An interventional study of Internet-delivered Parent-Child Interaction Therapy (I-PCIT) and Referrals as Usual (RAU) in Developmental Delay and Disruptive Behavior, sponsored by Florida International University. Completed at 3 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 30 Months to 60 Months. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-06-03.
Sponsored by Florida International University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
The Advancing Child Competencies by Extending Supported Services (ACCESS) for Families Program is a study funded by the National Institutes of Health to explore behavior and developmental problems among young children aging out of Early Steps (Part C). All families will participate in five evaluations in their home to learn more about their child's behavior and development. Families also may receive treatment designed to help change their child's behaviors that will be conducted over the Internet using a tablet.
The proposed study will evaluate, via a randomized controlled trial, the incremental utility of I-PCIT for disruptive behavioral problems in traditionally underserved young children with developmental delay (DD) from predominantly economically disadvantaged and ethnic and racial minority backgrounds. Specifically, the investigators are interested in the impact of I-PCIT on child disruptive behavior problems, parenting practices, parental distress, and pre-academic skills relative to traditional referrals as usual (RAU) among youth aging out of Part C EI services and transitioning from home-based family services to school-based special education services. A secondary goal is to evaluate potential moderators and mediators that explain under which circumstances, for whom, and through which pathways I-PCIT is most effective for young children with DD. Our primary aims are (1) to evaluate the immediate and one-year impact of I-PCIT on (1a) disruptive behavior problems in young children with DD, as well as (1b) parenting practices and (1c) parental distress in parents of young children with DD; (2) to evaluate the impact of I-PCIT on pre-academic skills among young children with DD; and (3) to evaluate (3a) family retention, (3b) engagement, and (3c) satisfaction associated with I-PCIT in young children with DD. Our secondary aim is to examine potential moderators and mediators of response to I-PCIT for disruptive behavior problems in young children with DD. Specifically, the investigators are interested in the extent to which technological literacy and access (4a) moderate I-PCIT efficacy, such that I-PCIT efficacy will be weaker among families with poorer technological literacy and/or access, and the extent to which traditional barriers to care (4b) moderate I-PCIT efficacy, such that the incremental efficacy of I-PCIT over RAU will be strongest among families with geographic, transportation and/or childcare obstacles to in-person services. Finally, the investigators hypothesize that I-PCIT will yield changes in child behavior and pre-academic skills indirectly through direct effects on parenting practices (4c). Specifically, changes in parental consistency, warmth, follow-through, and effective discipline will mediate observed I-PCIT efficacy, such that these treatment-related parenting changes will account for observed differences in child disruptive behavior problems and pre-academic skills.
270 studies on the registry are indexed under Learning Disabilities; 62 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 150 is above the median of 60 across 181 interventional studies indexed under Learning Disabilities.
Browse Learning Disabilities studies →Florida International University is the lead sponsor of 104 studies on the registry; 20 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Families will receive weekly sessions of Internet-delivered Parent-Child Interaction Therapy (I-PCIT), a short-term parent-training intervention emphasizing positive attention, consistency, problem-solving, and communication. Using videoconferencing, webcams, and wireless Bluetooth earpieces, I-PCIT therapists provide in-the-moment feedback to parents during live parent-child interactions.
Behavioral: Internet-delivered Parent-Child Interaction Therapy (I-PCIT)
Families in the referrals as usual (RAU) group will be referred to services as usual in their Early Intervention exit interview, which includes a variety of clinic-based mental health services at local community agencies. At each assessment, the access and extent of participation in other services will be monitored.
Other: Referrals as Usual (RAU)
Families assigned to the Internet-delivered Parent-Child Interaction Therapy (I-PCIT) group will receive Internet-delivered weekly sessions of a short-term parent-training intervention emphasizing positive attention, consistency, problem-solving, and communication. Using videoconferencing, webcams, and wireless Bluetooth earpieces, I-PCIT therapists provide in-the-moment feedback to parents during live parent-child interactions.
Families assigned to RAU will participate in services referred by their Early Steps team, as per usual care.
Child Behavior Checklist, Ages 1.5-5 (CBCL, 1.5-5)
The Child Behavior Checklist 1.5-5 (CBCL/1.5-5; Achenbach \& Rescorla, 2001) is a 99-item caregiver- report questionnaire of behavioral, emotional, and social problems in children between the ages of 18 months and 5 years. In the current study the externalizing behavior problem scale will be used to screen children into the study (T- score = 60), and the following subscales will be used as outcomes: aggressive behavior, attention problems, attention-deficit/hyperactivity problems, emotionally reactive, and oppositional defiant problems.
Time frame: Change from Week 0, Week 8, Week 21, Week 42 and Week 68
Body Mass Index (BMI)
A weight-to-height ratio, calculated by dividing one's weight in kilograms by the square of one's height in meters.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Post (Week 21), Follow-Up One (Week 42) and Follow-Up Two (Week 68)
Sutter-Eyberg Behavior Inventory, Revised (SESBI-R)
The Sutter-Eyberg Student Behavior Inventory-Revised (SESBI-R; Eyberg \& Pincus, 1999) is a teacher rating scale of disruptive behaviors at school in children as young as 2 years, and the Intensity and Problem scales will be used as outcome measures for participants in school to assess generalization of improvement in child disruptive behavior to the classroom setting.
Time frame: Change from Week 0, Week 8, Week 21, Week 42 and Week 68
Multidimensional Assessment of Preschool Disruptive Behavior (MAP-DB): Temper Loss Scale
The Temper Loss Scale of the Multidimensional Assessment of Preschool Disruptive Behavior (MAP-DB; Wakschlag et al., 2014) assesses temper loss in terms of tantrum features and anger regulation.
Time frame: Change from Week 0, Week 8, Week 21, Week 42 and Week 68
Impossibly Perfect Circle (IPC)
Children will complete a self-regulation task called the Impossibility Perfect Circles (IPC; Goldsmith \& Reilly, 1993) task in which the child is asked to draw a perfect circle several times. The purpose of this task is to code how well the child is regulating their behaviors and emotions during challenging tasks.
Time frame: Change from Week 0, Week 8, Week 21, Week 42 and Week 68
Child Rearing Inventory (CRI)
The Child Rearing Inventory (CRI; Brestan et al., 2003) is an 11-item caregiver-report measure of caregivers' ability to tolerate misbehavior and will also be used as an outcome measure of parenting practices.
Time frame: Change from Week 0, Week 8, Week 21, Week 42 and Week 68
Parenting Practices Inventory (PPI)
The Parenting Practices Inventory (PPI; Webster-Stratton et al., 2004)) is a 72-item caregiver-report questionnaire designed to measure caregiver disciplinary styles and strategies. The PPI is designed to measure parenting practices using the following subscales: appropriate discipline, harsh and inconsistent discipline, positive verbal discipline, monitoring, physical punishment, praise and incentives, and clear expectations.
Time frame: Change from Week 0, Week 8, Week 21, Week 42 and Week 68
Parent-Child Book Reading
The caregiver-child book- reading procedure will consist of one age-appropriate book (The Way I Feel by Janan Cain; Cain, 2005) which also has Spanish version (Asi me siento yo by Janan Cain; Cain, 2009). Caregivers will be instructed to describe the books to their children like they would normally for 5 minutes. This book is intended to elicit emotion talk as it includes emotional content, but also depicted multiple scenes, events, and objects that caregivers could talk about in addition to or instead of emotions, thereby permitting the capture of differences in caregivers' predilection to discuss emotions with their children.
Time frame: Change from Week 0, Week 21, Week 42 and Week 68
Family Impact Questionnaire (FIQ)
The Family Impact Questionnaire (FIQ; Donenberg \& Baker, 1993) is a 50-item caregiver-report questionnaire of stress and strain, selected over other measures as an outcome of caregiver distress because it has been Child Disruptive Symptoms.
Time frame: Change from Week 0, Week 8, Week 21, Week 42 and Week 68
Depression, Anxiety, Stress Scale- 21 (DASS-21)
The Depression, Anxiety, Stress Scale-21 (DASS21; Lovibond \& Lovibond, 1995) is a clinical assessment that measures the three related states of depression, anxiety and stress.
Time frame: Change from Week 0, Week 8, Week 21, Week 42 and Week 68
Bracken School Readiness Assessment-3 (BSRA-3)
Bracken School Readiness Assessment-3 (BSRA-3; Bracken, 2007) is an individual cognitive test designed for children examining the areas of colors, letters, numbers/counting, sizes, comparisons, and shapes.
Time frame: Change from Week 0, Week 21, Week 42 and Week 68
Preschool Language Scale-5 (PLS-5)
The Preschool Language Scale-5 (PLS-5; Zimmerman, Steiner, \& Pond, 2011) is an assessment of developmental language skills, specifically auditory comprehension and expressive communication.
Time frame: Change from Week 0, Week 21, Week 42 and Week 68
Clinical Global Impression (CGI-I)
The Clinical Global Impression - Improvement scale (CGI-I; Guy, 1976) is a 7-point scale that requires the clinician to assess how much the patient's illness has improved or worsened relative to a baseline state at the beginning of the intervention.
Time frame: Week 21
Technology Experience and Attitude Rating Scale (TEARS)
The Technology Experience and Attitude Rating Scale (TEARS) will be administered to assess caregiver and child technology use and literacy as a potential moderator of treatment response.
Time frame: Change in weekly ratings from Week 0 to Week 21
Therapy Attitude Inventory (TAI)
The Therapy Attitude Inventory (TAI; Brestan et al. 2000) is a 10-item parent-report of satisfaction with the process and outcome of parent-training interventions.
Time frame: Week 21
Client Satisfaction Questionnaire-8 (CSQ-8)
The Client Satisfaction Questionnaire-8 (CSQ-8; Nguyen et al., 1983) is an 8-item generic measure of clients' perceptions of the value of services received.
Time frame: Week 21
Telepresence in Videoconferencing Scale
The Telepresence in Videoconferencing Scale will be administered to assess caregiver experience interacting within video web-conferencing platform.
Time frame: Week 21
Barriers to Treatment Participation Scale (BTPS)
The Barriers to Treatment Participation Scale (BTPS; Kazdin et al. 1997) is a 44-item measure of perceived barriers to treatment participation.
Time frame: Week 21
Parental Attitudes Toward Psychological Services Inventory (PATPSI): Stigmatization Scale and Help-Seeking Attitudes Scale
Two scales from the Parental Attitudes Toward Psychological Services Inventory (PATPSI; Turner, 2012) will be administered: help- seeking attitudes scale and the stigmatization scale. The PATPSI is a measure to assess caregivers' attitudes toward outpatient mental health services.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0)
Child's Sleep Habits Questionnaire
The Children's Sleep Habits Questionnaire (CSHQ; Owens et al. 2000) is a 33-item parent questionnaire designed to examine sleep behavior in young children and thus screen for the most common sleep problems.
Time frame: Change from Week 0, Week 8, Week 21, Week 42 and Week 68
Dyadic Parent-Child Interaction Coding System-IV (DPICS-4)
The Dyadic Parent-Child Interaction Coding System-4th Ed (DPICS-IV; Eyberg et al., 2013) is a structured behavioral observation coding system assessing caregiver-child interactions. Observed parenting behaviors will be coded during a 5-min child-led play and combined into two categories of positive (praises, behavior descriptions, and reflections) and negative (questions, commands, and negative talk) verbalizations, reflecting behaviors caregivers are taught to use and avoid in PCIT. Additionally, child compliance will be assessed during a 5-min caregiver-led play and 5-min clean up situation and will be examined as an objective outcome of child behavior. The positive and negative caregiver verbalizations will be examined as both outcomes and candidate mediators of treatment, and child compliance will be examined as an outcome.
Time frame: Change from Week 0, Week 8, Week 21, Week 42 and Week 68
Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory (ECBI)
The Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory (ECBI; Eyberg \& Pincus, 1999) is a 36-item caregiver-report of disruptive behavior problems in children as young as 2 years. The Intensity and Problem scales will be used to assess changes in child disruptive behavior.
Time frame: Change from Week 0, Week 8, Week 21, Week 42 and Week 68
Plan to share: Undecided — We will use a controlled access approach, using a robust system to review requests and provide secure access to de-identified data.
Ran from Mar 2016 to primary completion in Dec 2020, 57 months.
Of 96 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Learning Disabilities, half reached primary completion within 30 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 53. This study's 57 months is above that.
Counting every sponsor, half of 99 studies reached it within 29 months; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 51.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Florida International University →