An interventional study of High-Flow nasal cannula (HFNC) in Severe Sepsis, sponsored by Althaia Xarxa Assistencial Universitària de Manresa. Terminated at 1 site in Spain. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 99 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-01-14.
Sponsored by Althaia Xarxa Assistencial Universitària de Manresa · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
Severe sepsis leads a high morbidity and mortality by causing organ damage at distance. The treatment relies on early antibiotic therapy and hemodynamic resuscitation. Hypothesis: high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) could reduce work of breathing and improve the outcome of patients with severe sepsis and peripheral perfusion. Objective: the aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of HFNC for improving sixty-day survival in patients with severe sepsis. Design: multicenter parallel-group randomized clinical trial. Method: 592 adult patients with a diagnosis of severe sepsis in the first 12 hours of admission in the Emergency Room will be randomly assigned to an experimental or control group. In the experimental group, HFNC will be administered until the resolution of sepsis or until required mechanical ventilation, either invasive or non-invasive. In the Control group, conventional oxygen will be administered, if required. Sixty-day survival will be the primary outcome. The study is powered to demonstrate an improvement in survival from 70% in control group up to 80% in the HFNC group. The secondary outcomes will be reducing the need for vital support (mechanical ventilation, dialysis, vasoactive drugs) and physiological (acidosis, clearance of lactate, SvO2 and SOFA). Statistical analysis: Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazard models will be calculated for all-cause sixty-day survival. If the results are conclusive, they will have immediate application in medical practice.
Severe sepsis is a syndrome associated with severe infections with a high morbidity and mortality. In its most severe form, septic shock still leads to an in-hospital mortality of up to 50%. The pathophysiology of severe sepsis / septic shock includes increased work of breathing to compensate for tissue hypoperfusion-induced metabolic acidosis. This exaggerated work of breathing requires increased consumption of oxygen by respiratory muscles, which calls for a greater percentage of the already insufficient cardiac output, which can aggravate tissue hypoperfusion.
In the last decade, high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) appeared as an alternative ventilatory support intermediate between conventional oxygen and mechanical ventilation. Among others (3-7), the investigators have also demonstrated their effectiveness in patients with respiratory failure of different etiologies (8-11). Patients treated with HFNC quickly show a reduction of respiratory rate and respiratory work, associated with an improvement of the functional residual capacity and gas exchange. The absence of significant side effects and low cost makes HFNC especially attractive as adjunctive medical treatment in severe sepsis.
Then, the hypothesis is that in patients with severe sepsis, high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy could reduce work of breathing, which would allow a redistribution of cardiac output from the respiratory muscles to other organs, improving peripheral perfusion with minor injury of organs at distance, less multiorgan failure and improved survival. Therefore, the aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of HFNC for improving sixty-day survival in patients with severe sepsis. This study will also provide a detailed evaluation of the HFNC's effects on the need for vital support (mechanical ventilation, dialysis, vasoactive drugs) and physiological parameters (acidosis, clearance of lactate, SvO2 and SOFA).
DESIGN Prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial in 592 patients with severe sepsis admitted into a network of 18 ICUs from university and community hospitals in Spain to define the role of high flow oxygen therapy, with one experimental arm that will receive high flow oxygen therapy and a control arm that will receive conventional oxygen therapy if required.
Patients who consent will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive HFNC or conventional treatment, which consists of adding oxygen on nasal prongs or Venturi mask only if hypoxemia is detected as SpO2 \< 92% by pulse oximetry.
STUDY ARMS
HFNC therapy (experimental group) Treatment with HFNC (Airvo2® Fisher \& Paykel, and AquaNASE® Armstrong Medical) will begin with high flow (50 L/min), high temperature and humidity and oxygen concentration adjusted for SpO2 >92%, even with FiO2 of 0.21, if needed.
The rationale for this HFNC dosage is that minute ventilation can be already reduced with 30 L/min, but functional residual capacity and oxygenation maximally improve at higher flow. On the contrary, flow >50 L/min is uncomfortable for many patients.
In the case of clinical intolerance, flow will be reduced to 40, 30 or 20 L/min. Yet it is not tolerated, HFNC will be stopped and patients will receive conventional oxygen if required, but will be evaluated as in the HFNC group by intention to treat.
In HFNC patients we propose an extra caution to avoid delaying a mechanical ventilation that would be beneficial. To do this, the ROX index (ROX = SpO2/FiO2/respiratory rate) will be calculated and if it is \< 5, it is recommended to assess mechanical ventilatory support, either invasive or non-invasive.
Target for oxygenation in both arms is SpO2 between 92% and 95%. SpO2 >95% without oxygen supply is acceptable. On the contrary, SpO2 \<92% may be acceptable when needed for medical reasons, mainly chronic hypercapnic patients.
Exclusion Criteria:
Treatment with HFNC will be adjusted for SpO2 \>92%, even with FiO2 of 0.21, if needed. The rationale for this HFNC dosage is that minute ventilation can be already reduced with 30 L/min, but functional residual capacity and oxygenation maximally improve at higher flow. On the contrary, flow \>50 L/min is uncomfortable for many patients. In the case of clinical intolerance, flow will be reduced to 40, 30 or 20 L/min. Yet it is not tolerated, HFNC will be stopped and patients will receive conventional oxygen if required, but will be evaluated as in the HFNC group by intention to treat.
Device: High-Flow nasal cannula (HFNC)
Patients assigned to the conventional treatment will receive the standard care given at hospital which consists of adding oxygen on nasal prongs or Venturi mask only if hypoxemia is suggested by SpO2 \< 92% by pulse oximetry. Target for oxygenation in both arms is SpO2 between 92% and 95%. SpO2 \>95% without oxygen supply is acceptable. On the contrary, SpO2 \<92% may be acceptable when needed for medical reasons, mainly chronic hypercapnic patients.
The patient will receive HFNC adjusted for SatO2 \> 92% and with, at least, 30 liters of total flow.
Also known as: Conventional therapy
Mortality
60-day survival after enrollment
Time frame: 60 day
Mechanical ventilation support
Institution of mechanical ventilation (either invasive or noninvasive)
Time frame: up to 60-days
Dialysis support
Institution of dialysis
Time frame: up to 60-days
Vasoactive drugs tappering
Daily dose of vasoactive drugs until stopping
Time frame: up to 60-days
Sequential Organ Failure Assessment
Daily Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score. The organs scored are respiratory, cardiovascular, neurologic, hematologic, renal, and liver. Each organ is scored as 0 (best) to 4 (worse) and the total score is the sum of each component.
Time frame: up to 60-days
Acidosis improvement
Hours until the ph becomes normal
Time frame: up to 60-days
Central Venous Oxygen Saturation (SatVO2)
Hours until the SatVO2 \< 65%
Time frame: up to 60-days
Lactate clearance
Hours until lactate \< 3 mmol/l
Time frame: up to 60-days
Plan to share: No
This study is terminated, as verified in Jan 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Althaia Xarxa Assistencial Universitària de Manresa