ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03315741STOP-BOSUpdated Jun 13, 2022

The Safety and Tolerability of Pirfenidone for BOS After HCT

A Phase 1 interventional study of Pirfenidone 267 MG [Esbriet] in Bronchiolitis Obliterans and Graft Vs Host Disease, sponsored by Stanford University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-06-13.

Primary conditionBronchiolitis Obliterans SyndromeRegistry: Bronchiolitis ObliteransReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Bronchiolitis Obliterans — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome
Why
  1. The study's title name Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome, a narrower term within Bronchiolitis Obliterans.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own title. Of 46 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 72% were exactly right and 89% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 4% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by Stanford University · Phase 1, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was Feb 2022, 4 years 8 months ago, and no results have been posted to the registry.
Phase
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a phase 1, non-randomized, single-arm, open label, single center clinical trial to determine the tolerability and safety of pirfenidone in patients with BOS associated with lung GVHD after hematopoietic cell transplant.

Read the detailed description

This is a phase 1, non-randomized, single-arm, open label, single center clinical trial to determine the tolerability and safety of pirfenidone in patients with BOS associated with lung GVHD after hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT). Such a trial is a necessary step prior to an evaluation of efficacy, as pirfenidone is known to be associated with adverse events (AEs) of the liver, gastrointestinal system and skin, organs frequently affected in GVHD. Approximately 30 patients will be enrolled, all patients will follow the same drug titration approach. The primary endpoint will be drug tolerability as measured by: the number of patients that are able to maintain the recommended dose of pirfenidone (2403 mg/d) without dose reduction lasting more than 21 days, due to adverse events (AEs). Changes from Baseline to Week 52 will be studied using validated health-related quality of life scales. Eligible patients aged > 18 years must have a diagnosis of BOS according to pre-specified criteria. Patients will be required to have an %FEV1 or %FVC decline >20% from pre-transplant baseline and symptoms of dyspnea, or cough. Eligible patients will enter the Screening Period, which may last up to 28 days. The dose of pirfenidone will be titrated over 3-8 weeks. Patients will have a telephone assessment at Week 1 and 2. An in-clinic assessment will occur every 1-3 months as part of their usual clinical care in the Stanford University Lung GVHD clinic. Patients will complete an AE and dosing compliance diary. If patients discontinue study treatment early for any reason, they will continue with all scheduled study procedures through Week 52. All deaths will be reviewed by a Mortality Assessment Committee (MAC). An external Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) will monitor patient safety during the study.

02

Conditions studied

  • Bronchiolitis Obliterans
  • Graft Vs Host Disease

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome
03

In context

Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome Reclassified

714 studies on the registry are indexed under Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome; 128 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 30 is below the median of 50 across 565 interventional studies indexed under Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome.

Browse Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

Stanford University is the lead sponsor of 2,168 studies on the registry; 431 are open to participants now.

Of its 267 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 207 (78%) have results posted.

Compared within Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Bronchiolitis Obliterans. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age > 18 years at randomization
  2. Clinical symptoms (e.g., dyspnea or cough) consistent with BOS of ≥ 2 months duration
  3. Presence of cGVHD in an organ other than lung
  4. Subjects must have had recent pulmonary function test (PFTs) measured for at least 3 months prior to study enrollment that show:

    1. A decrease in %FVC and/or % ≥ 20% at Screening compared with pre-transplant baseline.
    2. Bronchodilator response on PFT testing that results in an FEV1 \< 75%
  5. Diagnosis of BOS by one of the following criteria:

    1. Transbronchial or surgical lung demonstrating the obliterative bronchiolitis lesion
    2. Volumetric CT scan with lung density analysis with ≥ 28% air trapping (1).
    3. NIH-based PFT criteria for the diagnosis of BOS: FEV1/FVC \<0.7 and FEV1 \< 75%
    4. Evidence of clinical improvement after treatment for BOS has been initiated.
  6. No features supporting an alternative diagnosis by transbronchial biopsy, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), surgical lung biopsy, culture and non-culture based data, if performed
  7. Adequate organ and marrow function including: liver function as defined by a total below the (ULN), excluding patients with Gilbert's syndrome; /SGOT or ALT/SGPT \< 3 x ULN; alkaline phosphatase \< 2.5 x ULN; renal function as defined by a > 30 mL/min, calculated using the Cockcroft-Gault formula; cardiac electrophysiologic stability as defined by an (ECG) with a \< 500 msec at Screening; and bone marrow function as defined by a white blood cell count > 3 K/µL, an > 15 K/µL and a count > 20 K/µL
  8. > 6 months
  9. Participants must be able to understand and sign a written form and understand the importance of adherence to study treatment and protocol. In addition, participants must demonstrate a willingness to follow all study requirements, including the concomitant medication restrictions, throughout the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Any condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, might be significantly exacerbated by the known side effects associated with the administration of pirfenidone e.g., presence of active of the gastrointestinal tract as manifested by rising liver function tests (LFTs) prior to initiation of study treatment
  2. Uncontrolled infection
  3. Major surgery within the past 2 months
  4. The use of another drug within the previous 30 days.
  5. Inability to attend scheduled clinic visits
  6. Inability to perform pulmonary function testing
  7. Significant clinical change in health in the past 30 days
  8. (BMI) \< 17.5
  9. \< 6 months due to any condition other than BOS that, in the opinion of the investigator, is likely to result in the death of the patient.
  10. History of unstable or deteriorating cardiac or pulmonary disease (other than BOS) within the previous 6 months, including but not limited to the following:

    1. Unstable angina pectoris or myocardial infarction
    2. Congestive heart failure requiring hospitalization
    3. Uncontrolled arrhythmias
  11. Pregnancy or lactation.
  12. Family or personal history of long syndrome
  13. Investigational therapy, defined as any drug that has not been approved for marketing for any indication in cGVHD will be restricted from the study
  14. The following medications may significantly increase the level of Pirfenidone and should not be taken concurrently including: fluvoxamine, ciprofloxacin > 500mg twice daily, systemically administered aminolevulinic acid, vemurafenib and enoxacin. Any other strong inhibitors of P450 isoenzymes CYP1A2, CYP2C9, 2C19, 2D6, and 2E1 should be avoided. Participants that cannot take alternative medications to those listed above will be excluded from this study.

Laboratory Exclusions

  1. Any of the following LFT criteria above specified limits: total above the (ULN), excluding patients with Gilbert's syndrome; aspartate or (AST/SGOT or ALT/SGPT) >3 × ULN; alkaline phosphatase >2.5 × ULN
  2. (CrCl) \<30 mL/min, calculated using the Cockcroft-Gault formula
  3. (ECG) with a QTc interval >500 msec at Screening

Medication Exclusions

  1. Prior use of pirfenidone or known to any of the components of study treatment.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(17)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

FEV1

From a breathing test (spirometry): how much air you can blow out in the first second. Often given as a percentage of what is expected for your age, height and sex.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

Bilirubin

A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.

Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

Creatinine clearance (CrCl)

How quickly the kidneys clear creatinine, a waste product, from the blood. A study may estimate it from a blood test with age, weight and sex (often by the Cockcroft–Gault formula), or measure it using blood and urine collected over a set time. Given in mL/min; higher is better.

ECG (electrocardiogram)

A recording of the heart’s electrical activity, taken with stickers on the chest, arms and legs. It takes a few minutes and does not hurt.

QT and QTc

On an ECG, the QT interval is the time the heart’s lower chambers take to activate electrically and recover in each beat. QTc is that time adjusted for heart rate (QTcF by Fridericia’s formula, QTcB by Bazett’s). Some medicines lengthen it, and a long QTc can raise the risk of a dangerous heart rhythm.

The study may name a correction formula and a limit in milliseconds, often around 450–480.

Absolute neutrophil count (ANC)

The number of neutrophils, white blood cells that help fight infection, in a given amount of blood. Too few raises the risk of infection.

It is a count, not a percentage of the white cells. Limits are written in units that mean the same: ≥ 1.5 × 10⁹/L is ≥ 1,500 per mm³ (µL). Each lab has its own reference range.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

GVHD (graft-versus-host disease)

After a transplant from a donor, the donor’s immune cells attack the recipient’s body, often the skin, gut or liver.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
30 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Patient centered approach

    Drug titration of maximum dose over 3-8 weeks

    Drug: Pirfenidone 267 MG [Esbriet]

Interventions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The number of participants that do not require a reduction in drug dose for more than 21 days due to adverse events.

    We will count the number of participants that do not require a reduction in drug dose of more than 21, non-continuous days due to adverse events. Tolerability will be assessed during continuous treatment. If the medication dosage increase results in the reoccurrence of a moderate adverse event or serious adverse event, lasting more than 21 days, then the event would be defined as "not tolerated". If adverse events resolve before 21 days, then participants will attempt to again up-titrate the Pirfenidone dose, as tolerated. If at least 25% of participants tolerate the drug, then investigators will deem that this study demonstrates adequate tolerability to proceed to a larger trial to examine drug efficacy.

    Time frame: 52 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. The number of participants that permanently discontinue drug due to adverse events.

    We will count the number of patients that permanently discontinue Pirfenidone due to adverse events. A permanent discontinuation of drug is defined as discontinuation of the drug for more than 42 days.

    Time frame: 52 weeks

  2. The number of participants that temporarily discontinue drug due to adverse events.

    We will count the number of participants that temporarily discontinue Pirfenidone due to adverse events. A temporary discontinuation of drug is defined as discontinuation of the drug for less than or equal to 42 days.

    Time frame: 52 week

  3. The number of patients that experience treatment-emergent adverse events

    Treatment emergent events are defined as those that start or worsen after the start of study treatment and up to 28 days after the last dose of study treatment. AEs will be summarized by treatment group, system organ class, and preferred term, and also by the event's relationship to study treatment. At each level of summation, patients will be counted only once, under the greatest severity and strongest study-drug relationship (as reported by the investigator).

    Time frame: 56 week

  4. The number of patients that experience treatment-emergent serious adverse events (SAEs)

    Serious adverse events (SAEs) are defined as those that result in: (i) death or are life threatening; (ii) result in hospitalization or prolong hospitalization; or (iii) result in disability (disruption of the participant's ability to conduct normal daily activities). Serious adverse events will be summarized by treatment group, system organ class, and preferred term, and also by the event's relationship to study treatment. At each level of summation, patients will be counted only once, under the greatest severity and strongest study-drug relationship (as reported by the investigator).

    Time frame: 56 week

  5. The number of patients that experience treatment-emergent deaths during the study period and for 28 days after the last dose of study treatment.

    Treatment emergent deaths are defined as those that occur after the start of study treatment and up to 28 days after the last dose of study treatment and are deemed by the investigator to be related to study treatment.

    Time frame: 56 week

  6. All-cause mortality

    We will count the total number of deaths during the study period and for 28 days after the last dose of study treatment

    Time frame: 56 week

  7. The number of patients that experience treatment-emergent changes in complete blood counts.

    The complete blood count measures the number white blood cells (WBCs) per liter (L) including differential counts of the type of WBCs, hemoglobin concentration (g/dL), and platelet count per liter.

    Time frame: 52 week

  8. The number of patients that experience treatment-emergent changes in liver function testing.

    We will assess treatment related changes in total bilirubin (mg/dL), AST/SGOT (units/L) or ALT/SGPT (units/L), alkaline phosphatase (units/L)

    Time frame: 52 week

  9. The number of patients that experience treatment-emergent changes in serum chemistries panel.

    We will assess treatment related changes in potassium (mEq/L), blood urea nitrogen (mg/dL) and serum creatinine (mg/dL).

    Time frame: 52 week

  10. The number of patients that experience treatment-emergent changes in the corrected QT-interval on electrocardiogram.

    We will evaluate changes in the interval from ventricular depolarization (Q-wave) to ventricular repolarization (T-wave) corrected for by heart rate

    Time frame: 52 week

  11. Body mass index

    We will measure changes in the participant's height (meters) and weight (kg) to determine changes in body mass index (kg/m\^2)

    Time frame: 52 week

  12. Oxygen saturation

    We will measure the participant's oxygen saturation (%) at rest on room air.

    Time frame: 52 week

  13. Heart rate

    We will measure the participant's resting heart rate (beats per minute)

    Time frame: 52 week

  14. Chronic GVHD assessment

    Chronic GVHD symptoms will be assessed according to NIH cGVHD global severity score. The global cGVHD severity score evaluates the severity of cGVHD in eight sites including the skin, mouth, eyes, gastrointestinal track, liver, lungs, joints and fascia, and genital track. Each organ is assigned a severity score and composite scores are calculated based on the number of organs involved and the severity score within each affected organ.

    Time frame: 56 week

Other outcomes

  1. Pulmonary function testing: spirometric change from baseline to week 52.

    We will measure the participant's Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1: L, % predicted), and Forced Vital Capacity (FVC: L, % predicted)

    Time frame: 52 week

  2. Pulmonary function testing: diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) change from baseline to week 52.

    We will measure DLCO (ml/min/mmHg)

    Time frame: 52 week

  3. Change from Baseline to Week 52 in % air trapping as measured by volumetric CT thorax with lung density analysis

    We will use lung density analysis to radiographically quantify the percent air trapping between an inspiratory and expiratory CT scan.

    Time frame: 52 week

  4. BOS-related mortality

    We will count the number of participant deaths that are attributable to BOS.

    Time frame: 52 week

  5. Change from Baseline to Week 24 and 52 in dyspnea, as measured by the University of California at San Diego Shortness-of-Breath Questionnaire (UCSD SOBQ) score

    Changes in dyspnea, as measured by UCSD SOBQ score, from Baseline to Week 26 and 52 will be analyzed using the same methods described in Section 5.4.2.1. Baseline UCSD SOBQ score will be the average of the measurements recorded at the Screening and Day 1 visits. The UCSD SOBQ score will be repeated at Week 26 and 52. The magnitude of the treatment effect of pirfenidone will be presented as the distribution (number and percentage) of patients across two categories of change from Baseline: * Increase of ≥ 25 points in the UCSD SOBQ score at Week 26 and 52 or death before Week 52 * Decrease of ≥ 0

    Time frame: 24 and 52 week

  6. Change from Baseline to Week 24 and 52 in Chronic GVHD (cGVHD) response

    The Lee cGVHD symptom scale contains 30 items in 7 subscales (skin, eye, mouth, lung, nutrition, energy and psychological), using a 5-point Likert scale. Scores are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale with higher values representing more severe symptoms. A summary score also is calculated if 4 or more subscales are available for scoring. Change in GVHD symptoms as measured by the Lee GVHD-symptom scale from Baseline to Week 26 and 52 will be evaluated.

    Time frame: 24 and 52 week

  7. Cumulative systemic corticosteroid exposure

    We will calculate the cumulative Prednisone dose (mg, or its corticosteroid equivalent) used by each participant over the trial period.

    Time frame: 52 week

  8. Use of other immunosuppressive medications

    We will calculate the type and the cumulative dose (mg) of other immune suppressive medications used by each participant over the trial period.

    Time frame: 52 week

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Stanford University School of Medicine
    Palo Alto, California 94304, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Matthaiou EI, Sharifi H, O'Donnell C, Chiu W, Owyang C, Chatterjee P, Turk I, Johnston L, Brondstetter T, Morris K, Cheng GS, Hsu JL. The safety and tolerability of pirfenidone for bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome after hematopoietic cell transplant (STOP-BOS) trial. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2022 Aug;57(8):1319-1326. doi: 10.1038/s41409-022-01716-4. Epub 2022 May 31. PubMed 35641662 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Mar 2018 to primary completion in Feb 2022, 47 months.

Of 22 phase 1 interventional studies under Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome, half reached primary completion within 47 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 18 and three quarters within 65. This study's 47 months is close to that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 5, 2017
First posted
Oct 20, 2017
StartActual
Mar 1, 2018
Primary completionActual
Feb 27, 2022
CompletionActual
Apr 27, 2022
Last update
Jun 13, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 13, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03315741
Collaborators
Genentech, Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 20, 2017
Start date
Mar 1, 2018
Primary completion
Feb 27, 2022
Completion
Apr 27, 2022
Last update
Jun 13, 2022

Study contacts

Joe L Hsu, MD, MPH
principal investigator · Stanford University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Pirfenidone

Start the discussion