CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03309020Updated Jun 29, 2021Results posted

PREVAIL VII: Cataract Surgery in Ebola Survivors

An interventional study of Cataract surgery in Cataract, sponsored by National Eye Institute (NEI). Completed at 1 site in Liberia. Open to participants aged 14 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-06-29.

Sponsored by National Eye Institute (NEI) · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
37
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
14 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Objective: Zaire ebolavirus is a single-stranded RNA virus associated with high morbidity and mortality. The most recent epidemic of Ebola virus disease (EVD) in West Africa resulted in over 11,000 deaths and disabling sequelae among survivors, among which eye complications are highly represented. Chronic intraocular inflammation and viral persistence may result in posterior synechiae and cataract formation, resulting in loss of visual acuity and requiring surgical intervention to resolve. Approximately one out of ten Ebola survivors present with cataract, most of whom will require intraocular surgery during their lifetime, and many of whom require intervention in the near future to regain quality of life. For survivors who are blind from cataract, cataract extraction is necessary to restore visual function, allow reintegration into society and facilitate performance of activities of daily living.

However, surgical parameters among Ebola survivors are unknown, including whether Ebola viral RNA persists in aqueous humor, whether additional anti-inflammatory medication is needed, and the expected degree of improvement in visual function. Moreover, sites of viral persistence are unknown, and it is unclear if lens tissues removed during cataract surgery may harbor virus in Ebola-affected eyes. We propose following EVD survivors and control subjects undergoing cataract surgery to determine visual outcomes among Ebola survivors and explore detection of the presence of virus in lens tissues. The data will inform both future surgical intervention and aid in the understanding of the pathophysiology of Ebola-associated eye disease.

Study Population: Up to 60 Ebola survivors and up to 60 controls will be enrolled. The accrual ceiling is 120 participants.

Design: This is a prospective, natural history study to evaluate the persistence of Ebola viral RNA in the eyes of Ebola survivors and assess the response to cataract surgery in survivors as compared to controls. EVD survivors will first undergo assessment of aqueous humor for the presence of viral RNA. Survivors testing negative for viral RNA and control subjects will undergo clinically indicated cataract surgery. Subjects will be evaluated 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, and 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after surgery for safety and visual outcome assessments, and more often as clinically indicated.

Outcome Measures: The primary outcomes are: 1) the proportion of EVD survivors with evidence of persistence of Ebola viral RNA in ocular tissue and 2) the comparison of amount of intraocular inflammation, as measured by average grade of anterior chamber cell by SUN criteria, between EVD survivors and controls at 1 month and 3 months following cataract surgery. Secondary outcomes include: 1) the proportion of survivors with at least 20/40 best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) after cataract surgery, relative to controls; 2) impact of the covariates age and gender on viral persistence and cataract outcomes; 3) post-operative optical coherence tomography results in EVD survivors.

Read the detailed description

Objective: Zaire ebolavirus is a single-stranded RNA virus associated with high morbidity and mortality. The most recent epidemic of Ebola virus disease (EVD) in West Africa resulted in over 11,000 deaths and disabling sequelae among survivors, among which eye complications are highly represented. Chronic intraocular inflammation and viral persistence may result in posterior synechiae and cataract formation, resulting in loss of visual acuity and requiring surgical intervention to resolve. Approximately one out of ten Ebola survivors present with cataract, most of whom will require intraocular surgery during their lifetime, and many of whom require intervention in the near future to regain quality of life. For survivors who are blind from cataract, cataract extraction is necessary to restore visual function, allow reintegration into society and facilitate performance of activities of daily living.

However, surgical parameters among Ebola survivors are unknown, including whether Ebola viral RNA persists in aqueous humor, whether additional anti-inflammatory medication is needed, and the expected degree of improvement in visual function. Moreover, sites of viral persistence are unknown, and it is unclear if lens tissues removed during cataract surgery may harbor virus in Ebola-affected eyes. We propose following EVD survivors and control subjects undergoing cataract surgery to determine visual outcomes among Ebola survivors and explore detection of the presence of virus in lens tissues. The data will inform both future surgical intervention and aid in the understanding of the pathophysiology of Ebola-associated eye disease.

Study Population: Up to 60 Ebola survivors and up to 60 controls will be enrolled. The accrual ceiling is 120 participants.

Design: This is a prospective, natural history study to evaluate the persistence of Ebola viral RNA in the eyes of Ebola survivors and assess the response to cataract surgery in survivors as compared to controls. EVD survivors will first undergo assessment of aqueous humor for the presence of viral RNA. Survivors testing negative for viral RNA and control subjects will undergo clinically indicated cataract surgery. Subjects will be evaluated 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, and 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after surgery for safety and visual outcome assessments, and more often as clinically indicated.

Outcome Measures: The primary outcomes are: 1) the proportion of EVD survivors with evidence of persistence of Ebola viral RNA in ocular tissue and 2) the comparison of amount of intraocular inflammation, as measured by average grade of anterior chamber cell by SUN criteria, between EVD survivors and controls at 1 month and 3 months following cataract surgery. Secondary outcomes include: 1) the proportion of survivors with at least 20/40 best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) after cataract surgery, relative to controls; 2) impact the of covariates, age and gender on viral persistence and cataract outcomes; 3) post-operative optical coherence tomography results in EVD survivors.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cataract

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • OCT
  • Cataracts
  • Visual Acuity
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
14 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

To be eligible, the following inclusion criteria must be met, where applicable.

  1. Participant must be 14 years of age or older.
  2. Participant must be able to understand and sign an informed consent or have a parent/legal guardian do so if they are minor children or a legally authorized representative to provide consent for adults without consent capacity.
  3. Participant must be either:

    • an Ebola virus disease (EVD) seropositive survivor or seropositive control OR
    • an EVD seronegative survivor or seronegative control (Serology confirmation is available for PREVAIL participants and will be conducted for non-PREVAIL participants.).
  4. Participant must have visually significant cataract(s) consistent with level of visual deficit.
  5. Participant must have corrected visual acuity worse than 20/40 in affected eye and vision loss believed to be primarily the result of the cataract.
  6. Any woman and persons of childbearing potential age have a negative pregnancy test at screening and must be willing to undergo pregnancy testing prior to the cataract surgery.

Exclusion criteria

EXCLUSION CRITERIA:

A participant is not eligible if any of the following exclusion criteria are present.

  1. Concurrent life-threatening illness or other condition that compromises a participant's ability to safely undergo surgery, as determined by the surgical and medical team, including any condition that prevents the participant from lying down supine or remaining still, such as severe lung disease, or a known life-threatening, untreated or unstable cardiac or pulmonary condition.
  2. Active uveitis at time of surgery or within the past three months, if documented.
  3. Participant is pregnant, as surgery is elective and no adequate data regarding the use of postoperative topical antibiotic-steroid combination drops exists in pregnant women.
  4. Any condition that poses a risk to the participant having a safe surgical or post-operative experience, including known inability or unwillingness to follow up for the full duration of the protocol.
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
37 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Control

    Control with clinical need for cataract surgery

    Procedure: Cataract surgery

  • Experimental
    EVD Survivors

    EVD survivors with need for cataract surgery

    Procedure: Cataract surgery

Interventions

  • ProcedureCataract surgery

    Cataract surgery and aqueous humor sampling.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportion of EVD Survivors With Evidence of Persistence of Ebola Viral RNA in Ocular Tissue

    Participants undergo aqueous fluid (aqueous humor) sampling to assess for the presence of Ebola virus RNA via RT-PCR using the GeneXpert assay. The study was intended to include analysis of lens tissue to explore detection of the presence of virus in lens tissue in EVD survivors; however, the collected lens tissue samples were damaged during storage and transport. Therefore, the lens samples were unable to yield any reportable data.

    Time frame: One week prior to cataract surgery

  2. Comparison of the Amount of Intraocular Inflammation Between EVD Survivors and Controls at 1 Month Following Cataract Surgery

    The amount of intraocular inflammation is measured by the average grade of anterior chamber (AC) cell per Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN) criteria. AC cell grading, with higher grades indicating a worse outcome: Grade 0 -- 0-5 cells per 1 mm x 1 mm high-powered field; Grade 1 -- 6-15 cells per 1 mm x 1 mm high-powered field; Grade 2 -- 16-25 cells per 1 mm x 1 mm high-powered field; Grade 3 -- 26-50 cells per 1 mm x 1 mm high-powered field; Grade 4 -- \> 50 cells per 1 mm x 1 mm high-powered field

    Time frame: 1 month after cataract surgery

  3. Comparison of the Amount of Intraocular Inflammation Between EVD Survivors and Controls at 3 Months Following Cataract Surgery

    The amount of intraocular inflammation is measured by the average grade of anterior chamber cell per Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN) criteria. AC cell grading, with higher grades indicating a worse outcome: Grade 0 -- 0-5 cells per 1 mm x 1 mm high-powered field; Grade 1 -- 6-15 cells per 1 mm x 1 mm high-powered field; Grade 2 -- 16-25 cells per 1 mm x 1 mm high-powered field; Grade 3 -- 26-50 cells per 1 mm x 1 mm high-powered field; Grade 4 -- \> 50 cells per 1 mm x 1 mm high-powered field

    Time frame: 3 months after cataract surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Comparison of Proportion of Eyes With at Least 20/40 Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) 12 Months After Cataract Surgery

    Comparison of proportion with at least 20/40 best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) after cataract surgery 12 months in survivors vs controls. Best corrected visual acuity was measured using the Tumbling-E Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) protocol vision chart. Acuity is measured as letters read on an ETDRS eye chart and the letters read equate to Snellen measurements. For example, if a participant reads between 84 and 88 letters, the equivalent Snellen measurement is 20/20.

    Time frame: 12 months (1 year) after cataract surgery

  2. Comparison of Intraretinal Fluid Cysts Between EVD Survivors and Controls From Baseline to 12 Months After Cataract Surgery

    Optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging of the retina and optic nerve was used to identify the presence of intraretinal fluid cysts in EVD survivors vs. controls from baseline to 12 months after surgery

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 months (1 year) after cataract surgery

  3. Comparison of Central Subfield Thickness (CST) Between EVD Survivors and Controls From Baseline to 12 Months After Cataract Surgery

    Optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging of the retina and optic nerve was used to measure macular central subfield thickness (CST) in µm in EVD survivors vs. controls from baseline to 12 months after cataract surgery

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 months (1 year) after cataract surgery

  4. Comparison of Central Subfield Thickness (CST) Between EVD Survivors and Controls, Excluding Cases of Intraretinal Fluid Cysts, From Baseline to 12 Months After Cataract Surgery

    Optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging of the retina and optic nerve was used to measure central subfield thickness (CST) in µm in EVD survivors vs. controls, excluding cases of intraretinal fluid cysts, from baseline to 12 months after cataract surgery

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 months (1 year) after cataract surgery

  5. Impact of Gender on Visual Acuity From Baseline to 12 Months After Surgery

    Visual acuity (20/x) was measured using the Tumbling-E Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) protocol vision chart. Acuity is measured as letters read on an ETDRS eye chart and the letters read equate to Snellen measurements. For example, if a participant reads between 84 and 88 letters, the equivalent Snellen measurement is 20/20.

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 months (1 year) after cataract surgery

  6. Impact of Gender on Improvement in the Number of Lines Read on an ETDRS Eye Chart From Baseline to 12 Months After Surgery

    Visual acuity was measured using the Tumbling-E Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) protocol vision chart. Acuity is measured as letters read on an ETDRS eye chart and the letters read equate to Snellen measurements. Number of lines improvement equals the number of lines read at 12 months post cataract surgery minus the number of lines read at baseline

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 months (1 year) after cataract surgery

  7. Impact of Age on Visual Acuity From Baseline to 12 Months After Surgery

    Age was age at enrollment in years. Visual acuity (20/x) was measured using the Tumbling-E Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) protocol vision chart. Acuity is measured as letters read on an ETDRS eye chart and the letters read equate to Snellen measurements. For example, if a participant reads between 84 and 88 letters, the equivalent Snellen measurement is 20/20.

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 months (1 year) after cataract surgery

  8. Impact of Age on Improvement in the Number of Lines Read on an ETDRS Eye Chart From Baseline to 12 Months After Surgery

    Age was age at enrollment in years. Visual acuity was measured using the Tumbling-E Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) protocol vision chart. Acuity is measured as letters read on an ETDRS eye chart and the letters read equate to Snellen measurements. Number of lines improvement equals the number of lines read at 12 months post cataract surgery minus the number of lines read at baseline

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 months (1 year) after cataract surgery

  9. Impact of Gender on Viral Persistence One Week Prior to Cataract Surgery

    Participants undergo aqueous fluid (aqueous humor) sampling to assess for the presence of Ebola virus RNA via RT-PCR using the GeneXpert assay.

    Time frame: One week prior to cataract surgery

  10. Impact of Age on Viral Persistence One Week Prior to Cataract Surgery

    Age was age at enrollment in years. Participants undergo aqueous fluid (aqueous humor) sampling to assess for the presence of Ebola virus RNA via RT-PCR using the GeneXpert assay.

    Time frame: One week prior to cataract surgery

06

Results

Posted Jun 29, 2021

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneControlEVD Survivors
Started1225
Underwent cataract surgery1024
Completed924
Not completed31
Withdrew: Death10
Withdrew: Did not undergo surgery21

Outcome measures

PrimaryProportion of EVD Survivors With Evidence of Persistence of Ebola Viral RNA in Ocular Tissue

Participants undergo aqueous fluid (aqueous humor) sampling to assess for the presence of Ebola virus RNA via RT-PCR using the GeneXpert assay. The study was intended to include analysis of lens tissue to explore detection of the presence of virus in lens tissue in EVD survivors; however, the collected lens tissue samples were damaged during storage and transport. Therefore, the lens samples were unable to yield any reportable data.

Time frame:
One week prior to cataract surgery
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Proportion of EVD Survivors With Evidence of Persistence of Ebola Viral RNA in Ocular Tissue
ParticipantsEVD Survivors
Proportion of EVD Survivors With Evidence of Persistence of Ebola Viral RNA in Ocular Tissue0
PrimaryComparison of the Amount of Intraocular Inflammation Between EVD Survivors and Controls at 1 Month Following Cataract Surgery

The amount of intraocular inflammation is measured by the average grade of anterior chamber (AC) cell per Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN) criteria. AC cell grading, with higher grades indicating a worse outcome: Grade 0 -- 0-5 cells per 1 mm x 1 mm high-powered field; Grade 1 -- 6-15 cells per 1 mm x 1 mm high-powered field; Grade 2 -- 16-25 cells per 1 mm x 1 mm high-powered field; Grade 3 -- 26-50 cells per 1 mm x 1 mm high-powered field; Grade 4 -- \> 50 cells per 1 mm x 1 mm high-powered field

Time frame:
1 month after cataract surgery
Reported as:
Mean · AC cell grade
Comparison of the Amount of Intraocular Inflammation Between EVD Survivors and Controls at 1 Month Following Cataract Surgery
AC cell gradeControlEVD Survivors
Comparison of the Amount of Intraocular Inflammation Between EVD Survivors and Controls at 1 Month Following Cataract Surgery.67 ± .49.64 ± .66
Statistical analysis
  • Control vs EVD Survivors · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.802 (The threshold for statistical significance was p = 0.05)Age at enrollment and gender (male or female) were included as covariates in the model
PrimaryComparison of the Amount of Intraocular Inflammation Between EVD Survivors and Controls at 3 Months Following Cataract Surgery

The amount of intraocular inflammation is measured by the average grade of anterior chamber cell per Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN) criteria. AC cell grading, with higher grades indicating a worse outcome: Grade 0 -- 0-5 cells per 1 mm x 1 mm high-powered field; Grade 1 -- 6-15 cells per 1 mm x 1 mm high-powered field; Grade 2 -- 16-25 cells per 1 mm x 1 mm high-powered field; Grade 3 -- 26-50 cells per 1 mm x 1 mm high-powered field; Grade 4 -- \> 50 cells per 1 mm x 1 mm high-powered field

Time frame:
3 months after cataract surgery
Reported as:
Mean · AC cell grade
Comparison of the Amount of Intraocular Inflammation Between EVD Survivors and Controls at 3 Months Following Cataract Surgery
AC cell gradeControlEVD Survivors
Comparison of the Amount of Intraocular Inflammation Between EVD Survivors and Controls at 3 Months Following Cataract Surgery.5 ± 1.17.82 ± 1.01
Statistical analysis
  • Control vs EVD Survivors · Mixed Models Analysis · p = .713 (The threshold for statistical significance was p = 0.05)Age at enrollment and gender (male or female) were included as covariates in the model
SecondaryComparison of Proportion of Eyes With at Least 20/40 Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) 12 Months After Cataract Surgery

Comparison of proportion with at least 20/40 best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) after cataract surgery 12 months in survivors vs controls. Best corrected visual acuity was measured using the Tumbling-E Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) protocol vision chart. Acuity is measured as letters read on an ETDRS eye chart and the letters read equate to Snellen measurements. For example, if a participant reads between 84 and 88 letters, the equivalent Snellen measurement is 20/20.

Time frame:
12 months (1 year) after cataract surgery
Reported as:
Count of units · eyes
Comparison of Proportion of Eyes With at Least 20/40 Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) 12 Months After Cataract Surgery
eyesControlEVD Survivors
Comparison of Proportion of Eyes With at Least 20/40 Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) 12 Months After Cataract Surgery518
Statistical analysis
  • Control vs EVD Survivors · Odds ratio (or): 0.1 · 95% CI 0.01 to 0.69Odds of eye with at least 20/40 best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) 12 months after cataract surgery for controls vs. EVD survivors
SecondaryComparison of Intraretinal Fluid Cysts Between EVD Survivors and Controls From Baseline to 12 Months After Cataract Surgery

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging of the retina and optic nerve was used to identify the presence of intraretinal fluid cysts in EVD survivors vs. controls from baseline to 12 months after surgery

Time frame:
Baseline to 12 months (1 year) after cataract surgery
Reported as:
Number · eyes
Comparison of Intraretinal Fluid Cysts Between EVD Survivors and Controls From Baseline to 12 Months After Cataract Surgery
eyesControlEVD Survivors
Baseline00
Month 100
Month 313
Month 601
Month 912
Month 1222
Statistical analysis
  • Control vs EVD Survivors · Mixed Models Analysis · p = .832 (The threshold for statistical significance was p = 0.05)Age at enrollment and gender (male or female) were included as covariates in the model
SecondaryComparison of Central Subfield Thickness (CST) Between EVD Survivors and Controls From Baseline to 12 Months After Cataract Surgery

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging of the retina and optic nerve was used to measure macular central subfield thickness (CST) in µm in EVD survivors vs. controls from baseline to 12 months after cataract surgery

Time frame:
Baseline to 12 months (1 year) after cataract surgery
Reported as:
Median · µm
Comparison of Central Subfield Thickness (CST) Between EVD Survivors and Controls From Baseline to 12 Months After Cataract Surgery
µmControlEVD Survivors
Baseline203 (182 to 204)209 (184 to 244.5)
Month 1222 (217.5 to 260)224 (211 to 269.5)
Month 3227 (196.8 to 260.2)216 (188 to 253)
Month 6226.5 (209.5 to 234.8)234 (203 to 258)
Month 9240 (227.8 to 258.2)238 (214 to 254.5)
Month 12244 (221.5 to 264.5)231 (212.5 to 245.5)
Statistical analysis
  • Control vs EVD Survivors · Mixed Models Analysis · p = .995 (The threshold for statistical significance was p = 0.05)Age at enrollment and gender (male or female) were included as covariates in the model
SecondaryComparison of Central Subfield Thickness (CST) Between EVD Survivors and Controls, Excluding Cases of Intraretinal Fluid Cysts, From Baseline to 12 Months After Cataract Surgery

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging of the retina and optic nerve was used to measure central subfield thickness (CST) in µm in EVD survivors vs. controls, excluding cases of intraretinal fluid cysts, from baseline to 12 months after cataract surgery

Time frame:
Baseline to 12 months (1 year) after cataract surgery
Reported as:
Median · µm
Comparison of Central Subfield Thickness (CST) Between EVD Survivors and Controls, Excluding Cases of Intraretinal Fluid Cysts, From Baseline to 12 Months After Cataract Surgery
µmControlEVD Survivors
Baseline203 (182 to 204)218 (190.2 to 244)
Month 1222 (217.5 to 260)224 (211 to 269.5)
Month 3223 (196.5 to 248)214 (183.5 to 224)
Month 6220 (207 to 234)229 (202.8 to 251.2)
Month 9240 (225.5 to 253)238 (211 to 254)
Month 12242 (211 to 248)231 (216 to 244)
Statistical analysis
  • Control vs EVD Survivors · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.441 (The threshold for statistical significance was p = 0.05)Age at enrollment and gender (male or female) were included as covariates in the model
SecondaryImpact of Gender on Visual Acuity From Baseline to 12 Months After Surgery

Visual acuity (20/x) was measured using the Tumbling-E Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) protocol vision chart. Acuity is measured as letters read on an ETDRS eye chart and the letters read equate to Snellen measurements. For example, if a participant reads between 84 and 88 letters, the equivalent Snellen measurement is 20/20.

Time frame:
Baseline to 12 months (1 year) after cataract surgery
Reported as:
Median · visual acuity (20/x)
Impact of Gender on Visual Acuity From Baseline to 12 Months After Surgery
visual acuity (20/x)All Participants
Baseline800 (100 to 4000)
Month 140 (25 to 50)
Month 1232 (25 to 50)
Statistical analysis
  • All Participants · Mixed Models Analysis · p = .892 (The threshold for statistical significance was p = 0.05)Age at enrollment, survivor status (EVD survivor/control) included as covariates; within-subject measurement of distinct eyes treated as independent
SecondaryImpact of Gender on Improvement in the Number of Lines Read on an ETDRS Eye Chart From Baseline to 12 Months After Surgery

Visual acuity was measured using the Tumbling-E Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) protocol vision chart. Acuity is measured as letters read on an ETDRS eye chart and the letters read equate to Snellen measurements. Number of lines improvement equals the number of lines read at 12 months post cataract surgery minus the number of lines read at baseline

Time frame:
Baseline to 12 months (1 year) after cataract surgery
Reported as:
Median · lines of improvement
Impact of Gender on Improvement in the Number of Lines Read on an ETDRS Eye Chart From Baseline to 12 Months After Surgery
lines of improvementAll Participants
Impact of Gender on Improvement in the Number of Lines Read on an ETDRS Eye Chart From Baseline to 12 Months After Surgery8.06 (4.01 to 20.97)
Statistical analysis
  • All Participants · Mixed Models Analysis · p = .913 (The threshold for statistical significance was p = 0.05)Age at enrollment, survivor status (EVD survivor/control) included as covariates; within-subject measurement of distinct eyes treated as independent
SecondaryImpact of Age on Visual Acuity From Baseline to 12 Months After Surgery

Age was age at enrollment in years. Visual acuity (20/x) was measured using the Tumbling-E Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) protocol vision chart. Acuity is measured as letters read on an ETDRS eye chart and the letters read equate to Snellen measurements. For example, if a participant reads between 84 and 88 letters, the equivalent Snellen measurement is 20/20.

Time frame:
Baseline to 12 months (1 year) after cataract surgery
Reported as:
Median · visual acuity (20/x)
Impact of Age on Visual Acuity From Baseline to 12 Months After Surgery
visual acuity (20/x)All Participants
Baseline800 (100 to 4000)
Month 140 (25 to 50)
Month 1232 (25 to 50)
Statistical analysis
  • All Participants · Mixed Models Analysis · p = .106 (The threshold for statistical significance was p = 0.05)Gender (male/female), survivor status (EVD survivor/control) as covariates; within-subject measurement of distinct eyes treated as independent
SecondaryImpact of Age on Improvement in the Number of Lines Read on an ETDRS Eye Chart From Baseline to 12 Months After Surgery

Age was age at enrollment in years. Visual acuity was measured using the Tumbling-E Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) protocol vision chart. Acuity is measured as letters read on an ETDRS eye chart and the letters read equate to Snellen measurements. Number of lines improvement equals the number of lines read at 12 months post cataract surgery minus the number of lines read at baseline

Time frame:
Baseline to 12 months (1 year) after cataract surgery
Reported as:
Median · lines of improvement
Impact of Age on Improvement in the Number of Lines Read on an ETDRS Eye Chart From Baseline to 12 Months After Surgery
lines of improvementAll Participants
Impact of Age on Improvement in the Number of Lines Read on an ETDRS Eye Chart From Baseline to 12 Months After Surgery8.06 (4.01 to 20.97)
Statistical analysis
  • All Participants · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.09 (The threshold for statistical significance was p = 0.05)Gender (male/female), survivor status (EVD survivor/control) as covariates; within-subject measurement of distinct eyes treated as independent
SecondaryImpact of Gender on Viral Persistence One Week Prior to Cataract Surgery

Participants undergo aqueous fluid (aqueous humor) sampling to assess for the presence of Ebola virus RNA via RT-PCR using the GeneXpert assay.

Time frame:
One week prior to cataract surgery

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryImpact of Age on Viral Persistence One Week Prior to Cataract Surgery

Age was age at enrollment in years. Participants undergo aqueous fluid (aqueous humor) sampling to assess for the presence of Ebola virus RNA via RT-PCR using the GeneXpert assay.

Time frame:
One week prior to cataract surgery

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

Adverse events

Collected over Participants are monitored during all study visits, with the last visit being 12 (+/- 1.5) months from the day of surgery.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Control1/8 (12.5%)1/8 (12.5%)0/8 (0%)
EVD Survivors0/22 (0%)2/22 (9.1%)0/22 (0%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventControlEVD Survivors
Subluxed intraocular lensEye disorders1/81/22
Retinal detachmentEye disorders1/80/22
Surgery on the fellow eyeEye disorders0/81/22

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)ControlEVD SurvivorsTotal
Median56 (40 to 63.8)62 (40 to 68)59 (40 to 68)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)ControlEVD SurvivorsTotal
Female61420
Male61117
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)ControlEVD SurvivorsTotal
Count of participants——0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)ControlEVD SurvivorsTotal
Liberia122537
07

Study locations

1 site
  • PREVAIL JFK Hospital
    Monrovia, Liberia
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Eghrari AO, Shantha JG, Ross RD, Ryn CV, Crozier I, Hayek B, Gradin D, Roberts B, Prakalapakorn SG, Amegashie F, Nishant K, Singh G, Dolo R, Fankhauser J, Burkholder B, Pettitt J, Gross R, Brady T, Dighero-Kemp B, Reilly C, Hensley L, Higgs E, Yeh S, Bishop RJ. Efficacy and Safety Outcomes of Cataract Surgery in Survivors of Ebola Virus Disease: 12-Month Results From the PREVAIL VII Study. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2021 Jan 25;10(1):32. doi: 10.1167/tvst.10.1.32. eCollection 2021 Jan. PubMed 33520427 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Sep 18, 2019
  • Informed consent form · Apr 4, 2018

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03309020
Lead sponsor
National Eye Institute (NEI)
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 13, 2017
Start date
Sep 21, 2017
Primary completion
Jan 4, 2018
Completion
Aug 1, 2019
Results posted
Jun 29, 2021
Last update
Jun 29, 2021

Study contacts

Teresa M Magone de Quadros Costa, M.D.
principal investigator · National Eye Institute (NEI)

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion