ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06366841SERENAUpdated Oct 14, 2026

Stigma and Psychological profilE in REctal-anal caNcer pAtients

An observational study in Rectal Cancer and Anal Cancer, sponsored by Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS. Recruiting at 2 sites in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-14.

Primary conditionAnus NeoplasmsRegistry: Rectal NeoplasmsReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Rectal Neoplasms — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Anus Neoplasms
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Anus Neoplasms, a narrower term within Rectal Neoplasms.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started May 2024; still recruiting 2 years 6 months later.
Updated Oct 14, 2026Primary completion movedStudy completion movedGo to Updates ↓
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
148
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

In 2022, Italy is estimated to have 48,100 cases of colon-rectum cancer. Locally advanced mid-lower rectal cancers require preoperative chemo-radiotherapy with fluoropyrimidine. The diagnosis and treatment of rectal cancer have a significant impact on patients' well-being, causing physical and psychological distress. Symptoms such as abdominal pain, fatigue, diarrhea, are commonly reported. While distress levels have been examined before, the relationship between other aspects of the patient experience, such as psychosocial factors, stigma, temperament and personality, alexithymia, have not been extensively explored. Colorectal cancer is associated with specific socially stigmatized challenges. Stigmatization is defined as societal identification of an individual as abnormal and worthy of separation, leading to discrimination and loss of social status. Rectal cancer patients may perceive high levels of stigma and blame due to factors such as defecation-related symptoms, colonoscopy or rectal examinations, physical limitations, loss of work ability and the use of colostomy or ileostomy. Anal cancer, although traditionally surrounded by social stigma, is gaining awareness worldwide due to increasing diagnoses. In other forms of cancer, stigma has been linked to personality traits. Given the characteristics related to the illness and the profile of rectal and anal cancer patients, it is important to assess the psychological traits and psychological resources, also in order to establish tailored psychological pathways during the disease trajectory that comprehend chemoradiations and possible subsequent surgery. Currently, there is no documented data on the relationship between stigma, and psychological profiles in rectal and anal cancer patients. Aim of this protocol is to evaluate the stigma, and psychopathological profile in rectal and anal cancer patients and to evaluate changes in those variables over time.

02

Conditions studied

  • Rectal Cancer
  • Anal Cancer

Browse trials for

03

In context

Anus Neoplasms Reclassified

297 studies on the registry are indexed under Anus Neoplasms; 74 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 148 is close to the median of 144 across 75 observational studies indexed under Anus Neoplasms.

Browse Anus Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS is the lead sponsor of 952 studies on the registry; 541 are open to participants now.

Compared within Anus Neoplasms, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Rectal Neoplasms. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Rectal and anal cancer patients undergoing a long course of radiotherapy

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Locally advanced rectal and anal cancer patients undergoing a long course of radiotherapy

  • Patients in chemo-radiation treatment
  • Ability to understand and complete the questionnaires
  • Age ≥18 years
  • signed

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age > 75 years
  • Rectal and anal cancer patients undergoing short-course radiotherapy
  • Rectal and anal cancer patients undergoing palliative radiotherapy
  • Patients with inability to express
  • Patients denying informed consent
  • Patients with psychopathological disturbances preexisting to the cancer diagnosis
  • Patients affected by severe language deficits
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
148 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Interventions

  • OtherPsychological tests administration

    Psychological tests administration to evaluate stigma, personality characteristics and quality of life of rectal and anal cancer patients.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Evaluation of rectal and anal cancer stigma

    PSS (modified) Perceived Stigma Scale. A self-administered questionnaire to measure perceived stigma through 7 items on a five-point Likert scale (ranging from 0 = never to 4 = always), with a higher score reflecting a greater level of perceived stigma (min score 0 max score 28).

    Time frame: 24 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Evaluation of psychological characteristics in rectal and anal cancer

    Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (Diagnostic Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 5th edition) brief form for adults The Personality Inventory for DSM-5 brief form measures non-adaptive personality traits: Negative Affectivity, Detachment, Antagonism, Disinhibition and Psychoticism (25 items).

    Time frame: 24 months

  2. Temperament Evaluation of Memphis, Pisa, Paris and San Diego-autoquestionnaire brief version

    Temperament Evaluation of Memphis, Pisa, Paris and San Diego-autoquestionnaire brief version. is a new self-report measure of the affective temperament with depressive (D), cyclothymic (C), hyperthymic (H), irritable (I), and anxious (A) subscales.

    Time frame: 24 months

  3. Toronto Alexithymia Scale

    Alexithymia Toronto Scale is a 20-item Likert scale. Within the TAS, there are distinct subscales that focus on specific dimensions of alexithymia: Difficulty Describing Feelings, Difficulty Identifying Feelings, and Externally Oriented Thinking.

    Time frame: 24 months

  4. EORTC QLQ - CR29 and EORTC QLQ-ANL27

    EORTC QLQ - CR29 and EORTC QLQ-ANL27 Quality of life in rectal and anal cancer submodules specifically assess colon-rectal and anal cancer. Raw scores for each scale are linear transformed into a 0-100 outcome. A higher functioning score indicated better functioning or global health/QoL, whereas higher symptom scores indicate a higher level of symptom severity.

    Time frame: 24 months

07

Study locations

2 of 2 sites recruiting
08

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedDate before it movedWhere the date was before it movedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started May 2024 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Oct 2027, 41 months after the start.

Of 36 observational studies under Anus Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 44 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 32 and three quarters within 137. This study's planned 41 months is close to that.

Since we started tracking on Sep 25, 2026, the dates moved once, on Oct 14, 2026: primary completion Aug 2026 → Oct 2027 and completion Aug 2026 → Jul 2028.

Earlier changes are on the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 5, 2024
First posted
Apr 16, 2024
StartActual
May 6, 2024
Primary completionEst.
Oct 31, 2027was Aug 2026
CompletionEst.
Jul 1, 2028was Aug 2026
Last update
Oct 14, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Primary completion
Aug 31, 2026→Oct 31, 2027
Oct 14, 2026
Study completion
Aug 31, 2026→Jul 1, 2028
Oct 14, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 14, 2026
    Primary completion Aug 31, 2026→Oct 31, 2027
    Study completion Aug 31, 2026→Jul 1, 2028
    + 1 other change: verification date

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06366841
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 16, 2024
Start date
May 6, 2024
Primary completion
Oct 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 1, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 14, 2026

Study contacts

Loredana Dinapoli
Contact
loredana.dinapoli@policlinicogemelli.it
+390630154428
Loredana Dinapoli
principal investigator · Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion