An interventional study of Dry Needing in Tinnitus, Trigger Point Pain, Myofascial and Somatosensory Disorders, sponsored by University of Sao Paulo General Hospital. Status unknown at 1 site in Brazil. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-09-28.
Sponsored by University of Sao Paulo General Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
Self paring study, double blind placebo controlled with chronic tinnitus patients attended at the Tinnitus Research Group HC- FMUSP, complaining of neck and/or cervical pain and with myofascial trigger point in the head, neck and/or shoulder. They were submitted to a complete otolaryngologist evaluation which included history, physical examination and myofascial trigger point checkup. Patients also performed blood tests, tonal and vocal audiometry, and psychoacoustic tinnitus measures. Self paring study, double blind placebo controlled. Each patient will be subjected to the dry needling placebo, 4 sessions, 1 per week, with placebo stretching, followed by washout period of two weeks, and 4 more dry needling therapeutic sessions and active stretching. On the first day of the study will be conducted the following evaluation: questionnaires THI and NDI, quantification of cervical pain and tinnitus through the Visual analogue scale (VAS), search and confirmation of the presence of PGM and cervical pain, psychoacoustic measures and somatic tests. This evaluation will be repeated at the end of the four placebo sessions, at the beginning of therapeutic needling sessions and at the end of the same.
The first phase of the study will be the placebo needling, performed with a sham needle and following the same procedures than the therapeutic treatment. Four placebo sessions will be performed, 1 per week, with placebo stretching, followed by washout period of two weeks, and 4 more dry needling therapeutic sessions, also once a week and active stretching. The muscles selected for dry needling were frontal, temporal, trapezius, masseter, sternocleidomastoid (SCM), head splenius, scalene, medial pterygoid, lateral pterygoid, rhomboid.
Procedure technique Each patient was recommended to assume a relaxed posture suitable to access the muscles being treated, instructed to expose the painful area, settled himself in supine, prone, or side lying positions, at a stretcher or a chair, depending on the muscle to be treated. The main therapist performed MTP target with a pen, hands antisepsis, gloves wear and skin area cleaning with 70% isopropyl alcohol prior to needling. Along all procedure the main therapist was able to view the patient's face and to receive regular treating feedback. A sterile disposable filament needle was inserted directly perpendicular through the skin using a guide tube that was then removed. Depth needle penetration with slow sidelong direction in and outside displacements were performed through the muscle until reach MTP spot. The patient's reaction indicated a "DEQI" (name given for the vague sensation of needle-specific pain) or a "twitch response" (deflagration of a contractile muscle answer in the moment that maximum muscle shortening fibers were broken). At this point needle was leaved static in situ for 30-60 seconds. After the correct treatment needle was removed and the muscle was active stretched.
Variables studied before and after therapeutic needling were:
Exclusion Criteria:
Intervention = Sham Needling
Procedure: Dry Needing
Intervention = Active Needling
Procedure: Dry Needing
Dry Needling
Placebo Dry Needling
Placebo Needling on trigger points
Time frame: 4 weeks
Active Dry needling
Therapeutic needling on trigger points
Time frame: 4 weeks
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is status unknown, as verified in Sep 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
University of Sao Paulo General Hospital