CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03307135MSPMIUpdated Nov 30, 2020

Medical Spastic Patient Machine Interface MSPMI : Biomechanical and Electrophysiological Assessment of the Triceps Surae Spasticity

An interventional study of single assessment with the MSPMI and double assessment with the MSPMI with 7 days of interval in Spasticity, Muscle, sponsored by Nantes University Hospital. Completed at 1 site in France. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-11-30.

Sponsored by Nantes University Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
67
Allocation
Non-randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Spasticity is a disorder of the muscular tonus that occurs in disease including the upper motor neuron (strokes, spinal cord injuries, multiple sclerosis, traumatic brain injuries or cerebral palsies). It begins few hours after the neural aggression and last until the grave.

The most accepted definition refers to a velocity-dependent increase in stretch reflexes elicited by passive stretch (Lance definition) but new approaches prefers to distinguish neural (reflex) and non-neural (soft tissues alterations) components of the increase resistance to a passive stretch. This deficiency is a major cause of complications as walking impairment, pain or bone deformities and may require intensive therapies (intrathecal baclofen infusion, intramuscular toxin botulinium injection, surgery, etc). Despite its high frequency and the potential complications, only clinical scales (modified Ashworth scale and modified Tardieu scale essentially) with criticized metrological properties are available for daily assessment. The SPASM Consortium has published on 2005 recommendations for developing devices using both mechanical and electrophysiological parameters. The principle challenge was to ally parameters accuracy and utilization facility allowing quickly evaluation to the patient's bed. Few research team works on this topic but mostly on specific population and nowadays, no device has really crossed the door of laboratories.

This kind of tool would help us to improve the quality of the follow-up and to guide us between the choices of specific therapies.

The MSPMI has been created following these recommendations in the University of Technology of Compiègne, thanks to the collaboration between researchers of the UMR 7338 CNRS and a brain surgeon of the Nantes University Hospital. The patent was obtained on 2012. This device allows the assessment of the ankle plantar extensor (triceps surae) during a manually applied stretch movement. This muscle was selected as it is frequently involved and treated for spasticity.

This study aims to evaluate the metrological properties of the MSPMI (reliabilities, responsiveness, known group validity, construct validity, measurement errors and internal consistency) among a large cohort of patients with no restriction of etiologies recruited in the Nantes University Hospital.

Read the detailed description

Evaluation will include medical histories and specific information about spasticity management and consequences. The patient will be assessed by two evaluators with the MSPMI installed on the foot and the shank. MSPMI allows the record of angular movement of the ankle (position, speed and acceleration), of biomechanics (stiffness, torque, work and power) and electromyography (root mean squared and integrated electromyography signals) of two chiefs of the triceps surae (medial gastrocnemius and soleus). Electromyography data will be recorded on a maximum voluntary contraction when the deficiency will permit it. After that, data will be recorded at 3 velocities (with respect to the clinical scale recommendations) on two different positions (knee flexed and extended), according to our clinical practice. The evaluation on day 0 will allow the assessment of inter-rater intra-session reproductibility, internal consistency, construct validity, measurement error and known group validity. If the patient is hospitalized, he will be included on the "hospitalization group" and a second evaluation following the same protocol will be done 7 days later (assessment of inter and intra-rater inter-session reproductibility). If a specific therapy (selective tibial neurotomy, anesthetic block or botulinum toxin intramuscular injection) is proposed, the patient will be included on the "treatment group" and a new evaluation will be done after the therapy (30 minutes - 2 hours after an anesthetic block, 2-3 months after neurotomy or botulinium toxin injection) allowing assessment of the responsiveness of the MSPMI. If the patient is not on these two situations, he will be included on the "simple evaluation group" and his participation will end.

02

Conditions studied

  • Spasticity, Muscle

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Spasticity
  • electrophysiology
  • biomechanics
  • objective assessment
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Spasticity with respect to the Lance defintion (minimal score of 1 on the modified Ashworth scale)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contraindication of ankle manipulation : fracture, phlebitis, bedsore
  • amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
67 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Simple Assessment group

    Intervention is a single evaluation with the MSPMI by two evaluators.

    Device: single assessment with the MSPMI

  • Experimental
    Hospitalization group

    Evaluation with the MSPMI by two evaluators on two consultations separate by a 7 days interval.

    Device: double assessment with the MSPMI with 7 days of interval

  • Experimental
    Treatment group

    Evaluation with the MSPMI by two evaluators before and after specific therapies proposed on our usual practices (Selective tibial neurotomy, anesthetic block or botulinum toxin intramuscular injection).

    Device: double assessment with the MSPMI before and after treatment

Interventions

  • Devicesingle assessment with the MSPMI

    Manually applied stretch with the MSPMI installed on the foot and shank at 3 different velocities on 2 positions (knee flexed and extended)

  • Devicedouble assessment with the MSPMI with 7 days of interval

    Manually applied stretch with the MSPMI installed on the foot and shank at 3 different velocities on 2 positions (knee flexed and extended)

  • Devicedouble assessment with the MSPMI before and after treatment

    Manually applied stretch with the MSPMI installed on the foot and shank at 3 different velocities on 2 positions (knee flexed and extended)

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Duration of the mobilization reproductibility coefficient

    inter-rater intra-session reproductibility coefficient

    Time frame: Day 0

  2. range of motion (degree) reproductibility coefficient

    inter-rater intra-session reproductibility coefficient

    Time frame: Day 0

  3. maximal angular speed (degree.sec-1) reproductibility coefficient

    inter-rater intra-session reproductibility coefficient

    Time frame: Day 0

  4. torque peaque (N.m) reproductibility coefficient

    inter-rater intra-session reproductibility coefficient

    Time frame: Day 0

  5. work variability index (mJ.sec) reproductibility coefficient

    inter-rater intra-session reproductibility coefficient

    Time frame: Day 0

  6. area under the curve raw Work = f(time) reproductibility coefficient

    inter-rater intra-session reproductibility coefficient

    Time frame: Day 0

  7. area under the curve rectified Work = f(time) (J.sec) reproductibility coefficient

    inter-rater intra-session reproductibility coefficient

    Time frame: Day 0

  8. raw and averaged rectified EMG for Soleus and Gastrocnemius medialis (μV and μV.sec-1) reproductibility coefficient

    inter-rater intra-session reproductibility coefficient

    Time frame: Day 0

  9. Raw rectified EMG for Soleus (μv) reproductibility coefficient

    inter-rater intra-session reproductibility coefficient

    Time frame: Day 0

  10. Averaged rectified EMG for Gastrocnemius medialis (μv.sec-1) reproductibility coefficient

    inter-rater intra-session reproductibility coefficient

    Time frame: Day 0

  11. Averaged rectified EMG for Soleus (μv.sec-1) reproductibility coefficient

    inter-rater intra-session reproductibility coefficient

    Time frame: Day 0

  12. Maximal value of EMG for Gastrocnemius medialis (μv) reproductibility coefficient

    inter-rater intra-session reproductibility coefficient

    Time frame: Day 0

  13. Maximal value of EMG for Soleus (μv) reproductibility coefficient

    inter-rater intra-session reproductibility coefficient

    Time frame: Day 0

Secondary outcomes

  1. duration of the mobilization (sec)

    Patients of the 3 groups

    Time frame: Day0

  2. duration of the mobilization (sec),

    Patients included in the "hospitalization group"

    Time frame: Day7

  3. duration of the mobilization (sec),

    Patients included in the "treatment group" and treated by anesthesic block

    Time frame: 30minutes to 2 hours after an anesthesic block

  4. duration of the mobilization (sec),

    Patients included in the "treatment group" and treated by selective tibial neurotomy or toxin intramuscular injection

    Time frame: 2 to 3 months after neurotomy or botulinium toxin injection

  5. range of motion (degree),

    Patients of the 3 groups

    Time frame: Day0

  6. range of motion (degree),

    Patients included in the "hospitalization group"

    Time frame: Day7

  7. range of motion (degree),

    Patients included in the "treatment group" and treated by anesthesic block

    Time frame: 30minutes to 2 hours after an anesthesic block

  8. range of motion (degree),

    Patients included in the "treatment group" and treated by selective tibial neurotomy or toxin intramuscular injection

    Time frame: 2 to 3 months after neurotomy or botulinium toxin injection

  9. maximal angular speed (degree.sec-1)

    Patients of the 3 groups

    Time frame: Day 0

  10. maximal angular speed (degree.sec-1)

    Patients included in the "hospitalization group"

    Time frame: Day 7

  11. maximal angular speed (degree.sec-1)

    Patients included in the "treatment group" and treated by anesthesic block

    Time frame: 30minutes to 2 hours after an anesthesic block

  12. maximal angular speed (degree.sec-1)

    Patients included in the "treatment group" and treated by selective tibial neurotomy or toxin intramuscular injection

    Time frame: 2 to 3 months after neurotomy or botulinium toxin injection

  13. torque peaque (N.m)

    Patients of the 3 groups

    Time frame: Day 0

  14. torque peaque (N.m)

    Patients included in the "hospitalization group"

    Time frame: Day 7

  15. torque peaque (N.m)

    Patients included in the "treatment group" and treated by anesthesic block

    Time frame: 30minutes to 2 hours after an anesthesic block

  16. torque peaque (N.m)

    Patients included in the "treatment group" and treated by selective tibial neurotomy or toxin intramuscular injection

    Time frame: 2 to 3 months after neurotomy or botulinium toxin injection

  17. work variability index (mJ.sec)

    Patients of the 3 groups

    Time frame: Day0

  18. work variability index (mJ.sec)

    Patients included in the "hospitalization group"

    Time frame: Day7

  19. work variability index (mJ.sec)

    Patients included in the "treatment group" and treated by anesthesic block

    Time frame: 30minutes to 2 hours after an anesthesic block

  20. work variability index (mJ.sec)

    Time frame: 2 to 3 months after neurotomy or botulinium toxin injection

  21. area under the curve raw Work = f(time)

    Patients of the 3 groups

    Time frame: Day 0

  22. area under the curve raw Work = f(time)

    Patients included in the "hospitalization group"

    Time frame: Day 7

  23. area under the curve raw Work = f(time)

    Patients included in the "treatment group" and treated by anesthesic block

    Time frame: 30minutes to 2 hours after an anesthesic block

  24. area under the curve raw Work = f(time)

    Patients included in the "treatment group" and treated by selective tibial neurotomy or toxin intramuscular injection

    Time frame: 2 to 3 months after neurotomy or botulinium toxin injection

  25. area under the curve rectified Work = f(time) (J.sec)

    Patients of the 3 groups

    Time frame: Day 0

  26. area under the curve rectified Work = f(time) (J.sec)

    Patients included in the "hospitalization group"

    Time frame: Day 7

  27. area under the curve rectified Work = f(time) (J.sec)

    Patients included in the "treatment group" and treated by anesthesic block

    Time frame: 30minutes to 2 hours after an anesthesic block

  28. area under the curve rectified Work = f(time) (J.sec)

    Patients included in the "treatment group" and treated by selective tibial neurotomy or toxin intramuscular injection

    Time frame: 2 to 3 months after neurotomy or botulinium toxin injection

  29. raw rectified EMG for Gastrocnemius medialis (μV and μV.sec-1)

    Patients of the 3 groups

    Time frame: Day 0

  30. raw rectified EMG for Gastrocnemius medialis (μV and μV.sec-1)

    Patients included in the "hospitalization group"

    Time frame: Day 7

  31. raw rectified EMG for Gastrocnemius medialis (μV and μV.sec-1)

    Patients included in the "treatment group" and treated by anesthesic block

    Time frame: 30minutes to 2 hours after an anesthesic block

  32. raw rectified EMG for Gastrocnemius medialis (μV and μV.sec-1)

    Patients included in the "treatment group" and treated by selective tibial neurotomy or toxin intramuscular injection

    Time frame: 2 to 3 months after neurotomy or botulinium toxin injection

  33. Averaged rectified EMG for Gastrocnemius medialis (μv.sec-1)

    Patients of the 3 groups

    Time frame: Day0

  34. Averaged rectified EMG for Gastrocnemius medialis (μv.sec-1)

    Patients included in the "hospitalization group"

    Time frame: Day7

  35. Averaged rectified EMG for Gastrocnemius medialis (μv.sec-1)

    Patients included in the "treatment group" and treated by anesthesic block

    Time frame: 30minutes to 2 hours after an anesthesic block

  36. Averaged rectified EMG for Gastrocnemius medialis (μv.sec-1)

    Patients included in the "treatment group" and treated by selective tibial neurotomy or toxin intramuscular injection

    Time frame: 2 to 3 months after neurotomy or botulinium toxin injection

  37. Raw rectified EMG for Soleus (μv)

    Patients of the 3 groups

    Time frame: Day 0

  38. Raw rectified EMG for Soleus (μv)

    Patients included in the "hospitalization group"

    Time frame: Day 7

  39. Raw rectified EMG for Soleus (μv)

    Patients included in the "treatment group" and treated by anesthesic block

    Time frame: 30minutes to 2 hours after an anesthesic block

  40. Raw rectified EMG for Soleus (μv)

    Patients included in the "treatment group" and treated by selective tibial neurotomy or toxin intramuscular injection

    Time frame: 2 to 3 months after neurotomy or botulinium toxin injection

  41. Averaged rectified EMG for Soleus (μv.sec-1)

    Patients of the 3 groups

    Time frame: Day 0

  42. Averaged rectified EMG for Soleus (μv.sec-1)

    Patients included in the "hospitalization group"

    Time frame: Day 7

  43. Averaged rectified EMG for Soleus (μv.sec-1)

    Patients included in the "treatment group" and treated by anesthesic block

    Time frame: 30minutes to 2 hours after an anesthesic block

  44. Averaged rectified EMG for Soleus (μv.sec-1)

    Patients included in the "treatment group" and treated by selective tibial neurotomy or toxin intramuscular injection

    Time frame: 2 to 3 months after neurotomy or botulinium toxin injection

  45. maximal value of EMG for Gastrocnemius medialis (μV)

    Patients of the 3 groups

    Time frame: Day0

  46. maximal value of EMG for Gastrocnemius medialis (μV)

    Patients included in the "hospitalization group"

    Time frame: Day7

  47. maximal value of EMG for Gastrocnemius medialis (μV)

    Patients included in the "treatment group" and treated by anesthesic block

    Time frame: 30minutes to 2 hours after an anesthesic block

  48. maximal value of EMG for Gastrocnemius medialis (μV)

    Patients included in the "treatment group" and treated by selective tibial neurotomy or toxin intramuscular injection

    Time frame: 2 to 3 months after neurotomy or botulinium toxin injection

  49. Maximal value of EMG for Soleus (μv)

    Patients of the 3 groups

    Time frame: Day 0

  50. Maximal value of EMG for Soleus (μv)

    Patients included in the "hospitalization group"

    Time frame: Day 7

  51. Maximal value of EMG for Soleus (μv)

    Patients included in the "treatment group" and treated by anesthesic block

    Time frame: 30minutes to 2 hours after an anesthesic block

  52. Maximal value of EMG for Soleus (μv)

    Patients included in the "treatment group" and treated by selective tibial neurotomy or toxin intramuscular injection

    Time frame: 2 to 3 months after neurotomy or botulinium toxin injection

  53. score on the modified Asworth scale

    Patients of the 3 groups

    Time frame: Day 0

  54. modified Tardieu scale assigned by the evaluator

    Patients of the 3 groups

    Time frame: Day 0

06

Study locations

1 site
  • Médecine Physique et Réadaptation Neurologique
    Nantes, 44000, France
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Bar-On L, Aertbelien E, Molenaers G, Van Campenhout A, Vandendoorent B, Nieuwenhuys A, Jaspers E, Hunaerts C, Desloovere K. Instrumented assessment of the effect of Botulinum Toxin-A in the medial hamstrings in children with cerebral palsy. Gait Posture. 2014 Jan;39(1):17-22. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.05.018. Epub 2013 Jun 20. PubMed 23791154 ↗
  • Bar-On L, Van Campenhout A, Desloovere K, Aertbelien E, Huenaerts C, Vandendoorent B, Nieuwenhuys A, Molenaers G. Is an instrumented spasticity assessment an improvement over clinical spasticity scales in assessing and predicting the response to integrated botulinum toxin type a treatment in children with cerebral palsy? Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Mar;95(3):515-23. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.08.010. Epub 2013 Aug 27. PubMed 23994052 ↗
  • de Vlugt E, de Groot JH, Schenkeveld KE, Arendzen JH, van der Helm FC, Meskers CG. The relation between neuromechanical parameters and Ashworth score in stroke patients. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2010 Jul 27;7:35. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-7-35. PubMed 20663189 ↗
  • Schless SH, Desloovere K, Aertbelien E, Molenaers G, Huenaerts C, Bar-On L. The Intra- and Inter-Rater Reliability of an Instrumented Spasticity Assessment in Children with Cerebral Palsy. PLoS One. 2015 Jul 2;10(7):e0131011. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131011. eCollection 2015. PubMed 26134673 ↗
  • Gaverth J, Sandgren M, Lindberg PG, Forssberg H, Eliasson AC. Test-retest and inter-rater reliability of a method to measure wrist and finger spasticity. J Rehabil Med. 2013 Jul;45(7):630-6. doi: 10.2340/16501977-1160. PubMed 23695917 ↗
  • Turk R, Notley SV, Pickering RM, Simpson DM, Wright PA, Burridge JH. Reliability and sensitivity of a wrist rig to measure motor control and spasticity in poststroke hemiplegia. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008 Nov-Dec;22(6):684-96. doi: 10.1177/1545968308315599. Epub 2008 Sep 5. PubMed 18776066 ↗
08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03307135
Lead sponsor
Nantes University Hospital
Collaborators
Compiègne University of Technology
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 11, 2017
Start date
Oct 10, 2017
Primary completion
Sep 10, 2019
Completion
Mar 13, 2020
Last update
Nov 30, 2020

Study contacts

Brigitte Perrouin-Verbe, PU-PH
principal investigator · Nantes CHU

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion