, whether or not considered related to the IP, that occurred during the conduct of a clinical study. TEAEs were defined as those AEs with onset after the first dose of AR101 in ARC008 and no more than 30 days after the last dose of study drug.

    Time frame: From first dose of study drug through 30 days after last dose of study drug, up to 59 months

  3. Number of Participants With Premature Discontinuation of AR101 Dosing Due to Chronic/Recurrent Gastrointestinal TEAEs

    An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in humans, whether or not considered related to the IP, that occurred during the conduct of a clinical study. TEAEs were defined as those AEs with onset after the first dose of AR101 in ARC008 and no more than 30 days after the last dose of study drug. Gastrointestinal (GI) AEs, typically chronic/recurrent GI AEs, that resulted in prolonged interruption of dosing are reported.

    Time frame: From first dose of study drug through 30 days after last dose of study drug, up to 59 months

  4. Number of Participants With TEAEs That Led to a Change in Treatment Regimen

    An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in humans, whether or not considered related to the IP, that occurred during the conduct of a clinical study. TEAEs were defined as those AEs with onset after the first dose of AR101 in ARC008 and no more than 30 days after the last dose of study drug. Number of participants with TEAEs requiring dose interruption and dose reduction of study treatment are reported.

    Time frame: From first dose of study drug through 30 days after last dose of study drug, up to 59 months

  5. Number of Participants With TEAEs That Led to Early Withdrawal

    An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in humans, whether or not considered related to the IP, that occurred during the conduct of a clinical study. TEAEs were defined as those AEs with onset after the first dose of AR101 in ARC008 and no more than 30 days after the last dose of study drug.

    Time frame: From first dose of study drug through 30 days after last dose of study drug, up to 59 months

  6. Number of Participants Who Experienced a Treatment-emergent Anaphylactic Reaction

    Anaphylaxis was defined by a number of signs and symptoms that occurred alone or in combination within minutes up to a few hours after exposure to a provoking agent. Treatment-emergent anaphylactic reactions included anaphylactic reactions that occurred after first dose of AR101 in ARC008 through 30 days after last dose of study product but excluding anaphylactic reactions that occurred during or related to a food challenge.

    Time frame: From first dose of study drug through 30 days after last dose of study drug, up to 59 months

  7. Number of Participants With Use of Epinephrine as a Rescue Medication

    Rescue medications were any medication used to treat individual acute allergic reactions during ARC008 and were according to recognized standards of care for allergy practice.

    Time frame: From first dose of study drug through 30 days after last dose of study drug, up to 59 months

  8. Number of Participants Who Experienced Accidental or Non-accidental Food Allergy Episodes

    An accidental food allergen exposure was any known or suspected exposure to a food to which the participant was allergic, including peanut, whether or not it resulted in an AE. A non-accidental food allergen exposure was an intentional exposure to a food to which the participant was allergic, including peanut, whether or not it resulted in an AE. Treatment-emergent food allergy episodes included food allergy episodes that occurred after first dose of AR101 in ARC008 through 30 days after last dose of study product but excluding food allergy episodes that occurred during or related to a food challenge.

    Time frame: From first dose of study drug through 30 days after last dose of study drug, up to 59 months

  9. Number of Participants With TEAEs Following Accidental or Non-accidental Exposure to Peanut and Other Allergenic Foods

    An accidental food allergen exposure was any known or suspected exposure to a food to which the participant was allergic, including peanut, whether or not it resulted in an AE. A non-accidental food allergen exposure was an intentional exposure to a food to which the participant was allergic, including peanut, whether or not it resulted in an AE. An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in humans, whether or not considered related to the IP, that occurred during the conduct of a clinical study. Treatment-emergent food allergy episodes included food allergy episodes that occurred after first dose of AR101 in ARC008 through 30 days after last dose of study product but excluding food allergy episodes that occurred during or related to a food challenge.

    Time frame: From first dose of study drug through 30 days after last dose of study drug, up to 59 months

  10. Number of Participants With Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EoE)

    EoE was diagnosed by biopsy/endoscopy.

    Time frame: From first dose of study drug through 30 days after last dose of study drug, up to 59 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants Tolerating Each Challenge Dose in the Open-label Food Challenge (OLFC) and the Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled Food Challenge (DBPCFC)

    During the OLFC, single doses (300, 600, 1000, and 2000 mg) of peanut protein were conditionally tested using a food challenge mixture administered sequentially at 20- to 30-minute intervals. During the DBPCFC, single doses (3, 10, 30, 100, 300, 600, 1000, and 2000 mg) of peanut protein and placebo were conditionally tested using a food challenge mixture administered sequentially at 20- to 30-minute intervals up to a single highest challenge dose of 2000 mg.

    Time frame: OLFC: At Month 12 and yearly thereafter, up to 58 months; DBPCFC: End of treatment (Month 58)

  2. Maximum Tolerated Challenge Dose at Each Food Challenge

    The maximum tolerated challenge dose for a food challenge was defined as the maximum single dose of peanut protein resulting in no more than mild symptoms and assessed by the investigator to have been tolerated (i.e., the participant did not experience any dose-limiting symptoms). During the OLFC, single doses (300, 600, 1000, and 2000 mg) of peanut protein were conditionally tested using a food challenge mixture administered sequentially at 20- to 30-minute intervals. During the DBPCFC, single doses (3, 10, 30, 100, 300, 600, 1000, and 2000 mg) of peanut protein and placebo were conditionally tested using a food challenge mixture administered sequentially at 20- to 30-minute intervals up to a single highest challenge dose of 2000 mg.

    Time frame: OLFC: At Month 12 and yearly thereafter, up to 58 months; DBPCFC: End of treatment (Month 58)

  3. Number of Participants With Use of Epinephrine as a Rescue Medication During the Food Challenges

    Rescue medications were any medication used to treat individual acute allergic reactions during ARC008 and were according to recognized standards of care for allergy practice. During the OLFC, single doses (300, 600, 1000, and 2000 mg) of peanut protein were conditionally tested using a food challenge mixture administered sequentially at 20- to 30-minute intervals. During the DBPCFC, single doses (3, 10, 30, 100, 300, 600, 1000, and 2000 mg) of peanut protein and placebo were conditionally tested using a food challenge mixture administered sequentially at 20- to 30-minute intervals up to a single highest challenge dose of 2000 mg.

    Time frame: OLFC: At Month 12 and yearly thereafter, up to 58 months; DBPCFC: End of treatment (Month 58)

06

Results

Posted Dec 19, 2024

Participant flow

This Phase 3, open-label study was conducted in participants who participated in a prior AR101 study at 89 investigational sites in 10 countries (Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Netherlands, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom, and the United States).

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneAR101
Started911
Safety population908
Participants who had an open-label food challenge (olfc)517
Participants who had a double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge (dbpcfc)211
Completed18
Not completed893
Withdrew: Participants did not have disposition - study exit forms415
Withdrew: Withdrew consent (unrelated to adverse event [ae])86
Withdrew: Protocol violation2
Withdrew: Investigator decision (unrelated to ae)13
Withdrew: Sponsor decision349
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up7
Withdrew: Coronavirus disease 20191
Withdrew: Other20

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in humans, whether or not considered related to the investigational product (IP), that occurred during the conduct of a clinical study. A SAE was any event that resulted in any of the following: death, life-threatening AE, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant incapacity or substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions, congenital abnormality or birth defect, or important medical event that did not result in one of the above outcomes, but jeopardized the health of the study participant or required medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above. TEAEs were defined as those AEs with onset after the first dose of AR101 in ARC008 and no more than 30 days after the last dose of study drug.

Time frame:
From first dose of study drug through 30 days after last dose of study drug, up to 59 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)
ParticipantsAR101
TEAEs866
TESAEs42
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Premature Discontinuation of AR101 Dosing Due to TEAEs

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in humans, whether or not considered related to the IP, that occurred during the conduct of a clinical study. TEAEs were defined as those AEs with onset after the first dose of AR101 in ARC008 and no more than 30 days after the last dose of study drug.

Time frame:
From first dose of study drug through 30 days after last dose of study drug, up to 59 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Premature Discontinuation of AR101 Dosing Due to TEAEs
ParticipantsAR101
Number of Participants With Premature Discontinuation of AR101 Dosing Due to TEAEs53
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Premature Discontinuation of AR101 Dosing Due to Chronic/Recurrent Gastrointestinal TEAEs

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in humans, whether or not considered related to the IP, that occurred during the conduct of a clinical study. TEAEs were defined as those AEs with onset after the first dose of AR101 in ARC008 and no more than 30 days after the last dose of study drug. Gastrointestinal (GI) AEs, typically chronic/recurrent GI AEs, that resulted in prolonged interruption of dosing are reported.

Time frame:
From first dose of study drug through 30 days after last dose of study drug, up to 59 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Premature Discontinuation of AR101 Dosing Due to Chronic/Recurrent Gastrointestinal TEAEs
ParticipantsAR101
Number of Participants With Premature Discontinuation of AR101 Dosing Due to Chronic/Recurrent Gastrointestinal TEAEs25
PrimaryNumber of Participants With TEAEs That Led to a Change in Treatment Regimen

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in humans, whether or not considered related to the IP, that occurred during the conduct of a clinical study. TEAEs were defined as those AEs with onset after the first dose of AR101 in ARC008 and no more than 30 days after the last dose of study drug. Number of participants with TEAEs requiring dose interruption and dose reduction of study treatment are reported.

Time frame:
From first dose of study drug through 30 days after last dose of study drug, up to 59 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With TEAEs That Led to a Change in Treatment Regimen
ParticipantsAR101
TEAEs requiring dose interruption of study treatment669
TEAEs requiring dose reduction of study treatment167
PrimaryNumber of Participants With TEAEs That Led to Early Withdrawal

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in humans, whether or not considered related to the IP, that occurred during the conduct of a clinical study. TEAEs were defined as those AEs with onset after the first dose of AR101 in ARC008 and no more than 30 days after the last dose of study drug.

Time frame:
From first dose of study drug through 30 days after last dose of study drug, up to 59 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With TEAEs That Led to Early Withdrawal
ParticipantsAR101
Number of Participants With TEAEs That Led to Early Withdrawal27
PrimaryNumber of Participants Who Experienced a Treatment-emergent Anaphylactic Reaction

Anaphylaxis was defined by a number of signs and symptoms that occurred alone or in combination within minutes up to a few hours after exposure to a provoking agent. Treatment-emergent anaphylactic reactions included anaphylactic reactions that occurred after first dose of AR101 in ARC008 through 30 days after last dose of study product but excluding anaphylactic reactions that occurred during or related to a food challenge.

Time frame:
From first dose of study drug through 30 days after last dose of study drug, up to 59 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Who Experienced a Treatment-emergent Anaphylactic Reaction
ParticipantsAR101
Number of Participants Who Experienced a Treatment-emergent Anaphylactic Reaction192
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Use of Epinephrine as a Rescue Medication

Rescue medications were any medication used to treat individual acute allergic reactions during ARC008 and were according to recognized standards of care for allergy practice.

Time frame:
From first dose of study drug through 30 days after last dose of study drug, up to 59 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Use of Epinephrine as a Rescue Medication
ParticipantsAR101
Number of Participants With Use of Epinephrine as a Rescue Medication234
PrimaryNumber of Participants Who Experienced Accidental or Non-accidental Food Allergy Episodes

An accidental food allergen exposure was any known or suspected exposure to a food to which the participant was allergic, including peanut, whether or not it resulted in an AE. A non-accidental food allergen exposure was an intentional exposure to a food to which the participant was allergic, including peanut, whether or not it resulted in an AE. Treatment-emergent food allergy episodes included food allergy episodes that occurred after first dose of AR101 in ARC008 through 30 days after last dose of study product but excluding food allergy episodes that occurred during or related to a food challenge.

Time frame:
From first dose of study drug through 30 days after last dose of study drug, up to 59 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Who Experienced Accidental or Non-accidental Food Allergy Episodes
ParticipantsAR101
Accidental Food Allergy Episodes208
Non-accidental Food Allergy Episodes35
PrimaryNumber of Participants With TEAEs Following Accidental or Non-accidental Exposure to Peanut and Other Allergenic Foods

An accidental food allergen exposure was any known or suspected exposure to a food to which the participant was allergic, including peanut, whether or not it resulted in an AE. A non-accidental food allergen exposure was an intentional exposure to a food to which the participant was allergic, including peanut, whether or not it resulted in an AE. An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in humans, whether or not considered related to the IP, that occurred during the conduct of a clinical study. Treatment-emergent food allergy episodes included food allergy episodes that occurred after first dose of AR101 in ARC008 through 30 days after last dose of study product but excluding food allergy episodes that occurred during or related to a food challenge.

Time frame:
From first dose of study drug through 30 days after last dose of study drug, up to 59 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With TEAEs Following Accidental or Non-accidental Exposure to Peanut and Other Allergenic Foods
ParticipantsAR101
Number of Participants With TEAEs Following Accidental or Non-accidental Exposure to Peanut and Other Allergenic Foods227
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EoE)

EoE was diagnosed by biopsy/endoscopy.

Time frame:
From first dose of study drug through 30 days after last dose of study drug, up to 59 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EoE)
ParticipantsAR101
Number of Participants With Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EoE)7
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Tolerating Each Challenge Dose in the Open-label Food Challenge (OLFC) and the Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled Food Challenge (DBPCFC)

During the OLFC, single doses (300, 600, 1000, and 2000 mg) of peanut protein were conditionally tested using a food challenge mixture administered sequentially at 20- to 30-minute intervals. During the DBPCFC, single doses (3, 10, 30, 100, 300, 600, 1000, and 2000 mg) of peanut protein and placebo were conditionally tested using a food challenge mixture administered sequentially at 20- to 30-minute intervals up to a single highest challenge dose of 2000 mg.

Time frame:
OLFC: At Month 12 and yearly thereafter, up to 58 months; DBPCFC: End of treatment (Month 58)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Tolerating Each Challenge Dose in the Open-label Food Challenge (OLFC) and the Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled Food Challenge (DBPCFC)
percentage of participantsAR101
OLFC: Tolerated a single highest dose of at least 300 mg98.6 (97.2 to 99.5)
OLFC: Tolerated a single highest dose of at least 600 mg94.2 (91.8 to 96.1)
OLFC: Tolerated a single highest dose of at least 1000 mg78.7 (74.9 to 82.2)
OLFC: Tolerated a single highest dose of at least 2000 mg55.9 (51.5 to 60.2)
DBPCFC: Tolerated a single highest dose of at least 3 mg100.0 (98.3 to 100.0)
DBPCFC: Tolerated a single highest dose of at least 10 mg100.0 (98.3 to 100.0)
DBPCFC: Tolerated a single highest dose of at least 30 mg99.5 (97.4 to 100.0)
DBPCFC: Tolerated a single highest dose of at least 100 mg99.1 (96.6 to 99.9)
DBPCFC: Tolerated a single highest dose of at least 300 mg94.8 (90.9 to 97.4)
DBPCFC: Tolerated a single highest dose of at least 600 mg88.2 (83.0 to 92.2)
DBPCFC: Tolerated a single highest dose of at least 1000 mg75.8 (69.5 to 81.4)
DBPCFC: Tolerated a single highest dose of at least 2000 mg60.2 (53.2 to 66.8)
SecondaryMaximum Tolerated Challenge Dose at Each Food Challenge

The maximum tolerated challenge dose for a food challenge was defined as the maximum single dose of peanut protein resulting in no more than mild symptoms and assessed by the investigator to have been tolerated (i.e., the participant did not experience any dose-limiting symptoms). During the OLFC, single doses (300, 600, 1000, and 2000 mg) of peanut protein were conditionally tested using a food challenge mixture administered sequentially at 20- to 30-minute intervals. During the DBPCFC, single doses (3, 10, 30, 100, 300, 600, 1000, and 2000 mg) of peanut protein and placebo were conditionally tested using a food challenge mixture administered sequentially at 20- to 30-minute intervals up to a single highest challenge dose of 2000 mg.

Time frame:
OLFC: At Month 12 and yearly thereafter, up to 58 months; DBPCFC: End of treatment (Month 58)
Reported as:
Number · mg
Maximum Tolerated Challenge Dose at Each Food Challenge
mgAR101
OLFC2000
DBPCFC2000
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Use of Epinephrine as a Rescue Medication During the Food Challenges

Rescue medications were any medication used to treat individual acute allergic reactions during ARC008 and were according to recognized standards of care for allergy practice. During the OLFC, single doses (300, 600, 1000, and 2000 mg) of peanut protein were conditionally tested using a food challenge mixture administered sequentially at 20- to 30-minute intervals. During the DBPCFC, single doses (3, 10, 30, 100, 300, 600, 1000, and 2000 mg) of peanut protein and placebo were conditionally tested using a food challenge mixture administered sequentially at 20- to 30-minute intervals up to a single highest challenge dose of 2000 mg.

Time frame:
OLFC: At Month 12 and yearly thereafter, up to 58 months; DBPCFC: End of treatment (Month 58)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Use of Epinephrine as a Rescue Medication During the Food Challenges
ParticipantsAR101
OLFC110
DBPCFC35

Adverse events

Collected over From first dose of study drug through 30 days after last dose of study drug, up to 59 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
AR1010/908 (0%)42/908 (4.6%)865/908 (95.3%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 33
Most frequent serious events
EventAR101
AppendicitisInfections and infestations8/908
Anaphylactic reactionImmune system disorders8/908
AsthmaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders4/908
Croup infectiousInfections and infestations2/908
Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders2/908
ConcussionInjury, poisoning and procedural complications2/908
Enterovirus infectionInfections and infestations1/908
GastroenteritisInfections and infestations1/908
Gastroenteritis viralInfections and infestations1/908
InfluenzaInfections and infestations1/908
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 47
Most frequent other events
EventAR101
CoughRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders302/908
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders293/908
PyrexiaGeneral disorders293/908
Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders271/908
UrticariaSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders251/908
HeadacheNervous system disorders240/908
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations221/908
Upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations213/908
PruritusSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders191/908
Anaphylactic reactionImmune system disorders187/908

Baseline characteristics

Analysis was performed on all enrolled participants.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)AR101
Mean9.8 ± 4.75
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)AR101
Female359
Male552
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)AR101
Hispanic or Latino38
Not Hispanic or Latino842
Unknown or Not Reported31
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)AR101
Asian106
Black or African American18
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander3
White664
Other65
Multiple Races Reported53
Not Collected2
07

Study locations

93 sites
  • Alabama Allergy and Asthma Center
    Birmingham, Alabama 35209, United States
  • Medical Research of Arizona, Allergy, Asthma & Immunology Associates
    Scottsdale, Arizona 85251, United States
  • Banner Univ. of Arizona Medical Center
    Tucson, Arizona 85724, United States
  • Arkansas Children's Hospital
    Little Rock, Arkansas 72202, United States
  • Jonathan Corren, M.D., Inc.
    Los Angeles, California 90025, United States
  • Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Division of Clinical Immunology and Allergy
    Los Angeles, California 90027, United States
  • Allergy & Asthma Associates of Southern California
    Mission Viejo, California 92691, United States
  • Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research LPCH El Camino Hospital
    Mountain View, California 94040, United States
  • Stanford University
    Palo Alto, California 94305, United States
  • Peninsula Research Associates
    Rolling Hills Estates, California 90274, United States
  • Allergy & Asthma Medical Group and Research Center
    San Diego, California 92123, United States
  • Rady Children's Hospital, Div. of Allergy & Immunology
    San Diego, California 92123, United States
  • UCSF, Benioff Children's Hospital - Allergy and Immunology
    San Francisco, California 95148, United States
  • Allergy & Asthma Associates of Santa Clara Valley Research Center
    San Jose, California 95117, United States
  • UCLA Medical Center, Santa Monica
    Santa Monica, California 90404, United States
  • Bay Area Allergy
    Walnut Creek, California 94598, United States
  • Children's Hospital Colorado
    Aurora, Colorado 80045, United States
  • Asthma & Allergy Associates
    Colorado Springs, Colorado 80907, United States
  • National Jewish Health
    Denver, Colorado 80206, United States
  • Colorado Allergy & Asthma Centers, P.C.
    Denver, Colorado 80230, United States
  • Children's National Health System
    Washington, District of Columbia 20010, United States
  • Sher Allergy Specialists - Center for Cough
    Largo, Florida 33778, United States
  • Allergy Associates of the Palm Beaches
    North Palm Beach, Florida 33408, United States
  • Sarasota Clinical Research
    Sarasota, Florida 34239, United States
  • University of South Florida, Asthma Allergy & Immunology Clinical Research Unit
    Tampa, Florida 33613, United States
  • Children's Healthcare of Atlanta
    Atlanta, Georgia 30329, United States
  • Atlanta Allergy & Asthma Clinic
    Marietta, Georgia 30060, United States
  • Idaho Allergy and Research
    Eagle, Idaho 83616, United States
  • Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago
    Chicago, Illinois 60611-2605, United States
  • The University of Chicago Medicine, Comer Children's Hospital
    Chicago, Illinois 60637, United States
  • Sneeze, Wheeze, & Itch Associates
    Normal, Illinois 61761, United States
  • Riley Children's Specialists
    Carmel, Indiana 46032, United States
  • Deaconess Clinic, Inc.
    Evansville, Indiana 47713, United States
  • Family Allergy & Asthma Research Institute
    Louisville, Kentucky 40215, United States
  • Chesapeake Clinical Research, Inc.
    Baltimore, Maryland 21236, United States
  • Johns Hopkins Hospital, Pediatric Clinical Research Unit
    Baltimore, Maryland 21287, United States
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
    Boston, Massachusetts 02114, United States
  • Boston Children's Hospital
    Boston, Massachusetts 02115, United States
  • Univ. of Michigan Health System, Div. of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
    Ann Arbor, Michigan 48106, United States
  • Clinical Research Institute Inc.
    Plymouth, Minnesota 55441, United States
  • Children's Mercy on Broadway
    Kansas City, Missouri 64111, United States
  • Atlantic Research Center
    Ocean City, New Jersey 07712, United States
  • Princeton Center for Clinical Research
    Skillman, New Jersey 08558, United States
  • Northwell Health System
    Great Neck, New York 11021, United States
  • Jaffe Food Allergy Institute Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
    New York, New York 10029, United States
  • Univ. of Rochester Medical Center, Golisano Children's Hosp.
    Rochester, New York 14642, United States
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Clinical & Translational Research Center
    Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, United States
  • Clinical Research of Charlotte
    Charlotte, North Carolina 28277, United States
  • Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
    Cincinnati, Ohio 45229, United States
  • Bernstein Clinical Research Center, LLC
    Cincinnati, Ohio 45231, United States
  • Oklahoma Institute of Allergy and Asthma Clinical Research
    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73131, United States
  • Columbia Asthma & Allergy Clinic
    Clackamas, Oregon 97015, United States
  • Baker Allergy, Asthma and Dermatology
    Portland, Oregon 97223, United States
  • The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States
  • Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15224, United States
  • National Allergy and Asthma Research, LLC
    North Charleston, South Carolina 29420, United States
  • Le Bonheur Children's Hospital, Outpatient Bldg.
    Memphis, Tennessee 38105, United States
  • 'Specially for Children Allergy, Asthma and Immunology Clinic
    Austin, Texas 78723, United States
  • Specially for Children Allergy, Asthma and Immunology Clinic
    Austin, Texas 78723, United States
  • Children's Health
    Dallas, Texas 75235, United States
  • Western Sky Medical Research
    El Paso, Texas 79903, United States
  • Texas Children's Hospital, Baylor College of Medicine
    Houston, Texas 77030, United States
  • Central Texas Health Research
    New Braunfels, Texas 78130, United States
  • Virginia Mason Medical Center
    Seattle, Washington 98101, United States
  • ASTHMA, Inc. Clinical Research Center
    Seattle, Washington 98115-2024, United States
  • McMaster University Medical Center
    Hamilton, Ontario L8N 3Z5, Canada
  • Triple A Lab
    Hamilton, Ontario L8S 1G5, Canada
  • Cheema Research Inc.
    Mississauga, Ontario L5A 3V4, Canada
  • Ottawa Allergy Research Corp
    Ottawa, Ontario K1G 6C6, Canada
  • Gordon Sussman Clinical Research
    Toronto, Ontario M4V 1R2, Canada
  • Unité de dermatologie Pédiatrique, Hôpital Pellegrin-Enfants
    Bordeaux, Cedex 33076, France
  • Hopital Saint Vincent de Paul- Service d'Allergologie
    Lille, Cedex 59020, France
  • Jeanne de Flandre Hospital -Paediatric Allergy and Pulmonology Center
    Lille, Cedex 59037, France
  • Service d'Allergologie Nouvel Hôpital Civil Hôpitaux Univesitaires de Strasbourg
    Strasbourg, Cedex 67091, France
  • Charité Universitaetsmedizin Berlin
    Berlin, 13353, Germany
  • University of Frankfurt
    Frankfurt, 60590, Germany
  • Cork University Hospital, UCC Department of Paediatrics and Child Health
    Cork, T12 DC4A, Ireland
  • National Children's Research Centre, Our Lady's Children's Hospital Crumlin
    Dublin, D12 V004, Ireland
  • Azienda Ospedaliera di Padova
    Padova, Province Of Padua 35128, Italy
  • Beatrix Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Groningen
    Groningen, 9700 RB, Netherlands
  • University Medical Center Groningen
    Groningen, 9713 GZ, Netherlands
  • Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón
    Madrid, 28007, Spain
  • H. Infantil Universitario Niño Jesús, Servicio de Alergia
    Madrid, 28009, Spain
  • Madrid Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Servicio de Alergia
    Madrid, 28040, Spain
  • Sachsska Children and Youth Hospital
    Stockholm, 118 83, Sweden
  • Leicester Royal infirmary
    Leicester, Leicestershire LE1 5WW, United Kingdom
  • James Paget University Hospital
    Gorleston-on-Sea, Norfolk NR31 6LA, United Kingdom
  • Guy & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Children Allergies Department
    London, SE1 7EH, United Kingdom
  • St Mary's Hospital - Paediatric Research Unit
    London, W2 1NY, United Kingdom
  • Children's Clinical Research Facility, Royal Manchester Children's Hospital
    Manchester, M13 9WL, United Kingdom
  • Sheffield Children's Hospital
    Sheffield, S10 2TH, United Kingdom
  • University Hospitals Southampton Foundation NHS Trust
    Southampton, SO16 6YD, United Kingdom
  • Central Manchester University Hospitals
    Wythenshawe, M23 9LT, United Kingdom
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Nilsson C, Scurlock AM, Dellon ES, Brostoff JM, Pham T, Ryan R, Brown KR, Adelman DC, Aceves SS. Onset of eosinophilic esophagitis during a clinical trial program of oral immunotherapy for peanut allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2021 Dec;9(12):4496-4501. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2021.07.048. Epub 2021 Aug 11. No abstract available. PubMed 34389504 ↗
  • Fernandez-Rivas M, Vereda A, Vickery BP, Sharma V, Nilsson C, Muraro A, Hourihane JO, DunnGalvin A, du Toit G, Blumchen K, Beyer K, Smith A, Ryan R, Adelman DC, Jones SM. Open-label follow-on study evaluating the efficacy, safety, and quality of life with extended daily oral immunotherapy in children with peanut allergy. Allergy. 2022 Mar;77(3):991-1003. doi: 10.1111/all.15027. Epub 2021 Sep 24. PubMed 34320250 ↗

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Dec 22, 2020
  • Statistical analysis plan · Dec 5, 2023

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03292484
Lead sponsor
Aimmune Therapeutics, Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 25, 2017
Start date
Nov 2, 2017
Primary completion
Apr 27, 2023
Completion
Apr 27, 2023
Results posted
Dec 19, 2024
Last update
Dec 19, 2024

Study contacts

Jen Garcia
study chair · Director, Clinical Operations

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion