ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03257670BCLSUpdated Sep 28, 2021

Fractional CO2 Laser Therapy Versus 4% Topical Lidocaine Gel for Dyspareunia in Breast Cancer Survivors

An interventional study of 4% Topical Lidocaine Gel and CO2RE fractional laser therapy in Dyspareunia, sponsored by University of Cincinnati. Status unknown at 1 site in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-09-28.

Sponsored by University of Cincinnati · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Sep 2021), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
70
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This trial seeks to determine if therapy with a CO2 laser to the vagina is more effective than lidocaine to the opening of the vagina before intercourse to reduce painful intercourse in women who are breast cancer survivors. This study will also be looking at whether or not the CO2 laser improves pelvic floor function, bowel and bladder function, and sexual function before and after treatment.

Read the detailed description

This is a randomized trial to determine the comparative effectiveness of the CO2RE laser device relative to topical lidocaine in treating dyspareunia among breast cancer survivors. The large and growing population of breast cancer survivors experience a significant burden of urogenital symptoms including dyspareunia. Several studies have evaluated the feasibility and effectiveness of CO2 lasers for the treatment of symptomatic vulvovaginal atrophy in postmenopausal women suggesting improvements in atrophy symptoms with favorable histological and microscopic changes. There is little know about the effectiveness of CO2 laser therapy in breast cancer survivors.

Patients who are breast cancer survivors experiencing dyspareunia and desiring intervention will be randomized to two cohorts: (1) Treatment with the CO2RE laser or (2) application of 4% aqueous lidocaine applied to the vulvar vestibule for 3 minutes before vaginal penetration. The primary outcome will be the overall as well as lubrication, satisfaction, and pain domain scores on the Female Sexual Function Index instrument. Secondary outcomes will be according to other validated pain and pelvic floor symptom instruments.

Following initiation of treatment, both groups will follow up at one-week, 1-month, 3-months, and 6-months. At the 3-month assessment, subjects in the lidocaine arm will be given the option to undergo CO2RE laser therapy. A combination of validated and non-validated physical exam and survey instruments will be utilized at each visit in order to assess pelvic floor function, bowel and bladder function, and sexual function before and after treatment.

02

Conditions studied

  • Dyspareunia

Keywords

  • Dyspareunia
  • Laser
  • CO2
  • Breast Cancer
  • Vaginal Atrophy
  • Lidocaine
03

In context

Dyspareunia

158 studies on the registry are indexed under Dyspareunia; 40 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 70 is above the median of 63 across 126 interventional studies indexed under Dyspareunia.

Browse Dyspareunia studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Cincinnati is the lead sponsor of 324 studies on the registry; 42 are open to participants now.

Of its 24 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 15 (63%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Subjects included must be female breast cancer survivors over the age of 18, sexually active (at least 4 episodes of sexual intercourse per month), and find intercourse painful. Subjects must also be English speaking and able to give .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects will be excluded if pregnant, has not had breast cancer, does not have painful intercourse secondary to treatment received for their breast cancer, is not English speaking, or lacks the ability to sign .
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
70 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    CO2RE Laser

    This group will undergo vaginal CO2 laser therapy for a total of three (3) treatments with one month between treatments.

    Device: CO2RE fractional laser therapy

  • Active comparator
    4% Topical Lidocaine Gel

    This group will be given 4% topical lidocaine gel to take home. The patient will apply the 4% lidocaine gel to the outside and opening of the vagina for 3 minutes before vaginal penetration. The patient will continue using the numbing gel prior to vaginal penetration for the extent of the study (3 months).

    Drug: 4% Topical Lidocaine Gel

Interventions

  • This group will be given 4% topical lidocaine gel to take home. The patient will apply the 4% lidocaine gel to the outside and opening of the vagina for 3 minutes before vaginal penetration. The patient will continue using the numbing gel prior to vaginal penetration for the extent of the study (3 months).

  • DeviceCO2RE fractional laser therapy

    This group will undergo vaginal CO2 laser therapy for a total of three (3) treatments with one month between treatments.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) score before and after treatment with topical lidocaine ointment or transvaginal CO2 laser among breast cancer survivors with dyspareunia.

    The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) is a survey instrument used to determine the level of sexual function or dysfunction in females. It is comprised of a 19 item questionnaire focused on sexual functioning. There are six domains assessed: desire, arousal, lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction, and pain. The subject is to consider each of the questions in the context of the previous 4 weeks. The scores of each of the domains are then calculated into a final score. Initial and follow-up assessments will allow comparisons across this instrument as well as all the secondary and other pre-specified outcome measures.

    Time frame: 9 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) score before and after treatment with topical lidocaine ointment or transvaginal CO2 laser among breast cancer survivors with dyspareunia.

    The Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) is a measure of pain intensity in adults.The NPRS is a segmented numeric version of the visual analog scale (VAS) in which a respondent selects a whole number (0-10 integers) that best reflects the intensity of his/her pain. The common format is a horizontal bar or line. Similar to the VAS, the NPRS is anchored by terms describing pain severity extremes. The 11-point numeric scale ranges from '0' representing one pain extreme (e.g. "no pain") to '10' representing the other pain extreme (e.g. "pain as bad as you can imagine" or "worst pain imaginable").The NPRS can be administered verbally (therefore also by telephone) or graphically for self-completion. Scores range from 0-10 with higher numbers representing higher pain intensity.

    Time frame: 9 months

  2. Incontinence Severity Index (ISI) score before and after treatment with topical lidocaine ointment or transvaginal CO2 laser among breast cancer survivors with dyspareunia.

    The Incontinence Severity Index (ISI) consists of two questions, regarding frequency and amount of leakage. It categorizes urinary incontinence (UI) into none, slight, moderate, severe, and very severe. It assess the frequency (from 0-4): (0-never, 1-less than once a month, 2-a few times a month, 3-a few times a week, 4-every day and/or night ), and amount (from 0-3) of urine leakage: 0-none, 1-drops, 2-small splashes, 3-more. The index value is from 0-12 obtained by multiplying the numbers responded in the two questions with categories of urinary incontinence severity of: None (0), Slight (1-2), Moderate (3-6), Severe (8-9), Very severe (12).

    Time frame: 9 months

  3. 3 Incontinence Questions (3-IQ) score before and after treatment with topical lidocaine ointment or transvaginal CO2 laser among breast cancer survivors with dyspareunia.

    The 3 Incontinence Questions (3-IQ) is a survey instrument that is used to determine if a patient has stress urinary incontinence (SUI), urge urinary incontinence (UUI), or mixed urinary incontinence (MUI). The subject is to consider each of the questions in the context of the previous 3 months.The first question asks if the patient has every leaked urine. The second question asks the patient to indicate if she has leaked urine with any of the following: activity, urge, or without activity or urge. The Third question asks which form of urinary leakage was most common. The response to question 3 is then used to determine if the patient has: 1) Stress only or mostly stress, 2) urge only or mostly urge, 3) other cause, or 4) mixed.

    Time frame: 9 months

  4. Colon Rectal Anal Distress Inventory (CRADI) score before and after treatment with topical lidocaine ointment or transvaginal CO2 laser among breast cancer survivors with dyspareunia.

    The Colon Rectal Anal Distress Inventory (CRADI) is a survey instrument used to determine the level and severity of bowel symptoms. It consists of 17 questions inquiring to specific questions regarding bowel symptoms. Total score out of 400, with higher scores indicating more bowel symptoms.

    Time frame: 9 months

  5. Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) score before treatment with topical lidocaine ointment or transvaginal CO2 laser among breast cancer survivors with dyspareunia.

    The PGI-S are 1 question assessments of overall condition severity before implementation of therapy measured on a 7-point response scale.

    Time frame: 9 months

  6. Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) score after treatment with topical lidocaine ointment or transvaginal CO2 laser among breast cancer survivors with dyspareunia.

    The Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) is 1 question assessment of overall condition improvement since implementation of therapy measured on a 7-point response scale.

    Time frame: 9 months

  7. Satisfaction with Decision (SDS) score before and after treatment with topical lidocaine ointment or transvaginal CO2 laser among breast cancer survivors with dyspareunia.

    The Satisfaction with Decision (SDS) was developed to measure patient satisfaction with health care decisions. The SDS is a 6-item questionnaire with a 5-point response scale with higher scores indicating higher overall satisfaction.

    Time frame: 9 months

Other outcomes

  1. Symptom inventory (number of voids/day, pads/day, etc.)

    Symptom inventory (number of voids/day, pads/day, etc.) will be collected and available for comparison by cohort prior to and after treatment.

    Time frame: 9 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • University of Cincinnati
    Cincinnati, Ohio 45267, United States
    Recruiting
    • James L Whiteside, MD · Contactwhitesje@ucmail.uc.edu · 513-475-8713
    • Carson T Kaeser, MD · Contactcarson.kaeser@thechristhospital.com · 513-585-3474
    • James L Whiteside, MD · Principal investigator
    • Jamie D Lewis, MD · Sub investigator
    • Carson T Kaeser, MD · Sub investigator
    • Cynthia Dehlinger, CNM · Sub investigator
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Miller KD, Siegel RL, Lin CC, Mariotto AB, Kramer JL, Rowland JH, Stein KD, Alteri R, Jemal A. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016 Jul;66(4):271-89. doi: 10.3322/caac.21349. Epub 2016 Jun 2. PubMed 27253694 ↗
  • Maiorino MI, Chiodini P, Bellastella G, Giugliano D, Esposito K. Sexual dysfunction in women with cancer: a systematic review with meta-analysis of studies using the Female Sexual Function Index. Endocrine. 2016 Nov;54(2):329-341. doi: 10.1007/s12020-015-0812-6. Epub 2015 Dec 7. PubMed 26643312 ↗
  • Mazzarello S, Hutton B, Ibrahim MFK, Jacobs C, Shorr R, Smith S, Ng T, Clemons M. Management of urogenital atrophy in breast cancer patients: a systematic review of available evidence from randomized trials. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015 Jul;152(1):1-8. doi: 10.1007/s10549-015-3434-z. Epub 2015 May 24. PubMed 26003182 ↗
  • Falk SJ, Bober S. Vaginal Health During Breast Cancer Treatment. Curr Oncol Rep. 2016 May;18(5):32. doi: 10.1007/s11912-016-0517-x. PubMed 27074843 ↗
  • Baumgart J, Nilsson K, Stavreus-Evers A, Kask K, Villman K, Lindman H, Kallak T, Sundstrom-Poromaa I. Urogenital disorders in women with adjuvant endocrine therapy after early breast cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Jan;204(1):26.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.08.035. Epub 2010 Oct 14. PubMed 20950790 ↗
  • Sinha A, Ewies AA. Non-hormonal topical treatment of vulvovaginal atrophy: an up-to-date overview. Climacteric. 2013 Jun;16(3):305-12. doi: 10.3109/13697137.2012.756466. Epub 2013 Jan 8. PubMed 23215675 ↗
  • Perino A, Calligaro A, Forlani F, Tiberio C, Cucinella G, Svelato A, Saitta S, Calagna G. Vulvo-vaginal atrophy: a new treatment modality using thermo-ablative fractional CO2 laser. Maturitas. 2015 Mar;80(3):296-301. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2014.12.006. Epub 2014 Dec 25. PubMed 25596815 ↗
  • Salvatore S, Nappi RE, Zerbinati N, Calligaro A, Ferrero S, Origoni M, Candiani M, Leone Roberti Maggiore U. A 12-week treatment with fractional CO2 laser for vulvovaginal atrophy: a pilot study. Climacteric. 2014 Aug;17(4):363-9. doi: 10.3109/13697137.2014.899347. Epub 2014 Jun 5. PubMed 24605832 ↗
  • Salvatore S, Nappi RE, Parma M, Chionna R, Lagona F, Zerbinati N, Ferrero S, Origoni M, Candiani M, Leone Roberti Maggiore U. Sexual function after fractional microablative CO(2) laser in women with vulvovaginal atrophy. Climacteric. 2015 Apr;18(2):219-25. doi: 10.3109/13697137.2014.975197. Epub 2014 Dec 16. PubMed 25333211 ↗
  • Zerbinati N, Serati M, Origoni M, Candiani M, Iannitti T, Salvatore S, Marotta F, Calligaro A. Microscopic and ultrastructural modifications of postmenopausal atrophic vaginal mucosa after fractional carbon dioxide laser treatment. Lasers Med Sci. 2015 Jan;30(1):429-36. doi: 10.1007/s10103-014-1677-2. Epub 2014 Nov 20. PubMed 25410301 ↗
  • Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo K, Brubaker LP, DeLancey JO, Klarskov P, Shull BL, Smith AR. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Jul;175(1):10-7. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70243-0. PubMed 8694033 ↗
  • Sandvik H, Hunskaar S, Seim A, Hermstad R, Vanvik A, Bratt H. Validation of a severity index in female urinary incontinence and its implementation in an epidemiological survey. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1993 Dec;47(6):497-9. doi: 10.1136/jech.47.6.497. PubMed 8120507 ↗
  • Childs JD, Piva SR, Fritz JM. Responsiveness of the numeric pain rating scale in patients with low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Jun 1;30(11):1331-4. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000164099.92112.29. PubMed 15928561 ↗
  • Yalcin I, Bump RC. Validation of two global impression questionnaires for incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Jul;189(1):98-101. doi: 10.1067/mob.2003.379. PubMed 12861145 ↗
  • Sung VW, Kauffman N, Raker CA, Myers DL, Clark MA. Validation of decision-making outcomes for female pelvic floor disorders. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 May;198(5):575.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.12.035. Epub 2008 Mar 7. PubMed 18313632 ↗
  • Rosen R, Brown C, Heiman J, Leiblum S, Meston C, Shabsigh R, Ferguson D, D'Agostino R Jr. The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): a multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. J Sex Marital Ther. 2000 Apr-Jun;26(2):191-208. doi: 10.1080/009262300278597. PubMed 10782451 ↗
  • Sandvik H, Espuna M, Hunskaar S. Validity of the incontinence severity index: comparison with pad-weighing tests. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2006 Sep;17(5):520-4. doi: 10.1007/s00192-005-0060-z. Epub 2006 Mar 18. PubMed 16547687 ↗
  • Brown JS, Bradley CS, Subak LL, Richter HE, Kraus SR, Brubaker L, Lin F, Vittinghoff E, Grady D; Diagnostic Aspects of Incontinence Study (DAISy) Research Group. The sensitivity and specificity of a simple test to distinguish between urge and stress urinary incontinence. Ann Intern Med. 2006 May 16;144(10):715-23. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-144-10-200605160-00005. PubMed 16702587 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Mar 2018 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jan 2022, 45 months after the start.

Of 51 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Dyspareunia, half reached primary completion within 33 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 14 and three quarters within 48. This study's planned 45 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 59 studies reached it within 33 months; a quarter within 13 and three quarters within 38.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 23, 2017
First posted
Aug 22, 2017
StartActual
Mar 20, 2018
Primary completionEst.
Jan 1, 2022
CompletionEst.
Jun 1, 2022
Last update
Sep 28, 2021
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 28, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03257670
Collaborators
Syneron Candela
Responsible party
James Whiteside (Principal Investigator, University of Cincinnati) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 22, 2017
Start date
Mar 20, 2018
Primary completion
Jan 1, 2022 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 1, 2022 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 28, 2021

Study contacts

James L Whiteside, MD
Contact
whitesje@ucmail.uc.edu
513-475-8713
Carson T Kaeser, MD
Contact
carson.kaeser@thechristhospital.com
513-475-8713
James L Whiteside, MD
principal investigator · University of Cincinnati

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Sep 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Lidocaine

Start the discussion