ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03283488Updated Jul 7, 2023

Comparison Between Mirtazapine and Megestrol for the Control of Anorexia-cachexia in Cancer Patients in Palliative Care.

A Phase 2 interventional study of Mirtazapine and Megestrol in Cachexia; Cancer and Anorexia, sponsored by University of Sao Paulo. Completed at 1 site in Brazil. Open to participants aged 50 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-07-07.

Sponsored by University of Sao Paulo · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
52
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
50 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Cancer-associated anorexia-cachexia is an insidious syndrome that has a major impact on the patient's quality of life, but is also associated with a significant reduction in survival. Despite its clinical importance, it remains a widely underestimated and untreated condition. Considering the scarcity of pharmacological measures, it is necessary to invest in studies that may contribute to the rational and effective treatment of this clinical condition. Mirtazapine has a special therapeutic potential because it is a well-tolerated drug with few adverse effects and with well-known orexigenic action in clinical practice.The objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of mirtazapine as a pharmacological measure in the management of cancer-related anorexia-cachexia in patients in palliative care. A randomized, double-blind clinical trial involving 52 cancer patients with anorexia-cachexia in palliative care will be conducted. Patients will be randomized to receive mirtazapine or megestrol and will be evaluated longitudinally for a period of 8 weeks. The primary endpoint will be to assess the effect of mirtazapine on anorexia and weight gain and secondary outcomes will be to assess the tolerability and safety of mirtazapine and the effect of mirtazapine on body composition, quality of life, and functional capacity of patients.

Read the detailed description

Cancer-associated anorexia-cachexia is an insidious syndrome that has a major impact on the patient's quality of life, but is also associated with a significant reduction in survival. Unintentional weight loss can predict a poor prognosis in cancer patients which is most likely due to decreased doses of treatment. Despite its clinical importance, it remains a widely underestimated and untreated condition. Considering the scarcity of pharmacological measures, it is necessary to invest in studies that may contribute to the rational and effective treatment of this clinical condition. Mirtazapine has a special therapeutic potential because it is a well-tolerated drug with few adverse effects and with well-known orexigenic action in clinical practice. It has been shown to have side effects of increased appetite and weight gain in cancer subjects with depression and nausea, as well as in non-depressed cancer patients, but there are not, as yet, randomized controlled trials showing its effect on cancer-associated anorexia-cachexia. The objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of mirtazapine as a pharmacological measure in the management of cancer-related anorexia-cachexia in patients in palliative care. A randomized, double-blind clinical trial involving 52 cancer patients with anorexia-cachexia in palliative care will be conducted. Patients will be randomized to receive mirtazapine or megestrol and will be evaluated longitudinally for a period of 8 weeks. After the initial evaluation and randomization, patients will be reassessed after 4 and 8 weeks at an outpatient clinic where they will be evaluated for the following variables: (1) General and demographic characteristics; (2) Usual food intake; (3) Anthropometric evaluation; (4) Presence and degree of symptoms using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System; (4) Status performance using the Karnofsky performance status; (5) Quality of life using the QLQ-C30 Questionnaire; (6) Depression using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; (7) Prognosis using the Palliative Prognostic Score; (8) Evaluation of functional capacity using hand grip strength and gait speed; (9) Body composition using electrical bioimpedance and dual energy x-ray absorptiometry; (10) Physical Activity Behaviour using a tri-axial accelerometer. Patients will also be contacted via telephone calls at weeks 1, 2, 3, 5 and 6 for information regarding adverse events and drug compliance. The questioning about the occurrence of adverse events will also be performed at the outpatient clinic. Self-report of ingestion of tablets and counting of tablets on return of packages at the end of the study will be used to determine patient compliance. It is expect that use of mirtazapine can bring benefits increasing appetite and the body weight in cancer patientes in palliative care compared to the use of megestrol.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cachexia; Cancer
  • Anorexia

Keywords

  • anorexia
  • cachexia
  • mirtazapine
  • megestrol
  • palliative care
03

In context

Cachexia

336 studies on the registry are indexed under Cachexia; 76 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 52 is below the median of 66 across 226 interventional studies indexed under Cachexia.

Browse Cachexia studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Sao Paulo is the lead sponsor of 1,030 studies on the registry; 92 are open to participants now.

Of its 8 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
50 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients aged ≥ 50 years.
  • Patients with confirmed diagnosis of cancer by histopathological examination, including those not yet submitted to any therapy because they are in the therapeutic definition phase and those whose therapies have already been suspended because they are ineffective.
  • Patients with cancer progression, with either local or distant metastases, documented by radiological or histopathological methods.
  • Patients complaining of anorexia graded by the patient as ≥ 5 by the Edmonton Sympton Assessement Scale.
  • Patients with weight loss ≥ 2% in the last 2 months or weight loss ≥ 5% in the last 6 months, referred by the patient or documented in electronic medical records, compared to the stable weight before diagnosis.
  • Patients with a life expectancy of ≥ 2 months by the Palliative Prognostic Score.
  • Patients with performance status greater than or equal to 60% using the Karnofsky Performance Status scale.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients diagnosed with depression or using antidepressant therapy with a score ≥ 12 in the depression items of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale.
  • Patients with unstable doses of corticosteroids.
  • Patients with moderate renal and/or hepatic dysfunction (total bilirubin ≥ 1.5x the upper limit of normal, AST and ALT ≥ 5x upper limit of normal or creatinine ≥1.5x upper limit of normal).
  • Patients with Central Nervous System metastases.
  • Patients with inability to take oral medications.
  • Patients with mechanical obstruction of the gastrointestinal tract.
  • Patients with clinically bulky ascites and generalized edema.
  • Patients with reports of allergy to the medications studied.
  • Patients with hypothyroidism with TSH levels greater than or equal to 5 μU/mL and free T4 less than 0.7 ng/dL.
  • Patients with uncorrected hydroelectrolytic disturbances, with altered serum sodium, potassium and/ or ionic calcium.
  • Patients with persistent and uncontrolled nausea and/or vomiting associated with gastrointestinal tract neoplasia and/or chemotherapeutic or radiotherapeutic treatment.
  • Patients with pacemakers.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
52 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Mirtazapine

    Tablets of 15mg mirtazapine will be used according to randomization. At the first visit, patients will be instructed to take one tablet at night for better tolerability. From the second week, if there is good tolerance, they will take two tablets at night until the end of the study.

    Drug: Mirtazapine

  • Active comparator
    Megestrol

    Tablets of 160mg megestrol will be used according to randomization. At the first visit, patients will be instructed to take one tablet at night for better tolerability. From the second week, if there is good tolerance, they will take two tablets at night until the end of the study.

    Drug: Megestrol

Interventions

  • Tablets of 15mg mirtazapine will be used according to randomization. At the first visit, patients will be instructed to take one tablet at night for better tolerability. From the second week, if there is good tolerance, they will take two tablets at night until the end of the study.

    Also known as: Remeron

  • Tablets of 160mg megestrol will be used according to randomization. At the first visit, patients will be instructed to take one tablet at night for better tolerability. From the second week, if there is good tolerance, they will take two tablets at night until the end of the study.

    Also known as: megestrol acetate

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in appetite

    Assessed by Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale. This evaluation will be collected at baseline and after 8 weeks of follow-up. Changes in appetite will be divided into 3 categories according to the following definitions: appetite improvement will be a decrease ≥ 2 points in Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale, maintenance of appetite as an improvement or worsening of 1 point and worsening of appetite as deterioration ≥ 2 points.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  2. Change in body weight

    Assessed by body weight. This evaluation will be collected at baseline and after 8 weeks of follow-up. The weight changes will be divided into 3 categories according to the following definitions: weight improvement will be a gain ≥ 1 kg, weight maintenance will be a loss \< 500g or a gain \< 1kg and weight loss will be a loss ≥ 500g.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in body lean and fat mass

    Assessed by body bioelectrical impedance and dual energy x-ray absorptiometry. They will be performed at baseline and after 8 weeks of follow-up. The body bioelectrical impedance will be performed using the ImpediMed DF50 mono-frequency system (ImpediMed Limited, Australia). The dual energy x-ray absorptiometry will be performed on the measuring table using the equipment-specific software.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  2. Change in Quality of life

    The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) instrument QLQ-C30 Questionnaire will be used to assess quality of life at baseline and after 8 weeks of follow-up.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  3. Assessment of muscle strength

    Assessed by hand grip strenght measured by the use of a manual hydraulic dynamometer (Saehan, model SH 5.001, Koreia). It will be performed at baseline and after 8 weeks of follow-up.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  4. Assessment of gait speed

    The gait speed will be measured at 4 meters on usual speed. It will be performed at baseline and after 8 weeks of follow-up. The results will be expressed in m/s.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  5. Physical Activity behaviour

    Assessed by a tri-axial accelerometer to measure profile of spontaneous physical activity. It will be performed at first week and the last week of follow-up.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  6. Incidence of treatment-related Adverse Events

    Assessed by contact via telephone calls at weeks 1, 2, 3, 5 and 6 for information regarding treatment-related adverse events. The questioning about the occurrence of treatment-related adverse events will also be performed at the outpatient clinic at baseline and weeks 4 and 8 during the follow-up.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Clinics Hospital, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo
    Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo 14048900, Brazil
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Riechelmann RP, Burman D, Tannock IF, Rodin G, Zimmermann C. Phase II trial of mirtazapine for cancer-related cachexia and anorexia. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2010 Mar;27(2):106-10. doi: 10.1177/1049909109345685. Epub 2009 Sep 23. PubMed 19776373 ↗
  • Theobald DE, Kirsh KL, Holtsclaw E, Donaghy K, Passik SD. An open-label, crossover trial of mirtazapine (15 and 30 mg) in cancer patients with pain and other distressing symptoms. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2002 May;23(5):442-7. doi: 10.1016/s0885-3924(02)00381-0. PubMed 12007762 ↗
  • Tomiska M, Tomiskova M, Salajka F, Adam Z, Vorlicek J. Palliative treatment of cancer anorexia with oral suspension of megestrol acetate. Neoplasma. 2003;50(3):227-33. PubMed 12937858 ↗
  • Wen HS, Li X, Cao YZ, Zhang CC, Yang F, Shi YM, Peng LM. Clinical studies on the treatment of cancer cachexia with megestrol acetate plus thalidomide. Chemotherapy. 2012;58(6):461-7. doi: 10.1159/000346446. Epub 2013 Feb 7. PubMed 23406994 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — IPD to be made available after the end of the study protocol.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form

Time frame: after the publication of the results of study.

Access criteria: researchers after the review and approval of protocol by the principal investigator

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Mar 2019 to primary completion in Feb 2022, 34 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 10, 2017
First posted
Sep 14, 2017
StartActual
Mar 26, 2019
Primary completionActual
Feb 2, 2022
CompletionActual
Feb 2, 2022
Last update
Jul 7, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 7, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03283488
Responsible party
Nereida Kilza da Costa Lima (Assistant Professor, University of Sao Paulo) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 14, 2017
Start date
Mar 26, 2019
Primary completion
Feb 2, 2022
Completion
Feb 2, 2022
Last update
Jul 7, 2023

Study contacts

Nereida KC Lima, MD, PhD
principal investigator · University of Sao Paulo

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Mirtazapine

Start the discussion