CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03314792Updated Apr 4, 2019

Effects of Tapentadol Versus Oxycodone After Hysterectomy.

A Phase 4 interventional study of Tapentadol and Oxycodone in Pain, Postoperative, Pain Uterus and Pain, Acute, sponsored by Oslo University Hospital. Completed at 1 site in Norway. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-04-04.

Sponsored by Oslo University Hospital · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
86
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Opioids remain the first-line drugs for the treatment of moderate to severe postoperative pain, but the use is limited by well-known side-effects, most of which are dose-dependent.

The opioid oxycodone is standard therapeutic treatment for acute postoperative pain, either in immediate-release formulation, OxyNorm®, or as extended-release formulation, OxyContin®. Oxycodone provides analgesic effects through µ-opioid receptors in the central nervous system.

Tapentadol hydrochloride/depot (Palexia/depot®) is a novel, centrally acting, strong analgesic with a dual mechanism of action on µ-opioid receptors and noradrenaline reuptake in the central nervous system. Tapentadol is an active compound, devoid of active metabolites and not reliant on enzyme systems. For these reasons, it has a low drug interaction potential. This dual mechanism also translates clinically into less adverse effects than with pure opioid agonists like oxycodone. This is probably due to less µ-opioid receptor stimulation.

Tapentadol has been shown effective in models of acute, osteoarthritic, neuropathic and cancer pain. There is now an increasing use of tapentadol in postoperative pain treatment in Norway. However, there is a lack of broad-based evidence for the use of tapentadol in the post-surgical setting. So far, to our knowledge, there are only published studies on postoperative pain treatment after orthopedic and dental surgery, but none related to deep abdominal pain.

Tapentadol is shown in several studies on chronic pain patients to have comparable analgesic effects to traditional opioid pain medications like oxycodone and morphine, but with a more tolerable side-effect profile. In the postoperative setting after dental or orthopedic surgery, studies have shown less nausea and constipation. It has also been suggested a lower frequency of pruritus compared with oxycodone, but no difference in central nervous system symptoms such as sleepiness or dizziness. The most dangerous side-effect from opioids is respiratory depression with the potential of fatal outcome. The investigators have not found any publications from short-term postoperative pain management comparing the respiratory effect of tapentadol to the traditional opioids.

The aim of the study is to compare the analgesic effect and side-effects of this new analgesic, tapentadol, to the standard treatment to day, oxycodone, in the acute postoperative period after hysterectomy.

Read the detailed description

Postoperative pain is a major cause of postoperative suffering, prolonged hospitalization, complications and increased costs. It has been shown that postoperative pain is a frequent and unresolved problem in Norwegian hospitals, and so also internationally. Building knowledge on pain prophylaxis and treatment of postoperative pain is an area with substantial potential for improvement and affecting many patients.

Opioids remain as first-line drugs for the treatment of moderate to severe postoperative pain, but the use is limited by well-known side-effects, most of which are dose-dependent.

The opioid oxycodone is used as standard therapeutic treatment for acute postoperative pain, either in immediate-release formulation, OxyNorm®, or as extended-release formulation, OxyContin®. Oxycodone is a pure opioid receptor agonist with central and peripheral effects.

Tapentadol hydrochloride/depot (Palexia/depot®) is a novel, centrally acting, strong analgesic with a dual mechanism of action. It is a µ-opioid receptor agonist with central and peripheral effects, and it also inhibits noradrenaline reuptake in the central nervous system. Tapentadol is an active compound, devoid of active metabolites and not reliant on enzyme systems. For these reasons, it has a low drug interaction potential.

Opioid receptors are usually not well expressed in non-inflamed peripheral tissue and they have limited effect on the peripheral pathophysiology and origin of acute wound pain. While postoperative pain basically is induced by relevant nociceptive pain nerve stimulation, there is also a neuropathic component in most cases. Opioids are not very effective in blocking neuropathic pain in low to moderate doses. Also, opioids do not have the potential to block the wind-up of pain when given before the start of surgical trauma. The noradrenaline re-uptake inhibition (NRI) component of tapentadol is believed to have effect on descending pathways in the spinal cord. Such excitatory and inhibitory pathways act through monoamine systems mediated by noradrenaline and 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT). The inhibition of noradrenaline reuptake increases monoaminergic transmission in the descending pain inhibitory pathways, leading to reduced pain sensation. It seems like tapentadol produce not simply additive, but synergistic anti-nociceptive action by inhibitory actions in µ-opioid receptor agonism and NRI. While the effect on µ-opioid receptors is important in nociceptive pain, the NRI component seems to be especially relevant for both acute and persistent neuropathic pain.

Tapentadol has been shown effective in models of acute, osteoarthritic, neuropathic and cancer-induced bone pain. There is now an increasing use of tapentadol in postoperative pain treatment in Norwegian hospitals. However, there is a lack of broad-based evidence for the use of tapentadol in the post-surgical setting. So far, to our study group's knowledge, there are only published studies on postoperative pain treatment after orthopedic and dental surgery, but none related to visceral pain. Most studies have so far been initiated by the industry. The standard treatment today, oxycodone, on the other hand is shown in several studies to have a preferable analgesic effect on pain of visceral origin compared to morphine.

The synergistic effect of µ-opioid receptor agonism and NRI translates clinically into less adverse effects than with pure opioid agonists. This is probably due to less µ-opioid receptor stimulation. Tapentadol is shown in several studies on chronic pain patients to have comparable analgesic effects to traditional opioid pain medications like oxycodone and morphine, but with a more tolerable side-effect profile. In the postoperative setting after dental or orthopedic surgery, studies have shown less nausea and constipation. It has also been suggested a lower frequency of pruritus compared with oxycodone, but no difference in central nervous system symptoms such as somnolence or dizziness. The most dangerous side-effect from opioids is respiratory depression with the potential of fatal outcome. Intravenous oxycodone is shown to have dose dependent effect on respiratory depression decreasing the mean minute volume with a more rapid onset than morphine. One study has attempted to study respiratory depression after tapentadol administration, but failed due to technical failure of the pulse oximetry device. The investigators have not found any other publications from short-term postoperative pain management comparing any respiratory effect of tapentadol to the traditional opioids.

The aim of the study is to compare the analgesic effect and side-effects of this new analgesic, tapentadol, to the standard treatment to day, oxycodone, in the acute postoperative period in patients with visceral pain. Patients scheduled for elective hysterectomy are chosen as the study population, as this is a group of patients with significant visceral pain after surgery.

The study will be performed as a randomized, double-blind, prospective, parallel-group, single-center study on patients scheduled for laparoscopic sub-/total hysterectomy, as this is a classic study comparing effects from two different medications on two groups in a population.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pain, Postoperative
  • Pain Uterus
  • Pain, Acute
  • Opioid Use
  • Analgesics, Antipyretics, and Antirheumatics Causing Adverse Effects in Therapeutic Use
  • Visceral Pain

Keywords

  • pain
  • postoperative pain
  • postoperative pain management
  • opioid
  • analgesia
  • oxycodone
  • tapentadol
  • hysterectomy
  • respiratory depression
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Women diagnosed with a benign gynecological condition, undergoing laparoscopic, supra-cervical or total hysterectomy in general anesthesia.
  • Age 18-64 years.
  • ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) classification I-III.
  • Signed informed consent and expected cooperation of the patients for the treatment and follow up must be obtained and documented according to International Conference on Harmonisation GCP, and national/local regulations.
  • The patients will be recruited from the patient population at the Department of Gynaecology.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age under 18 or over 65.
  • BMI > 31 and/or weight \<55 kg, >85 kg.
  • Chronic pain syndromes related to organ systems other than the female reproductive system.
  • Chronic opioid therapy (codeine medication allowed up to 60 mg/day) or enteral steroid therapy.
  • Alcohol or medical abuse/addiction.
  • Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (spirometry with postbronchodilator FEV1/FVC ratio less than 0.7), untreated asthma (FEV1/FVC is reduced to less than 0.70), obstructive sleep apnea or other conditions known to predispose for respiratory depression.
  • Neurological diagnosis with affection of respiratory system or prone to seizures.
  • Previously diagnosed kidney (glomerular filtration rate \<60 mL/min/1.73 m2 over 3 months) or liver impairment (ALAT > 45 U/L; ASAT > 35 U/L; ALP > 105 U/L; GT > 45 U/L age 18-39 or GT > 75 U/L age over 39; LD > 205 U/L).
  • Biliary tract disease.
  • Paralytic ileus.
  • Heart failure (NYHA III-IV).
  • Malignancy of any kind under treatment. Malignancy during last 5 years.
  • HIV infection. Infections of any kind affecting the patient's clinical status, i.e. upper or lower airway infection, urinary tract infection, deep wound infection. Infections not affecting the patient's clinical status, i.e. conjunctivitis, is not an exclusion criteria.
  • Untreated depression, severe anxiety or other psychiatric disorders independent of treatment.
  • Nursing mothers.
  • Cognitive failure, language barriers, hearing/visual disability or other factors which make follow-up difficult.
  • Allergy or contraindication to any of the medications used in the study.
  • Lactose intolerance.
  • Monoamine oxidase inhibitors or SNRI (serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors) within 14 days prior to randomization. SSRI (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors) use is not an exclusion criterion if stable dose for at least 30 days before screening.
  • H1-antihistamine is not an exclusion criterion unless the patient experiences somnolence as a side-effect.
  • The concurrent use of benzodiazepines, barbiturates, neuroleptics, phenytoin tricyclic antidepressants, gabapentinoids, tramadol, clonidine, cimetidine, rifampicin, protease inhibitors, St John's wort (Hypericum perforatum), macrolides and antimycotics such as ketoconazole and fluconazole is not allowed.
  • Known complications to anesthesia or difficult airway (Definition of difficult airway: "The clinical situation in which a conventionally trained anesthesiologist experiences difficulty with mask ventilation, difficulty with tracheal intubation, or both.").
  • Patients who have participated in other clinical trials during the last 6 months are excluded to avoid confounders to the current study and for patient safety reasons.
04

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
86 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Oxycodone

    Active comparator drug administrated.

    Drug: Oxycodone

  • Experimental
    Tapentadol

    Experimental drug administrated.

    Drug: Tapentadol

Interventions

  • DrugTapentadol

    * Palexia depot 50 mg® (tapentadol depot 50 mg): Administered by the patient as oral premedication 1 hour before scheduled start of surgery. Palexia depot is repeated once after 12 hours. * Palexia 50 mg® (tapentadol 50 mg): Administered as oral rescue medicine. First possible administration in postoperative ward when the patient is awake and available for oral medication. Maximum 4 tablets/24-hour study period. Minimum 1 hour 15 minutes between tablets. The patient is instructed to take 1 tablet if pain is increasing and the minimum period since last tablet is exceeded.

  • DrugOxycodone

    * OxyContin 10 mg® (oxycodone extended-release 10 mg): Administered by the patient as oral premedication 1 hour before scheduled start of surgery. OxyContin is repeated once after 12 hours. * OxyNorm 10 mg® (oxycodone immediate-release 10 mg): Administered as oral rescue medicine. First possible administration in postoperative ward when the patient is awake and available for oral medication. Maximum 4 capsules/24-hour study period. Minimum 1 hour 15 minutes between capsules. The patient is instructed to take 1 tablet if pain is increasing and the minimum period since last tablet is exceeded.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain 1 hour postoperatively.

    Difference in scoring of pain at rest using the numerical rating scale for pain between the two intervention groups, tapentadol and oxycodone.

    Time frame: 1 hour

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pain 2 hours postoperatively.

    Difference in scoring of pain at rest using the numerical rating scale for pain between the two intervention groups, tapentadol and oxycodone.

    Time frame: 2 hours

  2. Pain 3 hours postoperatively.

    Difference in scoring of pain at rest using the numerical rating scale for pain between the two intervention groups, tapentadol and oxycodone.

    Time frame: 3 hours

  3. Pain 24 hours postoperatively.

    Difference in scoring of pain at rest using the numerical rating scale for pain between the two intervention groups, tapentadol and oxycodone.

    Time frame: 24 hours

  4. Pain relief 30 minutes

    Pain relief, measured with categorical scale "none, slight, moderate, good or complete", comparing pain at 30 minutes postoperatively to the previous measurement point. The measure "total pain relief" (TOTPAR) will be calculated from these values.

    Time frame: 30 minutes

  5. Pain relief 1 hour

    Pain relief, measured with categorical scale "none, slight, moderate, good or complete", comparing pain at 1 hour postoperatively to the previous measurement point. The measure "total pain relief" (TOTPAR) will be calculated from these values.

    Time frame: 1 hours

  6. Pain relief 2 hours

    Pain relief, measured with categorical scale "none, slight, moderate, good or complete", comparing pain at 2 hours postoperatively to the previous measurement point. The measure "total pain relief" (TOTPAR) will be calculated from these values.

    Time frame: 2 hours

  7. Pain relief 3 hours

    Pain relief, measured with categorical scale "none, slight, moderate, good or complete", comparing pain at 3 hours postoperatively to the previous measurement point. The measure "total pain relief" (TOTPAR) will be calculated from these values.

    Time frame: 3 hours

  8. Pain relief 24 hours

    Pain relief, measured with categorical scale "none, slight, moderate, good or complete", comparing pain at 24 hours postoperatively to the previous measurement point. The measure "total pain relief" (TOTPAR) will be calculated from these values.

    Time frame: 24 hours

  9. Global medication performance

    The measure "Global medication performance" after 24 hours: the patient evaluates the overall satisfaction with the pain treatment on a scale ("poor, fair, good, very good, excellent").

    Time frame: 24 hours

  10. Time to first rescue medicine

    Time to first intravenous and/or per oral rescue medicine.

    Time frame: 24 hours

  11. Total rescue analgesic consumption

    Total intravenous and per oral rescue analgesic consumption over 24 hours.

    Time frame: 24 hours

  12. Respiratory depression

    Continuous measurement of end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2) with Smart CapnoLine® Plus (Microstream®), data are collected at postoperatively.

    Time frame: 24 hours

  13. Respiratory rate

    Respiratory rate at rest is measured postoperatively.

    Time frame: 24 hours

06

Study locations

1 site
  • Oslo University Hospital
    Oslo, 0424, Norway
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Langford RM, Knaggs R, Farquhar-Smith P, Dickenson AH. Is tapentadol different from classical opioids? A review of the evidence. Br J Pain. 2016 Nov;10(4):217-221. doi: 10.1177/2049463716657363. Epub 2016 Jul 25. PubMed 27867511 ↗
  • Raeder J. Opioids in the treatment of postoperative pain: old drugs with new options? Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2014 Mar;15(4):449-52. doi: 10.1517/14656566.2014.879292. Epub 2014 Jan 17. PubMed 24437530 ↗
  • Schroder W, Vry JD, Tzschentke TM, Jahnel U, Christoph T. Differential contribution of opioid and noradrenergic mechanisms of tapentadol in rat models of nociceptive and neuropathic pain. Eur J Pain. 2010 Sep;14(8):814-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2010.05.005. Epub 2010 Jun 11. PubMed 20541444 ↗
  • Riley J, Eisenberg E, Muller-Schwefe G, Drewes AM, Arendt-Nielsen L. Oxycodone: a review of its use in the management of pain. Curr Med Res Opin. 2008 Jan;24(1):175-92. doi: 10.1185/030079908x253708. PubMed 18039433 ↗
  • Kleinert R, Lange C, Steup A, Black P, Goldberg J, Desjardins P. Single dose analgesic efficacy of tapentadol in postsurgical dental pain: the results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Anesth Analg. 2008 Dec;107(6):2048-55. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31818881ca. PubMed 19020157 ↗
  • Stegmann JU, Weber H, Steup A, Okamoto A, Upmalis D, Daniels S. The efficacy and tolerability of multiple-dose tapentadol immediate release for the relief of acute pain following orthopedic (bunionectomy) surgery. Curr Med Res Opin. 2008 Nov;24(11):3185-96. doi: 10.1185/03007990802448056. Epub 2008 Oct 15. PubMed 18851776 ↗
  • Daniels SE, Upmalis D, Okamoto A, Lange C, Haeussler J. A randomized, double-blind, phase III study comparing multiple doses of tapentadol IR, oxycodone IR, and placebo for postoperative (bunionectomy) pain. Curr Med Res Opin. 2009 Mar;25(3):765-76. doi: 10.1185/03007990902728183. PubMed 19203298 ↗
  • Hale M, Upmalis D, Okamoto A, Lange C, Rauschkolb C. Tolerability of tapentadol immediate release in patients with lower back pain or osteoarthritis of the hip or knee over 90 days: a randomized, double-blind study. Curr Med Res Opin. 2009 May;25(5):1095-104. doi: 10.1185/03007990902816970. PubMed 19301989 ↗
  • Lee LA, Caplan RA, Stephens LS, Posner KL, Terman GW, Voepel-Lewis T, Domino KB. Postoperative opioid-induced respiratory depression: a closed claims analysis. Anesthesiology. 2015 Mar;122(3):659-65. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000564. PubMed 25536092 ↗
  • Chang SH, Maney KM, Phillips JP, Langford RM, Mehta V. A comparison of the respiratory effects of oxycodone versus morphine: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled investigation. Anaesthesia. 2010 Oct;65(10):1007-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2010.06498.x. PubMed 20712805 ↗
  • Ramaswamy S, Chang S, Mehta V. Tapentadol--the evidence so far. Anaesthesia. 2015 May;70(5):518-22. doi: 10.1111/anae.13080. No abstract available. PubMed 25866038 ↗
  • Comelon M, Raeder J, Draegni T, Lieng M, Lenz H. Tapentadol versus oxycodone analgesia and side effects after laparoscopic hysterectomy: A randomised controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2021 Sep 1;38(9):995-1002. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001425. PubMed 33428347 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Jun 26, 2017

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — The study has no collaborators outside Oslo University Hospital and individual participant data (IPD) is not planned shared with other researchers during the study periode. The database with IPD will be stored in a secure research server at Oslo University Hospital according to the policy for secure storage.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Icf, Csr, Analytic code

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03314792
Lead sponsor
Oslo University Hospital
Responsible party
Harald Lenz (Principal investigator, Oslo University Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 19, 2017
Start date
Dec 4, 2017
Primary completion
Feb 28, 2019
Completion
Feb 28, 2019
Last update
Apr 4, 2019

Study contacts

Harald Lenz, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Oslo University Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion