CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03266263Updated Aug 30, 2017

A Study of Improving Education of Community Chain of Survival

An interventional study of automatic computer-led feedback and instructor-led feedback in Cardiac Arrest Circulatory, sponsored by National Taiwan University Hospital. Status unknown at 1 site in Taiwan. Open to participants aged 16 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-08-30.

Sponsored by National Taiwan University Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Aug 2016), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
500
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
16 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

"High-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR)" and "early defibrillation" are the most important parts of "the chain of survival", and they are highly associated with the survival rate and life quality of patients with cardiac arrest. It needs the witness to perform bystander CPR and use the automated external defibrillator (AED) if CPR and defibrillation are expected to be performed earlier. Nevertheless, few patients with cardiac arrest received bystander CPR in Taiwan. It might be caused by some reasons. First, traditional training programs were inefficient and ineffective in the retention of skills and thus students were not confident in their CPR skills after receiving training programs. Second, the current training module focused on personal skill training only and lacked teamwork skills training. It led to poor performance of the students in actual resuscitation scene, where on-scene resuscitators were usually more than one. Third, the current training contents did not improve the attitudes and willingness of performing bystander CPR and it caused people who had received training program did not resuscitate the patients finally. To improve the above-mentioned problem, a three-year research project will be implemented. The aims of the project are the following:

  1. to explore the effect of different teaching contents and hand-on practice feedback methods on the students' performance of chest compressing, ventilating and using AED in the CPR and AED training courses.
  2. to analyze the current situation of teamwork when CPR and AED were performed, to build up the collaborating module accordingly and evaluate the effect of the new module on the students' performance of chest compressing, ventilating and using AED after the module is introduced into the training course.
  3. to understand the factors affecting the motivations and willingness of people to learn and practice CPR and AED by utilizing questionnaires, and then to evaluate the effect of the creative program, which was modified according to the results of the questionnaires, on the motivations and willingness of people to learn and practice CPR and AED.

The investigators expect to design a more efficient resuscitation skill training course by implementing the research project and further to improve the motivations and willingness of people to learn and practice CPR and AED in the future.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cardiac Arrest Circulatory

Browse trials for

03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
16 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • healthy laypersons without CPR training within two years

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • non
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
500 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    automatic computer-led feedback

    automated feedback for CPR quality provided by computers

    Device: automatic computer-led feedback

  • Active comparator
    instructor-led feedback

    feedback for CPR quality provided by instructors

    Other: instructor-led feedback

Interventions

  • Deviceautomatic computer-led feedback

    automated feedback software for CPR quality, including compression depth, rate, recoil, hands-off time, and ventilation volume

  • Otherinstructor-led feedback

    feedback for CPR quality by instructors

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. chest compression rate

    differences of chest compression rates

    Time frame: immediately after the training course

  2. chest compression depth

    differences of chest compression depth

    Time frame: immediately after the training course

  3. hands-off time of chest compression

    differences of hands-off time of chest compression

    Time frame: immediately after the training course

  4. score of checklist

    differences of scores of checklists

    Time frame: immediately after the training course

Secondary outcomes

  1. score of satisfaction questionnaire

    differences of scores of satisfaction questionnaire

    Time frame: immediately after the training course

06

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
07

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03266263
Lead sponsor
National Taiwan University Hospital
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 30, 2017
Start date
Aug 1, 2016
Primary completion
Jul 31, 2019 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 31, 2019 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 30, 2017

Study contacts

Chih-Wei Yang
Contact
cwyang0413@gmail.com
886-23123456 ext. 61426

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Aug 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion