ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07871916Updated Oct 13, 2026

Healing Hearts: A Mindfulness App for Parents Navigating Divorce or Separation

An interventional study of Healing Hearts and electronic New Beginnings Program in Mental Health, Parenting / Maternal Behavior and Parenting Anxiety, sponsored by University of Connecticut. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-13.

Sponsored by University of Connecticut · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Updated Oct 13, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
96
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study examines online programs for parents navigating divorce or separation. Researchers will study whether a self-guided mindfulness app called Healing Hearts, followed by a self-guided online parenting program called the electronic New Beginnings Program, is feasible and acceptable to parents and shows promising effects on parent and child wellbeing. Ninety-six parents who live in the United States, have a child aged 6 to 18 with a former partner, and report mild to moderate psychological distress will be randomly assigned to one of three groups: Healing Hearts followed by the parenting program, the parenting program alone, or a set of online educational resources. Participants complete online assessments before assignment, about seven weeks later, and about seven weeks after the second assessment. The study measures parent wellbeing, parenting, parent reports of child behavior, program use, and participant experiences. All participation takes place remotely.

Read the detailed description

This pilot trial aims to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability and preliminary efficacy of a digital mindfulness app developed through prior formative work and user testing for parents navigating divorce or separation who report elevated psychological distress. Eligible parents complete electronic consent, an intake and identity-verification call, and a baseline survey (T1) before individual randomization in a 1:1:1 ratio. The three arms are: Healing Hearts immediately followed by the parenting program, the parenting program alone, or a set of online educational resources.

  1. The Healing Hearts program comprises four Parts with five days of activities per Part. Parents are encouraged to complete one Part weekly. Activities include guided meditation, lessons, journaling and reflection. In the combined arm, electronic New Beginnings Program access follows completion of the midpoint assessment (T2).
  2. The eNBP-only arm receives the parenting program after baseline and retains access during follow-up.
  3. The internet resources arm receives a list of online resources relevant to parenting and family wellbeing.

Intent-to-treat analyses will be used. Follow-up assessments are requested irrespective of intervention completion, subject to participant consent and approved safety procedures.

The study will estimate recruitment, retention, engagement, usability, acceptability, appropriateness and burden, together with preliminary between-group differences in parent self-regulation, parenting, distress and parent-reported child problems. In addition to online surveys, participants who have access to a PC computer will complete optional PC-based behavioral tasks to assess cognitive functioning.

The pilot sample is intended to inform a larger trial and is not a formal efficacy evaluation.

02

Conditions studied

  • Mental Health
  • Parenting / Maternal Behavior
  • Parenting Anxiety
  • Parenting Behavior
  • Stress
  • Psychological Distress
  • Depression and Anxiety Symptoms
  • Internalizing Problems
  • Externalizing Problems

Keywords

  • divorce
  • parental separation
  • divorced parent
  • separated parent
  • mindfulness
  • mindful parenting
  • parenting stress
  • parental distress
  • parenting skill
  • coparenting
  • family court
  • child visitation
  • web-based intervention
  • online parenting program
  • parent education
  • pilot randomized controlled trial
  • child emotional problems
  • child behavioral problems
  • remote study
  • family law
  • divorcing
  • interparental conflict
03

In context

Psychological Well-Being

1,045 studies on the registry are indexed under Psychological Well-Being; 509 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 96 is below the median of 113 across 888 interventional studies indexed under Psychological Well-Being.

Browse Psychological Well-Being studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Connecticut is the lead sponsor of 135 studies on the registry; 18 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18 years or older.
  • Able to speak, read, and write in English; living in the United States.
  • Has a mobile device, internet access on that device, and uses email.
  • Identifies as a parent and has at least one child aged 6 to 18 years with an ex-partner. Parenting time with the target child exceeds 3 hours/week.
  • Is going through a legal process to separate or divorce; or was married and divorced or legally separated within the past 3 years; or was never married to the ex-partner and has a qualifying separation marker within the past 3 years.
  • For never-married parents, the listed markers are child custody, visitation, or formal parenting-plan proceedings or agreements; child-support proceedings or agreements; dissolution of a domestic partnership or civil union; or either partner moving out and maintaining separate households.
  • Reports a Kessler 6 psychological distress score from 1 through 12, inclusive.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Low-speed internet.
  • Current regular mind-body practices, such as meditation or yoga.
  • The parent or target child is in psychotherapy or other clinical research.
  • Kessler 6 score of 0 or 13 or higher.
  • History of major psychiatric disorders.
  • Current alcohol use problems.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
96 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Healing Hearts and electronic New Beginnings Program

    Participants receive the Healing Hearts program (HH) followed by the electronic New Beginnings Program (eNBP). The two interventions are received sequentially. HH is first offered after baseline randomization as a self-guided mindfulness app that contains four Parts, which contain five days of activities each (i.e., a total of 20 Days of activities). It has a recommended four-week completion period. Completing each Day's activities take about 20-30 minutes. Most activities are under 5 minutes, with other longer activities. Participants will receive the second assessment (T2) at week 7. Upon completion, they will then receive the electronic New Beginnings Program (eNBP). The eNBP is a self-guided online parenting course requiring participants to spend about 30 minutes per module for a total of six modules. It is designed to be completed in 6 weeks (one module per week). Participants will receive the third assessment (T3) at week 14.

    Behavioral: Healing Hearts · Behavioral: electronic New Beginnings Program

  • Active comparator
    electronic New Beginnings program

    Participants receive eNBP after baseline randomization. This is the only intervention they receive in this condition. The eNBP is a self-guided online parenting course requiring participants to spend about 30 minutes per module for a total of six modules. It is designed to be completed in 6 weeks (one module per week). Participants will receive the second assessment (T2) at week 7 and the third assessment (T3) at week 14.

    Behavioral: electronic New Beginnings Program

  • Active comparator
    Internet Resources

    Participants receive a curated list of online educational resources relevant to parenting and family wellbeing throughout the study period. They do not receive Healing Hearts or eNBP during the active comparison period. Assessments follow the same schedule as the other arms. Optional access after study assessments is outside the randomized intervention period.

    Behavioral: Curated internet resources

Interventions

  • BehavioralHealing Hearts

    Four-Part self-guided web program with daily guided practices, lessons, journal and reflection activities.

  • Behavioralelectronic New Beginnings Program

    Online parenting skills program containing six modules. Each module takes 30 minutes to complete and contains home practice outside of the program. Prior studies have evaluated the efficacy of this program.

  • BehavioralCurated internet resources

    Educational information comparator.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Recruitment rate

    Number of eligible participants completing baseline assessment divided by months of active recruitment. Will also report the total number of participants randomized.

    Time frame: At completion of active recruitment, approximately 12 months after recruitment begins.

  2. Retention rate

    Percentage of all randomized participants completing the second assessment (T2) within the assessment window. The prior benchmark is at least 80%. The assessment window and completion rule require confirmation.

    Time frame: Second assessment (T2), approximately 7 weeks after the baseline assessment.

  3. Depressive symptoms

    Using the 7-item subscale of the DASS-21 (Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale - Short Form). Each item is rated on a 0-3 scale (raw score range: 0 - 21). Raw scores are multiplied by 2 to calculate a score that can be interpreted for severity. Higher scores indicate greater depressive symptoms. Depression: Normal 0-9, Mild 10-13, Moderate 14-20, Severe 21-27, Extremely Severe 28+.

    Time frame: From baseline to 7 weeks post-baseline (T1 to T2) and from baseline to 14 weeks post-baseline (T1 to T3).

  4. Anxiety symptoms

    Using the 7-item subscale of the DASS-21 (Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale - Short Form). Each item is rated on a 0-3 scale (raw score range: 0 - 21). Raw scores are multiplied by 2 to calculate a score that can be interpreted for severity. Higher scores indicate greater depressive symptoms. Anxiety: Normal 0-7, Mild 8-9, Moderate 10-14, Severe 15-19, Extremely Severe 20+.

    Time frame: From baseline to 7 weeks post-baseline (T1 to T2) and from baseline to 14 weeks post-baseline (T1 to T3).

  5. Stress symptoms

    Stress symptoms will be measured using the seven-item Stress subscale of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales, 21-item version (DASS-21). Each item is rated from 0 to 3, giving a raw subscale score of 0-21. The raw score is multiplied by 2, yielding a reported score of 0-42. Higher scores indicate more severe stress symptoms, a worse outcome. Conventional severity ranges for the multiplied score are normal (0-14), mild (15-18), moderate (19-25), severe (26-33), and extremely severe (34-42).

    Time frame: From baseline to 7 weeks post-baseline (T1 to T2) and from baseline to 14 weeks post-baseline (T1 to T3)

  6. Child Mental Health

    Parents rate their child's emotional and behavioral problems using the Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment Brief Problem Monitor Parent Form (BPM-P) for ages 6-18. The 19 items cover internalizing, attention, and externalizing problems. Each is rated 0 (not true), 1 (somewhat true), or 2 (very true). The Total Problems raw score ranges from 0 to 38; higher scores indicate more problems.

    Time frame: From baseline to 7 weeks post-baseline (T1 to T2) and from baseline to 14 weeks post-baseline (T1 to T3).

  7. Mindful parenting

    Using the 10-item Interpersonal Mindfulness in Parenting Scale to assess parents' attention, awareness, acceptance, and regulation during interactions with their children. Items are rated from 1 (never true) to 5 (always true). After reverse-scoring items where appropriate, the summed score ranges from 10 to 50; higher scores indicate greater mindful parenting.

    Time frame: From baseline to 7 weeks post-baseline (T1 to T2) and from baseline to 14 weeks post-baseline (T1 to T3).

  8. Parenting Acceptance and Rejection

    Using the combined Acceptance/Rejection score from the parent-report Child Report of Parenting Behavior Inventory (CRPBI). Parents rate 16 acceptance items and 16 rejection items from 1 (almost never or never) to 5 (almost always or always). Rejection items are reverse-scored, and all 32 items are averaged for a score ranging from 1 to 5. Higher scores indicate greater acceptance and less rejection of the child.

    Time frame: From baseline to 7 weeks post-baseline (T1 to T2) and from baseline to 14 weeks post-baseline (T1 to T3).

  9. Acceptability of Healing Hearts intervention

    Participants rate four statements about Healing Hearts using the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM). Each item is scored from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 5 (Strongly Agree). The four item scores are averaged, yielding a score from 1 to 5. Higher scores indicate greater perceived acceptability.

    Time frame: T2 (approximately 7 weeks after baseline) or T3 (approximately 14 weeks after baseline)

  10. Appropriateness of Healing Hearts Intervention

    Participants rate four statements about the appropriateness of Healing Hearts Intervention with Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM). Each item is scored from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 5 (Strongly Agree). Item scores are averaged to produce a score from 1 to 5; higher scores indicate greater perceived appropriateness.

    Time frame: T2 (approximately 7 weeks after baseline) or T3 (approximately 14 weeks after baseline)

  11. Usability of Healing Hearts Intervention

    Participants rate 10 statements about the usability of Healing Hearts on a scale from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 5 (Strongly Agree). Responses are scored using the standard System Usability Scale (SUS) procedure, including adjustment of negatively worded items, to produce a total score from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate greater perceived usability.

    Time frame: T2 (approximately 7 weeks after baseline) or T3 (approximately 14 weeks after baseline)

  12. Parenting stress

    Parenting stress will be measured using the Parenting Stress Index (PSI) short form. Each item is rated from 1 to 5. A total of 36 items are divided into three domains (Parental Distress, Parent-Child Dysfunctional Interaction, and Difficult Child). Higher scores indicate higher parenting stress.

    Time frame: From baseline to 7 weeks post-baseline (T1 to T2) and from baseline to 14 weeks post-baseline (T1 to T3)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Parental mindful self-regulation

    Mindful self-regulation will be measured using the 10-item Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale-Revised (CAMS-R). Each item is rated from 1 ("rarely/not at all") to 4 ("almost always"). After reverse-scoring the applicable item, responses are summed to yield a total score from 10 to 40. Higher scores indicate greater dispositional mindfulness, a better outcome.

    Time frame: From baseline to 7 weeks post-baseline (T1 to T2) and from baseline to 14 weeks post-baseline (T1 to T3).

  2. Parental executive functioning

    Executive functioning will be assessed using the 27-item Executive Function Index (EFI). Items are rated from 1 to 5. After reverse-scoring negatively worded items, responses are summed for a total score ranging from 27 to 135; higher scores indicate better executive functioning.

    Time frame: From baseline to 7 weeks post-baseline (T1 to T2) and from baseline to 14 weeks post-baseline (T1 to T3).

  3. Emotion coaching

    Using the 14-item Maternal Emotional Style Questionnaire (MESQ). Each item is rated from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Items are summed for a score ranging from 7 to 35. Higher scores indicate greater endorsement of an emotion-coaching parenting style.

    Time frame: From baseline to 7 weeks post-baseline (T1 to T2) and from baseline to 14 weeks post-baseline (T1 to T3).

  4. Child prosocial behavior

    Using the 5-item Prosocial Behavior subscale of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). Each item is rated on a 3-point scale from 0 (Not True) to 2 (Certainly True). The five items are summed to produce a score ranging from 0 to 10. Higher scores indicate greater prosocial behavior.

    Time frame: From baseline to 7 weeks post-baseline (T1 to T2) and from baseline to 14 weeks post-baseline (T1 to T3).

  5. Coparenting Conflict

    Parents report conflict with their ex-partner during the past two weeks using 13 items adapted for parent report Children's Perception of Interparental Conflict Scale (CPICS): six assessing conflict frequency and seven assessing conflict intensity. Responses are "False," "Sort of True," or "True." Items are coded and reverse coded as appropriate, then combined into an overall score ranging from 13 to 39. Higher scores indicate greater parent reported interparental conflict. "Not applicable" and "Prefer not to say" are treated as missing responses.

    Time frame: T1 (baseline)

  6. Coparenting communication

    Parents complete a six-item questionnaire about their emotional responses before and after communicating with their ex-partner. The questions are developed for this study. Each item is rated from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 5 (Strongly Agree). The two items describing not taking interactions personally and feeling confident are reverse scored. Item scores are averaged to produce a score from 1 to 5; higher scores indicate greater emotional distress related to communication with the ex-partner.

    Time frame: From baseline to 7 weeks post-baseline (T1 to T2) and from baseline to 14 weeks post-baseline (T1 to T3).

  7. Effective Discipline (Laxness)

    Parents rate 16 statements adapted from the Laxness domain of the Parenting Scale (Arnold et al., 1993), referring to the past two weeks. Each statement is rated from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 7 (Strongly Agree). Items describing consistent limit setting are reverse scored, and the item scores are averaged to produce a score from 1 to 7. Higher scores indicate more lax or inconsistent discipline.

    Time frame: Baseline (T1), approximately 7 weeks after baseline (T2), and approximately 14 weeks after baseline (T3)

  8. Effective Discipline (Overreaction)

    Parents rate 17 statements adapted from the Overreactivity domain of the Parenting Scale (Arnold et al., 1993), referring to the past two weeks. Each statement is rated from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 7 (Strongly Agree). Items describing calm responses are reverse scored, and the item scores are averaged to produce a score from 1 to 7. Higher scores indicate more reactive discipline. The physical punishment item is excluded.

    Time frame: Baseline (T1), approximately 7 weeks after baseline (T2), and approximately 14 weeks after baseline (T3).

  9. Parental emotion socialization

    Using a shortened version of the Coping with Children's Negative Emotions Scale (CCNES), parents rate how likely they would be to respond in six ways across 12 situations in which their child experiences a negative emotion. Each response is rated from 1 (very unlikely) to 7 (very likely). Higher scores indicate a greater likelihood of the reaction named by that subscale. Items worded in the opposite direction are reverse-scored according to the instrument's scoring key.

    Time frame: From baseline to 7 weeks post-baseline (T1 to T2) and from baseline to 14 weeks post-baseline (T1 to T3).

  10. Dispositional Mindfulness

    Participants complete the 39-item Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ), which assesses observing, describing, acting with awareness, nonjudging of inner experience, and nonreactivity to inner experience. Items are rated from 1 (Never or Very Rarely True) to 5 (Very Often or Always True). Specified items are reverse scored, then the 39 item scores are averaged to produce a mean score from 1 to 5. Higher scores indicate greater self-reported dispositional mindfulness.

    Time frame: From baseline to 7 weeks post-baseline (T1 to T2) and from baseline to 14 weeks post-baseline (T1 to T3).

  11. Parental executive function (computer-based)

    Three E-prime go tasks will be administered to participants who have access to PC. These tasks will be installed on their computer and assess their response accuracy and reaction time. The tasks are: Wisconsin Card Sorting, Counting Backwards, and Stroop. Higher accuracy and faster reaction time within accurate trials indicate better executive functions.

    Time frame: At 7 weeks post-baseline (T2) and 14 weeks post-baseline (T3).

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • University of Connecticut
    Stamford, Connecticut 06901, United States
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 13, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 13, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07871916
Responsible party
Na Zhang (Associate Professor, University of Connecticut) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 13, 2026
Start date
Oct 5, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jul 30, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 30, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 13, 2026

Study contacts

Na Zhang, PhD
Contact
nazhang@uconn.edu
2035617045

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion