ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03325361Updated Oct 30, 2017

The Role of Transanal Tube Drainage as A Mean of Prevention of Anastomotic Leakage Anastomotic Leakage

An interventional study of Tube drain insertion in Rectal Cancer, Rectal Neoplasms and Anastomotic Leak, sponsored by University of Rome Tor Vergata. Status unknown at 1 site in Italy. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-10-30.

Sponsored by University of Rome Tor Vergata · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Oct 2017), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Non-randomized
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-13

Among 103 studies in Rectal Neoplasms with a site in Italy — 32 open to participants now, 41 under way, 3 of them phase 3. Rectal Neoplasms · Italy.

Planned enrollment
47th of 70
100 · median 182
Started
2017
with 1 other
No phase
25 of 103
7 open now
Registered
41st of 103
by date

Among the 103 studies in Rectal Neoplasms with a site in Italy, this one is the 47th largest by planned enrollment of the 70 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 2 that started in 2017, is one of 25 with no phase, and was the 41st registered.

Rectal Neoplasms

2,401 studies on the registry are indexed under Rectal Neoplasms; 588 are open to participants now.

Browse Rectal Neoplasms studies →

Open to participants now

32 of the 103 studies in Rectal Neoplasms with a site in Italy are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

27 more — sign in →

All 32 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in Italy have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in Italy →

Who these studies take

Of the 404 Rectal Neoplasms studies recruiting now, 210 (52%) set no upper age limit and 142 (35%) stop at 75 or younger; 19 take children under 18; 16 take healthy volunteers.

This study: all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 103 studies in Rectal Neoplasms with a site in Italy, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

Anastomotic leakage (AL) is considered the commonest major complication after surgery for rectal cancer. Transanal tube drainage role in the prevention of AL is still debatable.

Read the detailed description

Patients who underwent low or ultralow anterior resection for rectal cancer were enrolled between 01/2015 and 06/2017. A de-Pezzer catheter was placed transanally after the creation of the anastomosis, secured to the buttocks, and connected to a urine bag to allow monitoring the amount and the color of the drainage. The catheter was removed on the 3rd day postoperative if the volume collected was insignificant.

Patients were followed-up on the ward and then in the outpatient's department at two weeks, and one month postoperative. Patients who were suspected to have AL underwent CT with rectal contrast to assess the integrity of the anastomosis. The primary outcome was the incidence of AL. We adopted the definition published by the International Study Group of Rectal Cancer.

03

Conditions studied

  • Rectal Cancer
  • Rectal Neoplasms
  • Anastomotic Leak
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Low or ultralow anterior resection with primary anastomosis for -proven primary rectal cancer

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • No anastomosis
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    TD

    Other: Tube drain insertion

  • No intervention
    NTD

Interventions

  • OtherTube drain insertion

    A de-Pezzer catheter was placed transanally after the creation of the anastomosis, secured to the buttocks, and connected to a urine bag to allow monitoring the amount and the color of the drainage. The catheter was removed on the 3rd day postoperative if the volume collected was insignificant.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Anastomotic leakage

    Prevention

    Time frame: 30 days

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Policlinico Tor Vergata Hospital
    Rome, RM 00133, Italy
    Recruiting
    • Pierpaolo Sileri · Contact3209353441
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Oct 2017; primary completion for Dec 2017, 2 months later.

Of 329 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Rectal Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 51 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 23 and three quarters within 78. This study's planned 2 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 336 studies reached it within 51 months; a quarter within 23 and three quarters within 78.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 24, 2017
First posted
Oct 30, 2017
StartEst.
Oct 2017
Primary completionEst.
Dec 2017
CompletionEst.
Jun 2018
Last update
Oct 30, 2017
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 30, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03325361
Lead sponsor
University of Rome Tor Vergata
Responsible party
Pierpaolo Sileri (Professor, University of Rome Tor Vergata) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 30, 2017
Start date
Oct 2017 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 2017 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 2018 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 30, 2017

Study contacts

Pierpaolo Sileri, PhD
Contact
piersileri@yahoo.com
3209353441
Mostafa Shalaby, PhD
Contact
shalaby-mostafa@hotmail.com

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Oct 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion