ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03256487Updated Oct 19, 2017

Intravenous Buprenorphine Versus Morphine for Severe Pain in the Emergency Department

A Phase 2 interventional study of Buprenorphine and Morphine Sulfate in Pain, sponsored by Alameda Health System. Status unknown at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-10-19.

Sponsored by Alameda Health System · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Oct 2017), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
122
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study evaluates intravenous (IV) buprenorphine versus IV morphine for the management of severe, acute pain among emergency department (ED) patients. ED patients with severe pain will be randomized in equal proportion to receive IV buprenorphine or IV morphine.

Read the detailed description

Buprenorphine is classified as a partial mu opioid agonist and a weak kappa antagonist. In lower doses, buprenorphine has an analgesic potency 25 to 40 times more potent than similar milligram dosages of morphine. Consistent with its partial agonist activity, an apparent ceiling effect for opioid-induced ventilatory impairment has been demonstrated. These properties would suggest that buprenorphine is an effective analgesic with a favorable safety profile.

Objective: The objective of this study is to determine if there is a clinically significant difference in reduction of pain scores, measured by the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), between intravenous (IV) buprenorphine and IV morphine for severe pain in patients presenting to the Alameda Health System--Highland Hospital ED. The investigators are evaluating if IV buprenorphine is non-inferior to IV morphing. The investigators hypothesize that buprenorphine will provide equivalent analgesic effects as morphine at 60 minutes, with a lower proportion of medication adverse effects.

Study Design: This is a double-blinded, randomized controlled non-inferiority trial comparing the analgesic efficacy of intravenous buprenorphine versus intravenous morphine for ED patients presenting with severe, acute pain.

Participants: ED patients aged ≥18 years old who present with severe (pain NRS ≥7), acute pain warranting (according the treating provider's judgment) and able to receive IV opioid analgesia. The investigators will exclude pregnant patients, patients deemed too critically ill by the provider, patients with allergy to buprenorphine or morphine, patients in custody, patients on methadone, patients who have taken/received short acting opioid medications in the last 12 hours, and patients who have taken/received long acting opioid medication in the past 24 hours.

Intervention: In arm A, patients will receive IV Buprenorphine 0.3mg diluted to a volume of 10mL with NS in a plastic syringe administered over 3-5 minute. In arm B, patients will receive IV morphine 0.1mg/kg (max 10mg) over 3-5 minutes. In both arms, at 20 minutes the patient will be asked "would you like more pain medication?" If he/she answers "yes", then he/she will receive a second dose of the same amount of medication they previously received based on the randomized arm they were placed into. At the end of the study time, 60 minutes, the patient's ongoing pain management will be left to the attending physician caring for the patient in the ED.

Data Collection: For both arms, the patients' NRS pain scores and adverse effects will be queried at times 0, 10min, 20 min, 30min, 40min, 50 min, and 60 min. Demographic and comorbidity data points will be abstracted during or after the study's conclusion.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pain

Browse trials for

03

In context

Pain

2,450 studies on the registry are indexed under Pain; 945 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 122 is above the median of 70 across 2,101 interventional studies indexed under Pain.

Browse Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

Alameda Health System is the lead sponsor of 4 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • ED patients with acute pain NRS ≥7 warranting IV opioid analgesia (according to ED provider)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient refusal
  • pregnancy

    • level 1 trauma patients
    • patients deemed critically ill by provider
    • patients in custody
    • patients on methadone
    • Patients who have received or taken any short acting opioid medication in the past 12 hours.
    • Patients who have received or taken any long acting opioid medication in the past 24 hours.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
122 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Buprenorphine

    Patients will receive IV buprenorphine 0.3mg diluted to a volume of 10mL with NS in a plastic syringe administered over 3-5 minutes. At 20 minutes, the patient will be asked "would you like more pain medication?" If he/she answers "yes", then he/she will receive a second dose of IV buprenorphine 0.3mg.

    Drug: Buprenorphine

  • Active comparator
    Morphine

    Patients will receive IV morphine 0.1mg/kg (max dose 8mg) diluted to a volume of 10mL with NS in a plastic syringe administered over 3-5 minutes. At 20 minutes, the patient will be asked "would you like more pain medication?" If he/she answers "yes", then he/she will receive a second dose of IV morphine 0.1mg/kg (max dose 8mg).

    Drug: Morphine Sulfate

Interventions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain score difference at 60 minutes

    The difference in pain scores (measured by NRS) between the two arms at 60 minutes.

    Time frame: 60 minutes

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pain score difference at 50 minutes

    The difference in pain scores (measured by NRS) between the two arms.

    Time frame: 50 minutes

  2. Pain score difference at 40 minutes

    The difference in pain scores (measured by NRS) between the two arms.

    Time frame: 40 minutes

  3. Pain score difference at 30 minutes

    The difference in pain scores (measured by NRS) between the two arms.

    Time frame: 30 minutes

  4. Pain score difference at 20 minutes

    The difference in pain scores (measured by NRS) between the two arms.

    Time frame: 20 minutes

  5. Pain score difference at 10 minutes

    The difference in pain scores (measured by NRS) between the two arms.

    Time frame: 10 minutes

  6. Adverse events

    Hypertension (SBP \> 180) from documented vital signs,hypotension (SBP \<90) from documented vital signs, hypoxia (oxygen saturation \< 90%), respiratory depression (RR\<8 or need for mechanical intervention), nausea, vomiting, symptoms of opiate withdrawal (diarrhea, abdominal pain, diaphoresis)

    Time frame: 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, and 60 minutes

  7. Pain reduction

    Pain reduction at each time point. Measured by NRS (time 0) minus NRS (time x)

    Time frame: 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, and 60 minutes

  8. Successful analgesia

    Proportion of patients with NRS \< 3 at 60 minutes

    Time frame: 60 minutes

  9. Repeat dosing

    Proportion of patients requiring reducing of analgesia at 20 minutes

    Time frame: 20 minutes

  10. Summed Pain Intensity difference

    Measurement combining relief magnitude and duration in a single score

    Time frame: 60 minutes

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Alameda Health System, Highland Hospital
    Oakland, California 94602, United States
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 19, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03256487
Lead sponsor
Alameda Health System
Responsible party
David Duong (Principal Investigator, Alameda Health System) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 22, 2017
Start date
Sep 26, 2017
Primary completion
Feb 1, 2018 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 1, 2018 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 19, 2017

Study contacts

David Duong, MD MS
Contact
dduong@alamedahealthsystem.org
510-437-4573

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Oct 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Buprenorphine

Start the discussion