CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT03285646FACT CLBP 1Updated Jun 30, 2021Results posted

Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Fasinumab in Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Chronic Low Back Pain and Osteoarthritis of the Hip or Knee

A Phase 3 interventional study of Fasinumab and Placebo in Chronic Low Back Pain and Osteoarthritis, sponsored by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals. Terminated at 56 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-06-30.

Sponsored by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Due to implementation of an urgent safety measure, enrollment and dosing in R475-PN-1612 was stopped; enrolled participants entered the 20-week safety follow-up
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
63
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of fasinumab in relieving Chronic low back pain (CLBP) as compared to placebo in participants with a clinical diagnosis of moderate-to-severe non-radicular CLBP and Osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee or hip when treated for up to 16 weeks. The secondary objectives of the study are: To evaluate the safety and tolerability of fasinumab compared to placebo when participants with a clinical diagnosis of moderate-to-severe non-radicular CLBP and OA of the knee or hip are treated for up to 16 weeks; To characterize the concentrations of fasinumab in serum over time when participants with a clinical diagnosis of moderate-to-severe non-radicular CLBP and OA of the knee or hip are treated for up to 16 weeks; To evaluate the immunogenicity of fasinumab when treated for up to 16 weeks in participants with a clinical diagnosis of moderate-to-severe non-radicular CLBP and OA of the knee or hip.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Low Back Pain
  • Osteoarthritis

Keywords

  • Knee
  • Hip
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Clinical diagnosis of non-radicular moderate-to-severe CLBP for ≥3 months (prior to screening visit)
  2. Clinical diagnosis of OA in at least 1 hip or knee joint based on the American College of Rheumatology Criteria with radiographic evidence of OA (K-L ≥2) at screening
  3. History of inadequate relief of CLBP from non-pharmacologic therapy
  4. Willing to undergo joint replacement (JR) surgery, if necessary
  5. History of regular analgesic medication use
  6. History of inadequate pain relief or intolerance to analgesics used for chronic LBP

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient is not a candidate for MRI
  2. History of major trauma or back surgery in the past 6 months prior to the screening visit
  3. History or presence of pyriformis syndrome
  4. Evidence on baseline lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging of potentially confounding conditions
  5. History or evidence on joint imaging of conditions that may confound joint safety evaluation
  6. Evidence or symptoms consistent with autonomic dysfunction (e.g., orthostatic hypotension and/or autonomic symptoms) as defined in the protocol
  7. Recent use of longer acting pain medications
  8. Other medical conditions that may interfere with participation or accurate assessments during the trial

Note: Other protocol defined Inclusion/ Exclusion criteria apply.

04

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
63 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Fasinumab

    Subcutaneous (SC) every 4 weeks (Q4W)

    Drug: Fasinumab

  • Experimental
    Placebo

    SC every 4 weeks

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugFasinumab

    Subcutaneous (SC) every 4 weeks (Q4W)

    Also known as: REGN475

  • DrugPlacebo

    Subcutaneous (SC) every 4 weeks (Q4W)

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline to Week 16 in the Average Daily Low Back Pain Intensity (LBPI) Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score

    Average daily low back pain (LBP) was assessed on an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS) and was defined as the average of the non-missing daily LBPI NRS scores for the 7 days before and including nominal visit. Participants described their average low back pain during the past 24 hours on a scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicate higher pain.

    Time frame: Week 1, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline to Week 16 in the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) Total Score

    The RMDQ is a self-administered, health status measure for lower back pain (LBP). It measures pain and function using 24 items describing limitations to everyday life that can be caused by LBP. The score of the RMDQ is the total number of items checked from a minimum of 0 (no disability) to a maximum of 24 (maximum disability), where lower scores are indicative of better function.

    Time frame: Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16

  2. Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Low Back Pain (LBP) Score

    The PGA of LBP is a participant assessed 5 point Likert scale of LBP ranging from 1-5 where 1 = very well; 2 = well; 3 = fair; 4 = poor; and 5 = very poor.

    Time frame: Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16

  3. Number of Participants Achieving ≥30% Reduction From Baseline to Week 16 in Average Daily LBPI NRS Score

    Average daily low back pain (LBP) was assessed on an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS) and was defined as the average of the non-missing daily LBPI NRS scores for the 7 days before and including nominal visit. Participants described their average low back pain during the past 24 hours on a scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicate higher pain.

    Time frame: Week 16

  4. Change From Baseline to Week 16 in the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Score

    The BPI-sf is a self-administered questionnaire for participants to rate the severity of their pain and the degree to which their pain interferes with common dimensions of feeling and function. With a recall period of 24 hours, the questionnaire contains the front and back body diagrams, the 4 pain severity items and 7 pain interference items rated on 0-10 scale; total interference score ranges from 0-10 (0, does not interfere; 10 completely interferes), and the question about percentage of pain relief by analgesics. The BPI pain interference is typically scored as the mean of the 7 interference items.

    Time frame: Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16

  5. Number of Adjudicated Arthropathy (AA) Events

    Adjudicated arthropathy (AA) is a composite term that encompasses the following conditions: Rapidly progressive OA type 1 and 2, Subchondral insufficiency fractures, and Primary Osteonecrosis. AAs were also evaluated to determine if they met Destructive Arthropathy criteria.

    Time frame: Up to Week 36

  6. Number of Adjudicated Arthropathy (AA) Events Meeting Destructive Arthropathy (DA) Criteria

    Destructive arthropathy (DA) is a unique clinical form of rapidly destructive arthropathy over and above that seen in the normal progression of OA. DA criteria can be associated with Rapidly Progressive Osteoarthritis type 2, Subchondral Insufficiency fracture, and Primary Osteonecrosis.

    Time frame: Up to Week 36

  7. Number of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

    Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) are defined as those that are not present at baseline or represent the exacerbation of a pre-existing condition during the on-treatment period.

    Time frame: Up to Week 16

  8. Number of Sympathetic Nervous System (SNS) Dysfunction Events

    Potential events of sympathetic nervous system (SNS) dysfunction were monitored throughout the study through physical examination, AE reporting, assessment of orthostatic hypotension, and the Survey of Autonomic Symptoms. Sympathetic nervous system dysfunction was diagnosed after consultation with an appropriate specialist, such as a neurologist and/or cardiologist.

    Time frame: Up to Week 36

  9. Number of Peripheral Sensory Adverse Events (AEs) That Require a Neurology Consultation

    Any peripheral sensory AE (eg, paraesthesia and hypoaesthesia) that required a neurology consultation.

    Time frame: Up to Week 36

  10. Number of All-Cause Joint Replacement (JR) Surgery Events

    All joint replacement surgery events regardless of cause.

    Time frame: Up to Week 36

  11. Number of Joint Replacement (JR) Surgery Events Reported at Telephone Survey After Last Dose of Study Drug

    An end of study phone contact was conducted approximately 52 weeks following the last dose of study drug (week 12) to evaluate the number of participants who had undergone or were scheduled for JR surgery.

    Time frame: Up to Week 64

  12. Number of Participants With at Least One Positive Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Assay

    Samples for Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) evaluation were collected at baseline and at subsequent study visits. ADA variables include ADA status (+ or -) and titer as follows: Total participants negative in the ADA assay at all time points analyzed. Pre-existing immunoreactivity - positive response at baseline with all post-dose results negative, or a positive response at baseline with all post-dose responses less than 9-fold over baseline titer levels. Treatment emergent - post-dose positive result when baseline results were negative. Persistent - A positive result detected in at least 2 consecutive post baseline samples separated by at least a 16-week post baseline period, with no negative results in-between. Indeterminate - A positive result at the last collection time point analyzed only. Transient - Not persistent or indeterminate regardless of any missing samples. Treatment boosted - any post-dose positive result at least 9-fold over the baseline level when baseline is positive.

    Time frame: 16 Weeks

  13. Serum Concentration of Functional Fasinumab Over Time

    Summary of mean concentration of functional fasinumab are presented by nominal time point.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 16

06

Results

Posted Jun 30, 2021
Limitations and caveats
Enrollment and study drug administration was stopped due to an urgent safety measure. As a result the small number of participants enrolled in this study limited the interpretability of the efficacy results.

Participant flow

Participants were screened for study eligibility across the US. Of the 377 participants screened, 63 met eligibility criteria. The most frequently reported reason for non-randomization was inclusion criteria not met and/or exclusion criteria met (224 participants):139 did not meet inclusion criteria, 86 participants met exclusion criteria.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneFasinumab-matching PlaceboFasinumab 3 mg SC Q4W
Started3231
Completed1927
Not completed134
Withdrew: Adverse event10
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject102
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up21
Withdrew: Investigator/sponsor decision01

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange From Baseline to Week 16 in the Average Daily Low Back Pain Intensity (LBPI) Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score

Average daily low back pain (LBP) was assessed on an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS) and was defined as the average of the non-missing daily LBPI NRS scores for the 7 days before and including nominal visit. Participants described their average low back pain during the past 24 hours on a scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicate higher pain.

Time frame:
Week 1, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16
Reported as:
Mean · Score on a Scale
Change From Baseline to Week 16 in the Average Daily Low Back Pain Intensity (LBPI) Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score
Score on a ScaleFasinumab-matching PlaceboFasinumab 3 mg SC Q4W
Change from Baseline to Week 1-0.73 ± 1.424-1.62 ± 2.037
Change from Baseline to Week 2-0.98 ± 1.588-2.15 ± 2.067
Change from Baseline to Week 4-1.28 ± 1.878-2.64 ± 2.038
Change from Baseline to Week 8-1.21 ± 1.568-2.82 ± 1.963
Change from Baseline to Week 12-2.12 ± 1.582-3.18 ± 2.046
Change from Baseline to Week 16-0.77 ± 1.943-2.32 ± 1.367
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 16 in the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) Total Score

The RMDQ is a self-administered, health status measure for lower back pain (LBP). It measures pain and function using 24 items describing limitations to everyday life that can be caused by LBP. The score of the RMDQ is the total number of items checked from a minimum of 0 (no disability) to a maximum of 24 (maximum disability), where lower scores are indicative of better function.

Time frame:
Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16
Reported as:
Mean · Score on a Scale
Change From Baseline to Week 16 in the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) Total Score
Score on a ScaleFasinumab-matching PlaceboFasinumab 3 mg SC Q4W
Change from Baseline to Week 2-2.70 ± 5.120-2.54 ± 4.836
Change from Baseline to Week 4-1.92 ± 4.529-3.09 ± 3.884
Change from Baseline to Week 80.37 ± 4.487-4.18 ± 5.015
Change from Baseline to Week 120.83 ± 3.061-3.33 ± 4.301
Change from Baseline to Week 16-1.00 ± NA-5.75 ± 3.948
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 16 in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Low Back Pain (LBP) Score

The PGA of LBP is a participant assessed 5 point Likert scale of LBP ranging from 1-5 where 1 = very well; 2 = well; 3 = fair; 4 = poor; and 5 = very poor.

Time frame:
Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16
Reported as:
Mean · Score on a Scale
Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Low Back Pain (LBP) Score
Score on a ScaleFasinumab-matching PlaceboFasinumab 3 mg SC Q4W
Change from Baseline to Week 2-0.44 ± 0.751-0.76 ± 0.786
Change from Baseline to Week 4-0.60 ± 0.957-1.04 ± 0.676
Change from Baseline to Week 8-0.55 ± 0.945-1.10 ± 1.021
Change from Baseline to Week 12-0.57 ± 1.134-1.00 ± 1.333
Change from Baseline to Week 160.00 ± NA-0.75 ± 0.500
SecondaryNumber of Participants Achieving ≥30% Reduction From Baseline to Week 16 in Average Daily LBPI NRS Score

Average daily low back pain (LBP) was assessed on an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS) and was defined as the average of the non-missing daily LBPI NRS scores for the 7 days before and including nominal visit. Participants described their average low back pain during the past 24 hours on a scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicate higher pain.

Time frame:
Week 16
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Achieving ≥30% Reduction From Baseline to Week 16 in Average Daily LBPI NRS Score
ParticipantsFasinumab-matching PlaceboFasinumab 3 mg SC Q4W
Number of Participants Achieving ≥30% Reduction From Baseline to Week 16 in Average Daily LBPI NRS Score1221
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 16 in the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Score

The BPI-sf is a self-administered questionnaire for participants to rate the severity of their pain and the degree to which their pain interferes with common dimensions of feeling and function. With a recall period of 24 hours, the questionnaire contains the front and back body diagrams, the 4 pain severity items and 7 pain interference items rated on 0-10 scale; total interference score ranges from 0-10 (0, does not interfere; 10 completely interferes), and the question about percentage of pain relief by analgesics. The BPI pain interference is typically scored as the mean of the 7 interference items.

Time frame:
Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16
Reported as:
Mean · Score on a Scale
Change From Baseline to Week 16 in the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Score
Score on a ScaleFasinumab-matching PlaceboFasinumab 3 mg SC Q4W
Change from Baseline to Week 2-1.55 ± 2.306-1.94 ± 2.255
Change from Baseline to Week 4-1.49 ± 2.390-2.15 ± 2.157
Change from Baseline to Week 8-1.31 ± 2.119-2.70 ± 2.774
Change from Baseline to Week 12-1.63 ± 2.096-1.84 ± 1.978
Change from Baseline to Week 16-1.14 ± NA-1.29 ± 3.017
SecondaryNumber of Adjudicated Arthropathy (AA) Events

Adjudicated arthropathy (AA) is a composite term that encompasses the following conditions: Rapidly progressive OA type 1 and 2, Subchondral insufficiency fractures, and Primary Osteonecrosis. AAs were also evaluated to determine if they met Destructive Arthropathy criteria.

Time frame:
Up to Week 36
Reported as:
Number · Adjudicated Arthropathy (AA) Events
Number of Adjudicated Arthropathy (AA) Events
Adjudicated Arthropathy (AA) EventsFasinumab-matching PlaceboFasinumab 3 mg SC Q4W
Number of Adjudicated Arthropathy (AA) Events02
SecondaryNumber of Adjudicated Arthropathy (AA) Events Meeting Destructive Arthropathy (DA) Criteria

Destructive arthropathy (DA) is a unique clinical form of rapidly destructive arthropathy over and above that seen in the normal progression of OA. DA criteria can be associated with Rapidly Progressive Osteoarthritis type 2, Subchondral Insufficiency fracture, and Primary Osteonecrosis.

Time frame:
Up to Week 36
Reported as:
Number · Destructive Arthropathy (DA) Events
Number of Adjudicated Arthropathy (AA) Events Meeting Destructive Arthropathy (DA) Criteria
Destructive Arthropathy (DA) EventsFasinumab-matching PlaceboFasinumab 3 mg SC Q4W
Number of Adjudicated Arthropathy (AA) Events Meeting Destructive Arthropathy (DA) Criteria00
SecondaryNumber of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) are defined as those that are not present at baseline or represent the exacerbation of a pre-existing condition during the on-treatment period.

Time frame:
Up to Week 16
Reported as:
Number · Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events
Number of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsFasinumab-matching PlaceboFasinumab 3 mg SC Q4W
Number of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)3314
SecondaryNumber of Sympathetic Nervous System (SNS) Dysfunction Events

Potential events of sympathetic nervous system (SNS) dysfunction were monitored throughout the study through physical examination, AE reporting, assessment of orthostatic hypotension, and the Survey of Autonomic Symptoms. Sympathetic nervous system dysfunction was diagnosed after consultation with an appropriate specialist, such as a neurologist and/or cardiologist.

Time frame:
Up to Week 36
Reported as:
Number · Sympathetic NS Dysfunction Events
Number of Sympathetic Nervous System (SNS) Dysfunction Events
Sympathetic NS Dysfunction EventsFasinumab-matching PlaceboFasinumab 3 mg SC Q4W
Number of Sympathetic Nervous System (SNS) Dysfunction Events00
SecondaryNumber of Peripheral Sensory Adverse Events (AEs) That Require a Neurology Consultation

Any peripheral sensory AE (eg, paraesthesia and hypoaesthesia) that required a neurology consultation.

Time frame:
Up to Week 36
Reported as:
Number · Peripheral Sensory Adverse Events (AEs)
Number of Peripheral Sensory Adverse Events (AEs) That Require a Neurology Consultation
Peripheral Sensory Adverse Events (AEs)Fasinumab-matching PlaceboFasinumab 3 mg SC Q4W
Hypoaesthesia events10
Paraesthesia events10
SecondaryNumber of All-Cause Joint Replacement (JR) Surgery Events

All joint replacement surgery events regardless of cause.

Time frame:
Up to Week 36
Reported as:
Number · Joint Replacement (JR) Surgery Events
Number of All-Cause Joint Replacement (JR) Surgery Events
Joint Replacement (JR) Surgery EventsFasinumab-matching PlaceboFasinumab 3 mg SC Q4W
Number of All-Cause Joint Replacement (JR) Surgery Events21
SecondaryNumber of Joint Replacement (JR) Surgery Events Reported at Telephone Survey After Last Dose of Study Drug

An end of study phone contact was conducted approximately 52 weeks following the last dose of study drug (week 12) to evaluate the number of participants who had undergone or were scheduled for JR surgery.

Time frame:
Up to Week 64
Reported as:
Number · Joint Replacement (JR) Surgery Events
Number of Joint Replacement (JR) Surgery Events Reported at Telephone Survey After Last Dose of Study Drug
Joint Replacement (JR) Surgery EventsFasinumab-matching PlaceboFasinumab 3 mg SC Q4W
Number of Joint Replacement (JR) Surgery Events Reported at Telephone Survey After Last Dose of Study Drug00
SecondaryNumber of Participants With at Least One Positive Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Assay

Samples for Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) evaluation were collected at baseline and at subsequent study visits. ADA variables include ADA status (+ or -) and titer as follows: Total participants negative in the ADA assay at all time points analyzed. Pre-existing immunoreactivity - positive response at baseline with all post-dose results negative, or a positive response at baseline with all post-dose responses less than 9-fold over baseline titer levels. Treatment emergent - post-dose positive result when baseline results were negative. Persistent - A positive result detected in at least 2 consecutive post baseline samples separated by at least a 16-week post baseline period, with no negative results in-between. Indeterminate - A positive result at the last collection time point analyzed only. Transient - Not persistent or indeterminate regardless of any missing samples. Treatment boosted - any post-dose positive result at least 9-fold over the baseline level when baseline is positive.

Time frame:
16 Weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With at Least One Positive Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Assay
ParticipantsFasinumab-matching PlaceboFasinumab 3 mg SC Q4W
Negative/Pre-Existing3131
Treatment Boosted00
Treatment-Emergent00
Treatment-Emergent: Persistent00
Treatment-Emergent: Transient00
Treatment-Emergent: Indeterminate00
SecondarySerum Concentration of Functional Fasinumab Over Time

Summary of mean concentration of functional fasinumab are presented by nominal time point.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 16
Reported as:
Mean · Milligram per Liter (mg/L)
Serum Concentration of Functional Fasinumab Over Time
Milligram per Liter (mg/L)Fasinumab 3 mg SC Q4W
Baseline0 ± 0
Week 20.262 ± 0.0992
Week 40.176 ± 0.0679
Week 80.247 ± 0.130
Week 160.192 ± 0.0932

Adverse events

Collected over From the first dose of study drug up to 24 weeks post the last dose of study drug (up to week 36). Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Fasinumab-matching Placebo0/32 (0%)1/32 (3.1%)14/32 (43.8%)
Fasinumab 3 mg SC Q4W0/31 (0%)2/31 (6.5%)4/31 (12.9%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventFasinumab-matching PlaceboFasinumab 3 mg SC Q4W
Breast cancer stage IVNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)0/321/31
DizzinessNervous system disorders0/321/31
DyspnoeaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/321/31
OsteoarthritisMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/320/31
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventFasinumab-matching PlaceboFasinumab 3 mg SC Q4W
Back painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders5/320/31
Upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations4/321/31
ArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders4/323/31
Blood creatine phosphokinase increasedInvestigations3/321/31
Neck PainMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders2/321/31
Peripheral swellingGeneral disorders2/320/31
CoughRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders2/320/31

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Fasinumab-matching PlaceboFasinumab 3 mg SC Q4WTotal
Mean57.7 ± 9.8860.0 ± 10.5258.8 ± 10.18
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Fasinumab-matching PlaceboFasinumab 3 mg SC Q4WTotal
Female211839
Male111324
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Fasinumab-matching PlaceboFasinumab 3 mg SC Q4WTotal
Hispanic or Latino134
Not Hispanic or Latino312859
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Fasinumab-matching PlaceboFasinumab 3 mg SC Q4WTotal
White151732
Black or African American151429
American Indian or Alaska Native101
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander101
Average Daily Low Back Pain Intensity (LBPI) Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score
Average Daily Low Back Pain Intensity (LBPI) Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score(Score on a Scale)Fasinumab-matching PlaceboFasinumab 3 mg SC Q4WTotal
Mean6.66 ± 1.4756.81 ± 1.3386.73 ± 1.400
07

Study locations

56 sites
  • Regeneron Research Site
    Phoenix, Arizona 85053, United States
  • Regeneron Research Site
    Tucson, Arizona 85704, United States
  • Regeneron Research Site
    Tucson, Arizona 85712, United States
  • Regeneron Research Site
    Anaheim, California 92801, United States
  • Regeneron Research Site
    Anaheim, California 92805, United States
  • Regeneron Research Site
    La Mesa, California 91942, United States
  • Regeneron Research Site
    North Hollywood, California 91606, United States
  • Regeneron Research Site
    San Diego, California 92103, United States
  • Regeneron Research Site
    San Marcos, California 92078, United States
  • Regeneron Research Site
    Santa Ana, California 92703, United States
  • Regeneron Research Site
    Spring Valley, California 91978, United States
  • Regeneron Research Site
    Whittier, California 90602, United States
  • Regeneron Research Site
    Stamford, Connecticut 06905, United States
  • Regeneron Research Site
    Waterbury, Connecticut 06708, United States
  • Regeneron Research Site
    Clearwater, Florida 33756, United States
  • Regeneron Research Site
    Hialeah, Florida 33012, United States
  • Regeneron Research Site
    Jacksonville, Florida 32256, United States
  • Regeneron Research Site
    Lauderdale Lakes, Florida 33319, United States
  • Regeneron Research Site
    Miami, Florida 33155, United States
  • Regeneron Research Site
    Ocoee, Florida 34761, United States
  • Regeneron Research Site
    Orlando, Florida 32801, United States
  • Regeneron Research Site
    Orlando, Florida 32806, United States
  • Regeneron Research Site
    Port Orange, Florida 32127, United States
  • Regeneron Research Site
    Sarasota, Florida 34232, United States
  • Regeneron Research Site
    Atlanta, Georgia 30189, United States
  • Regeneron Research Site
    Columbus, Georgia 31904, United States
  • Regeneron Research Site #1
    Marietta, Georgia 30060, United States
  • Regeneron Research Site #2
    Marietta, Georgia 30060, United States
  • Regeneron Research Site
    Newnan, Georgia 30265, United States
  • Regeneron Research Site
    Idaho Falls, Idaho 83404, United States
  • Regeneron Research Site
    Chicago, Illinois 60602, United States
  • Regeneron Research Site
    Chicago, Illinois 60607, United States
  • Regeneron Research Site
    Valparaiso, Indiana 46383, United States
  • Regeneron Research Site
    West Des Moines, Iowa 50265, United States
  • Regeneron Research Site
    Edgewood, Kentucky 41017, United States
  • Regeneron Research Site
    New Orleans, Louisiana 70115, United States
  • Regeneron Research Site
    Bay City, Michigan 48706, United States
  • Regeneron Research Site
    Saint Louis, Missouri 63117, United States
  • Regeneron Research Site
    Lincoln, Nebraska 68516, United States
  • Regeneron Research Site
    Las Vegas, Nevada 89144, United States
  • Regeneron Research Site
    Berlin, New Jersey 08009, United States
  • Regeneron Research Site
    Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102, United States
  • Regeneron Research Site
    Hartsdale, New York 10530, United States
  • Regeneron Research Site
    New York, New York 10036, United States
  • Regeneron Research Site
    High Point, North Carolina 27262, United States
  • Regeneron Research Site
    Fargo, North Dakota 58105, United States
  • Regeneron Research Site
    Beavercreek, Ohio 45431, United States
  • Regeneron Research Site
    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73103, United States
  • Regeneron Research Site
    Duncansville, Pennsylvania 16635, United States
  • Regeneron Research Site
    Rapid City, South Dakota 57702, United States
  • Regeneron Research Site #1
    Memphis, Tennessee 38119, United States
  • Regeneron Research Site #2
    Memphis, Tennessee 38119, United States
  • Regeneron Research Site
    Houston, Texas 77058, United States
  • Regeneron Research Site
    Katy, Texas 77498, United States
  • Regeneron Research Site
    Plano, Texas 75075, United States
  • Regeneron Research Site
    Kenosha, Wisconsin 53144, United States
08

References and documents

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Jul 25, 2017
  • Statistical analysis plan · Dec 10, 2018

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03285646
Lead sponsor
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
Collaborators
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 18, 2017
Start date
Oct 30, 2017
Primary completion
May 5, 2018
Completion
May 2, 2019
Results posted
Jun 30, 2021
Last update
Jun 30, 2021

Study contacts

Clinical Trial Management
study director · Regeneron Pharmaceuticals

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Jun 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion