An interventional study of automatic computer-led feedback and instructor-led feedback in Cardiac Arrest Circulatory, sponsored by National Taiwan University Hospital. Status unknown at 1 site in Taiwan. Open to participants aged 16 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-08-30.
Sponsored by National Taiwan University Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
"High-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR)" and "early defibrillation" are the most important parts of "the chain of survival", and they are highly associated with the survival rate and life quality of patients with cardiac arrest. It needs the witness to perform bystander CPR and use the automated external defibrillator (AED) if CPR and defibrillation are expected to be performed earlier. Nevertheless, few patients with cardiac arrest received bystander CPR in Taiwan. It might be caused by some reasons. First, traditional training programs were inefficient and ineffective in the retention of skills and thus students were not confident in their CPR skills after receiving training programs. Second, the current training module focused on personal skill training only and lacked teamwork skills training. It led to poor performance of the students in actual resuscitation scene, where on-scene resuscitators were usually more than one. Third, the current training contents did not improve the attitudes and willingness of performing bystander CPR and it caused people who had received training program did not resuscitate the patients finally. To improve the above-mentioned problem, a three-year research project will be implemented. The aims of the project are the following:
The investigators expect to design a more efficient resuscitation skill training course by implementing the research project and further to improve the motivations and willingness of people to learn and practice CPR and AED in the future.
Exclusion Criteria:
automated feedback for CPR quality provided by computers
Device: automatic computer-led feedback
feedback for CPR quality provided by instructors
Other: instructor-led feedback
automated feedback software for CPR quality, including compression depth, rate, recoil, hands-off time, and ventilation volume
feedback for CPR quality by instructors
chest compression rate
differences of chest compression rates
Time frame: immediately after the training course
chest compression depth
differences of chest compression depth
Time frame: immediately after the training course
hands-off time of chest compression
differences of hands-off time of chest compression
Time frame: immediately after the training course
score of checklist
differences of scores of checklists
Time frame: immediately after the training course
score of satisfaction questionnaire
differences of scores of satisfaction questionnaire
Time frame: immediately after the training course
This study is status unknown, as verified in Aug 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
National Taiwan University Hospital