ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03320512P3Updated Oct 25, 2022Results posted

P3 (Prepared, Protected, emPowered)

An interventional study of P3 and P3+ in Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Safe Sex and Adherence, Medication, sponsored by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Completed at 9 sites in United States. Open to male participants aged 16 Years to 24 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-10-25.

Sponsored by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
246
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
16 Years to 24 Years
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

P3 (Prepared, Protected, emPowered) is an interactive smartphone app for HIV-uninfected YMSM and YTW that utilizes social networking and game-based mechanics as well as a comprehensive understanding of what constitutes "best practices" in app development to improve PrEP adherence and persistence in PrEP care.

Read the detailed description

Sustainable, integrated PrEP adherence interventions are critically needed to reduce HIV incidence among YMSM and YTW. It is imperative that the investigators develop adherence interventions for YMSM and YTW initiating PrEP that are engaging, age-appropriate and take advantage of technologies that are already embedded in these individual's lives. A smartphone-delivered PrEP adherence intervention is well suited for this population, given they have a high-uptake and utilization of smartphone technology. The use of smartphones to deliver HIV prevention and care interventions has grown substantially in recent years due to: a) wide-scale adoption of smartphone technology among high-risk groups, b) the ability to deliver interventions in real-time within risk contexts, and c) low implementation costs.The accessibility, affordability, anonymity and acceptability of smartphones make them the intervention medium of choice for engaging youth and a logical platform to deliver an adherence intervention targeting PrEP. Further, smartphone interventions address can overcome issues that impede engagement with in-person interventions such as transportation logistics, stigma and confidentiality. Further youth, including YMSM and YTW are receptive to smartphone delivered interventions and these interventions can impact HIV related prevention behaviors.

P3 (Prepared, Protected, emPowered) is an interactive smartphone app for HIV-uninfected YMSM and YTW that utilizes social networking and game-based mechanics as well as a comprehensive understanding of what constitutes "best practices" in app development to improve PrEP adherence and persistence in PrEP care. Built on a successful, evidence-based platform designed and tested by our collaborating technology partner, Ayogo, P3 is flexible and responsive to changes in technology. This flexibility will also allow us to quickly respond to and modify our intervention to align with emerging PrEP practice standards and guidelines.

Despite the benefits of app-based interventions, maintaining engagement over time can be particularly challenging. Lack of rapport building may contribute to lower retention rates in technology-based interventions. Further, the available literature suggests that some tools, including technology based tools, may be more beneficial to patient adherence when combined with education or counseling. To investigate this possibility, the investigators will include a study arm (P3+) that includes P3 and adherence counseling delivered by a counselor through the P3 app.

This study has three phases, usability testing, field testing, and a randomized-controlled trial (RCT). In usability testing the investigators will test beta versions of the app and gain feedback about the intervention from the target population, identify any technical issues, and get feedback on app content. Field testing is to ensure that the features, platform and content of P3 and P3+ are acceptable to the target population and that there are no technical challenges or user concerns with either the app, the dried blood spot (DBS), hair, or mitra sampling collection.

The last phase is a three arm, RCT that will test the efficacy of P3, a novel, theory-based mobile app that utilizes game mechanics and social networking features to improve PrEP adherence, retention in PrEP clinical care, and PrEP persistence among young men who have sex with men (YMSM) and young trans women (YTW) who have sex with men, ages 16-24. The investigators will test the efficacy of P3 and P3+, which adds Next Step Counseling delivered by an adherence counselor through the app, against PrEP standard of care. Participants will be randomized to P3, P3+, or standard of care. A cost comparison between P3 and P3+ will be conducted.

02

Conditions studied

  • Sexually Transmitted Diseases
  • Safe Sex
  • Adherence, Medication

Keywords

  • PrEP
  • gamification
  • mHealth
  • HIV prevention
  • truvada
  • eHealth
  • app
  • adherence
  • ymsm
  • transgender women
03

In context

Sexually Transmitted Diseases

523 studies on the registry are indexed under Sexually Transmitted Diseases; 77 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 246 is below the median of 449 across 425 interventional studies indexed under Sexually Transmitted Diseases.

Browse Sexually Transmitted Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill is the lead sponsor of 1,372 studies on the registry; 133 are open to participants now.

Of its 161 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 139 (86%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
16 Years to 24 Years
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Are aged 16-24
  • Were assigned male sex at birth
  • Report sex with men or transgender women
  • Are able to speak and read English
  • Have reliable daily access to an Android or iOS smartphone with a data plan
  • Are -uninfected (self-report)
  • Are not currently on PrEP but plan to initiate in the next 7 days and have an active PrEP prescription (prescription confirmed by study staff) OR on PrEP have an active PrEP prescription (prescription confirmed by study staff)
  • Recruited from one of 9 subject recruitment venues (SRV) cities (Atlanta, Georgia; Boston, Massachusetts; Bronx, New York; Chicago, Illinois; Houston, Texas; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Tampa, Florida; Chapel Hill, NC; Charlotte, NC)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Aged younger than 15 years or older than 24 years
  • Not available to meet with project staff for planned study visit(s)
  • Non-English speaking
  • Living with
  • Not currently prescribed PrEP (study staff unable to verify participant has an active PrEP prescription by a health provider)
  • Anticipate not having reliable access to a smartphone with a data plan for 2 or more days during field testing or 1 or more weeks during the RCT intervention period
  • Planning to move out of study area during the study period
  • Unwilling or unable to comply with protocol requirements.
  • Participated in field trial phase of P3 study
  • Unable to be consented due to active substance use or psychological condition.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Factorial assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
246 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    P3

    Participants will use P3

    Behavioral: P3

  • Experimental
    P3+

    Participants will use P3+

    Behavioral: P3+

  • Placebo comparator
    Control

    Participants will receive the standard of care

    Behavioral: Control

Interventions

  • BehavioralP3

    P3 is an interactive smartphone app that utilizes social networking and game-based mechanics to improve PrEP adherence and persistence in PrEP care. The participant will install P3 on their phone, receive a guided tour of the app and a reminder card with the research coordinator's phone number and email address and instructed to contact the research coordinator immediately to report difficulties with any app components or to report any problems with their phone or phone service. A help link is embedded within the app that directly links to study staff if assistance is needed. P3 arm participants will have 24-hour access to all features of P3.

    Also known as: Prepared, Protected, emPowered

  • BehavioralP3+

    In P3+, participants receive all of P3 and the ability to text in the app with an adherence counselor, using Next Step Counseling (NSC). NSC is an interactive, client-centered motivational intervention to improve PrEP adherence. Key components of NSC include: review experiences with adherence, exploration of adherence facilitators and barriers, identification of adherence needs, identification of strategies to meet needs, and development of an adherence action plan. Participants will install P3+ on their phone. The adherence counselor feature will be unlocked for those in the P3+ arm. P3+ participants will have 24-hour access to all features of P3+.

  • BehavioralControl

    Control participants will receive the standard of care for receiving a prescription for PrEP.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. PrEP Adherence Defined by Tenofovir Diphosphate (P3 and P3+ vs Control)

    PrEP adherence is measured by blood sample levels of tenofovir diphosphate (TFV-DP) with blood concentration consistent with \> 4 doses/week at 3- and 6- month follow-ups. The estimation of the average treatment effect compared P3 and P3+ combined to Control.

    Time frame: Month 3, Month 6

  2. PrEP Adherence Defined by Emtricitabine Triphosphate (P3 and P3+ vs Control)

    PrEP adherence is measured by blood sample levels of emtricitabine triphosphate (FTC-TP) with blood concentration consistent with \> 4 doses/week at 3- and 6- month follow-ups. The estimation of the average treatment effect compared P3 and P3+ combined to Control.

    Time frame: Month 3, Month 6

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Self-reported Retention in PrEP Clinical Care

    The investigators define "retention in care" as at least 1 PrEP clinical visit occurring in the last 3 months.

    Time frame: Month 3, Month 6

  2. PrEP Persistence

    PrEP persistence will be measured by self-report at follow up of current PrEP use.

    Time frame: Month 3, Month 6

  3. Insertive Condomless Anal Sex

    Sexual Practices were assessed by self-reported number of insertive condomless anal sex occurrences during the past 3 months. This question is asked at the 3- and 6-month follow-up surveys.

    Time frame: Month 3, Month 6

  4. Receptive Condomless Anal Sex

    Sexual Practices were assessed by self-reported number of receptive condomless anal sex occurrences during the past 3 months. This question is asked at the 3- and 6-month follow-up surveys.

    Time frame: Month 3, Month 6

  5. Sexually Transmitted Infections (STI) Incidence

    Self-reported STIs (combined rectal and urethral gonorrhea and chlamydia, syphilis) in last 3 months. This question is asked at the 3- and 6-month follow-up surveys.

    Time frame: Month 3, Month 6

  6. PrEP Adherence Defined by Tenofovir Diphosphate (P3 vs Control and P3+ vs Control)

    PrEP adherence is measured by blood sample levels of tenofovir diphosphate (TFV-DP) with blood concentration consistent with \> 4 doses/week at 3- and 6- month follow-ups. The estimation of the average treatment effect compared P3 to Control and also P3+ to Control.

    Time frame: Month 3, Month 6

  7. PrEP Adherence Defined by Emtricitabine Triphosphate (P3 vs Control and P3+ vs Control)

    PrEP adherence is measured by blood sample levels of emtricitabine triphosphate (FTC-TP) with blood concentration consistent with \> 4 doses/week at 3- and 6- month follow-ups. The estimation of the average treatment effect compared P3 to Control and also P3+ to Control.

    Time frame: Month 3, Month 6

  8. Self-Reported Weekly PrEP Use

    Number of participants reported taking their PrEP medication \>/= 4 days in the past week.

    Time frame: Month 3, Month 6

  9. Self-Reported Monthly PrEP Use

    Median self-reported percent of time in the past month that participants' took their PrEP as prescribed.

    Time frame: Month 3, Month 6

  10. Mean Site-Level Intervention Cost

    Information was collected on (1) time spent by study staff for training and supervision of adherence counselor(s); (2) time participants spent in the adherence counseling sessions; and (3) costs associated with the delivery of both P3 and P3+. Resources were organized into standard expenditure categories and attributed to the corresponding P3 or P3+ arm and study site as appropriate.

    Time frame: Throughout the duration of the study, approximately 1.5 years

07

Results

Posted Sep 19, 2022
Limitations and caveats
Despite the sample including about a quarter Black (20.7%) and another quarter Hispanic or Latinx (28.9%) participants, a majority of the sample was White (55.7%). And while the study was conducted across nine U.S. cities (Atlanta, Boston, Chicago, Chapel Hill, Charlotte, Houston, New York, Philadelphia, and Tampa) the results may not be generalizable to entire populations of young men who have sex with men (YMSM) and young transgender women who have sex with men (YTWSM).

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneP3 ApplicationP3+ ApplicationControl
Started828183
Month 3 survey started697271
Month 3 survey completed697268
Month 3 lab sample collected515451
Month 6 survey started677269
Month 6 survey completed657168
Month 6 lab sample collected535951
Completed828183
Not completed000

Outcome measures

PrimaryPrEP Adherence Defined by Tenofovir Diphosphate (P3 and P3+ vs Control)

PrEP adherence is measured by blood sample levels of tenofovir diphosphate (TFV-DP) with blood concentration consistent with \> 4 doses/week at 3- and 6- month follow-ups. The estimation of the average treatment effect compared P3 and P3+ combined to Control.

Time frame:
Month 3, Month 6
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
PrEP Adherence Defined by Tenofovir Diphosphate (P3 and P3+ vs Control)
ParticipantsP3 ApplicationP3+ ApplicationControl
Month 3243323
Month 6182520
Statistical analysis
  • P3 Application vs P3+ Application vs Control · TMLE estimation of ATE and Wald test · p = 0.04965 · Average treatment effect: 0.15 · 95% CI 0.00 to 0.29Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation (TMLE) Average Treatment Effect (ATE)
  • P3 Application vs P3+ Application vs Control · TMLE estimation of ATE and Wald test · p = 0.62 · Average treatment effect: -0.04 · 95% CI -0.21 to 0.13
PrimaryPrEP Adherence Defined by Emtricitabine Triphosphate (P3 and P3+ vs Control)

PrEP adherence is measured by blood sample levels of emtricitabine triphosphate (FTC-TP) with blood concentration consistent with \> 4 doses/week at 3- and 6- month follow-ups. The estimation of the average treatment effect compared P3 and P3+ combined to Control.

Time frame:
Month 3, Month 6
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
PrEP Adherence Defined by Emtricitabine Triphosphate (P3 and P3+ vs Control)
ParticipantsP3 ApplicationP3+ ApplicationControl
Month 3363829
Month 6313124
Statistical analysis
  • P3 Application vs P3+ Application vs Control · TMLE estimation of ATE and Wald test · p = 0.11 · Average treatment effect: 0.12 · 95% CI -0.03 to 0.26
  • P3 Application vs P3+ Application vs Control · TMLE estimation of ATE and Wald test · p = 0.38 · Average treatment effect: 0.06 · 95% CI -0.08 to 0.21
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Self-reported Retention in PrEP Clinical Care

The investigators define "retention in care" as at least 1 PrEP clinical visit occurring in the last 3 months.

Time frame:
Month 3, Month 6
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Self-reported Retention in PrEP Clinical Care
ParticipantsP3 ApplicationP3+ ApplicationControl
Month 3384338
Month 6323425
Statistical analysis
  • P3 Application vs P3+ Application vs Control · TMLE estimation of ATE and Wald test · p = 0.68 (P-values adjusted using the Benjamini Hochberg procedure.) · Average treatment effect: 0.04 · 95% CI -0.09 to 0.16
  • P3 Application vs P3+ Application vs Control · TMLE estimation of ATE and Wald test · p = 0.53 (P-values adjusted using the Benjamini Hochberg procedure.) · Average treatment effect: 0.11 · 95% CI -0.03 to 0.25
SecondaryPrEP Persistence

PrEP persistence will be measured by self-report at follow up of current PrEP use.

Time frame:
Month 3, Month 6
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
PrEP Persistence
ParticipantsP3 ApplicationP3+ ApplicationControl
Month 3666459
Month 6524952
Statistical analysis
  • P3 Application vs P3+ Application vs Control · TMLE estimation of ATE and Wald test · p = 0.53 (P-values adjusted using the Benjamini Hochberg procedure.) · Average treatment effect: 0.06 · 95% CI -0.02 to 0.15
  • P3 Application vs P3+ Application vs Control · TMLE estimation of ATE and Wald test · p = 0.96 (P-values adjusted using the Benjamini Hochberg procedure.) · Average treatment effect: 0 · 95% CI -0.12 to 0.12
SecondaryInsertive Condomless Anal Sex

Sexual Practices were assessed by self-reported number of insertive condomless anal sex occurrences during the past 3 months. This question is asked at the 3- and 6-month follow-up surveys.

Time frame:
Month 3, Month 6
Reported as:
Median · sex acts
Insertive Condomless Anal Sex
sex actsP3 ApplicationP3+ ApplicationControl
Month 31 (0 to 2)0 (0 to 2)0 (0 to 2)
Month 60 (0 to 2)0 (0 to 1)0 (0 to 1)
Statistical analysis
  • P3 Application vs P3+ Application vs Control · TMLE estimation of ATE and Wald test · p = 0.93 (P-values adjusted using the Benjamini Hochberg procedure.) · Average treatment effect: 0.08 · 95% CI -0.84 to 1.00
  • P3 Application vs P3+ Application vs Control · TMLE estimation of ATE and Wald test · p = 0.60 (P-values adjusted using the Benjamini Hochberg procedure.) · Average treatment effect: -1.12 · 95% CI -4.16 to 1.91
SecondaryReceptive Condomless Anal Sex

Sexual Practices were assessed by self-reported number of receptive condomless anal sex occurrences during the past 3 months. This question is asked at the 3- and 6-month follow-up surveys.

Time frame:
Month 3, Month 6
Reported as:
Median · sex acts
Receptive Condomless Anal Sex
sex actsP3 ApplicationP3+ ApplicationControl
Month 31 (0 to 3)0 (0 to 2)1 (0 to 3)
Month 61 (0 to 3)0 (0 to 1)0 (0 to 2)
Statistical analysis
  • P3 Application vs P3+ Application vs Control · TMLE estimation of ATE and Wald test · p = 0.60 (P-values adjusted using the Benjamini Hochberg procedure.) · Average treatment effect: 0.73 · 95% CI -1.03 to 2.48
  • P3 Application vs P3+ Application vs Control · TMLE estimation of ATE and Wald test · p = 0.60 (P-values adjusted using the Benjamini Hochberg procedure.) · Average treatment effect: -0.91 · 95% CI -2.86 to 1.04
SecondarySexually Transmitted Infections (STI) Incidence

Self-reported STIs (combined rectal and urethral gonorrhea and chlamydia, syphilis) in last 3 months. This question is asked at the 3- and 6-month follow-up surveys.

Time frame:
Month 3, Month 6
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Sexually Transmitted Infections (STI) Incidence
ParticipantsP3 ApplicationP3+ ApplicationControl
Month 3 Gonorrhea121414
Month 6 Gonorrhea11610
Month 3 Chlamydia111417
Month 6 Chlamydia11812
Month 3 Syphilis9812
Month 6 Syphilis1139
Statistical analysis
  • P3 Application vs P3+ Application vs Control · TMLE estimation of ATE and Wald test · p = 0.60 (P-values adjusted using the Benjamini Hochberg procedure.) · Average treatment effect: -0.06 · 95% CI -0.20 to 0.08
  • P3 Application vs P3+ Application vs Control · TMLE estimation of ATE and Wald test · p = 0.60 (P-values adjusted using the Benjamini Hochberg procedure.) · Average treatment effect: -0.06 · 95% CI -0.21 to 0.09
  • P3 Application vs P3+ Application vs Control · TMLE estimation of ATE and Wald test · p = 0.53 (P-values adjusted using the Benjamini Hochberg procedure.) · Average treatment effect: -0.13 · 95% CI -0.30 to 0.03
  • P3 Application vs P3+ Application vs Control · TMLE estimation of ATE and Wald test · p = 0.60 (P-values adjusted using the Benjamini Hochberg procedure.) · Average treatment effect: -0.08 · 95% CI -0.24 to 0.08
  • P3 Application vs P3+ Application vs Control · TMLE estimation of ATE and Wald test · p = 0.53 (P-values adjusted using the Benjamini Hochberg procedure.) · Average treatment effect: -0.11 · 95% CI -0.25 to 0.04
  • P3 Application vs P3+ Application vs Control · TMLE estimation of ATE and Wald test · p = 0.60 (P-values adjusted using the Benjamini Hochberg procedure.) · Average treatment effect: -0.07 · 95% CI -0.20 to 0.07
SecondaryPrEP Adherence Defined by Tenofovir Diphosphate (P3 vs Control and P3+ vs Control)

PrEP adherence is measured by blood sample levels of tenofovir diphosphate (TFV-DP) with blood concentration consistent with \> 4 doses/week at 3- and 6- month follow-ups. The estimation of the average treatment effect compared P3 to Control and also P3+ to Control.

Time frame:
Month 3, Month 6
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
PrEP Adherence Defined by Tenofovir Diphosphate (P3 vs Control and P3+ vs Control)
ParticipantsP3 ApplicationP3+ ApplicationControl
Month 3243323
Month 6182520
Statistical analysis
  • P3 Application vs Control · Average treatment effect: 0.11 · 95% CI -0.07 to 0.29TMLE estimation of ATE and Wald Confidence Interval
  • P3+ Application vs Control · Average treatment effect: 0.19 · 95% CI 0.03 to 0.34TMLE estimation of ATE and Wald Confidence Interval
  • P3 Application vs Control · Average treatment effect: -0.06 · 95% CI -0.27 to 0.15TMLE estimation of ATE and Wald Confidence Interval
  • P3+ Application vs Control · Average treatment effect: -0.02 · 95% CI -0.21 to 0.16TMLE estimation of ATE and Wald Confidence Interval
SecondaryPrEP Adherence Defined by Emtricitabine Triphosphate (P3 vs Control and P3+ vs Control)

PrEP adherence is measured by blood sample levels of emtricitabine triphosphate (FTC-TP) with blood concentration consistent with \> 4 doses/week at 3- and 6- month follow-ups. The estimation of the average treatment effect compared P3 to Control and also P3+ to Control.

Time frame:
Month 3, Month 6
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
PrEP Adherence Defined by Emtricitabine Triphosphate (P3 vs Control and P3+ vs Control)
ParticipantsP3 ApplicationP3+ ApplicationControl
Month 3363829
Month 6313124
Statistical analysis
  • P3 Application vs Control · Average treatment effect: 0.11 · 95% CI -0.05 to 0.26TMLE estimation of ATE and Wald Confidence Interval
  • P3+ Application vs Control · Average treatment effect: 0.13 · 95% CI -0.04 to 0.29TMLE estimation of ATE and Wald Confidence Interval
  • P3 Application vs Control · Average treatment effect: 0.09 · 95% CI -0.08 to 0.26TMLE estimation of ATE and Wald Confidence Interval
  • P3+ Application vs Control · Average treatment effect: 0.03 · 95% CI -0.13 to 0.19TMLE estimation of ATE and Wald Confidence Interval
SecondarySelf-Reported Weekly PrEP Use

Number of participants reported taking their PrEP medication \>/= 4 days in the past week.

Time frame:
Month 3, Month 6
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Self-Reported Weekly PrEP Use
ParticipantsP3 ApplicationP3+ ApplicationControl
Month 3585951
Month 6494847
Statistical analysis
  • P3 Application vs P3+ Application vs Control · TMLE estimation of ATE and Wald test · p = 0.11 · Average treatment effect: 0.09 · 95% CI -0.02 to 0.19
  • P3 Application vs P3+ Application vs Control · TMLE estimation of ATE and Wald test · p = 0.82 · Average treatment effect: -0.01 · 95% CI -0.14 to 0.11
SecondarySelf-Reported Monthly PrEP Use

Median self-reported percent of time in the past month that participants' took their PrEP as prescribed.

Time frame:
Month 3, Month 6
Reported as:
Median · percentage of time compliant
Self-Reported Monthly PrEP Use
percentage of time compliantP3 ApplicationP3+ ApplicationControl
Month 3100 (80 to 100)100 (90 to 100)90 (72.5 to 100)
Month 690 (50 to 100)90 (25 to 100)90 (67.5 to 100)
Statistical analysis
  • P3 Application vs P3+ Application vs Control · TMLE estimation of ATE and Wald test · p = 0.05 (The a priori threshold for statistical significance is 0.025.) · Average treatment effect: 8.95 · 95% CI 0.07 to 17.83
  • P3 Application vs P3+ Application vs Control · TMLE estimation of ATE and Wald test · p = 0.45 · Average treatment effect: -3.69 · 95% CI -13.33 to 5.95
SecondaryMean Site-Level Intervention Cost

Information was collected on (1) time spent by study staff for training and supervision of adherence counselor(s); (2) time participants spent in the adherence counseling sessions; and (3) costs associated with the delivery of both P3 and P3+. Resources were organized into standard expenditure categories and attributed to the corresponding P3 or P3+ arm and study site as appropriate.

Time frame:
Throughout the duration of the study, approximately 1.5 years
Reported as:
Mean · average cost per participant in USD
Mean Site-Level Intervention Cost
average cost per participant in USDP3 ApplicationP3+ ApplicationControl
Mean Site-Level Intervention Cost551.88 ± 160.43673.52 ± 161.06—
Statistical analysis
  • P3 Application vs P3+ Application · Incremental cost effectiveness ratio: 25.79 · 95% CI -194.05 to 236.81The confidence interval was created using percentile bootstrap.

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse events were collected from the signing of the Informed consent by each participant until the end of the study, a duration of up to 6 months.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
P3 Application0/82 (0%)0/82 (0%)0/82 (0%)
P3+ Application0/81 (0%)0/81 (0%)0/81 (0%)
Control0/83 (0%)0/83 (0%)0/83 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)P3 ApplicationP3+ ApplicationControlTotal
Median22 (20 to 23)22 (20 to 23)22 (21 to 23)22 (20 to 23)
Sex/Gender, Customized
Sex/Gender, Customized(Participants)P3 ApplicationP3+ ApplicationControlTotal
Male717174216
Trans female, trans woman, or transfeminine0325
Genderqueer, gender non-conforming, or non-binary3249
Multiple genders reported83314
Declined to answer0202
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)P3 ApplicationP3+ ApplicationControlTotal
Female0000
Male828183246
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)P3 ApplicationP3+ ApplicationControlTotal
Hispanic or Latino26182771
Not Hispanic or Latino566356175
Unknown or Not Reported0000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)P3 ApplicationP3+ ApplicationControlTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native1113
Asian75416
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0000
Black or African American16191651
White494642137
More than one race34916
Unknown or Not Reported661123
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)P3 ApplicationP3+ ApplicationControlTotal
United States828183246
08

Study locations

9 sites
  • University of South Florida Infectious Diseases
    Tampa, Florida 33606, United States
  • PRISM Health
    Atlanta, Georgia 30322, United States
  • The Adolescent and Young Adult Research (AYAR) at the CORE Center
    Chicago, Illinois 60612, United States
  • The Fenway Institute
    Boston, Massachusetts 02215, United States
  • Children's Hospital at Montefiore
    Bronx, New York 10467, United States
  • UNC-Chapel Hill
    Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, United States
  • RAIN
    Charlotte, North Carolina 29202, United States
  • Adolescent Initiative at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States
  • Texas Children's Hospital
    Houston, Texas 77030, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Budhwani H, Yigit I, Maragh-Bass AC, Rainer CB, Claude K, Muessig KE, Hightow-Weidman LB. Validation of HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Medication Scales with Youth on PrEP: PrEP Confidence Scale and PrEP Difficulties Scale. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2022 Nov;36(11):443-450. doi: 10.1089/apc.2022.0072. Epub 2022 Oct 27. PubMed 36306520 ↗
  • LeGrand S, Knudtson K, Benkeser D, Muessig K, Mcgee A, Sullivan PS, Hightow-Weidman L. Testing the Efficacy of a Social Networking Gamification App to Improve Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Adherence (P3: Prepared, Protected, emPowered): Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2018 Dec 18;7(12):e10448. doi: 10.2196/10448. PubMed 30563818 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from May 2019 to primary completion in Sep 2021, 28 months.

Results were first posted in Sep 2022, 1 year after primary completion.

Of 172 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Sexually Transmitted Diseases, half reached primary completion within 32 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 17 and three quarters within 47. This study's 28 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 182 studies reached it within 31 months; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 46.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 3, 2017
First posted
Oct 25, 2017
StartActual
May 15, 2019
Primary completionActual
Sep 16, 2021
CompletionActual
Sep 16, 2021
Results first posted
Sep 19, 2022
Last update
Oct 25, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 25, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03320512
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 25, 2017
Start date
May 15, 2019
Primary completion
Sep 16, 2021
Completion
Sep 16, 2021
Results posted
Sep 19, 2022
Last update
Oct 25, 2022

Study contacts

Lisa Hightow-Weidman, MD
principal investigator · UNC Chapel Hill

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion