ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03281941ToASTUpdated Sep 13, 2017

ToAST:Investigating the Effect of Bronchial Thermoplasty on Cough in Patients With Severe Asthma

An interventional study of Inhaled capsaicin cough challenge in Asthma Chronic, Cough, sponsored by National Health Service, United Kingdom. Status unknown at 1 site in United Kingdom. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-09-13.

Sponsored by National Health Service, United Kingdom · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Sep 2017), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year after the study started (first participant enrolled Aug 2016, registered Aug 2017).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
24
Allocation
Not applicable
Sex
All
01

Study summary

ToAST study is a pilot study aiming to establish the safety profile of using inhaled capsaicin challenge in patients with severe asthma. The investigators will also explore the differences in cough symptoms and threshold in patients with and without bronchial thermoplasty.

Read the detailed description

ToAST is designed as a two-visit observational study. During visit 1, written consent and measurements of baseline asthma characteristics were completed; history and examination, questionnaires (Asthma Control Questionnaires and Leicester Cough Questionnaire, and basic lung physiological assessment were performed.

At the end of visit 1, a cough monitor was attached to the subject to monitor cough frequency for the next 24 hours and this was returned at visit 2.

Visit 2 followed within two weeks after visit 1, during which a full dose capsaicin cough challenge was performed. Emergency contact details were given towards end of visit 2 should any adverse events occur.

Telephone call within 48 hours, Day 3 and Day 7: The purpose of these phone calls was to ensure that the patient had not developed any adverse effects to the capsaicin challenge.

02

Conditions studied

  • Asthma Chronic, Cough

Browse trials for

03

In context

Cough

427 studies on the registry are indexed under Cough; 67 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 24 is below the median of 80 across 319 interventional studies indexed under Cough.

Browse Cough studies →

Lead sponsor

National Health Service, United Kingdom is the lead sponsor of 13 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Aged ≥18
  • Person with an established diagnosis of severe asthma
  • All patients should be on British Thoracic Society (BTS) steps 4 or 5
  • Patients who have had bronchial thermoplasty (BT) should be at least 2 months after their treatment
  • Historical evidence of one of the following:
  • Airway reversibility to a short acting beta-2 agonist of ≥12%
  • Bronchial hyper-responsiveness (PC20\<8mg/ml)
  • Fractional exhaled nitric oxide ≥50ppb
  • Peak flow variability >8%
  • Raised serum (≥0.45) or sputum eosinophilia (>3%)
  • Variability in spirometry over 24 months of >20%

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to give
  • \<50% predicted or \< 1 litre
  • Known allergy or intolerance to capsaicin
  • Symptoms of upper respiratory tract infection in the last 1 month which have not resolved.
  • Lower respiratory tract infection or pneumonia in the last 6 weeks.
  • Current smoker or ex-smoker with ≥10 pack year smoking history, abstinence of ≤6 months
  • Asthma exacerbation in the previous month requiring an increase or starting of an ICS or OCS
  • Subject has changed asthma medication within the past 4 weeks prior to screening
  • A previous asthma exacerbation requiring Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission.
  • Significant other pulmonary disorders as the major diagnosis, in particular: pulmonary embolism, pulmonary hypertension, interstitial lung disease, lung cancer, cystic fibrosis, emphysema or bronchiectasis.
  • Evidence of vocal cord dysfunction
  • Pregnancy or breast-feeding
  • Use of ACE inhibitors
  • Any centrally acting medication which in the view of the investigator could alter the sensitivity of the cough reflex*
  • History of psychiatric illness, drug or alcohol abuse which may interfere in the participation of the trial.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

FEV1

From a breathing test (spirometry): how much air you can blow out in the first second. Often given as a percentage of what is expected for your age, height and sex.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
24 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Other
    Patients without BT

    Other: Inhaled capsaicin cough challenge

  • Other
    Post BT

    Other: Inhaled capsaicin cough challenge

Interventions

  • OtherInhaled capsaicin cough challenge
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of participants who has had significant fall in FEV1 (defined as >20%) within the challenge period

    By measuring spirometry immediately before and after challenge

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months

  2. Number of participants who require bronchodilator treatment during capsaicin challenge period

    Defined as rescue medications - 2 puffs of salbutamol inhaler via spacer

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in %FEV1 predicted during capsaicin challenge period in all subjects

    By measuring spirometry immediately before and after challenge

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months

  2. The tolerability of inhaled capsaicin in severe asthma

    By exploring the pattern of termination of challenge in severe asthma

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months

  3. The number of adverse events in all subjects during and after capsaicin evoked cough challenge

    by follow up phone calls at 48 hours, 3 days and 7 days to assess AE and SAE

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months

  4. Degree of breathlessness during capsaicin challenge period assessed by using modified Borg scale (mBorg).

    By calculating Borg immediately before and after challenge to assess level of breathlessness.

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months

  5. Degree of breathlessness during capsaicin challenge period assessed by using dysnoea Visual Analogue Score (dVAS).

    By calculating dVAS immediately before and after challenge to assess level of breathlessness.

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months

  6. Differences in capsaicin dose response curves (Maximum cough response evoked by any concentration of capsaicin- Emax and Capsaicin dose inducing half-maximal response - ED50) between subjects who have had BT versus those have not

    by comparing post-BT and no-BT patients

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months

  7. The differences in 24-hour cough frequency between patients who have had BT and those who have not.

    by comparing post-BT and no-BT patients

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months

  8. The differences in Leicester cough questionnaire (LCQ) between patients who have had BT and those who have not.

    by comparing post-BT and no-BT patients

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months

  9. The differences in asthma control questionnaire(ACQ) between patients who have had BT and those who have not.

    by comparing post-BT and no-BT patients

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months

  10. The differences of the dose response curves in patients with severe asthma with existing data of capsaicin challenge in patients with healthy and mild/moderate asthma (in Emax and ED50).

    By comparing with existing data.

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • University hospital of South Manchester
    Manchester, M23 9LT, United Kingdom
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Aug 2016 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Feb 2018, 17 months after the start.

Of 78 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Cough, half reached primary completion within 15 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 38. This study's planned 17 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 86 studies reached it within 15 months; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 38.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 22, 2017
First posted
Sep 13, 2017
StartActual
Aug 6, 2016
Primary completionEst.
Feb 1, 2018
CompletionEst.
Feb 1, 2018
Last update
Sep 13, 2017
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 13, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03281941
Lead sponsor
National Health Service, United Kingdom
Responsible party
Ran Wang (Dr Ran Wang (Chief Investigator); Professor Jacky Smith (PI), National Health Service, United Kingdom) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 13, 2017
Start date
Aug 6, 2016
Primary completion
Feb 1, 2018 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 1, 2018 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 13, 2017

Study contacts

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Sep 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion