An interventional study of Mental Health Care Coordination in Mental Health, sponsored by Children's National Research Institute. Completed. Open to participants aged 16 Years to 22 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-02-23.
Sponsored by Children's National Research Institute · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research
Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →
This study seeks to quantify the impact of recommended mental health care coordination practices on patient experiences of care, (i.e. satisfaction, stigma, quality of mental health care), evaluate the efficiency and effectiveness of the intervention (i.e. care coordination, timing, unmet needs), and assess mental health outcomes (i.e. symptoms and functioning, involvement with law enforcement/juvenile justice system; rates of substance use /abuse, service utilization) in a population of 16-22 year-old youth receiving primary care in a D.C. urban academic adolescent medicine practice, using standardized outcome measures.
In the maternal and child health field, there is increasing awareness of modifiable health conditions that appear early in the life course and impact development and wellness throughout the life span. Special opportunities exist in vulnerable populations with serious mental health conditions to better understand what life course events can facilitate attainment of optimal health and development. One such opportunity is making sure youth with serious emotional disturbance/serious mental illness receive the mental health services they need.
Unfortunately, untreated mental illness among adolescents and young adults is a major public health problem. Particularly concerning is the fact that 80% of youth with serious emotional disturbance/serious mental illness are not receiving needed mental health services and unmet mental health needs are even higher among certain populations, including minority youth. Youth with untreated mental health problems face a number of challenges that are exacerbated when left untreated. For example, youth with serious mental illness tend to have more difficulties in school and more involvement with the criminal justice system than their peers. These youth also face more challenges successfully transitioning to adulthood and becoming productive members of society.
Untreated mental illness tends to lead to more intensive and costly treatment down the road. There are many barriers to accessing mental health services, including stigma and difficulty navigating a complex mental health system, which contribute to unmet mental health needs. Additionally, youth may be so significantly impaired that expecting them to access mental treatment without some supportive services is unrealistic.
In light of these facts, it becomes urgent to implement recommended standards for mental health integration and evaluate their impact on mental health outcomes. The Center for Integrated Health Solutions in a joint Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA)-Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) effort recently released expanded joint principles for behavioral health integration. In this model, coordinated care is defined by primary and behavioral health care provided at different locations in the medical neighborhood, but care is coordinated through enhanced communication across the two disciplines. This report makes available an important standard for establishing integrated mental health care coordination practices within a primary care setting, but also demands careful evaluation.
This study seeks to quantify the impact of recommended mental health care coordination practices on patient experiences of care, (i.e. satisfaction, stigma, quality of mental health care), evaluate the efficiency/effectiveness of the intervention (i.e. care coordination, timing, unmet needs), and assess mental health outcomes (i.e. symptoms and functioning, involvement with law enforcement/juvenile justice system; rates of substance use /abuse, service utilization) in a population of 16-22 year-old youth receiving primary care in a D.C. urban academic adolescent medicine practice, using standardized outcome measures.
2,195 studies on the registry are indexed under Psychological Well-Being; 728 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 220 is above the median of 110 across 1,798 interventional studies indexed under Psychological Well-Being.
Browse Psychological Well-Being studies →Children's National Research Institute is the lead sponsor of 127 studies on the registry; 47 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Enhanced usual care with written mental health resources and system navigation information in addition to individualized mental health care coordination by a dedicated specially trained mental health care coordinator.
Behavioral: Mental Health Care Coordination
Enhanced usual care with written mental health resources and system navigation information.
Enhanced usual care with written mental health resources and system navigation information in addition to individualized mental health care coordination by a dedicated specially trained mental health care coordinator.
Connection to mental healthcare
Number of study participants self-reported receiving mental health care services since enrollment
Time frame: 2 years
Patient Experiences
Experience of Care and Health Outcomes (ECHO) Survey
Time frame: 2 years
Depression symptoms
PHQ-9 Questionnaire
Time frame: 2 years
Mental Health Stigma
Internalized Stigma of Mental Illness (ISMI) Questionnaire
Time frame: 2 years
Patterns of substance use
Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS) Questionnaire
Time frame: 2 years
Adverse Childhood Events
Philadelphia ACE Survey
Time frame: 2 years
No study locations are listed for this record.
Ran from Apr 2016 to primary completion in Mar 2019, 35 months.
Of 1,261 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Psychological Well-Being, half reached primary completion within 17 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 7 and three quarters within 34. This study's 35 months is above that.
Counting every sponsor, half of 1,304 studies reached it within 16 months; a quarter within 7 and three quarters within 34.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Children's National Research Institute →