CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03327610VHI1Updated Oct 31, 2017

Selecting the Best Ventilator Hyperinflation Settings

An interventional study of VC-CMV20 and VC-CMV50 in Respiratory Failure and Respiration Disorders, sponsored by Centro Universitário Augusto Motta. Completed. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-10-31.

Sponsored by Centro Universitário Augusto Motta · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Ventilator hyperinflation (VHI) has been shown to be effective in improving respiratory mechanics, secretion removal, and gas exchange in mechanically ventilated patients; however, there are no recommendations on the best ventilator settings to perform the technique. Thus, the aim of this study was to compare six modes of VHI, concerning physiological markers of efficacy and safety criteria, in order to support the optimal VHI settings selection for mechanically ventilated patients. In a randomized, controlled and crossover study, 30 mechanically ventilated patients underwent 6 modes of ventilator hyperinflation. The maximum expansion (tidal volume), expiratory flow bias criteria (inspiratory and expiratory flow patterns), overdistension (alveolar pressure), asynchronies and hemodynamic variables (mean arterial pressure and heart rate) were assessed during the interventions.

Read the detailed description

Background: Ventilator Hyperinflation (VHI) has been shown to be effective in improving respiratory mechanics, secretion removal, and gas exchange in mechanically ventilated patients; however, there are no recommendations on the best ventilator settings to perform the technique. Thus, the aim of this study was to compare six modes of VHI, concerning physiological markers of efficacy and safety criteria, in order to support the optimal VHI settings selection for mechanically ventilated patients.

Methods: In a crossover study, every included mechanically ventilated patient underwent six modes of VHI in a randomized order: Volume Control Continuous Mandatory Ventilation (VC-CMV) with inspiratory flow = 20Lpm (VC-CMV20), VC-CMV with inspiratory flow = 50Lpm (VC-CMV50), Pressure Control Continuous Mandatory Ventilation (PC-CMV) with inspiratory time = 1s. (PC-CMV1), PC-CMV with inspiratory time = 3s. (PC-CMV3), Pressure Support Ventilation (PSV) with cycling off = 10% of peak inspiratory flow (PSV10), and PSV with cycling off = 25% of peak inspiratory flow (PSV25). The maximum expansion (tidal volume), expiratory flow bias criteria (inspiratory and expiratory flow patterns), over-distension (alveolar pressure), asynchronies and hemodynamic variables (mean arterial pressure and heart rate) were assessed during the interventions.

02

Conditions studied

  • Respiratory Failure
  • Respiration Disorders

Keywords

  • Respiratory Therapy
  • Positive Pressure Respiration
  • Physical Therapy Modalities
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients under mechanical ventilation for more than 48h

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • mucus hypersecretion (defined as the need for suctioning \< 2-h intervals),
  • absence of respiratory drive,
  • atelectasis,
  • severe bronchospasm,
  • positive end expiratory pressure > 10cmH2O,
  • PaO2-FiO2 relationship \< 150,
  • mean arterial pressure \< 60mmHg,
  • inotrope requirement equivalent to >15 ml/h total of adrenaline and noradrenalin,
  • intracranial pressure > 20mmHg
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
30 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    BASELINE

    The subjects were kept in their current ventilatory mode.

  • Experimental
    VC-CMV20

    Application of a ventilator hyperinflation intervention with Volume Control Continuous Mandatory Ventilation (VC-CMV) with an inspiratory flow of 20Lpm.

    Other: VC-CMV20

  • Experimental
    VC-CMV50

    Application of a ventilator hyperinflation intervention with Volume Control Continuous Mandatory Ventilation (VC-CMV) with an inspiratory flow of 50Lpm.

    Other: VC-CMV50

  • Experimental
    PC-CMV1

    Application of a ventilator hyperinflation intervention with Pressure Control Continuous Mandatory Ventilation (PC-CMV1) with an inspiratory time of 1 second.

    Other: PC-CMV1

  • Experimental
    PC-CMV3

    Application of a ventilator hyperinflation intervention with Pressure Control Continuous Mandatory Ventilation (PC-CMV1) with an inspiratory time of 3 seconds.

    Other: PC-CMV3

  • Experimental
    PSV10

    Application of a ventilator hyperinflation intervention with Pressure Support Ventilation (PSV) with a cycling off of 10% of peak inspiratory flow.

    Other: PSV10

  • Experimental
    PSV25

    Application of a ventilator hyperinflation intervention with Pressure Support Ventilation (PSV) with a cycling off of 25% of peak inspiratory flow.

    Other: PSV25

Interventions

  • OtherVC-CMV20

    Application of a ventilator hyperinflation intervention with Volume Control Continuous Mandatory Ventilation (VC-CMV). The inspiratory flow was set at 20Lpm and the tidal volume was increased in steps of 200mL until the peak airway pressure of 40cmH2O was achieved. After achieving the target pressure, this ventilatory regimen lasted 15 minutes. Positive end expiratory pressure and the inspired oxygen fraction were not modified.

  • OtherVC-CMV50

    Application of a ventilator hyperinflation intervention with Volume Control Continuous Mandatory Ventilation (VC-CMV). The inspiratory flow was set at 50Lpm and the tidal volume was increased in steps of 200mL until the peak airway pressure of 40cmH2O was achieved. After achieving the target pressure, this ventilatory regimen lasted 15 minutes. Positive end expiratory pressure and the inspired oxygen fraction were not modified.

  • OtherPC-CMV1

    Application of a ventilator hyperinflation intervention with Pressure Control Continuous Mandatory Ventilation (PC-CMV1). The inspiratory time was set at 1 second and the pressure control was increased until a peak pressure of 40cmH2O was achieved. After achieving the target pressure, this ventilatory regimen lasted 15 minutes. Positive end expiratory pressure and the inspired oxygen fraction were not modified.

  • OtherPC-CMV3

    Application of a ventilator hyperinflation intervention with Pressure Control Continuous Mandatory Ventilation (PC-CMV1). The inspiratory time was set at 3 seconds and the pressure control was increased until a peak pressure of 40cmH2O was achieved. After achieving the target pressure, this ventilatory regimen lasted 15 minutes. Positive end expiratory pressure and the inspired oxygen fraction were not modified.

  • OtherPSV10

    Application of a ventilator hyperinflation intervention with Pressure Support Ventilation (PSV). The cycling off was set at 10% of peak inspiratory flow and the pressure support was increased until a peak pressure of 40cmH2O was achieved. After achieving the target pressure, this ventilatory regimen lasted 15 minutes. Positive end expiratory pressure and the inspired oxygen fraction were not modified.

  • OtherPSV25

    Application of a ventilator hyperinflation intervention with Pressure Support Ventilation (PSV). The cycling off was set at 25% of peak inspiratory flow and the pressure support was increased until a peak pressure of 40cmH2O was achieved. After achieving the target pressure, this ventilatory regimen lasted 15 minutes. Positive end expiratory pressure and the inspired oxygen fraction were not modified.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Peak inspiratory to expiratory flow ratio

    Dichotomous variable, defined as achieving a peak inspiratory flow rate (PIFR) less than 90% of the peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR)

    Time frame: Ten minutes after the onset of intervention.

  2. Peak expiratory flow higher than 40 Lpm

    Dichotomous variable, defined as achieving a PEFR higher than 40 l/min

    Time frame: Ten minutes after the onset of intervention.

  3. Difference between peak inspiratory and expiratory flows.

    Dichotomous variable, defined as achieving a difference higher than 17Lpm.

    Time frame: Ten minutes after the onset of intervention.

  4. Pulmonary expansion

    Percentage of tidal volume above the normal tidal volume (estimated as 6mL/kg).

    Time frame: Ten minutes after the onset of intervention.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mean arterial pressure

    Mean arterial pressure verified using the multi-parameter monitor.

    Time frame: Ten minutes after the onset of intervention.

  2. Heart Rate

    Heart rate verified using the multi-parameter monitor.

    Time frame: Ten minutes after the onset of intervention.

06

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

07

References and documents

Publications

  • Berney S, Denehy L. A comparison of the effects of manual and ventilator hyperinflation on static lung compliance and sputum production in intubated and ventilated intensive care patients. Physiother Res Int. 2002;7(2):100-8. doi: 10.1002/pri.246. PubMed 12109234 ↗
  • Lemes DA, Zin WA, Guimaraes FS. Hyperinflation using pressure support ventilation improves secretion clearance and respiratory mechanics in ventilated patients with pulmonary infection: a randomised crossover trial. Aust J Physiother. 2009;55(4):249-54. doi: 10.1016/s0004-9514(09)70004-2. PubMed 19929767 ↗
  • Thomas PJ. The effect of mechanical ventilator settings during ventilator hyperinflation techniques: a bench-top analysis. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2015 Jan;43(1):81-7. doi: 10.1177/0310057X1504300112. PubMed 25579293 ↗
  • Ntoumenopoulos G, Shannon H, Main E. Do commonly used ventilator settings for mechanically ventilated adults have the potential to embed secretions or promote clearance? Respir Care. 2011 Dec;56(12):1887-92. doi: 10.4187/respcare.01229. Epub 2011 Jun 17. PubMed 21682986 ↗
  • Anderson A, Alexanders J, Sinani C, Hayes S, Fogarty M. Effects of ventilator vs manual hyperinflation in adults receiving mechanical ventilation: a systematic review of randomised clinical trials. Physiotherapy. 2015 Jun;101(2):103-10. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2014.07.006. Epub 2014 Oct 6. PubMed 25453540 ↗
  • Davies JD, Senussi MH, Mireles-Cabodevila E. Should A Tidal Volume of 6 mL/kg Be Used in All Patients? Respir Care. 2016 Jun;61(6):774-90. doi: 10.4187/respcare.04651. PubMed 27235313 ↗
  • de Wit M. Monitoring of patient-ventilator interaction at the bedside. Respir Care. 2011 Jan;56(1):61-72. doi: 10.4187/respcare.01077. PubMed 21235839 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03327610
Lead sponsor
Centro Universitário Augusto Motta
Collaborators
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
Responsible party
Fernando Silva Guimaraes (Associate Professor, Centro Universitário Augusto Motta) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 31, 2017
Start date
Jul 2016
Primary completion
Aug 2017
Completion
Aug 2017
Last update
Oct 31, 2017

Study contacts

FERNANDO S GUIMARAES, PhD
study chair · Centro Universitário Augusto Motta

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion