ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03324984Updated Feb 28, 2025Results posted

1% Chloroprocaine(PF) vs. Bupivacaine Spinals

A Phase 2 interventional study of 1% chloroprocaine and 0.75% bupivacaine in Return of Motor and Sensory Blockade, Anesthesia, Spinal and Decrease Discharge Time Status Post Hemorrhoidectomy, sponsored by Montefiore Medical Center. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-02-28.

Sponsored by Montefiore Medical Center · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
110
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 23 studies in Pain by Montefiore Medical Center — 2 open to participants now, 2 under way, none of them phase 3. Pain · Montefiore Medical Center.

Enrollment
16th of 23
110 · median 194
Started
2019
with 2 others
Phase 2
6 of 23
none open now
Registered
18th of 23
by date

Among the 23 studies in Pain by Montefiore Medical Center, this one is the 16th largest by enrollment, is one of 3 that started in 2019, is one of 6 in phase 2, and was the 18th registered.

By phase

23 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.

Phase 49 · 1 open
Phase 2this study6 · 0 open
No phase4 · 1 open
Phase 32 · 0 open
Phase 1/21 · 0 open
Phase 2/31 · 0 open

By the year they started

First in 2004; this study’s year is marked. 3 started in 2019.

Size and results

Median enrollment 194 across the 23 interventional studies. Of the 21 that completed or were terminated, 18 (86%) have results posted.

Watch this landscapeDownload CSVWith an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 23 studies in Pain by Montefiore Medical Center, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

The use of 1% Chloroprocaine (PF) spinal anesthesia will reduce the recovery times and discharge time of patients undergoing hemorrhoidectomies as compared to 0.75% bupivacaine spinal. The primary objective is to compare the recovery times (return of motor and sensory function) and discharge time (voiding time) between 2-Chloroprocaine and 0.75% bupivacaine spinal anesthesia for hemorrhoidectomies. This is a randomized, prospective study assigning patients to either 2-Chloroprocaine (PF) or 0.75% bupivacaine spinal anesthesia group.

Read the detailed description

The use of 1% Chloroprocaine (PF) spinal anesthesia will reduce the recovery times and discharge time of patients undergoing hemorrhoidectomies as compared to 0.75% bupivacaine spinal. The primary objective is to compare the recovery times (return of motor and sensory function) and discharge time (voiding time) between 1% Chloroprocaine and 0.75% bupivacaine spinal anesthesia for hemorrhoidectomies. This is a randomized, prospective study assigning patients to either 1% Chloroprocaine (PF) or 0.75% bupivacaine spinal anesthesia group. Consents for participation in the study will be obtained during the patients' preoperative anesthesia evaluation. There will be no change in the primary anesthetic technique (spinal anesthesia), since these patients routinely get spinal anesthesia for hemorrhoidectomies, however there would be a change in type of local anesthetic administration. On the day of surgery, consented patients will be randomized to one of the two groups. Both the patients and the researcher who recruited the patients and collected the data will be blinded. (Research assistant will hand an enclosed envelop to the anesthesiologists performing the spinal anesthesia with the name of local anesthetic to use) Postoperatively, the PACU nurse will be ask to document return of motor and sensory function in addition to voiding time. At the time of voiding, the nurse will be asked to inform an anesthesiologist (not involved in the case) for a postoperative evaluation and a discharge note. However, if the patient cannot void once there are able to ambulate, then they stay in PACU until they are the last patient in the unit. If still unable to void, the surgeon will be informed and an ultrasound bladder scan will be used to determine the volume of urine and the patient will be straight cath. The patient will be sent home and informed if he or she cannot void by the next day, then they should call the surgeon's office to notify them and go to the emergency room.

For postoperative data collection, the routine 24hr postoperative phone calls in which nurses make to patients will be utilize, however two additional questions will be asked, 1. Presence of nerve pain in the buttocks and thighs shooting down their legs unilaterally or bilaterally, 2. Inability to void, pass flatus or defecate. If any of the symptoms are present, then the nurse will inform an anesthesiologist (not involved in the case) whom will give the patient a call and advise them on treatment protocol. The research assistant will then be informed by the anesthesiologist who made the phone call.

03

Conditions studied

  • Return of Motor and Sensory Blockade
  • Anesthesia, Spinal
  • Decrease Discharge Time Status Post Hemorrhoidectomy

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Spinal anesthesia
  • Pain
  • Chloroprocaine
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient undergoing anorectal procedures
  • Age 18 and above
  • Physical Status (ASA), I-III

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient refusal
  • Inability to understand and sign
  • Allergic reaction to bupivacaine or other local anesthetics
  • Coagulopathy ( >= 1.5)
  • Use of anticoagulant drugs (Plavix, Coumadin)
  • Thrombocytopenia ( \< 100,000)
  • Infection at the site
  • Increased intracranial pressure
  • Unstable spine, Spine abnormalities
  • History of atypical cholinesterase (CP is metabolized by cholinesterase)
  • Diagnosis of any disorders (i.e., benign prostatic hyperplasia, cystitis, vulvovaginitis) that would delay voiding
  • Anticipated procedure time longer than 60 minutes
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

INR, PT and aPTT (clotting tests)

Blood tests of how long blood takes to clot. The INR is the prothrombin time (PT) put on a common scale; about 1 is usual for someone not taking a blood thinner.

Criteria often make an exception for people on a blood thinner such as warfarin, whose INR is raised on purpose.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
110 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    1% Chloroprocaine (PF)

    1% Chloroprocaine is an ester-linked local anesthetic with the shortest duration of action of all local anesthetics.

    Drug: 1% chloroprocaine

  • Active comparator
    0.75% bupivacaine

    0.75% bupivacaine is a amino-amide anesthetic local anesthetic. It is hyperbaric in nature due to addition of dextrose.

    Drug: 0.75% bupivacaine

Interventions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Recovery Time

    For this study Recovery time was defined as the time (in minutes) to return of both motor and sensory function, postoperatively. The return of motor function was tested by demonstrating mobility in both lower extremities including hips, knees, and lower legs using the Bromage scale. The return of sensory function was assessed using light touch and/or pinprick techniques on the dermatomes corresponding with the T8-S2 spinal cord segments. The duration in minutes when both sensory and motor function were re-established was documented and results were summarized by study arm using basic descriptive statistics. In this study it is hypothesized that use of 1% Chloroprocaine spinal anesthesia will reduce recovery times of patients undergoing anorectal procedures as compared to 0.75% bupivacaine spinal.

    Time frame: On post-operative day 1 (POD1), approximately every 15 minutes up to 24 hours

  2. Discharge Time

    For this study discharge time is defined as the time (in minutes) when the patient is "fit to discharge" from the Postoperative Care Unit (PACU). At the institution where this study took place "fit to discharge" was defined as the ability to void and the ability to ambulate unassisted for at least 10 feet. The duration of time when a patient was able to do both was documented. Results were summarized by study arm using basic descriptive statistics. It is hypothesized that the use of 1% Chloroprocaine spinal anesthesia will result in a clinically significant 30% reduction in discharge times of patients as compared to 0.75% bupivacaine spinal.

    Time frame: On post-operative day 1 (POD1), up to 24 hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. Evidence of Hypotension

    Evidence of hypotension will be documented if systolic blood pressure (SBP) drops more than 20mmHg from baseline following spinal anesthesia. Hypotension is a common side effect of spinal anesthesia (SA). The number of participants with evidence of hypotension will be summarized by study arm.

    Time frame: On day of procedure, 0-5 minutes following administration of spinal anesthesia

  2. Evidence of Transient Neurological Symptoms (TNS)

    The number of participants demonstrating TNS approximately 24 hours following the procedure will be assessed. TNS will be defined as back pain or dysesthesia that radiated to the buttocks, thighs, hips, or calves and began within the first 24 hours after surgery. Localized pain or tenderness at the injection site or lower back without radiation will not be considered TNS. TNS is clinically important as it causes patient pain and discomfort and, in severe cases, may delay discharge or cause readmission. Symptoms will be summarized and reported by study arm.

    Time frame: On post-op day 2, approximately 24 hours post operation

07

Results

Posted Feb 28, 2025

Participant flow

Between September 2019 and February 2023, a total of 110 eligible patients were randomized and 55 were assigned to each treatment group, 1% Chloroprocaine or 0.75% Bupivacaine. Study was paused from March 2020 to September 2020 due to the pandemic and was also paused December 2020 because the surgery center was closed and the pharmacy was unable to obtain the necessary medications from the manufacturer.

Participant flow — Overall Study
Milestone1% Chloroprocaine (PF)0.75% Bupivacaine
Started5555
Completed5451
Not completed14
Withdrew: Inability to place a spinal anesthesia due to the patients' anatomy14

Outcome measures

PrimaryRecovery Time

For this study Recovery time was defined as the time (in minutes) to return of both motor and sensory function, postoperatively. The return of motor function was tested by demonstrating mobility in both lower extremities including hips, knees, and lower legs using the Bromage scale. The return of sensory function was assessed using light touch and/or pinprick techniques on the dermatomes corresponding with the T8-S2 spinal cord segments. The duration in minutes when both sensory and motor function were re-established was documented and results were summarized by study arm using basic descriptive statistics. In this study it is hypothesized that use of 1% Chloroprocaine spinal anesthesia will reduce recovery times of patients undergoing anorectal procedures as compared to 0.75% bupivacaine spinal.

Time frame:
On post-operative day 1 (POD1), approximately every 15 minutes up to 24 hours
Reported as:
Mean · minutes
Recovery Time
minutes1% Chloroprocaine (PF)0.75% Bupivacaine
Recovery Time134.1 ± 8.6161.9 ± 10.3
PrimaryDischarge Time

For this study discharge time is defined as the time (in minutes) when the patient is "fit to discharge" from the Postoperative Care Unit (PACU). At the institution where this study took place "fit to discharge" was defined as the ability to void and the ability to ambulate unassisted for at least 10 feet. The duration of time when a patient was able to do both was documented. Results were summarized by study arm using basic descriptive statistics. It is hypothesized that the use of 1% Chloroprocaine spinal anesthesia will result in a clinically significant 30% reduction in discharge times of patients as compared to 0.75% bupivacaine spinal.

Time frame:
On post-operative day 1 (POD1), up to 24 hours
Reported as:
Mean · minutes
Discharge Time
minutes1% Chloroprocaine (PF)0.75% Bupivacaine
Discharge Time191.4 ± 6.6230.9 ± 9.4
SecondaryEvidence of Hypotension

Evidence of hypotension will be documented if systolic blood pressure (SBP) drops more than 20mmHg from baseline following spinal anesthesia. Hypotension is a common side effect of spinal anesthesia (SA). The number of participants with evidence of hypotension will be summarized by study arm.

Time frame:
On day of procedure, 0-5 minutes following administration of spinal anesthesia
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Evidence of Hypotension
Participants1% Chloroprocaine (PF)0.75% Bupivacaine
Evidence of Hypotension00
SecondaryEvidence of Transient Neurological Symptoms (TNS)

The number of participants demonstrating TNS approximately 24 hours following the procedure will be assessed. TNS will be defined as back pain or dysesthesia that radiated to the buttocks, thighs, hips, or calves and began within the first 24 hours after surgery. Localized pain or tenderness at the injection site or lower back without radiation will not be considered TNS. TNS is clinically important as it causes patient pain and discomfort and, in severe cases, may delay discharge or cause readmission. Symptoms will be summarized and reported by study arm.

Time frame:
On post-op day 2, approximately 24 hours post operation
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Evidence of Transient Neurological Symptoms (TNS)
Participants1% Chloroprocaine (PF)0.75% Bupivacaine
Evidence of Transient Neurological Symptoms (TNS)00

Adverse events

Collected over Up to 48 hours following procedure. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
1% Chloroprocaine (PF)0/54 (0%)0/54 (0%)0/54 (0%)
0.75% Bupivacaine0/51 (0%)0/51 (0%)0/51 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)1% Chloroprocaine (PF)0.75% BupivacaineTotal
Mean50.5 (45.0 to 58.0)48.0 (36.0 to 59.0)49.3 (40.6 to 58.5)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)1% Chloroprocaine (PF)0.75% BupivacaineTotal
Female192140
Male353065
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)1% Chloroprocaine (PF)0.75% BupivacaineTotal
Count of participants——0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)1% Chloroprocaine (PF)0.75% BupivacaineTotal
United States5451105
American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA-PS) Classification
American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA-PS) Classification(Participants)1% Chloroprocaine (PF)0.75% BupivacaineTotal
Class I044
Class II403777
Class III141024
Body Mass Index (BMI)
Body Mass Index (BMI)(kg/m^2)1% Chloroprocaine (PF)0.75% BupivacaineTotal
Mean29.1 (24.4 to 31.7)28.1 (24.4 to 32.3)28.6 (24.4 to 32.0)
Surgical Procedure
Surgical Procedure(Participants)1% Chloroprocaine (PF)0.75% BupivacaineTotal
Ablation242246
Anal Fissurectomy8513
Debridement6814
Exam Under Anesthesia8311
Hemorrhoidectomy71219
Other112
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Montefiore Medical Center
    Bronx, New York 10467, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Apfelbaum JL, Walawander CA, Grasela TH, Wise P, McLeskey C, Roizen MF, Wetchler BV, Korttila K. Eliminating intensive postoperative care in same-day surgery patients using short-acting anesthetics. Anesthesiology. 2002 Jul;97(1):66-74. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200207000-00010. PubMed 12131105 ↗
  • Liu SS, Strodtbeck WM, Richman JM, Wu CL. A comparison of regional versus general anesthesia for ambulatory anesthesia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Anesth Analg. 2005 Dec;101(6):1634-1642. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000180829.70036.4F. PubMed 16301234 ↗
  • Forster JG. Short-acting spinal anesthesia in the ambulatory setting. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2014 Dec;27(6):597-604. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000126. PubMed 25211156 ↗
  • Pollock JE. Transient neurologic symptoms: etiology, risk factors, and management. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2002 Nov-Dec;27(6):581-6. doi: 10.1053/rapm.2002.36457. No abstract available. PubMed 12430108 ↗
  • Fanelli A, Ghisi D, Allegri M. Is spinal anaesthesia a suitable technique for ultra-short outpatient procedures? Acta Biomed. 2013 Jun 1;84(1):76-80. PubMed 24189768 ↗
  • Smith KN, Kopacz DJ, McDonald SB. Spinal 2-chloroprocaine: a dose-ranging study and the effect of added epinephrine. Anesth Analg. 2004 Jan;98(1):81-88. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000093361.48458.6E. PubMed 14693591 ↗
  • Vath JS, Kopacz DJ. Spinal 2-chloroprocaine: the effect of added fentanyl. Anesth Analg. 2004 Jan;98(1):89-94. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000093360.02058.ED. PubMed 14693593 ↗
  • Kouri ME, Kopacz DJ. Spinal 2-chloroprocaine: a comparison with lidocaine in volunteers. Anesth Analg. 2004 Jan;98(1):75-80. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000093228.61443.EE. PubMed 14693590 ↗
  • Yoos JR, Kopacz DJ. Spinal 2-chloroprocaine for surgery: an initial 10-month experience. Anesth Analg. 2005 Feb;100(2):553-558. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000130397.38849.4A. PubMed 15673893 ↗
  • Hejtmanek MR, Pollock JE. Chloroprocaine for spinal anesthesia: a retrospective analysis. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2011 Mar;55(3):267-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2010.02371.x. PubMed 21288208 ↗
  • Pavlin DJ, Pavlin EG, Fitzgibbon DR, Koerschgen ME, Plitt TM. Management of bladder function after outpatient surgery. Anesthesiology. 1999 Jul;91(1):42-50. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199907000-00010. PubMed 10422927 ↗
  • Mulroy MF. Outpatients do not need to void after short neuraxial blocks. Anesthesiology. 2009 Dec;111(6):1388; author reply 1389. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181bfa8d3. No abstract available. PubMed 19934900 ↗
  • Lacasse MA, Roy JD, Forget J, Vandenbroucke F, Seal RF, Beaulieu D, McCormack M, Massicotte L. Comparison of bupivacaine and 2-chloroprocaine for spinal anesthesia for outpatient surgery: a double-blind randomized trial. Can J Anaesth. 2011 Apr;58(4):384-91. doi: 10.1007/s12630-010-9450-x. Epub 2011 Jan 4. PubMed 21203878 ↗
  • Teunkens A, Vermeulen K, Van Gerven E, Fieuws S, Van de Velde M, Rex S. Comparison of 2-Chloroprocaine, Bupivacaine, and Lidocaine for Spinal Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Knee Arthroscopy in an Outpatient Setting: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Sep-Oct;41(5):576-83. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000420. PubMed 27281722 ↗
  • Kim SW, Khandaker R, Muse IO, Pulverenti T, Goman M, Patel J, Yedlin A, Balikai CP, Levine R, Choice C, Montilla Medrano E. Comparison of 1% chloroprocaine hydrochloride versus hyperbaric bupivacaine spinal in patients undergoing anorectal surgery in an ambulatory surgery center: a double-blind randomized clinical trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2024 Dec 31:rapm-2024-106130. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2024-106130. Online ahead of print. PubMed 39740957 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 28, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03324984
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 30, 2017
Start date
Sep 11, 2019
Primary completion
Feb 1, 2023
Completion
Feb 1, 2023
Results posted
Feb 28, 2025
Last update
Feb 28, 2025

Study contacts

Elilary Montilla Medrano, MD
principal investigator · Montefiore Medicial Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Chloroprocaine

Start the discussion