ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03279471STAARUpdated Sep 23, 2026Results posted

Specifying and Treating Anxiety in Autism Research

A Phase 2 interventional study of Sertraline and CBT/BIACA in Autism Spectrum Disorder and Anxiety, sponsored by University of California, Davis. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 8 Years to 14 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-23.

Primary conditionAutistic DisorderRegistry: Autism Spectrum DisorderReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Autism Spectrum Disorder — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Autistic Disorder
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Autistic Disorder, a narrower term within Autism Spectrum Disorder.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by University of California, Davis · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
65
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
8 Years to 14 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-13

Among 603 studies in Autistic Disorder with a site in United States — 123 open to participants now, 152 under way, 3 of them phase 3. Autistic Disorder · United States.

Enrollment
175th of 504
65 · median 44
Started
2017
with 17 others
Phase 2
95 of 603
11 open now
Registered
335th of 603
by date

Among the 603 studies in Autistic Disorder with a site in United States, this one is the 175th largest by enrollment of the 504 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 18 that started in 2017, is one of 95 in phase 2, and was the 335th registered.

Autistic Disorder

1,033 studies on the registry are indexed under Autistic Disorder; 269 are open to participants now.

Browse Autistic Disorder studies →

Open to participants now

123 of the 603 studies in Autistic Disorder with a site in United States are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

118 more — sign in →

All 123 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in United States have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in United States →

Who these studies take

Of the 183 Autistic Disorder studies recruiting now, 33 (18%) set no upper age limit and 143 (78%) stop at 75 or younger; 148 take children under 18; 56 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 8 Years to 14 Years · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 603 studies in Autistic Disorder with a site in United States, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

In the Specifying and Treating the Anxiety Phenotype in Autism Spectrum Disorder (STAAR) study, we conducted a16-week randomized comparative treatment trial of the Behavioral Intervention for Anxiety in Children with Autism (BIACA), the medication sertraline, and placebo in youth with ASD ages 8-14 years old. The study involved 2-3 half day telehealth visits for behavioral and medical assessments, 1-2 lab visits for safety testing, and 1-2 optional fMRI (functional magnetic resonance imaging) visits for participants before the pandemic made this impossible. The study provided 16-weeks of anxiety treatment involving weekly BIACA therapy either in-person or through telehealth, or medical check-up visits either at the UC Davis MIND Institute or via telehealth. After study completion a 3 month follow up call was conducted and participants in the placebo group were given the option to participate in an additional study phase with the study treatment of their choice. Study participation could be done remotely through the use of telehealth and local labs, meaning that visits to the University of California (UC) Davis MIND Institute were not required for most participants.

Several changes were made to the original protocol after the initiation of the COVID-19 Pandemic in mid-March of 2020. While the IRB of UCDMC deemed our study to be essential and permitted us to continue both psychosocial CBT therapy and medication administration, they required that:

  1. Assessment measures that had been implemented in person, be switched to online or Zoom administration.
  2. It also became impossible to administer the Autism Diagnostic Observation Scale (ADOS) in a valid manner. We then used the Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS-2) as the basis for qualification for the study.
  3. We were no longer able to see participants in person so Cognitive Behavior Therapy visits were moved to an online format.
  4. Similarly, medication visits were conducted over Zoom unless it was necessary to have the participant come into our clinic such as in the initial assessment or for safety concerns.
  5. In the Medication Arm, we partnered with Quest Labs to enable participants to receive their safety monitoring blood tests in the community.
  6. Unfortunately, it became extremely difficult to recruit patients willing to be scanned so we halted the fMRI component of the study.
Read the detailed description

Approximately 40%-80% of children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) exhibit clinically significant anxiety symptoms. These symptoms are associated with increased social deficits, depression, irritability, and stereotyped and self-injurious behaviors. Children and adolescents with anxiety also frequently avoid potentially stressful situations, thereby missing opportunities to learn important new skills. Despite the significant consequences of anxiety symptoms, what to do about this problem is less clear. The search for empirically-validated treatments has begun with multiple small trials providing promising evidence that selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) might reduce anxiety in those with ASD. However, this work is in its early stages. There is a great need for large, rigorously designed trials that validate the effectiveness of both medication and CBT, as well as functional neuroimaging studies that identify neural predictors of treatment efficacy and markers of therapy-induced change. Such work holds the potential to help answer the questions posed above and to assist the field in developing more personalized treatments. In Project 1 of the Center for the Development of Phenotype-Based Treatments of Autism Spectrum Disorder, we conducted a study in children with ASD and clinically significant anxiety ages 8-14 to compare efficacy of these different treatment types.

More specifically, the overall aim of the study was to conduct a 16-week randomized comparative treatment trial of Behavioral Intervention for Anxiety in Children with Autism (BIACA), sertraline, and placebo in youth with ASD, IQ (intelligence quotient) >50, and clinically significant anxiety as assessed by a PARS score that is greater than or equal to 8. PARS is the primary outcome measures for the trial. Other prespecified measures such as clinician-administered gold standard assays will be used of traditional DSM (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual) [Pediatric Anxiety Rating Scale (PARS) and the Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule-IV (ADIS-IV)], and nontraditional ASD related anxiety symptoms [Autism Spectrum Addendum to the ADIS (ASDD)] to qualify participants. We also used additional prespecified measures including parent reports of potentially overlapping symptoms that complicate the ASD anxiety phenotype. Although we additionally had wanted to include fMRI to investigate neural predictors of treatment efficacy, markers of treatment induced change, and signatures of anxiety sub-types, these efforts needed to be stopped due to the pandemic.

03

Conditions studied

  • Autism Spectrum Disorder
  • Anxiety

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • autism spectrum disorder
  • anxiety
  • cognitive behavior therapy
  • functional neuroimaging
  • STAAR
  • ASD
  • MIND Institute
  • UC Davis
  • MIND
  • University of California, Davis
  • autism
04

In context

Autistic Disorder Reclassified

1,033 studies on the registry are indexed under Autistic Disorder; 269 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 65 is above the median of 49 across 813 interventional studies indexed under Autistic Disorder.

Browse Autistic Disorder studies →

Lead sponsor

University of California, Davis is the lead sponsor of 810 studies on the registry; 142 are open to participants now.

Of its 67 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 43 (64%) have results posted.

Compared within Autistic Disorder, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Autism Spectrum Disorder. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

05

Who can participate

Ages eligible
8 Years to 14 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Outpatient boys and girls with ASD between ages 8-14 years at consent.
  2. Meets criteria for a diagnosis of ASD.
  3. Meets criteria for anxiety symptoms as defined by a minimum score of 8 on the PARS Severity Scale.
  4. Meets criteria for clinically significant anxiety symptoms as defined by qualifying for diagnosis on 1 or more non-phobia items on the ADIS.
  5. The child has a Verbal Comprehension IQ greater than 50 as assessed on the Wechsler Abbreviated Scales of Intelligence or other standardized cognitive measure.
  6. Anxiety symptoms are considered the primary mental health problem (i.e., most impairing/distressing)
  7. Stable medication regimen for 8 weeks prior to screening visit, including alternative medication, nutritionals, or therapeutic diets.
  8. Stable non-psychotherapy regimen for 4 weeks prior to screening visits. Non-psychotherapy regimen may include:

    1. Academic tutoring
    2. Occupational therapy
    3. Speech therapy
    4. School aides
  9. Stable psychosocial treatment regimen for 4 weeks prior to screening visits. Allowed psychosocial treatments may include:

    1. School counseling (no more than 60 minutes per week in duration)
    2. Psychotherapy
    3. Social skills training
    4. Applied behavior analysis (ABA) (up to 10 hours per week)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

  1. Subject is receiving significant concurrent psychosocial treatment with the primary aim to treat the child's anxiety.

    a. Families will have the option of discontinuing such services to enroll in the study. If a potential participant is receiving non-allowed treatments at the time of the phone evaluation and wishes to discontinue these treatments to enter the study, the patient will be asked to discuss this option with their clinician to determine whether termination would be safe and in the child's best interest. We will not influence the decision patients make with their clinician.

  2. History of intolerance to sertraline OR previous unsuccessful treatment with sertraline or other SSRIs judged adequate in dose (per list below) and taken for at least 6 weeks, within the past 12 months.

    1. Sertraline - 100mg/daily
    2. Citalopram or paroxetine - 30mg/daily
    3. Escitalopram - 20mg/daily
    4. Fluoxetine - 20mg/daily
    5. Fluvoxamine - 100mg/daily
  3. Current suicidal behaviors with intent or plan or individuals who have engaged in suicidal behaviors within 6 months. Study physicians will direct patient to appropriate clinical care if these behaviors are seen.
  4. Child has unsuccessful treatment for anxiety using a manualized CBT program within the previous 2 years (at least 10 sessions over a period of less than 1 year conducted by a licensed provider of CBT). This will be determined through parent report, records review and speaking with the clinician if appropriate.
  5. Lifetime bipolar disorder, schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder as assessed by all forms of information (i.e., clinical history, data from the ADIS-IV, etc.).
  6. Abnormal laboratory or results at screening that are in the opinion of the investigator clinically significant and may jeopardize the safety of the study subject.
  7. Child has a major neurological disorder or medical illness that requires a prohibited episodic or chronic systemic medication that might interfere with the absorption, distribution, metabolism, or excretion of the study medication places the subject at increased risk, or that would interfere with study participation (e.g., frequent hospitalizations, frequent school absences).
  8. Child pregnancy as indicated by history or positive pregnancy test.
  9. Inability to safely swallow study medication after pill swallowing education.
  10. Child and parent/caregiver who do not speak English.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

DSM diagnostic criteria

The American Psychiatric Association’s manual of mental health diagnoses. DSM-5 (2013, revised as DSM-5-TR in 2022) replaced DSM-IV, and some studies still name the older edition. “Meets DSM criteria for …” means diagnosed by that edition’s diagnostic criteria, usually by a clinician in an interview.

ECG (electrocardiogram)

A recording of the heart’s electrical activity, taken with stickers on the chest, arms and legs. It takes a few minutes and does not hurt.

06

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
65 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    CBT/BIACA

    These participants will receive CBT treatment using Behavioral Interventions for Anxiety in Children with Autism (BIACA). BIACA is an anxiety treatment package designed for children with ASD that includes elements of CBT and social skills training.

    Behavioral: CBT/BIACA

  • Active comparator
    Sertraline

    These participants will receive sertraline

    Drug: Sertraline

  • Placebo comparator
    Pill Placebo

    These individuals will receive a pill placebo.

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • Participants start at 12.5 mg and are increased by 12.5/day every two weeks for 14-16 weeks based on their tolerability to the medication. Dosing is capped at 125mg/day.

  • BehavioralCBT/BIACA

    Participants receive 16 weeks of BIACA therapy.

  • DrugPlacebo

    Participants are given a placebo capsule with an administration schedule matching that of the sertraline subjects.

07

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Pediatric Anxiety Rating Scale

    The Pediatric Anxiety Rating Scale (PARS) is a clinician-rated scale assessing anxiety symptoms and the associated severity and impairment in children over the past week in 6 to 17 year olds. PARS is the one primary outcome measure used in this study. It is administered by a trained clinician who queries the participant's parent about anxiety symptoms experienced by the child and their associated severity and impairment over the past week. The first section is a Symptom Checklist with 50 items assessing 7 categories of anxiety symptoms on a 5-point scale. Given that some of these categories (number of symptoms and physical symptoms) don't directly bear on severity and/or may capture medication effects, they are not included in the final 5 Severity Score domains used in the overall calculation. Thus, scores on the PARS Severity Scale range from 0 to 25, with scores \>14 consistent with clinically significant levels of anxiety in youth with ASD.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to week 17 (treatment completion)

08

Results

Posted Sep 23, 2026

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneCBT/BIACASertralinePill Placebo
Started222122
Week 17202015
Completed131813
Not completed939
Withdrew: Protocol violation101
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up411
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject325
Withdrew: Adverse event102

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange in Pediatric Anxiety Rating Scale

The Pediatric Anxiety Rating Scale (PARS) is a clinician-rated scale assessing anxiety symptoms and the associated severity and impairment in children over the past week in 6 to 17 year olds. PARS is the one primary outcome measure used in this study. It is administered by a trained clinician who queries the participant's parent about anxiety symptoms experienced by the child and their associated severity and impairment over the past week. The first section is a Symptom Checklist with 50 items assessing 7 categories of anxiety symptoms on a 5-point scale. Given that some of these categories (number of symptoms and physical symptoms) don't directly bear on severity and/or may capture medication effects, they are not included in the final 5 Severity Score domains used in the overall calculation. Thus, scores on the PARS Severity Scale range from 0 to 25, with scores \>14 consistent with clinically significant levels of anxiety in youth with ASD.

Time frame:
Change from baseline to week 17 (treatment completion)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Pediatric Anxiety Rating Scale
score on a scaleCBT/BIACASertralinePill Placebo
Change in Pediatric Anxiety Rating Scale11.1 ± 5.889.3 ± 5.2714.06 ± 6.37

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse event data were collected per patient from treatment start date until final post-treatment follow-up (29 w weeks from treatment start) or until early termination from study.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
CBT/BIACA0/22 (0%)0/22 (0%)7/22 (31.8%)
Sertraline0/21 (0%)0/21 (0%)18/21 (85.7%)
Pill Placebo0/22 (0%)0/22 (0%)17/22 (77.3%)
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 27
Most frequent other events
EventCBT/BIACASertralinePill Placebo
Upper Respiratory InfectionRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders3/223/217/22
RashSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders0/224/215/22
FatigueGeneral disorders0/224/211/22
HeadacheGeneral disorders1/224/213/22
Sleep DisturbancePsychiatric disorders1/224/212/22
Autism-Related BehaviorsPsychiatric disorders1/223/212/22
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders0/223/211/22
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders0/223/211/22
AnxietyPsychiatric disorders0/222/213/22
Emotional LabilityPsychiatric disorders0/222/213/22

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)CBT/BIACASertralinePill PlaceboTotal
Mean10.74 ± 1.610.76 ± 1.6610.3 ± 1.6810.59 ± 1.62
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)CBT/BIACASertralinePill PlaceboTotal
Female33511
Male19181754
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)CBT/BIACASertralinePill PlaceboTotal
Hispanic or Latino38617
Not Hispanic or Latino16131342
Unknown or Not Reported3036
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)CBT/BIACASertralinePill PlaceboTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native0101
Asian2215
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0000
Black or African American3104
White11111638
More than one race2338
Unknown or Not Reported4329
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)CBT/BIACASertralinePill PlaceboTotal
United States22212265
Pediatric Anxiety Rating Scale (PARS) Total Score
Pediatric Anxiety Rating Scale (PARS) Total Score(units on a scale)CBT/BIACASertralinePill PlaceboTotal
Mean17.82 ± 3.9116.76 ± 3.5616.45 ± 3.6217.27 ± 3.48
09

Study locations

1 site
  • UC Davis MIND Institute
    Sacramento, California 95817, United States
10

References and documents

Publications

  • Leyfer OT, Folstein SE, Bacalman S, Davis NO, Dinh E, Morgan J, Tager-Flusberg H, Lainhart JE. Comorbid psychiatric disorders in children with autism: interview development and rates of disorders. J Autism Dev Disord. 2006 Oct;36(7):849-61. doi: 10.1007/s10803-006-0123-0. PubMed 16845581 ↗
  • Simonoff E, Pickles A, Charman T, Chandler S, Loucas T, Baird G. Psychiatric disorders in children with autism spectrum disorders: prevalence, comorbidity, and associated factors in a population-derived sample. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2008 Aug;47(8):921-9. doi: 10.1097/CHI.0b013e318179964f. PubMed 18645422 ↗
  • van Steensel FJ, Bogels SM, Perrin S. Anxiety disorders in children and adolescents with autistic spectrum disorders: a meta-analysis. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2011 Sep;14(3):302-17. doi: 10.1007/s10567-011-0097-0. PubMed 21735077 ↗
  • White SW, Oswald D, Ollendick T, Scahill L. Anxiety in children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorders. Clin Psychol Rev. 2009 Apr;29(3):216-29. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2009.01.003. Epub 2009 Jan 25. PubMed 19223098 ↗
  • Bishop-Fitzpatrick L, Mazefsky CA, Minshew NJ, Eack SM. The relationship between stress and social functioning in adults with autism spectrum disorder and without intellectual disability. Autism Res. 2015 Apr;8(2):164-73. doi: 10.1002/aur.1433. Epub 2014 Dec 19. PubMed 25524571 ↗
  • Gillott A, Furniss F, Walter A. Anxiety in high-functioning children with autism. Autism. 2001 Sep;5(3):277-86. doi: 10.1177/1362361301005003005. PubMed 11708587 ↗
  • Craske MG, Stein MB. Anxiety. Lancet. 2016 Dec 17;388(10063):3048-3059. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30381-6. Epub 2016 Jun 24. PubMed 27349358 ↗
  • Vasa RA, Mazurek MO. An update on anxiety in youth with autism spectrum disorders. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2015 Mar;28(2):83-90. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0000000000000133. PubMed 25602249 ↗
  • Sukhodolsky DG, Bloch MH, Panza KE, Reichow B. Cognitive-behavioral therapy for anxiety in children with high-functioning autism: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 2013 Nov;132(5):e1341-50. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-1193. Epub 2013 Oct 28. PubMed 24167175 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

11

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Oct 2017 to primary completion in Feb 2023, 64 months.

Results were first posted in Sep 2026, 3 years 7 months after primary completion.

Of 35 non-industry phase 2 interventional studies under Autistic Disorder, half reached primary completion within 46 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 24 and three quarters within 63. This study's 64 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 44 studies reached it within 39 months; a quarter within 24 and three quarters within 62.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 28, 2017
First posted
Sep 12, 2017
StartActual
Oct 1, 2017
Primary completionActual
Feb 22, 2023
CompletionActual
Feb 22, 2023
Results first posted
Sep 23, 2026
Last update
Sep 23, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 23, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
12

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03279471
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 12, 2017
Start date
Oct 1, 2017
Primary completion
Feb 22, 2023
Completion
Feb 22, 2023
Results posted
Sep 23, 2026
Last update
Sep 23, 2026

Study contacts

Marjorie Solomon, PH.D.
principal investigator · UC Davis

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion