ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05169229ABOGRAFTUpdated Jul 10, 2026

Antibiotic Impregnated Bone Graft to Reduce Infection in Hip Replacement.

A Phase 2 interventional study of Vancomycin + Tobramycin and Saline in Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip, Osteoarthritis, Hip and Antibiotic Resistant Infection, sponsored by University Hospital, Linkoeping. Recruiting at 1 site in Sweden. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-10.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Linkoeping · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Apr 2022; still recruiting 4 years 7 months later.
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Total hip replacement is the most successful treatment modern healthcare can offer patients to regain quality of life. Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is the most common and devastating complication after total hip replacement (THR). Between 0.5 to 2% of primary THR (first time hip replacement), and 8-10% of revision THR (replacement of a hip prosthesis) will become infected.1 The introduction of local antibiotics blended into bone cement has led to a reduction in postoperative infection in primary THR by half.2 Unfortunately, cement can't always be used in relevant quantities.

The number of primary and revision surgeries of the hip is projected to increase dramatically. Therefore, the need for a feasible infection prophylaxis that is applicable for complex primary and revision THR in addition to antibiotics loaded cement is urgent.

Impacted morselized bone allograft is often used in (revision) THR to fill bone defects. Morselized allograft has been used as a carrier for local antibiotic treatment in multiple pilot studies and appears to be an attractive and effective treatment option, both for already infected joints and as a prophylactic measure in high-risk patients (e.g. THR revision surgeries). Nonetheless, a pivotal trial to support its use in THR is lacking. The aim of this pragmatic randomized controlled double blinded drug trial is to investigate whether antibiotic impregnated bone graft (AIBG) decreases the risk of infection after hip arthroplasty compared to controls treated with placebo impregnated bone graft. Patients scheduled for elective THR will be randomized to receive AIBG or a placebo impregnated bone graft. The primary outcome variable will be the number of re-operations due to infections and PJI diagnoses 2 years postoperative.

02

Conditions studied

  • Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
  • Osteoarthritis, Hip
  • Antibiotic Resistant Infection
  • Prosthetic Joint Infection

Browse trials for

03

In context

Osteoarthritis, Hip

641 studies on the registry are indexed under Osteoarthritis, Hip; 120 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 1,100 is above the median of 90 across 457 interventional studies indexed under Osteoarthritis, Hip.

Browse Osteoarthritis, Hip studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Linkoeping is the lead sponsor of 119 studies on the registry; 15 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age ≥ 18 years
  2. Hip arthroplasty requiring bone graft
  3. Willing to provide .
  4. For women of ; a negative pregnancy test prior to surgery.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Ongoing prosthetic joint infection
  2. Known allergies and for the use of vancomycin or tobramycin
  3. Mental inability, reluctance, or language difficulties that according to investigator judgement, result in difficulty understanding the meaning of study participation
  4. Expected difficulties to complete 2-year follow-up
  5. Females of child bearing potential not using
  6. Pregnant females
  7. Nursing females
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
1,100 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Treatment arm

    Combination of vancomycin and tobramycin mixed with allograft and locally administered during revision surgery after total hip arthroplasty.

    Drug: Vancomycin + Tobramycin

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Saline locally added to allograft and locally administered during revision surgery after total hip arthroplasty.

    Drug: Saline

Interventions

  • DrugVancomycin + Tobramycin

    Drug pages: Vancomycin · Tobramycin

    1 g vancomycin (powder) diluted in 8 ml tobramycin (40 -80mg/ml). Added to the prepared allograft before the allograft is used during the revision surgery.

    Also known as: Treatment

  • DrugSaline

    As a placebo added to the allograft.

    Also known as: Control

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Time to reoperation due to infection or diagnosed PJI with bacteria that are sensitive to either vancomycin or tobramycin, in the same hip joint, within two years after hip arthroplasty.

    Reoperation due to infection or diagnosed PJI 2 years after index surgery.

    Time frame: 2 years after finalizing data collection.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time to reoperation due to infection or diagnosis of PJI with any microorganism in the same hip joint within 2 years after THA.

    Whereas the major outcome only takes into account infections that are sensitive to the antibiotic used this secondary outcomes includes all infections

    Time frame: All infections within 2 years after index surgery.

  2. Time to and cause for reoperation for any reason within 2 and 5 years

    Time to and cause for reoperation for any reason within 2 and 5 years

    Time frame: 2 and 5 years after finalizing data collection.

  3. Time to and cause for implant revision due to any reason within 2 and 5 years

    Time to and cause for implant revision due to any reason within 2 and 5 years

    Time frame: 2 and 5 years after finalizing data collection.

  4. Type of microorganism and antimicrobial susceptibility pattern for cases with postoperative infection

    Type of microorganism and antimicrobial susceptibility pattern for cases with postoperative infection.

    Time frame: 2 and 5 years after finalizing data collection.

Other outcomes

  1. Differences between the two experimental groups regarding the frequencies of adverse events

    Differences between the two experimental groups regarding the frequencies of adverse events

    Time frame: 2 and 5 years after finalizing data collection.

  2. Differences between the two experimental groups regarding the rates of revision due to aseptic loosening

    Differences between the two experimental groups regarding the rates of revision due to aseptic loosening

    Time frame: 2 and 5 years after finalizing data collection.

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — De-identified individual participant data (IPD), including the data dictionary, underlying the results reported in this study on antibiotic-impregnated bone grafts in hip arthroplasty (ABOGRAFT) will be made available upon reasonable request.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan

Time frame: Beginning immediately following publication of the main results article and ending 25 years thereafter, consistent with the retention period for clinical trial data.

Access criteria: Access will be granted to qualified researchers for prespecified scientific purposes. Sharing is conditional on: (i) approval of the proposed analysis by the study sponsor and, where legally required, approval of the secondary use by the Swedish Ethical Review Authority (Etikprövningsmyndigheten); (ii) a signed data sharing and data processing agreement outlining the terms of use; and (iii) compliance with the GDPR and applicable Swedish law, including data protection, ethical review, and secrecy provisions. The agreement prohibits any attempt at re-identification and any further sharing of the data. Transfer of personal data outside the EU/EEA will occur only where permitted under GDPR. Requests for access can be submitted to the study sponsor."

Data sharing details ↗ · euclinicaltrials.eu

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Apr 2022 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2028, 80 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 9, 2021
First posted
Dec 23, 2021
StartActual
Apr 1, 2022
Primary completionEst.
Dec 2028
CompletionEst.
Dec 2031
Last update
Jul 10, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 10, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05169229
Collaborators
Region Östergötland, The Swedish Research Council
Responsible party
Jörg Schilcher (Professor, University Hospital, Linkoeping) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 23, 2021
Start date
Apr 1, 2022
Primary completion
Dec 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2031 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 10, 2026

Study contacts

Daphne Wezenberg, PhD
Contact
daphne.wezenberg@liu.se
0046101030000
Jörg Schilcher, PhD
principal investigator · Linkoeping University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drugs tested here: Vancomycin · Tobramycin

Start the discussion