CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03285828FEMEMUpdated Sep 18, 2017

Motivational Interviewing Training for Medical Students: a Pilot Pre-post Study

An interventional study of motivationnal interviewing training in Change; Personality, Due to General Medical Condition, sponsored by Bicetre Hospital. Completed. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-09-18.

Sponsored by Bicetre Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Non-randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Objective is to evaluate the impact of a basic training programme in motivational interviewing (MI) for medical students, by comparing the ability of students to promote behavioural changes through relationship skills and to conduct a motivational interview before and after training.

Read the detailed description

Design: A pilot pre-post study in 20 students by comparing students' performance before and after MI training session.

Setting: Bicêtre Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, France.

Interventions: Students received three four-hour sessions of a basic MI training over a one week period. The students interviewed for 15 minutes a caregiver playing the role of a patient, six weeks before and three weeks after the training.

Main outcome measures: Global scores by two independent raters who used the Motivational Interviewing Treatment Integrity (MITI) 3.1.1 code, perception of student's empathy by the caregivers (CARE questionnaire), self-efficacy of students to engage in a patient-centred relationship (SEPCQ score), and student's satisfaction with the odds of achieving the target goal.

02

Conditions studied

  • Change; Personality, Due to General Medical Condition

Keywords

  • medical education, motivational interviewing, medical empathy
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Students in clinical internships (fourth or fifth year of medical courses) in the Immunology-Infection-Inflammation-Endocrinology Division of Bicêtre Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris.
  • signed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • participation refused
  • prior training in motivational interviewing
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
20 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    First group

    Students received three four-hour sessions of a basic motivationnal interviewing training over a one week period. The students interviewed for 15 minutes a caregiver playing the role of a patient, six weeks before and three weeks after the training.

    Behavioral: motivationnal interviewing training

  • Other
    Second group

    Students received three four-hour sessions of a basic motivationnal interviewing training over a one week period. The students interviewed for 15 minutes a caregiver playing the role of a patient, six weeks before and three weeks after the training.

    Behavioral: motivationnal interviewing training

Interventions

  • Behavioralmotivationnal interviewing training

    The students received three four-hour sessions of basic motivationnal interviewing training : 1. Viewing and commenting on video clips illustrating motivational and non-motivational doctor-patient interactions. 2. Lectures and the distribution of memory aids. 3. Practical exercises: making "reflections", asking open questions; exploring ambivalence; dealing with resistance; expressing empathy, summarising. 4. Role-playing, based on several situations, each involving two students. The investigators deliberately chose a non-medical situation (conflict between a mother and a student asking her for pocket money to go out for fun, the day before a university examination) for the first situation. All the other situations concerned changes to healthier behaviour in a medical setting, but with a goal different from that used for the first or the second simulated interview before motivationnal interviewing training.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. GLOBAL MITI scores (MITI = Motivational Interviewing Treatment Integrity version 3.1.1)

    Global scores by two independent raters who used the Motivational Interviewing Treatment Integrity (MITI) 3.1.1 code

    Time frame: 15 mn

  2. perception of student's empathy by the caregivers

    CARE questionnaire (CARE = The Consultation And Relational Empathy questionnaire)

    Time frame: 15 mn

  3. self-efficacy of students to engage in a patient-centred relationship

    SEPCQ score (SEPCQ = The self-efficacy in patient-centeredness score)

    Time frame: 15 mn

  4. student's satisfaction with the odds of achieving the target goal.

    specific questionnary (Analog scale of satisfaction from 1 (not satisfied) to 10 (very statisfied))

    Time frame: 15 mn

06

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

07

References and documents

Publications

  • Rollnick S, Butler CC, Kinnersley P, Gregory J, Mash B. Motivational interviewing. BMJ. 2010 Apr 27;340:c1900. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c1900. No abstract available. PubMed 20423957 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03285828
Lead sponsor
Bicetre Hospital
Collaborators
INSERM SC10-US19, University of Paris 5 - Rene Descartes
Responsible party
DR ANTOINE CHERET (Doctor ANTOINE CHERET, Bicetre Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 18, 2017
Start date
Apr 4, 2016
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2016
Completion
Jun 30, 2016
Last update
Sep 18, 2017

Study contacts

ANTOINE CHERET
principal investigator · Bicetre Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion