An interventional study of Pain Science Education and Biomedical Education in Knee Arthritis Osteoarthritis, sponsored by McMaster University. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 55 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-16.
Sponsored by McMaster University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
Among 14 studies in Osteoarthritis, Knee by McMaster University — 3 open to participants now, 4 under way, none of them phase 3. Osteoarthritis, Knee · McMaster University.
Among the 14 studies in Osteoarthritis, Knee by McMaster University, this one is the 2nd largest by planned enrollment, is the only one that started in 2027, is one of 12 with no phase, and was the 14th registered.
3,292 studies on the registry are indexed under Osteoarthritis, Knee; 621 are open to participants now.
Browse Osteoarthritis, Knee studies →3 of the 14 studies in Osteoarthritis, Knee by McMaster University are open now, in 1 country. Recruiting first, the newest first:
McMaster University · Sites in Canada
Ages 45+ · Healthy volunteers
McMaster University · Sites in Canada
Ages 60+
By country, each count listing its studies:
Of the 382 Osteoarthritis, Knee studies recruiting now, 176 (46%) set no upper age limit and 113 (30%) stop at 75 or younger; 19 take children under 18; 39 take healthy volunteers.
This study: 55 Years to 85 Years · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.
The full table on the hub →This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.
14 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.
First in 2009; this study’s year is marked. 1 started in 2027.
By drug class, each counting the studies that test any of its medicines:
This study's planned enrollment of 82 is above the median of 68 across 2,714 interventional studies indexed under Osteoarthritis, Knee.
Median enrollment 40 across the 14 interventional studies. Of the 9 that completed or were terminated, 6 (67%) have results posted.
This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.
McMaster University is the lead sponsor of 741 studies on the registry; 127 are open to participants now.
Of its 7 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 3 (43%) have results posted.
2 of the studies in Osteoarthritis, Knee by McMaster University that are under way reach primary completion within a year, 0 of them phase 3. Phase 3 first, then by date:
| Study | Primary completion |
|---|---|
| NCT06228573McMaster UniversityTranscranial Direct Current Stimulation and Yoga for Knee Osteoarthritis | 2026-11-15 |
| NCT04378049McMaster UniversityRobot-Assisted Partial Knee Replacement Versus Standard Total Knee Replacement | 2026-12 |
Add all 2 to your calendar (.ics) → With an account.
Among the 14 studies in Osteoarthritis, Knee by McMaster University, from their registry updates:
Nothing recorded among them since 2026-09-25.
This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.
Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a common cause of pain and disability in older adults. Many people with knee OA believe that pain is primarily caused by joint damage or "wear and tear." These beliefs may contribute to fear of movement, reduced physical activity, and lower engagement in recommended self-management strategies. However, current evidence suggests that pain is influenced by multiple biological, psychological, and social factors and is not always directly related to the degree of structural joint changes visible on imaging.
Pain Science Education (PSE) is an educational approach designed to improve understanding of pain by explaining the complex factors that contribute to the pain experience. In contrast, traditional biomedical education focuses primarily on structural joint pathology as the source of symptoms. Although patient education is recommended as a first-line intervention for knee OA, little is known about whether PSE is more effective than biomedical education in changing beliefs, improving disease understanding, or influencing behavior and physiological responses in older adults with knee OA.
The purpose of this randomized controlled trial is to compare the effectiveness of PSE with standard biomedical education in community-dwelling older adults aged 55 years and older with knee OA. Eighty-two participants will be randomly allocated to receive either PSE or biomedical education through an interactive website-based educational platform.
The primary outcome is osteoarthritis conceptualization, assessed using the Osteoarthritis Conceptualization Questionnaire (OACQ). Secondary outcomes include physiological measures of nervous system functioning, including heart rate variability, electrodermal activity, eye-tracking measures, and temporal summation testing. The study will also assess movement behaviors using accelerometry, including sleep, sedentary behavior, and physical activity across a 24-hour day. Additional outcomes include self-efficacy, fear of movement, knee pain, physical function, well-being, exercise intentions, and intentions regarding knee replacement surgery.
Participants will complete baseline questionnaires and one week of physical activity monitoring before attending an in-person assessment. During the in-person visit, participants will complete physiological and sensory testing and review the educational materials assigned to their group. Participants will then complete a talk-aloud exercise to explore how they interpret and engage with the educational content. Following the visit, participants will complete a second week of physical activity monitoring and follow-up questionnaires.
The investigators hypothesize that participants receiving PSE will demonstrate greater improvements in OA conceptualization than those receiving biomedical education. Exploratory analyses will examine whether PSE is associated with differences in nervous system responses, movement behaviors, self-reported outcomes, and whether these effects differ according to sex and gender. Findings from this study may help inform evidence-based educational strategies for older adults living with knee OA.
Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is one of the leading causes of persistent pain and disability among older adults worldwide. Contemporary clinical guidelines consistently recommend patient education, exercise, physical activity, and self-management as first-line interventions for individuals with knee OA. Despite these recommendations, many people with knee OA continue to hold beliefs that pain is primarily a consequence of structural joint damage, cartilage loss, or joint degeneration. These beliefs may contribute to fear of movement, reduced participation in physical activity, lower self-efficacy, and pessimistic expectations regarding recovery and long-term management.
Historically, OA has often been communicated through a biomedical framework emphasizing structural pathology and "wear-and-tear" explanations. Although structural changes can contribute to symptoms, growing evidence suggests that the relationship between imaging findings and pain severity is modest. Structural abnormalities commonly observed on imaging are frequently present in asymptomatic individuals and may reflect age-related changes rather than direct causes of pain. Nevertheless, many patients continue to receive messages that reinforce damage-focused beliefs and may discourage engagement in recommended management strategies.
Pain Science Education (PSE) was developed to address misconceptions regarding pain and musculoskeletal conditions. PSE aims to promote a contemporary understanding of pain by explaining the interaction of biological, psychological, and social contributors to the pain experience. In the context of knee OA, PSE emphasizes that pain is influenced by multiple factors and does not necessarily reflect ongoing tissue damage. It also promotes the understanding that movement and physical activity are generally safe, beneficial, and important components of OA management.
A central objective of PSE is conceptual change. Conceptual change refers to modifications in how individuals understand and interpret their condition and pain experience. Improved conceptualization of OA may facilitate more adaptive beliefs about pain, increase confidence in self-management, and support engagement in evidence-based treatments such as exercise and physical activity. However, little is known about the effectiveness of PSE in older adults with knee OA, particularly when compared with more traditional biomedical educational approaches.
A pilot randomized controlled trial conducted by the investigative team found that participants receiving PSE demonstrated improvements in osteoarthritis conceptualization, whereas participants receiving biomedical education showed little change. Although between-group differences did not reach statistical significance, the pilot study was not powered to detect treatment effects. These findings support the need for a fully powered randomized controlled trial.
In addition to influencing beliefs and understanding, educational interventions may affect behavioral and physiological outcomes. One proposed mechanism is through increasing participants' confidence to engage in physical activity by changing beliefs that pain necessarily indicates tissue damage. Because daily movement behaviors are interdependent, understanding changes in physical activity requires consideration of the entire 24-hour movement composition, including sleep, sedentary behavior, and different intensities of physical activity. Compositional Data Analysis (CoDA) provides an appropriate framework for investigating these relationships.
Educational interventions may also influence physiological responses associated with pain and stress processing. Chronic pain has been associated with alterations in autonomic nervous system regulation, including changes in sympathetic and parasympathetic activity. Physiological measures such as heart rate variability, electrodermal activity, eye-tracking metrics, and quantitative sensory testing may provide objective indicators of nervous system responsiveness and processing. Evaluating these measures may improve understanding of how individuals respond to different educational messages regarding pain and osteoarthritis.
The present study is a two-arm randomized controlled trial comparing Pain Science Education and Biomedical Education in community-dwelling older adults with knee OA. Participants will be randomly allocated to receive one of two website-based educational interventions designed to simulate information commonly encountered when searching for OA-related information online. Both educational programs include similar formats and presentation methods but differ in the concepts and messages emphasized. The biomedical education intervention focuses primarily on structural pathology and disease-related tissue changes, whereas the PSE intervention focuses on contemporary pain science principles and a biopsychosocial understanding of osteoarthritis pain.
The primary objective of the study is to determine whether PSE results in greater improvement in osteoarthritis conceptualization than biomedical education immediately following exposure to the intervention. Secondary objectives are to explore differences between groups in physiological measures of nervous system function, movement behaviors measured across the 24-hour day, and self-reported cognitive, emotional, and functional outcomes. The study will also explore how participants perceive, interpret, and engage with the educational content through a talk-aloud methodology. In addition, exploratory analyses will investigate the potential influence of sex and gender on treatment responses across outcome domains.
The results of this study will contribute to the understanding of how educational interventions influence beliefs, behavior, and physiological responses in individuals with knee OA. Findings may help inform the development of evidence-based educational strategies that support self-management, physical activity participation, and patient-centered osteoarthritis care.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Participants randomized to the experimental arm will receive a web-based Pain Science Education (PSE) intervention designed for older adults with knee osteoarthritis. The educational content presents contemporary evidence regarding pain and osteoarthritis using a biopsychosocial framework. Topics include the multidimensional nature of pain, the limited relationship between pain and structural joint changes, factors that influence the pain experience, and the role of physical activity and self-management in osteoarthritis care. Educational materials include OA-related images, myths and facts, explanatory concepts, and patient-provider statements. Participants will review the content during a single study session and subsequently complete outcome assessments and a structured talk-aloud activity exploring their interpretation of the educational material.
Behavioral: Pain Science Education
Participants randomized to the control arm will receive a web-based biomedical education intervention focused on the structural and pathological aspects of knee osteoarthritis. The educational content presents osteoarthritis primarily as a condition associated with joint degeneration, cartilage loss, and other structural changes commonly described in traditional OA education. Materials include OA-related images, myths and facts, disease-related concepts, and patient-provider statements emphasizing joint pathology and disease progression. Participants will review the content during a single study session and subsequently complete outcome assessments and a structured talk-aloud activity exploring their interpretation of the educational material.
Behavioral: Biomedical Education
Participants receive a web-based Pain Science Education (PSE) intervention designed for older adults with knee osteoarthritis. The educational content presents contemporary concepts of pain using a biopsychosocial framework, emphasizing that pain is influenced by multiple biological, psychological, and social factors and is not always directly related to structural joint damage. Content includes images, myths and facts, disease-related concepts, and patient-provider statements encouraging physical activity and self-management.
Participants receive a web-based biomedical education intervention focused on structural and pathological aspects of knee osteoarthritis. The educational content emphasizes joint degeneration, cartilage loss, osteophytes, and other structural changes commonly described in traditional osteoarthritis education. Content includes images, myths and facts, disease-related concepts, and patient-provider statements focused on joint pathology and disease progression.
Osteoarthritis Conceptualization Questionnaire (OACQ) score
Osteoarthritis conceptualization assessed using the Osteoarthritis Conceptualization Questionnaire (OACQ). The OACQ measures participants' understanding and beliefs about osteoarthritis, pain, and physical activity. Higher scores indicate greater alignment with contemporary evidence-based concepts of osteoarthritis and pain.
Time frame: Change from baseline to 1 week post-intervention
Heart Rate Variability (HRV)
Autonomic nervous system function assessed using heart rate variability derived from electrocardiogram recordings collected while participants interact with the educational material.
Time frame: during the intervention
Electrodermal Activity (EDA)
Sympathetic nervous system activity assessed through continuous electrodermal activity recordings obtained while participants review the educational material.
Time frame: during the intervention
Eye tracking
Visual attention and cognitive processing assessed using eye-tracking metrics, including gaze behavior (e.g. location and time spent on content) while participants review educational content.
Time frame: during the intervention
Mechanical Temporal Summation
Central nervous system sensitivity assessed using mechanical temporal summation testing. Higher values indicate greater pain facilitation.
Time frame: Change from pre-intervention to immediately post-intervention (same study visit)
24-hour movement behaviour composition
Distribution of time spent sleeping, sedentary, and engaging in light, moderate, vigorous, and very vigorous physical activity measured using accelerometry and analyzed using compositional data analysis.
Time frame: Change from baseline (7-day monitoring period before intervention) to follow-up (7-day monitoring period after intervention)
Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Disease (SEMCD-6)
Self-efficacy for managing chronic health conditions assessed using the SEMCD-6 questionnaire. Higher scores indicate greater self-efficacy.
Time frame: Change from baseline to 1 week post-intervention
Brief Fear of Movement Scale for Osteoarthritis (BFMSO)
Fear of movement related to osteoarthritis assessed using the BFMSO. Higher scores indicate greater fear of movement.
Time frame: Change from baseline to 1 week post-intervention
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Pain subscale
Knee pain assessed using the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Pain subscale. Higher scores indicate fewer knee problems.
Time frame: Change from baseline to 1 week post-intervention
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Activities of Daily Living Subscale
Physical function assessed using the KOOS Activities of Daily Living subscale. Higher scores indicate better function.
Time frame: Change from baseline to 1 week post-intervention
Well-being of Older People (WOOP)
Multidimensional well-being assessed using the WOOP questionnaire.
Time frame: Change from baseline to 1 week post-intervention
Intention to Exercise
Participants' motivation, commitment, and determination to engage in physical activity assessed using the Intention to Exercise scale.
Time frame: Change from baseline to 1 week post-intervention
Intention to undergo knee replacement surgery
Participants' willingness to consider knee joint replacement surgery assessed using the Surgery Intention Scale.
Time frame: Change from baseline to 1 week post-intervention
Computer Proficiency Questionnaire-12 (CPQ-12)
Self-reported computer proficiency assessed using the Computer Proficiency Questionnaire-12. Higher scores indicate greater perceived ability to perform computer-based tasks and use digital technologies. Scores range from 12 to 60
Time frame: Baseline
Attitudes Toward Technologies Questionnaire (ATTQ)
Attitudes toward technology assessed using the ATTQ. Higher scores indicate more positive attitudes toward technology use. Scores range from 6 to 30.
Time frame: Baseline
Participant perceptions of educational content
The will be qualitatively evaluated using participants' interpretations, perceptions, and engagement with the educational materials explored through a structured talk-aloud exercise.
Time frame: Immediately post-intervention (same study visit)
No study locations are listed for this record.
Plan to share: No — Individual participant data will not be shared due to restrictions outlined in the research ethics approval and informed consent process. Given the collection of detailed physiological, movement behavior, and qualitative data, public sharing may increase the risk of participant re-identification despite de-identification procedures.
Start is estimated for Feb 2027; primary completion for Apr 2028, 14 months later.
Of 1,111 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Osteoarthritis, Knee, half reached primary completion within 18 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 8 and three quarters within 36. This study's planned 14 months is below that.
Counting every sponsor, half of 1,251 studies reached it within 18 months; a quarter within 8 and three quarters within 36.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.