CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03256604self-testUpdated Aug 22, 2017

A Sputum Screening Test to Rule-out Pneumonia at an Early Stage

An observational study in Pneumonia, Community-acquired Pneumonia and Exacerbation Copd, sponsored by University Hospital, Linkoeping. Completed at 1 site in Sweden. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-08-22.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Linkoeping · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
467
Sex
All
01

Study summary

In patients with clinical symptoms of respiratory infection, rapid identification of cases requiring antibiotic therapy is crucial to avoid development of multiple resistant bacteria. Identification of local acute-phase reactants can help assess the host's response to bacterial infection at the injury site. Here, the investigators developed an affordable, stable, feasible, and accurate diagnostic tool based on a locally produced protein with specific binding affinity to polysaccharides. The investigators further evaluated the ability of the novel test strip to rule out pneumonia.

Read the detailed description

A lower respiratory tract infection is a serious situation that can abruptly become complicated by sepsis, respiratory failure, lung tissue necrosis, and multiple organ dysfunction. Hence, empiric antibiotic treatment is commonly initiated as soon as infection is suspected and cultures and/or other diagnostic tests are procured, representing a major reason for antibiotic prescription. Widespread antibiotic overuse and misuse have led to the emergence of multiple resistant bacterial strains, posing a major health threat. There exists a critical need for practical solutions to prevent antibiotic overuse, especially in communities where antibiotics are available without prescription.

Pathophysiologic studies show that infection does not result from bacterial or viral overgrowth alone, but rather from the microorganisms' penetration beyond the host immune system. Therefore, infection assessment requires investigation of both microorganism presence and the defense mechanisms activated within the patient's body. Bacteria overgrowth leads to lung tissue inflammation, recruitment of white blood cells to the infected area, and chemokine and cytokine production and release, which can cause the alveoli to become filled with fluid, leading the patient to develop a cough with phlegm or pus, fever, chills, and dyspnea.

Microbiological diagnosis of lower respiratory tract infections requires assessment of the invading microorganism by examination of sputum using microscopy, quantitative culture, and PCR. However, such microbiological investigations have limited value in pneumonia management. Polymicrobial flora make it difficult to interpret cultures from patients with chronic bronchitis. It is also difficult to evaluate cultures from nosocomial pneumonia since the pathogenic bacteria are often identical to those appearing in the throat flora. Immunosuppressed patients frequently produce sputum containing low number of white blood cells. The patient's clinical signs, such as respiratory and circulatory status, are the most reliable markers for determining treatment efficacy.

In practice, most physicians choose to examine additional markers at early stages to closely monitor the effects of therapy, particularly in high-risk patients who have been admitted to intensive care units. Commonly used systemic markers include body temperature, C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), and interleukin 6 (IL-6). Hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) concentration reportedly increases during organ damage, such as that caused by infectious diseases. Studies show increased HGF concentrations in serum and exhaled-breath condensate from patients with pneumonia, with HGF presence being significantly correlated with survival. Moreover, HGF levels markedly decrease within 48 hours of initiating appropriate antibiotic therapy. Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) results indicate that HGF produced during acute infection shows high affinity for the extracellular matrix component heparan sulfate proteoglycan (HSPG). These findings suggest that HGF assessment in sputum could be a tool for detecting bacterial infection at the site of injury.

Proteins can be detected based on their specific interaction with a corresponding antibody. However, this measurement system relies on specialized resources, limiting its usefulness in non-equipped centers or as a self-test. Metachromasia is a characteristic color change exhibited by certain aniline dyes upon binding to chromotropic substances. This phenomenon has been widely used in histology. Methylene blue (O-Toluidine) is an excellent metachromatic dye that changes from blue to pink upon binding to high-molecular-weight polysaccharides, such as sulfated glycan. The pink dye will then quickly turn back to blue following addition of a proportional amount of a protein with high affinity to sulfated glycan (inverted metachromacia).

Here the investigators used this approach to develop a new strip test-referred to herein as the index text-to assess the presence of dextran-sulfate-binding proteins in sputum. The investigators then assessed the accuracy of this strip test for detecting bacterial infection in sputum, by analyzing leftover sputum samples that were sent for examination to the Department of Microbiology, University hospital in Linköping.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pneumonia
  • Community-acquired Pneumonia
  • Exacerbation Copd

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • point of care, HGF, innate immunity
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

All cases that searched the open Health care specialist facility at Linkoeping University hospital or were admitted to the ward at different clinics at the University Hospital in Linkoeping between 1st November 2015 to 30th January 2016 due to suspected respiratory infection and sputum samples were collected to be cultured at the Department of Microbiology University Hospital in Linkoeping.

Inclusion criteria

  • Sputum samples collected for routine diagnostic and reached the laboratory within 12 hours after Collection and considered as representative by microscopy and kept 4-8 C after Culture.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Samples not collected as above
04

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
467 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples without dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Fresh left-over sputum

    All fresh sputum samples that were sent to the Department of Microbiology between November 1 2015 and January 30 2016 under the standard requirements for sputum cultures at the accredited (ISO 17025 and 15189 beginning in 1993) laboratory were kept cold (4-8 ͦC) after analysis by microscope and cultures until it was collected and coded by the study nurse in the evening (left-over samples).

    Diagnostic Test: left-over sputum

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testleft-over sputum

    Totally 467 samples were gathered from different clinics, and the diagnostic procedures and the therapeutic approaches were completely unknown to the study group. The coded samples were stored at 4-8°C and analyzed within 72 hours of sampling using the sputum strip test. From April to June 2016, a physician and the study nurse reviewed the journals. The age, sex, length of stay on ward, the clinical symptoms, the blood and sputum cultures and PCR along with the results, the X-rays, the antibiotic therapy, CRB-65 and the ultimate diagnosis code (ICD-10) were documented in Excel-files.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Negative predictive value to rule-out pneumonia

    The sputum samples were collected randomly without knowledge about the patient or the ultimate diagnosis. The diagnoses were established first after the patient was dismissed from the clinic. RESPIRATORY INFECTION Pneumonia The following criteria were used to define pneumonia diagnosis 1. Clinical signs and symptoms 2. Changes detected by recent chest radiography 3. Received antibiotic therapy, irrespective previous antibiotic consumption. 4. The ultimate diagnosis J13-J18-J690 (ICD-10). Community-acquired pneumonia: The patients without previous respiratory disease. Hospital acquired (Nosocomial) pneumonia: Patients (n=11) acquired pneumonia at the hospital at least 48-72 hours after being admitted.

    Time frame: Within two years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Correlation to HGF and S100A8-A9 (Calprotectin) concentration (Elisa) in sputum

    We assessed immunoreactive human HGF and calprotectin (Human S100A8/S100A9 heterodimer) concentrations by ELISA (80 randomly chosen samples) using commercially available ELISA kits (Quantikine ELISA; R\&D systems, Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA). This method measures HGF and calprotectin in serum, plasma, culture media, and other biological fluids. Sputum samples that had been stored -20C were thawed and centrifuged at 1000 g for 10 minutes prior to analysis. The minimum detectable dose (MDD) as defined by supplier for this assay was 0.04 ng/ml for HGF and 0.086 ng/ml for calprotectin.

    Time frame: The samples were kept frozen after sampling -20 C and then thawed after 4 months and analyse was performed within 1 day.

  2. Correlation to binding affinity to the parts of HGF molecule by Surface plasmon resonance

    Paired analysis was performed on 47 randomly chosen samples. Measurements and ligand immobilization procedures were conducted using a Biacore 2000 system (GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences AB, Uppsala, Sweden). Three different ligands were immobilized in separate channels on the SPR-chip. The ligands were affinity purified polyclonal antibodies directed against HGF peptides mapping at the N-terminus of human HGFβ (N-19), the N-terminus of human HGFα (N-17), and amino acids 32-176 of human HGFα (H-145). These ligands were diluted 1:10 in 10 mM acetate buffer (pH 4.5) and immobilized to carboxymethylated dextran CM5 chips

    Time frame: in 47 samples paired Elisa and SPR analysis was performed on samples kept in -20 C within 4 months after sampling..

Other outcomes

  1. The management routine for pneumonia at Infectious clinic in Linkoeping in last decades

    We studied the archived paper journals from patients that were admitted to our ward and dismissed under diagnosis pneumonia/bronchopneumonia, beginning in 1970. We aimed to identify the diagnostic approaches that were used at the same center and had an impact on the correct diagnosis of pneumonia. Patients received a code depending on the date of admission to the ward from January-December and were registered under the code in a book. The codes belonging to a particular diagnosis were collected on a card and kept separately in boxes (one card corresponded to one diagnosis and one year). We randomly chose the first 40 coded cases with a diagnosis of Pneumonia (ICD-9 diagnosis code 486.9) in 1970, 1980, and 1990 and collected the paper journals and identified the criteria for diagnosis.

    Time frame: The data was obtained from paper journals from patients that were admitted (December to March) to the Department of Infectious diseases in Linköping in 1970,1980 and1990

06

Study locations

1 site
  • Department of Infectious Diseases
    Linköping, Östergotland 58185, Sweden
07

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Information regarding the samples that were included in statistic calculations, excluded cases with infection, pneumonia 1970-1980-1990, the actual cost of tests performed at our centre for diagnosis of pneumonia and the volunteers joining the feasibility test in Tables A-L

Supporting information: Study protocol, Icf, Csr

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03256604
Lead sponsor
University Hospital, Linkoeping
Collaborators
Linkoeping University, PEAS Institut
Responsible party
Fariba Nayeri (PhD, MD, associated professor, University Hospital, Linkoeping) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 22, 2017
Start date
Nov 2015
Primary completion
Feb 5, 2016
Completion
Apr 2016
Last update
Aug 22, 2017

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion