CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03280043Updated Sep 12, 2017

Risk of Hematoma After Ketorolac Use in Reduction Mammoplasty.

An observational study in Breast Reduction, Reduction Mammoplasty and Hematoma, sponsored by McMaster University. Completed at 2 sites in Canada. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 85 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-09-12.

Sponsored by McMaster University · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
80
Ages
18 Years to 85 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The investigators hope to answer the question, "does ketorolac increase the risk of hematoma after reduction mammoplasty?" using a case-control study. All patients who developed a hematoma post reduction mammoplasty (cases) at our institution, and match these with women who had an uncomplicated reduction mammoplasty (controls), and then compare frequency of ketorolac exposure between these two groups as the primary outcome. If ketorolac increases the risk of hematoma, one should expect cases to have been exposed to ketorolac more frequently than controls. Based on previously existing literature, the investigators hypothesize that cases and controls will not differ in their ketorolac exposure, that is, ketorolac does not increase the risk of hematoma.

Read the detailed description

The electronic health record databases of St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton and Hamilton Health Sciences will be searched, using the coding system, for all cases of reduction mammoplasty with post--operative hematoma as a complication. Only hematomas which required return to the operating room for evacuation will be included (i.e. those treated with observation or needle aspiration will be excluded).

Cases are defined as patients suffering a hematoma post reduction mammoplasty will be identified through hospital coding, and matched with controls based on the following criteria: age, body mass index (BMI), pre-existing hypertension, and institution. Controls are defined as patients who had uncomplicated reduction mammoplasty, and will be randomly pulled through retrospective chart review within the same databases, in the same time period (±5 years).

All patient data will be de--identified, and all devices containing patient information will remain on hospital grounds, and be encrypted according to our hospital protocols. The following data will be extracted from patient charts: age, date of surgery, body mass index, surgeon, anesthetist, volume of breast tissue removed per breast, comorbidities, platelet count, coagulation profile, ketorolac and opioid use including dose, timing, frequency, duration, and route of administration of both, time to discharge including length of stay if overnight, comorbidities (including smoking status), American Society of Anesthesiology score, and post--operative usage of drains.

Matching of cases and controls will be performed by the primary investigator (JB), and at the time of matching, the only visible patient information will be the de-identified patient identification (ID) and the four matching variables (ketorolac exposure was not visible).

The frequency of ketorolac exposure between cases and controls will then be reviewed, and the odds ratio (OR) of exposure to ketorolac, with 95% confidence intervals will be calculated. A two by two table will be generated from our data. Since the incidence of hematoma formation after reduction mammoplasty is very low, the odds ratio will closely approximate the relative risk. To evaluate the statistical significance of the ORs, a level of significance of 0.05 will be used. Independent samples t-test will be used to compare continuous demographic data, and Chi-square analysis will be used for ordinal or categorical data between cases and controls.

Sample size was calculated using the POWER program, described by Dupont and Plummer in 1990. A sample size of 25 cases matched with 25 controls (total n = 50) was required from the following data:

  • p0 = 0.32 (approximate rate of ketorolac exposure amongst breast reduction patients from previous literature from Cawthorn et al.)
  • α = 0.05 (chance of type I error)
  • P = 0.8 (power)
  • m = 1 (matching ratio1:1)
  • Ψ = 3.6 (estimated risk ratio of developing hematoma post breast reduction if exposed to ketorolac, Cawthorn et al.)
  • Φ = 0.2 (measurable difference)
02

Conditions studied

  • Breast Reduction
  • Reduction Mammoplasty
  • Hematoma
  • Hemorrhage

Keywords

  • Breast reduction
  • Reduction mammoplasty
  • Hematoma
  • Hemorrhage
  • Ketorolac
  • Toradol
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Medical coders will identify all possible cases of hematoma by searching the key words "hemorrhage," "hematoma," and "plastic surgery". Hematomas post reduction mammoplasty will be manually retrieved and reviewed. Control patients will be randomly pulled from the database of uncomplicated reduction mammoplasties.

Inclusion criteria

Cases:

  • Patients who developed hematoma post-reduction mammoplasty requiring repeat surgery

Controls:

  • Uncomplicated bilateral reduction mammoplasty

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Hematoma patients treated with observation or needle aspiration
  • Concomitant surgeries in addition to the reduction mammoplasty
  • Allergy/sensitivity to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
  • Unilateral reduction mammoplasty
  • Male reduction mammoplasty
  • Documented bleeding disorders
04

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
80 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Cases

    Women who underwent reduction mammoplasty and then developed a hematoma which required return to the operating room for evacuation.

    Procedure: Hematoma

  • Controls

    Women who had uncomplicated reduction mammoplasty.

Interventions

  • ProcedureHematoma

    Hematoma requiring return to operating room.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Ketorolac exposure.

    Whether or not cases and controls were exposed to ketorolac on the day of surgery will be determined and compiled as a categorical variable (yes/no).

    Time frame: Sept 2015 - Aug 2017.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Year of reduction mammoplasty.

    The year of which the reduction mammoplasty occurred will be recorded for cases and controls. The investigators will then calculate the mean year which the reduction mammoplasty surgery occurred for the case and control groups, to ensure that on average, each group is similar in terms of the year the surgeries occurred.

    Time frame: Sept 2015 - Aug 2017.

  2. Age of patients in each group will be calculated.

    Age, extracted from the medical chart, will be aggregated and mean age for cases and controls will be calculated.

    Time frame: Sept 2015 - Aug 2017.

  3. Body mass index compared between cases and controls.

    BMI will be calculated for each patient from height and weight available in the medical chart, and mean BMI between case and control groups will be compared.

    Time frame: Sept 2015 - Aug 2017.

  4. Volume of breast tissue resected during surgery (in grams) for each patient.

    Mean volume of breast tissue resected from each breast, which is a routinely recorded number during reduction mammoplasty, will be extracted for each patient, and mean volumes resected will be compared between cases and controls.

    Time frame: Sept 2015 - Aug 2017.

  5. Pre-operative platelet count.

    Platelet counts, if available, will be extracted for each patient and means for cases and controls will be compared.

    Time frame: Sept 2015 - Aug 2017.

  6. Smoking status.

    Active smokers (yes/no) will be determined by reviewing the pre-operative anesthesia records which routinely contain this information.

    Time frame: Sept 2015 - Aug 2017.

  7. American society of anesthesiologist (ASA) score.

    This is an ordinal score (ASA 1 through 4) given to all patients pre-operatively, as a general indicator of risk of morbidity and mortality with a general anesthetic. This will be extracted for each patient from the pre-operative anesthesia records and frequencies of patients who are ASA 1, ASA 2, ASA 3, or ASA 4 will be aggregated and compared between cases and controls.

    Time frame: Sept 2015 - Aug 2017.

  8. Specific breast side of hematoma occurrence (left versus right).

    In patients who developed a hematoma (cases), the investigators will record whether this occurred on the left, right, or both breasts.

    Time frame: Sept 2015 - Aug 2017.

  9. Post-operative opioid consumption.

    The investigators will calculate post-operative opioid consumption for each patient in the study. Values will be converted to equivalence of oral morphine, in milligrams, using standard conversion charts. Mean opioid consumption will be compared between patients who received ketorolac and those who did not.

    Time frame: Sept 2015 - Aug 2017.

  10. Surgeon's description of bleeding encountered during hematoma take-back.

    The investigators will review transcribed dictations of the surgeon for hematoma cases in order to determine what type of bleeding was encountered during take-back surgery. The categorical descriptors will be: pulsatile bleeding, general ooze, or both. The investigators will compare descriptors between patients who received ketorolac and those who did not.

    Time frame: Sept 2015 - Aug 2017.

  11. Ketorolac dose.

    Amongst cases and controls who received ketorolac, the specific dose of ketorolac given will be recorded in milligrams.

    Time frame: Sept 2015 - Aug 2017.

  12. Ketorolac route given.

    Amongst cases and controls who received ketorolac, the route which ketorolac was given will be recorded as a categorical variable (intra-venous, intra-muscular, or oral).

    Time frame: Sept 2015 - Aug 2017.

  13. Timing of ketorolac dose.

    Amongst cases and controls who received ketorolac, the timing of the dose given will be recorded (i.e. pre-operative, intra-operative, or post-operative).

    Time frame: Sept 2015 - Aug 2017.

06

Study locations

2 sites
  • St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton
    Hamilton, Ontario L8N 3Z5, Canada
  • Hamilton Health Sciences
    Hamilton, Ontario L8N3Z5, Canada
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Cawthorn TR, Phelan R, Davidson JS, Turner KE. Retrospective analysis of perioperative ketorolac and postoperative bleeding in reduction mammoplasty. Can J Anaesth. 2012 May;59(5):466-72. doi: 10.1007/s12630-012-9682-z. Epub 2012 Mar 21. PubMed 22434401 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03280043
Lead sponsor
McMaster University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 12, 2017
Start date
Sep 1, 2015
Primary completion
May 20, 2017
Completion
Aug 20, 2017
Last update
Sep 12, 2017

Study contacts

Achilleas Thoma, MD, MSc, BSc
principal investigator · McMaster University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion