ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03280563MORPHEUS HR+BCUpdated Nov 10, 2025Results posted

A Study of Multiple Immunotherapy-Based Treatment Combinations in Hormone Receptor (HR)-Positive Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2)-Negative Breast Cancer

A Phase 1/2 interventional study of Atezolizumab (MPDL3280A), an engineered anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibody and Bevacizumab in Breast Neoplasms, sponsored by Hoffmann-La Roche. Completed at 22 sites in 3 countries. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-11-10.

Sponsored by Hoffmann-La Roche · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 1/2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
144
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This study is designed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of several immunotherapy-based combination treatments in participants with inoperable locally advanced or metastatic HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer who have progressed during or following treatment with a cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitor in the first- or second-line setting, such as palbociclib, ribociclib, or abemaciclib. The study will be performed in two stages. During Stage 1, participants will be randomized to fulvestrant (control) or an atezolizumab-containing doublet or triplet combination. Those who experience disease progression, loss of clinical benefit, or unacceptable toxicity may be eligible to receive a new triplet combination treatment in Stage 2 until loss of clinical benefit or unacceptable toxicity. New treatment arms may be added and/or existing treatment arms may be closed during the course of the study on the basis of ongoing clinical efficacy and safety as well as the current treatments available.

02

Conditions studied

  • Breast Neoplasms

Browse trials for

03

In context

Breast Neoplasms

14,825 studies on the registry are indexed under Breast Neoplasms; 3,319 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 144 is above the median of 72 across 10,896 interventional studies indexed under Breast Neoplasms.

Browse Breast Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Hoffmann-La Roche is the lead sponsor of 2,101 studies on the registry; 87 are open to participants now.

Of its 330 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 248 (75%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria for Both Stages:

  • per v1.1
  • Adequate hematologic and end organ function
  • Disease progression during or after first- or hormonal therapy with CDK4/6 inhibitor

Inclusion Criteria for Stage 1:

  • (ECOG) performance status 0-1
  • or inoperable, locally advanced, or cytologically confirmed invasive HR-positive -negative breast cancer
  • Recommended for endocrine therapy, and cytotoxic chemotherapy not indicated at study entry
  • Recurrence or progression following most recent systemic breast cancer therapy
  • Disease progression during or after first- or second-line hormonal therapy for locally advanced or metastatic disease
  • according to protocol-defined criteria
  • >3 months
  • Available tumor specimen for determination of status

Inclusion Criteria for Stage 2:

  • ECOG performance status of 0-2
  • Ability to initiate treatment within 3 months after disease progression or unacceptable toxicity on a Stage 1 regimen

Exclusion Criteria for Both Stages:

  • Significant or uncontrolled comorbid disease as specified in the protocol
  • Uncontrolled tumor-related pain
  • disease except for stable/controlled hypothyroidism, Type 1 diabetes mellitus, or certain dermatologic conditions
  • Positive test
  • Active or C
  • Active tuberculosis
  • Severe infection within 4 weeks and/or antibiotics within 2 weeks prior to study treatment
  • Prior allogeneic stem cell or solid organ transplantation
  • History of other than breast cancer within 2 years prior to screening except those with negligible risk of metastasis/death
  • History of or known to study drug or
  • For patients entering Stage 2, recovery from all immunotherapy-related adverse events to Grade 1 or better or to baseline at the time of consent

Exclusion Criteria for Stage 1:

  • Prior fulvestrant or cytotoxic chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer, or certain other agents as specified in the protocol
  • Unresolved AEs from prior anti-cancer therapy
  • Eligibility only for the control arm
  • Prior treatment with inhibitors as specified in the protocol

Exclusion Criteria for Stage 2:

  • Unacceptable toxicity with atezolizumab during Stage 1
  • Uncontrolled cardiovascular disease or coagulation disorder, including use of anticoagulants as specified in the protocol
  • Significant abdominal or intestinal manifestations within 6 months prior to treatment
  • Grade 2 or higher proteinuria
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(16)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Measurable disease

The amount of disease can be tracked with a defined measurement, so the study can see whether it shrinks or grows. It might be a tumour measured on a scan or, in some blood cancers such as myeloma, a marker measured in blood or urine.

The criteria or the study team say which measurement counts — having no tumour visible on a scan does not by itself rule you out.

RECIST

The standard rules for measuring tumours on CT or MRI scans, to tell whether a cancer is shrinking, stable or growing during treatment.

“Measurable disease per RECIST 1.1” usually means at least one tumour 10 mm or more at its longest on a CT scan, or a lymph node 15 mm or more across its short axis.

Line of therapy

A line of therapy is one course of treatment, which may combine several drugs. First-line is the first course given; second-line follows when that stops working or is not tolerated.

“Two prior lines” means two courses that count separately under the study’s rules — not simply two drugs. Ask the study team if you are unsure how yours are counted.

ECOG performance status

A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.

0
Fully active, no restrictions.
1
Limited in strenuous activity, but walking and able to do light work, such as housework or office work.
2
Walking and able to look after yourself, but unable to work; up and about more than half of waking hours.
3
Able to look after yourself only in part; in bed or a chair more than half of waking hours.
4
Unable to look after yourself at all; in bed or a chair all day.

Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

Histologically or cytologically confirmed

The diagnosis was confirmed by looking at a sample under a microscope: tissue from a biopsy or surgery (histology), or cells from a fluid or needle sample (cytology).

Your pathology report is the document that shows this.

HER2

HER2 is a protein, made from the ERBB2 gene, that drives the growth of some cancers. A study may look for a level of the protein, extra copies of the gene, or a particular change in it.

In breast cancer, protein tests are read as HER2-positive, HER2-low or HER2-negative; other cancers use their own rules. Check which test result the study requires.

Postmenopausal

Periods have stopped for good: usually no period for 12 months in a row without another medical reason, sometimes confirmed by a blood test (FSH).

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

PD-1, PD-L1 and checkpoint inhibitors

PD-1, PD-L1 and CTLA-4 are proteins that act as brakes on the immune system. Checkpoint inhibitors, such as pembrolizumab or nivolumab, block them so the immune system can attack a cancer.

PD-L1 can also be measured in a tumour sample. Some scores count stained tumour cells only (TPS); others also count certain immune cells (CPS). The study names the score and the minimum it uses.

Autoimmune disease

A condition in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease.

Immunotherapy studies often leave out active autoimmune disease, and some name exceptions, such as thyroid disease on replacement hormone. Check the exceptions this study lists.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Hepatitis B tests

Hepatitis B is a virus that infects the liver. These are separate tests: HBsAg positive usually means a current infection (a recent vaccination can briefly cause it too); total anti-HBc (HBcAb) positive means an infection now or in the past; HBV DNA measures how much virus is in the blood.

Some studies accept a past infection if HBV DNA is undetectable, sometimes with antiviral medicine during the study. Check what this study allows.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Excipients

The other ingredients in a medicine besides the active drug, such as fillers, colours or preservatives.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Sequential assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
144 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Stage 1: Fulvestrant

    Participants will receive fulvestrant until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression according to RECIST v1.1.

    Drug: Fulvestrant

  • Experimental
    Stage 1: Atezolizumab + Entinostat

    Participants will receive doublet combination treatment with atezolizumab plus entinostat until unacceptable toxicity or loss of clinical benefit as determined by the investigator.

    Drug: Atezolizumab (MPDL3280A), an engineered anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibody · Drug: Entinostat

  • Experimental
    Stage 1: Atezolizumab + Fulvestrant

    Participants will receive doublet combination treatment with atezolizumab plus fulvestrant until unacceptable toxicity or loss of clinical benefit as determined by the investigator.

    Drug: Atezolizumab (MPDL3280A), an engineered anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibody · Drug: Fulvestrant

  • Experimental
    Stage 1: Atezolizumab + Ipatasertib

    Participants will receive doublet combination treatment with atezolizumab plus ipatasertib until unacceptable toxicity or loss of clinical benefit as determined by the investigator. Prior to enrollment into this arm, the first 6 participants in the study will complete a safety run-in with atezolizumab plus ipatasertib.

    Drug: Atezolizumab (MPDL3280A), an engineered anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibody · Drug: Ipatasertib

  • Experimental
    Stage 1: Atezolizumab + Ipatasertib + Fulvestrant

    Participants will receive triplet combination treatment with atezolizumab plus ipatasertib plus fulvestrant until unacceptable toxicity or loss of clinical benefit as determined by the investigator. Prior to enrollment into this arm, the first 6 participants in the study will complete a safety run-in with atezolizumab plus ipatasertib.

    Drug: Atezolizumab (MPDL3280A), an engineered anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibody · Drug: Fulvestrant · Drug: Ipatasertib

  • Experimental
    Stage 2: Atezolizumab + Bevacizumab + Endocrine Therapy

    Those who progress or experience unacceptable toxicity during treatment in Stage 1 may be eligible to enter Stage 2. Participants will receive triplet combination therapy with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab plus one of three endocrine therapies (fulvestrant, exemestane, or tamoxifen) selected by the physician. Treatment in Stage 2 will continue until unacceptable toxicity or loss of clinical benefit as determined by the investigator.

    Drug: Atezolizumab (MPDL3280A), an engineered anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibody · Drug: Bevacizumab · Drug: Exemestane · Drug: Fulvestrant · Drug: Tamoxifen

  • Experimental
    Stage 1: Mandatory On-Treatment Biopsy

    For experimental combination arms that demonstrate clinical activity during the preliminary phase, the Sponsor may open enrollment into a separate mandatory on-treatment biopsy cohort for that combination.

    Drug: Atezolizumab (MPDL3280A), an engineered anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibody · Drug: Entinostat · Drug: Fulvestrant · Drug: Ipatasertib · Drug: Abemaciclib

  • Experimental
    Stage 1: Atezolizumab + Abemaciclib + Fulvestrant

    Participants will receive triplet combination treatment with atezolizumab plus abemaciclib plus fulvestrant until unacceptable toxicity or loss of clinical benefit as determined by the investigator.

    Drug: Atezolizumab (MPDL3280A), an engineered anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibody · Drug: Fulvestrant · Drug: Abemaciclib

Interventions

  • Atezolizumab will be given as 840 milligrams (mg) via intravenous (IV) infusion on Days 1 and 15 of each 28-day cycle. This regimen will apply to all arms except when given with entinostat in Stage 1, or exemestane or tamoxifen in Stage 2, in which atezolizumab will be given as 1200 mg via IV infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle.

    Also known as: Tecentriq

  • Bevacizumab will be given as 10 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) via IV infusion on Days 1 and 15 of each 28-day cycle in the regimen containing fulvestrant. When given with exemestane or tamoxifen, bevacizumab will be given as 15 mg/kg via IV infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle.

    Also known as: Avastin

  • Entinostat will be given as 5 mg orally once a week on Days 1, 8 and 15 of each 21-day cycle.

  • Exemestane will be given as 25 mg orally QD in each 21-day cycle.

  • Fulvestrant will be given as 500 mg intramuscularly on Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1 and thereafter on Day 1 of each 28-day cycle.

  • Ipatasertib will be given as 400 mg orally QD on Days 1-21 of each 28-day cycle.

  • Tamoxifen will be given as 20 mg orally QD in each 21-day cycle.

  • Abemaciclib will be given as 150mg twice daily during each 28-day cycle.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Stage 1: Percentage of Participants With Objective Response

    Objective response rate (ORR) was defined as the percentage of participants with an objective response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) as determined by the investigator according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1). CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions and any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) that have a reduction in short axis to \< 10 millimeters (mm). PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters (SOD) of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD, in the absence of CR. Participants with missing or no response assessments were classified as non-responders. Percentages have been rounded off to the nearest whole number.

    Time frame: Up to 50.4 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Stage 1: Progression-free Survival (PFS)

    PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the date of the first recorded occurrence of PD or death from any cause (whichever occurred first) in Stage 1, as determined by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum in the study including baseline in addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥ 5 mm. Participants who did not have documented PD or death, PFS was censored at the day of the last tumor assessment. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the median for PFS.

    Time frame: From randomization to the first occurrence of PD or death (up to 51.9 months)

  2. Stage 1: Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR)

    CBR was defined as the percentage of participants with stable disease (SD) ≥ 24 weeks or with confirmed CR or PR, as determined by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1. SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for CR or PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions and any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) having a reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD, in the absence of CR. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum in the study, including baseline, in addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥ 5 mm. Percentages have been rounded off to the nearest whole number.

    Time frame: Up to 51.9 months

  3. Stage 1: Overall Survival (OS)

    OS was defined as the time from randomization to death from any cause. Participants who were still alive at the time of OS analysis were censored at the last date they were known to be alive. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the median for OS.

    Time frame: From randomization to death (up to 62.2 months)

  4. Stage 1: Percentage of Participants Event-free for OS at Month 18

    OS was defined as the time from randomization to death from any cause. Participants who were still alive at the time of OS analysis were censored at the last date they were known to be alive. The Kaplan-Meier approach was used to estimate the percentage of participants who were event-free for OS at Month 18. Percentages have been rounded off to the nearest whole number.

    Time frame: At Month 18

  5. Stage 1: Duration of Response (DOR)

    DOR was defined as the time from the first occurrence of a documented objective response (CR or PR) to the first date of recorded PD or death from any cause (whichever occurs first), as determined by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions and any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) having a reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD, in the absence of CR. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum in study including baseline in addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥ 5 mm. Participants who did not have documented PD or death, DOR was censored at the day of the last tumor assessment. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the median for DOR.

    Time frame: From first occurrence of a documented OR to the first date of recorded PD or death (up to 50.4 months)

  6. Stages 1 and 2: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

    An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product, regardless of causal attribution. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. SAE = serious adverse events; AESIs = adverse events of special interest.

    Time frame: From baseline until 30 days (for AEs) or 135 days (for SAEs & AESIs) after the last dose of study treatment or until initiation of new systemic anti-cancer therapy, whichever occurred first (Stage 1: up to 52 months; Stage 2: up to 21.7 months)

  7. Stage 1: Plasma Concentration of Entinostat

    Time frame: Predose on Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 2; 2-4 hours postdose on Day 1 Cycle 1 (Cycle length = 21 days)

  8. Stage 1: Plasma Concentration of Abemaciclib

    Time frame: Predose on Day 1 of Cycles 1, 2 and 3, and on Day 15 Cycle 1; 4-8 hours postdose on Day 1 Cycle 1 (Cycle length = 28 days)

  9. Stage 1: Plasma Concentration of Ipatasertib

    Time frame: Predose and Postdose at 1 Hour, 2 Hour, 4 Hour, and 6 Hour on Day 15 Cycle 1; Post dose at 1-3 Hour on Day 15 Cycle 3 (Cycle length = 28 days)

  10. Stage 1: Plasma Concentration of Fulvestrant

    Time frame: Predose on Day 1 of Cycle 2 and Cycle 3 (Cycle length = 28 days)

  11. Stage 2: Plasma Concentration of Fulvestrant

    Nominal time restarted to 0 at Stage 2. PK data for Stage was analyzed and reported for the subgroups \[crossover arms (Stage 1 to Stage 2)\] only.

    Time frame: Predose on Day 1 of Cycles 2 and 3 (Cycle length = 21 days)

  12. Stage 2: Serum Concentration of Atezolizumab

    Nominal time restarted to 0 at Stage 2; RO5541267 = atezolizumab. PK data for Stage was analyzed and reported for the subgroups \[crossover arms (Stage 1 to Stage 2)\] only.

    Time frame: Predose on Day 1 of Cycles 1, 2, 3, 4, 8 and 12; 30 minutes (mins) postdose on Day 1 Cycle 1; postdose on Day 120 and Treatment Discontinuation Visit (Cycle length = 21 days)

  13. Stage 2: Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADAs) to Atezolizumab

    Participants who received atezolizumab were considered to be treatment-emergent ADA-positive if they were ADA-negative or had missing data at baseline but developed an ADA response following atezolizumab exposure (treatment-induced ADA response), or if they were ADA-positive at baseline and the titer of one or more post-baseline samples was at least 0.60 titer units (t.u.) greater than the titer of the baseline sample (treatment-enhanced ADA response). Participants were considered to be treatment-emergent ADA-negative if they were ADA-negative or were missing data at baseline and all post-baseline samples were negative, or if they were ADA-positive at baseline but did not have any post-baseline samples with a titer that was at least 0.60 t.u. greater than the titer of the baseline sample (treatment unaffected). Participants with a positive post-baseline sample has been reported here.

    Time frame: Post-baseline (up to approximately 134 days)

07

Results

Posted Nov 10, 2025

Participant flow

A total of 144 participants with inoperable locally advanced or metastatic hormone receptor-positive (HR+) human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-) breast cancer took part in the study at 26 investigative sites across the United States of America and South Korea from 22 December 2017 to 26 September 2024. The study is considered "Completed" because all the pre-planned study activities and analyses have been performed.

Stage 1
Participant flow — Stage 1
MilestoneFulvestrant ControlStage 1: Fulvestrant + AtezolizumabStage 1: Fulvestrant + Atezolizumab + IpatasertibStage 1: Atezolizumab + IpatasertibStage 1: Atezolizumab + EntinostatStage 1: Fulvestrant + Atezolizumab + AbemaciclibStage 2: Atezolizumab + Bevacizumab + FulvestrantStage 2: Atezolizumab + Bevacizumab + ExemestaneStage 2: Atezolizumab + Bevacizumab + Tamoxifen
Started25312761540000
Safety-evaluable (se) population20302661539000
Completed18282461533000
Not completed733007000
Withdrew: Death210003000
Withdrew: Study ended by sponsor001001000
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject512002000
Withdrew: Reason not specified000001000
Withdrew: Physician decision010000000
Stage 2
Participant flow — Stage 2
MilestoneFulvestrant ControlStage 1: Fulvestrant + AtezolizumabStage 1: Fulvestrant + Atezolizumab + IpatasertibStage 1: Atezolizumab + IpatasertibStage 1: Atezolizumab + EntinostatStage 1: Fulvestrant + Atezolizumab + AbemaciclibStage 2: Atezolizumab + Bevacizumab + FulvestrantStage 2: Atezolizumab + Bevacizumab + ExemestaneStage 2: Atezolizumab + Bevacizumab + Tamoxifen
Started0000001343
Se population0000001343
Completed0000001133
Not completed000000210
Withdrew: Death000000010
Withdrew: Progressive disease000000200
Long-term Survival Follow-up
Participant flow — Long-term Survival Follow-up
MilestoneFulvestrant ControlStage 1: Fulvestrant + AtezolizumabStage 1: Fulvestrant + Atezolizumab + IpatasertibStage 1: Atezolizumab + IpatasertibStage 1: Atezolizumab + EntinostatStage 1: Fulvestrant + Atezolizumab + AbemaciclibStage 2: Atezolizumab + Bevacizumab + FulvestrantStage 2: Atezolizumab + Bevacizumab + ExemestaneStage 2: Atezolizumab + Bevacizumab + Tamoxifen
Started15252039321133
Completed000000000
Not completed15252039321133
Withdrew: Death10141536181113
Withdrew: Study ended by sponsor4930013020
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject111010000
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up011021000

Outcome measures

PrimaryStage 1: Percentage of Participants With Objective Response

Objective response rate (ORR) was defined as the percentage of participants with an objective response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) as determined by the investigator according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1). CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions and any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) that have a reduction in short axis to \< 10 millimeters (mm). PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters (SOD) of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD, in the absence of CR. Participants with missing or no response assessments were classified as non-responders. Percentages have been rounded off to the nearest whole number.

Time frame:
Up to 50.4 months
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Stage 1: Percentage of Participants With Objective Response
percentage of participantsFulvestrant ControlStage 1: Fulvestrant + AtezolizumabStage 1: Fulvestrant + Atezolizumab + IpatasertibStage 1: Atezolizumab + IpatasertibStage 1: Atezolizumab + EntinostatStage 1: Fulvestrant + Atezolizumab + Abemaciclib
Stage 1: Percentage of Participants With Objective Response10.0 (1.23 to 31.70)10.0 (2.11 to 26.53)26.9 (11.57 to 47.79)16.7 (0.42 to 64.12)6.7 (0.17 to 31.95)26.3 (13.40 to 43.10)
Statistical analysis
  • Fulvestrant Control vs Stage 1: Fulvestrant + Atezolizumab · Difference in overall response rates: 0.00 · 95% CI -21.14 to 21.14
  • Fulvestrant Control vs Stage 1: Fulvestrant + Atezolizumab + Ipatasertib · Difference in overall response rates: 16.92 · 95% CI -9.03 to 42.88
  • Fulvestrant Control vs Stage 1: Atezolizumab + Ipatasertib · Difference in overall response rates: 6.67 · 95% CI -36.76 to 50.09
  • Fulvestrant Control vs Stage 1: Atezolizumab + Entinostat · Difference in overall response rates: -3.33 · 95% CI -27.39 to 20.73
  • Fulvestrant Control vs Stage 1: Fulvestrant + Atezolizumab + Abemaciclib · Difference in overall response rates: 16.32 · 95% CI -6.71 to 39.34
SecondaryStage 1: Progression-free Survival (PFS)

PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the date of the first recorded occurrence of PD or death from any cause (whichever occurred first) in Stage 1, as determined by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum in the study including baseline in addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥ 5 mm. Participants who did not have documented PD or death, PFS was censored at the day of the last tumor assessment. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the median for PFS.

Time frame:
From randomization to the first occurrence of PD or death (up to 51.9 months)
Reported as:
Median · months
Stage 1: Progression-free Survival (PFS)
monthsFulvestrant ControlStage 1: Fulvestrant + AtezolizumabStage 1: Fulvestrant + Atezolizumab + IpatasertibStage 1: Atezolizumab + IpatasertibStage 1: Atezolizumab + EntinostatStage 1: Fulvestrant + Atezolizumab + Abemaciclib
Stage 1: Progression-free Survival (PFS)1.95 (1.45 to 4.93)3.15 (1.51 to 7.79)5.86 (1.64 to 11.24)2.28 (1.41 to NA)1.82 (1.48 to 3.84)6.28 (5.13 to 11.73)
Statistical analysis
  • Fulvestrant Control vs Stage 1: Fulvestrant + Atezolizumab · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.91 · 95% CI 0.50 to 1.66
  • Fulvestrant Control vs Stage 1: Fulvestrant + Atezolizumab + Ipatasertib · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.64 · 95% CI 0.35 to 1.20
  • Fulvestrant Control vs Stage 1: Atezolizumab + Ipatasertib · Hazard ratio (hr): 1.25 · 95% CI 0.45 to 3.48
  • Fulvestrant Control vs Stage 1: Atezolizumab + Entinostat · Hazard ratio (hr): 1.55 · 95% CI 0.74 to 3.23
  • Fulvestrant Control vs Stage 1: Fulvestrant + Atezolizumab + Abemaciclib · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.50 · 95% CI 0.28 to 0.88
SecondaryStage 1: Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR)

CBR was defined as the percentage of participants with stable disease (SD) ≥ 24 weeks or with confirmed CR or PR, as determined by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1. SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for CR or PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions and any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) having a reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD, in the absence of CR. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum in the study, including baseline, in addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥ 5 mm. Percentages have been rounded off to the nearest whole number.

Time frame:
Up to 51.9 months
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Stage 1: Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR)
percentage of participantsFulvestrant ControlStage 1: Fulvestrant + AtezolizumabStage 1: Fulvestrant + Atezolizumab + IpatasertibStage 1: Atezolizumab + IpatasertibStage 1: Atezolizumab + EntinostatStage 1: Fulvestrant + Atezolizumab + Abemaciclib
Stage 1: Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR)15.0 (3.21 to 37.89)26.7 (12.28 to 45.89)42.3 (23.35 to 63.08)16.7 (0.42 to 64.12)6.7 (0.17 to 31.95)42.1 (26.31 to 59.18)
SecondaryStage 1: Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the time from randomization to death from any cause. Participants who were still alive at the time of OS analysis were censored at the last date they were known to be alive. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the median for OS.

Time frame:
From randomization to death (up to 62.2 months)
Reported as:
Median · months
Stage 1: Overall Survival (OS)
monthsFulvestrant ControlStage 1: Fulvestrant + AtezolizumabStage 1: Fulvestrant + Atezolizumab + IpatasertibStage 1: Atezolizumab + IpatasertibStage 1: Atezolizumab + EntinostatStage 1: Fulvestrant + Atezolizumab + Abemaciclib
Stage 1: Overall Survival (OS)26.02 (9.13 to 35.09)26.48 (15.87 to 46.46)26.91 (20.93 to 47.41)10.91 (5.59 to NA)23.10 (15.24 to NA)26.71 (22.60 to 36.17)
Statistical analysis
  • Fulvestrant Control vs Stage 1: Fulvestrant + Atezolizumab · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.77 · 95% CI 0.36 to 1.65
  • Fulvestrant Control vs Stage 1: Fulvestrant + Atezolizumab + Ipatasertib · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.74 · 95% CI 0.34 to 1.58
  • Fulvestrant Control vs Stage 1: Atezolizumab + Ipatasertib · Hazard ratio (hr): 2.26 · 95% CI 0.55 to 9.34
  • Fulvestrant Control vs Stage 1: Atezolizumab + Entinostat · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.74 · 95% CI 0.28 to 2.01
  • Fulvestrant Control vs Stage 1: Fulvestrant + Atezolizumab + Abemaciclib · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.72 · 95% CI 0.35 to 1.46
SecondaryStage 1: Percentage of Participants Event-free for OS at Month 18

OS was defined as the time from randomization to death from any cause. Participants who were still alive at the time of OS analysis were censored at the last date they were known to be alive. The Kaplan-Meier approach was used to estimate the percentage of participants who were event-free for OS at Month 18. Percentages have been rounded off to the nearest whole number.

Time frame:
At Month 18
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Stage 1: Percentage of Participants Event-free for OS at Month 18
percentage of participantsFulvestrant ControlStage 1: Fulvestrant + AtezolizumabStage 1: Fulvestrant + Atezolizumab + IpatasertibStage 1: Atezolizumab + IpatasertibStage 1: Atezolizumab + EntinostatStage 1: Fulvestrant + Atezolizumab + Abemaciclib
Stage 1: Percentage of Participants Event-free for OS at Month 1863.91 (40.55 to 87.26)63.16 (43.97 to 82.35)81.61 (65.22 to 98.00)NA (NA to NA)75.76 (45.17 to 100.00)74.40 (59.97 to 88.84)
Statistical analysis
  • Fulvestrant Control vs Stage 1: Fulvestrant + Atezolizumab · Difference in event free rate: -0.75 · 95% CI -30.98 to 29.48
  • Fulvestrant Control vs Stage 1: Fulvestrant + Atezolizumab + Ipatasertib · Difference in event free rate: 17.70 · 95% CI -10.84 to 46.23
  • Fulvestrant Control vs Stage 1: Atezolizumab + Entinostat · Difference in event free rate: 11.85 · 95% CI -26.63 to 50.33
  • Fulvestrant Control vs Stage 1: Fulvestrant + Atezolizumab + Abemaciclib · Difference in event free rate: 10.49 · 95% CI -16.96 to 37.95
SecondaryStage 1: Duration of Response (DOR)

DOR was defined as the time from the first occurrence of a documented objective response (CR or PR) to the first date of recorded PD or death from any cause (whichever occurs first), as determined by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions and any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) having a reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD, in the absence of CR. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum in study including baseline in addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥ 5 mm. Participants who did not have documented PD or death, DOR was censored at the day of the last tumor assessment. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the median for DOR.

Time frame:
From first occurrence of a documented OR to the first date of recorded PD or death (up to 50.4 months)
Reported as:
Median · months
Stage 1: Duration of Response (DOR)
monthsFulvestrant ControlStage 1: Fulvestrant + AtezolizumabStage 1: Fulvestrant + Atezolizumab + IpatasertibStage 1: Atezolizumab + IpatasertibStage 1: Atezolizumab + EntinostatStage 1: Fulvestrant + Atezolizumab + Abemaciclib
Stage 1: Duration of Response (DOR)13.03 (10.15 to NA)5.88 (3.29 to NA)11.07 (7.85 to 20.70)4.40 (NA to NA)2.46 (NA to NA)13.36 (8.87 to 17.02)
Statistical analysis
  • Fulvestrant Control vs Stage 1: Fulvestrant + Atezolizumab · Hazard ratio (hr): 1.07 · 95% CI 0.15 to 7.90
  • Fulvestrant Control vs Stage 1: Fulvestrant + Atezolizumab + Ipatasertib · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.80 · 95% CI 0.15 to 4.20
  • Fulvestrant Control vs Stage 1: Fulvestrant + Atezolizumab + Abemaciclib · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.76 · 95% CI 0.15 to 3.84
SecondaryStages 1 and 2: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product, regardless of causal attribution. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. SAE = serious adverse events; AESIs = adverse events of special interest.

Time frame:
From baseline until 30 days (for AEs) or 135 days (for SAEs & AESIs) after the last dose of study treatment or until initiation of new systemic anti-cancer therapy, whichever occurred first (Stage 1: up to 52 months; Stage 2: up to 21.7 months)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Stages 1 and 2: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
ParticipantsFulvestrant ControlStage 1: Fulvestrant + AtezolizumabStage 1: Fulvestrant + Atezolizumab + IpatasertibStage 1: Atezolizumab + IpatasertibStage 1: Atezolizumab + EntinostatStage 1: Fulvestrant + Atezolizumab + AbemaciclibStage 2: Atezolizumab + Bevacizumab + FulvestrantStage 2: Atezolizumab + Bevacizumab + ExemestaneStage 2: Atezolizumab + Bevacizumab + Tamoxifen
Stages 1 and 2: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)182826615391233
SecondaryStage 1: Plasma Concentration of Entinostat
Time frame:
Predose on Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 2; 2-4 hours postdose on Day 1 Cycle 1 (Cycle length = 21 days)
Reported as:
Geometric mean · nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Stage 1: Plasma Concentration of Entinostat
nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)Stage 1: Atezolizumab + Entinostat
Predose on Cycle 1 Day 1NA ± NA
2-4 Hrs Postdose on Cycle 1 Day 122.3 ± 91.0
Predose on Cycle 2 Day 12.12 ± 60.3
SecondaryStage 1: Plasma Concentration of Abemaciclib
Time frame:
Predose on Day 1 of Cycles 1, 2 and 3, and on Day 15 Cycle 1; 4-8 hours postdose on Day 1 Cycle 1 (Cycle length = 28 days)
Reported as:
Geometric mean · micrograms per milliliter (µg/mL)
Stage 1: Plasma Concentration of Abemaciclib
micrograms per milliliter (µg/mL)Stage 1: Fulvestrant + Atezolizumab + Abemaciclib
Predose on Cycle 1 Day 10.00417 ± 50.3
4-8 Hour Postdose on Cycle 1 Day 10.0581 ± 170.0
Predose on Cycle 1 Day 150.319 ± 57.4
Predose on Cycle 2 Day 10.108 ± 573.7
Predose on Cycle 3 Day 10.144 ± 177.7
SecondaryStage 1: Plasma Concentration of Ipatasertib
Time frame:
Predose and Postdose at 1 Hour, 2 Hour, 4 Hour, and 6 Hour on Day 15 Cycle 1; Post dose at 1-3 Hour on Day 15 Cycle 3 (Cycle length = 28 days)
Reported as:
Geometric mean · µg/mL
Stage 1: Plasma Concentration of Ipatasertib
µg/mLStage 1: Fulv + Atezo + IpatStage 1: Atezo + Ipat
Predose on Cycle 1 Day 150.0353 ± 248.90.0105 ± 10113.9
1 Hour Postdose on Cycle 1 Day 150.154 ± 185.00.203 ± 38.5
2 Hour Postdose on Cycle 1 Day 150.447 ± 53.70.398 ± NA
4 Hour Postdose on Cycle 1 Day 150.273 ± 45.90.303 ± NA
6 Hour Postdose on Cycle 1 Day 150.203 ± 45.40.227 ± NA
1-3 Hour Postdose on Cycle 3 Day 150.576 ± 25.90.0664 ± NA
SecondaryStage 1: Plasma Concentration of Fulvestrant
Time frame:
Predose on Day 1 of Cycle 2 and Cycle 3 (Cycle length = 28 days)
Reported as:
Geometric mean · µg/mL
Stage 1: Plasma Concentration of Fulvestrant
µg/mLStage 1: Fulv + Atezo + AbemStage 1: Fulve + AtezoStage 1: Fulv + Atezo + Ipat
Predose on Cycle 2 Day 10.0127 ± NA0.0136 ± 60.20.0161 ± 74.3
Predose on Cycle 3 Day 1—0.0107 ± 40.30.0121 ± 38.0
SecondaryStage 2: Plasma Concentration of Fulvestrant

Nominal time restarted to 0 at Stage 2. PK data for Stage was analyzed and reported for the subgroups \[crossover arms (Stage 1 to Stage 2)\] only.

Time frame:
Predose on Day 1 of Cycles 2 and 3 (Cycle length = 21 days)
Reported as:
Geometric mean · µg/mL
Stage 2: Plasma Concentration of Fulvestrant
µg/mLStage 1: Atezo + Entino : Stage 2: Atezo + Beva + FulvStage 1: Fulv Control : Stage 2: Atezo + Beva+ FulvStage 1: Atezo + Ipat : Stage 2: Atezo + Beva + Fulv
Predose on Day 1 Cycle 2 (Stage 2)0.0207 ± 14.10.00938 ± NA0.0142 ± 41.2
Predose on Day 1 Cycle 3 (Stage 2)0.0121 ± 39.30.0175 ± NA0.0132 ± 10.3
SecondaryStage 2: Serum Concentration of Atezolizumab

Nominal time restarted to 0 at Stage 2; RO5541267 = atezolizumab. PK data for Stage was analyzed and reported for the subgroups \[crossover arms (Stage 1 to Stage 2)\] only.

Time frame:
Predose on Day 1 of Cycles 1, 2, 3, 4, 8 and 12; 30 minutes (mins) postdose on Day 1 Cycle 1; postdose on Day 120 and Treatment Discontinuation Visit (Cycle length = 21 days)
Reported as:
Geometric mean · µg/mL
Stage 2: Serum Concentration of Atezolizumab
µg/mLStage 1: Fulv + Atezo + Abem : Stage 2: Atezo + Beva + FulvStage 1: Atezo + Entino : Stage 2: Atezo + Beva + FulvStage 1: Fulv + Atezo : Stage 2: Atezo + Beva + FulvStage 1: Fulv + Atezo : Stage 2: Atezo+ Beva+ TamoStage 1: Fulv + Atezo + Ipat : Stage 2: Atezo + Beva + ExemStage 1: Fulv + Atezo+ Ipat : Stage 2: Atezo + Beva + TamoStage 1: Fulv Control : Stage 2 Atezo + Beva + ExemStage 1: Fulv Control : Stage 2: Atezo + Beva+ FulvStage 1: Atezo + Ipat : Stage 2: Atezo + Beva + Fulv
Predose on Day 1 Cycle 1 (Stage 2)217 ± NA128 ± 49.2443 ± NA160 ± 209.6277 ± NA167 ± NANA ± NANA ± NA16.3 ± 63062.7
30 mins postdose on Day 1 Cycle 1 (Stage 2)617 ± NA388 ± 22.3907 ± NA725 ± 52.91030 ± NA679 ± NA498 ± NA—491 ± 16.3
Predose on Day 1 Cycle 2 (Stage 2)202 ± NA251 ± 35.8434 ± NA211 ± 143.9373 ± NA253 ± NA141 ± NA136 ± NA227 ± 65.2
Predose on Day 1 Cycle 3 (Stage 2)—318 ± 8.8—208 ± 93.2333 ± NA284 ± NA—220 ± NA274 ± 47.4
Predose on Day 1 Cycle 4 (Stage 2)—302 ± 20.8—115 ± NA341 ± NA310 ± NA—238 ± NA309 ± 35.2
Predose on Day 1 Cycle 8 (Stage 2)————————131 ± NA
Predose on Day 1 Cycle 12 (Stage 2)————————182 ± NA
Postdose on Day 120 (Stage 2)—27.4 ± NA—30.0 ± NA——22.6 ± NA—7.38 ± NA
Treatment Discontinuation Visit (Stage 2)—250 ± 18.9450 ± NA130 ± NA———201 ± NA169 ± 145.8
SecondaryStage 2: Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADAs) to Atezolizumab

Participants who received atezolizumab were considered to be treatment-emergent ADA-positive if they were ADA-negative or had missing data at baseline but developed an ADA response following atezolizumab exposure (treatment-induced ADA response), or if they were ADA-positive at baseline and the titer of one or more post-baseline samples was at least 0.60 titer units (t.u.) greater than the titer of the baseline sample (treatment-enhanced ADA response). Participants were considered to be treatment-emergent ADA-negative if they were ADA-negative or were missing data at baseline and all post-baseline samples were negative, or if they were ADA-positive at baseline but did not have any post-baseline samples with a titer that was at least 0.60 t.u. greater than the titer of the baseline sample (treatment unaffected). Participants with a positive post-baseline sample has been reported here.

Time frame:
Post-baseline (up to approximately 134 days)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Stage 2: Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADAs) to Atezolizumab
ParticipantsStage 2: Atezolizumab + Bevacizumab + FulvestrantStage 2: Atezolizumab + Bevacizumab + ExemestaneStage 2: Atezolizumab + Bevacizumab + Tamoxifen
Stage 2: Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADAs) to Atezolizumab000

Adverse events

Collected over From baseline until 30 days (for AEs) or 135 days (for SAEs & AESIs) after the last dose of study treatment or until initiation of new systemic anti-cancer therapy, whichever occurred first (Stage 1: up to 52 months; Stage 2: up to 21.7 months) All-cause mortality: Stage 1: up to approximately 62.2 months; Stage 2: From study initiation (from Stage 1) up to approximately 63.7 months). Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Fulvestrant Control12/25 (48%)2/20 (10%)18/20 (90%)
Stage 1: Fulvestrant + Atezolizumab16/31 (51.6%)3/30 (10%)28/30 (93.3%)
Stage 1: Fulvestrant + Atezolizumab + Ipatasertib15/27 (55.6%)12/26 (46.2%)25/26 (96.2%)
Stage 1: Atezolizumab + Ipatasertib3/6 (50%)3/6 (50%)6/6 (100%)
Stage 1: Atezolizumab + Entinostat6/15 (40%)4/15 (26.7%)15/15 (100%)
Stage 1: Fulvestrant + Atezolizumab + Abemaciclib23/40 (57.5%)14/39 (35.9%)38/39 (97.4%)
Stage 2: Atezolizumab + Bevacizumab + Fulvestrant11/13 (84.6%)1/13 (7.7%)12/13 (92.3%)
Stage 2: Atezolizumab + Bevacizumab + Exemestane2/4 (50%)1/4 (25%)3/4 (75%)
Stage 2: Atezolizumab + Bevacizumab + Tamoxifen3/3 (100%)0/3 (0%)3/3 (100%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 50
Most frequent serious events
EventFulvestrant ControlStage 1: Fulvestrant + AtezolizumabStage 1: Fulvestrant + Atezolizumab + IpatasertibStage 1: Atezolizumab + IpatasertibStage 1: Atezolizumab + EntinostatStage 1: Fulvestrant + Atezolizumab + AbemaciclibStage 2: Atezolizumab + Bevacizumab + FulvestrantStage 2: Atezolizumab + Bevacizumab + ExemestaneStage 2: Atezolizumab + Bevacizumab + Tamoxifen
Rash maculo-papularSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders0/200/300/262/60/150/390/130/40/3
Adrenal insufficiencyEndocrine disorders0/200/300/260/60/150/390/131/40/3
PyrexiaGeneral disorders0/200/300/261/63/151/390/130/40/3
Pericardial effusionCardiac disorders0/201/300/261/60/150/390/130/40/3
Abdominal pain upperGastrointestinal disorders0/200/300/261/60/150/390/130/40/3
DysphagiaGastrointestinal disorders0/200/300/261/60/150/390/130/40/3
HypertransaminasaemiaHepatobiliary disorders0/200/300/261/60/150/390/130/40/3
DyspnoeaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/200/301/261/60/150/390/130/40/3
Pleural effusionRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/200/301/261/60/150/390/130/40/3
PneumothoraxRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/200/303/260/60/150/390/130/40/3
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 171
Most frequent other events
EventFulvestrant ControlStage 1: Fulvestrant + AtezolizumabStage 1: Fulvestrant + Atezolizumab + IpatasertibStage 1: Atezolizumab + IpatasertibStage 1: Atezolizumab + EntinostatStage 1: Fulvestrant + Atezolizumab + AbemaciclibStage 2: Atezolizumab + Bevacizumab + FulvestrantStage 2: Atezolizumab + Bevacizumab + ExemestaneStage 2: Atezolizumab + Bevacizumab + Tamoxifen
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders1/206/3014/264/62/1533/391/130/40/3
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders4/208/3014/264/65/1517/395/130/40/3
Decreased appetiteMetabolism and nutrition disorders2/204/305/264/64/1513/391/130/40/3
FatigueGeneral disorders4/2011/309/263/64/1517/397/131/40/3
RashSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders0/203/3014/260/61/1510/391/130/40/3
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders3/207/3012/263/61/154/391/130/40/3
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders0/203/307/263/64/1512/390/130/40/3
DizzinessNervous system disorders3/203/302/263/63/153/390/131/40/3
CoughRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/207/307/263/64/153/391/131/40/3
HypertensionVascular disorders0/201/302/260/60/151/396/131/41/3

Baseline characteristics

Randomized population included all participants enrolled, regardless if treatment was received.

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Fulvestrant ControlStage 1: Fulvestrant + AtezolizumabStage 1: Fulvestrant + Atezolizumab + IpatasertibStage 1: Atezolizumab + IpatasertibStage 1: Atezolizumab + EntinostatStage 1: Fulvestrant + Atezolizumab + AbemaciclibStage 2: Atezolizumab + Bevacizumab + FulvestrantStage 2: Atezolizumab + Bevacizumab + ExemestaneStage 2: Atezolizumab + Bevacizumab + TamoxifenTotal
Stage 1 — <=18 years0000000000
Stage 1 — Between 18 and 65 years21232251228000111
Stage 1 — >=65 years485131200033
Stage 2 — <=18 years0000000000
Stage 2 — Between 18 and 65 years000000103114
Stage 2 — >=65 years0000003126
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Fulvestrant ControlStage 1: Fulvestrant + AtezolizumabStage 1: Fulvestrant + Atezolizumab + IpatasertibStage 1: Atezolizumab + IpatasertibStage 1: Atezolizumab + EntinostatStage 1: Fulvestrant + Atezolizumab + AbemaciclibStage 2: Atezolizumab + Bevacizumab + FulvestrantStage 2: Atezolizumab + Bevacizumab + ExemestaneStage 2: Atezolizumab + Bevacizumab + TamoxifenTotal
Stage 1 — Female25312761540000144
Stage 1 — Male0000000000
Stage 2 — Female000000134320
Stage 2 — Male0000000000
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Fulvestrant ControlStage 1: Fulvestrant + AtezolizumabStage 1: Fulvestrant + Atezolizumab + IpatasertibStage 1: Atezolizumab + IpatasertibStage 1: Atezolizumab + EntinostatStage 1: Fulvestrant + Atezolizumab + AbemaciclibStage 2: Atezolizumab + Bevacizumab + FulvestrantStage 2: Atezolizumab + Bevacizumab + ExemestaneStage 2: Atezolizumab + Bevacizumab + TamoxifenTotal
Stage 1 — Hispanic or Latino1110000003
Stage 1 — Not Hispanic or Latino23282561440000136
Stage 1 — Unknown or Not Reported1210100005
Stage 2 — Hispanic or Latino0000000000
Stage 2 — Not Hispanic or Latino000000133319
Stage 2 — Unknown or Not Reported0000000101
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Fulvestrant ControlStage 1: Fulvestrant + AtezolizumabStage 1: Fulvestrant + Atezolizumab + IpatasertibStage 1: Atezolizumab + IpatasertibStage 1: Atezolizumab + EntinostatStage 1: Fulvestrant + Atezolizumab + AbemaciclibStage 2: Atezolizumab + Bevacizumab + FulvestrantStage 2: Atezolizumab + Bevacizumab + ExemestaneStage 2: Atezolizumab + Bevacizumab + TamoxifenTotal
Stage 1 — American Indian or Alaska Native0000000000
Stage 1 — Asian81011051500049
Stage 1 — Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0000000000
Stage 1 — Black or African American1320010007
Stage 1 — White121612692400079
Stage 1 — More than one race0000000000
Stage 1 — Unknown or Not Reported4220100009
Stage 2 — American Indian or Alaska Native0000000000
Stage 2 — Asian0000001102
Stage 2 — Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0000000000
Stage 2 — Black or African American0000000000
Stage 2 — White000000120315
Stage 2 — More than one race0000000000
Stage 2 — Unknown or Not Reported0000000303
08

Study locations

22 sites
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham
    Birmingham, Alabama 35249, United States
  • UCSF Helen Diller Family CCC
    San Francisco, California 94158, United States
  • Stanford Cancer Institute
    Stanford, California 94305-5456, United States
  • Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center
    Torrance, California 90502, United States
  • Wellness Oncology and Hematology - Main Office
    West Hills, California 91307, United States
  • Northwest Georgia Oncology Centers PC - Marietta
    Marietta, Georgia 30060, United States
  • Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center
    Baltimore, Maryland 21231, United States
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
    New York, New York 10065, United States
  • Levine Cancer Institute
    Charlotte, North Carolina 28204, United States
  • Providence Cancer Center
    Portland, Oregon 97231, United States
  • UPMC Pinnacle Health System
    Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17102, United States
  • Thomas Jefferson University Hospital
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107, United States
  • Univ of Pittsburgh Sch of Med
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, United States
  • Sarah Cannon Research Institute / Tennessee Oncology
    Nashville, Tennessee 37203, United States
  • Rambam Medical Center
    Haifa, 3109601, Israel
  • Shaare Zedek Medical Center
    Jerusalem, 9103102, Israel
  • Rabin Medical Center-Beilinson Campus
    Petah Tikva, 4941492, Israel
  • Sheba Medical Center
    Ramat Gan, 5262100, Israel
  • Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center
    Tel Aviv, 64239, Israel
  • National Cancer Center
    Gyeonggi-do, 10408, South Korea
  • Seoul National University Hospital
    Seoul, 03080, South Korea
  • University of Ulsan College of Medicine - Asan Medical Center
    Seoul, 05505, South Korea
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 10, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03280563
Lead sponsor
Hoffmann-La Roche
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 12, 2017
Start date
Dec 22, 2017
Primary completion
Sep 26, 2024
Completion
Sep 26, 2024
Results posted
Nov 10, 2025
Last update
Nov 10, 2025

Study contacts

Clinical Trials
study director · Hoffmann-La Roche

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drugs tested here: Bevacizumab · Entinostat · Ipatasertib · Tamoxifen · Abemaciclib

Start the discussion