CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03245645Updated Jul 11, 2023

FODMAP Reintroduction in Irritable Bowel Syndrome

An interventional study of Dietary Intervention in Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Diarrhea and Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Mixed Bowel Habits, sponsored by University of California, Los Angeles. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-07-11.

Sponsored by University of California, Los Angeles · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 4 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Mar 2017, registered Jul 2017).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the amount and timing of when certain Fermentable Oligo-Di-Monosaccharides and Polyols (FODMAPs), specifically fructose, can be safely reintroduced into the diet of Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) patients that have successfully completed a low-FODMAP elimination diet. The FODMAP diet is an effective treatment for IBS; however it is unclear how patients can successfully reintroduce and liberalize fructose into their diet. The low FODMAP diet is thought to reduce IBS symptoms by decreasing water content and gas production in the bowel and also possibly by altering gut bacteria. Although use of the FODMAP elimination diet can initially successfully treat IBS symptoms for up to 50-75% of patients, the reintroduction diet is difficult for patients to complete and maintain for long periods of time because current methods for reintroduction of FODMAPs are imprecise leading to frequent recurrent symptoms. As a result, patients often continue the low FODMAP elimination diet for additional months because they have difficulties knowing how to add back FODMAPs into their diet. There are no studies to date to help guide patients with FODMAP reintroduction.

Read the detailed description

Research supports clinical experience that ingestion of food often triggers the emergence or exacerbation of symptoms in the majority of patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). While IBS remains primarily a symptom driven entity, our understanding of its pathophysiology is evolving. However, comparatively little research has focused on the specific role of certain foods and how they prompt the development of IBS symptoms.

Food may be linked to changes in motility, visceral sensation, gut microbiome, intestinal permeability, immune activation and brain-gut axis. This study will focus on fructose, which is one of the main components of FODMAP (fermentable oligosaccharides, disacharides, mono-saccharides and polyols) foods. Fructose is a common part of the Western diet and can be consumed as a free monosaccharide, part of sucrose, or in polymers referred to as fructans. There are no human gut specific fructose transporters. Rather glucose transporters are used (GLUT 2,5) leading some to hypothesize that over ingestion of these agents may trigger some of the enteric complaints of patients with IBS. The literature on fructose malabsorption gives varying threshold amounts: from 15 to 50 grams in healthy controls, and from 5 to 50 grams in IBS patients/known malabsorbers (Barrett, 2007; Rao, 2007; Frieling, 2011). Average daily fructose consumption in the American diet is approximately 34 grams, with a range of 15 to 54 grams, which falls well within the threshold levels (Frieling, 2011). FODMAP foods are thought to induce gastrointestinal symptoms including gas, bloating, abdominal pain or discomfort, and loose stools by increasing small bowel water content and increasing gas production by fermentation of foods by gut bacteria. Studies including a recent controlled clinical trial demonstrated that a low FODMAP diet can be an effective nutritional therapy.

There are risks to prolonged use of a low FODMAPs diet. A study from 2012 suggested that continued restriction of FODMAPS (longer than 4 weeks) can lead to reduction of luminal bifidobacteria in patients with IBS. Bifidobacteria mainly inhabit the large intestine where they produce short chain fatty acids (SCFA) as byproducts, including butyrate, shown to be important for colorectal cancer prevention and limit enteropathogenic colonization. Furthermore the diet is very restrictive and difficult for patients to maintain over time.

However, important clinical questions include when FODMAPS can be safely reintroduced into the diet, how quickly this can be accomplished, and what is a daily threshold of intake that is acceptable for IBS patients who respond or do not respond to a low FODMAPs diet. There are no evidence based answers to these questions, and it is in this setting that we propose our current project.

02

Conditions studied

  • Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Diarrhea
  • Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Mixed Bowel Habits

Keywords

  • FODMAP
  • IBS
  • Diet
  • Re-introduction
  • Fructose
03

In context

Irritable Bowel Syndrome

1,062 studies on the registry are indexed under Irritable Bowel Syndrome; 190 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 30 is below the median of 71 across 853 interventional studies indexed under Irritable Bowel Syndrome.

Browse Irritable Bowel Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

University of California, Los Angeles is the lead sponsor of 1,142 studies on the registry; 192 are open to participants now.

Of its 91 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 66 (73%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults (18+ years or older) with a diagnosis of IBS-D or IBS-M based on Rome IV criteria
  • Diarrhea must occur 2 or more days per week
  • Patients on current pharmacological therapy for their gastrointestinal complaints can enroll in the study as long as they have been on a stable dose for at least 30 days.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Significant comorbidities that are associated with GI symptoms (e.g. diabetes, scleroderma, SLE), history of GI surgery excluding appendectomy, or prior organic GI illness
  • Antibiotics taken in the past 2 months
  • Current disordered eating patterns (diagnosed eating disorder; as per verbal ESP questionnaire)
  • Current history of greater than moderate alcohol intake (more than 1 drink per day for women, more than 2 drinks per day for men, binge drinking behavior of 5+ drinks in a single session once per week)
  • Cannot have had a cholecystectomy in the past 6 months prior to enrollment
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Care provider)
Enrollment
30 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    100% Fructose

    The fructose group will help to determine whether an absolute amount of fructose will lead to IBS symptoms.

    Other: Dietary Intervention

  • Placebo comparator
    100% Glucose

    The glucose group will serve as a control since glucose is not a FODMAP and as a result is not expected to lead to recurrent symptoms.

    Other: Dietary Intervention

  • Active comparator
    Fructose and Glucose

    The glucose/fructose mixture group is a cross comparison group that will determine whether the relative excess fructose concentration is an important cause of IBS symptoms.

    Other: Dietary Intervention

Interventions

  • OtherDietary Intervention

    Food may be linked to changes in motility, visceral sensation, gut microbiome, intestinal permeability, immune activation and brain-gut axis. This study will focus on fructose, which is one of the main components of FODMAP (Fermentable oligosaccharides, dissacharides, mono-saccharides and polyols) foods. Fructose is a common part of the Western diet and can be consumed as a free monosaccharide, part of sucrose, or in polymers referred to as fructans. FODMAP foods are thought to induce gastrointestinal symptoms including gas, bloating, abdominal pain or discomfort, and loose stools by increasing small bowel water content and increasing gas production by fermentation of foods by gut bacteria. Studies including a recent controlled clinical trial demonstrated that a low FODMAP diet can be an effective nutritional therapy.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Adequate relief of IBS symptoms in past 7 days

    As indicated by the study coordinator asking the participant "Have you had adequate relief of your IBS symptoms in the past 7 days?"

    Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks (post-elimination diet)

  2. Highest amount of grams of sugar in solutions that do not significantly increase IBS symptoms

    As measured by 100 MM Visual Analog Scale (VAS) with 0 representing no symptoms for overall gastrointestinal symptoms.

    Time frame: Daily, during weeks 5-7 (reintroduction phase)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in IBS-symptom severity scale

    This is a validated symptom questionnaire pertaining to irritable bowel syndrome symptoms

    Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks (post-elimination diet), 7 weeks (post-reintroduction phase)

  2. Change in Visceral Sensitivity Index (VSI)

    This is a self-report measure of the gastrointestinal symptom-specific anxiety (GSA) of patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS)

    Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks (post-elimination diet), 7 weeks (post-reintroduction phase)

  3. Change in Personal Health Questionnaire (PHQ-15)

    This is a validated symptom questionnaire pertaining to somatic symptoms severity

    Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks (post-elimination diet), 7 weeks (post-reintroduction phase)

  4. Change in abdominal pain severity

    This is a self-report measure of the severity of abdominal pain during the week before report gathered by circling a number from 0-20 with 20 being the most intense pain imaginable.

    Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks (post-elimination diet), 7 weeks (post-reintroduction phase)

  5. Change in overall severity of gastrointestinal symptoms

    This is a self-report measure of the overall severity of gastrointestinal symptoms during the week before report gathered by circling a number from 0-20 with 20 being the most intense symptoms imaginable.

    Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks (post-elimination diet), 7 weeks (post-reintroduction phase)

  6. Change in severity of the sensation of bloating, abdominal fullness or visible distension

    This is a self-report measure of the severity of the sensation of bloating, abdominal fullness, or visible distension in the patient's belly that the patient has experienced during the week before report gathered by circling a number from 0-20 with 20 being the most intense sensation imaginable.

    Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks (post-elimination diet), 7 weeks (post-reintroduction phase)

  7. Change in intestinal microbiota

    This is a measure of the intestinal microbiota 16S rRNA gene signatures in the patients' stool before and after the low FODMAP diet.

    Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks (post-elimination diet)

  8. Change in visceral sensitivity index score

    This is a validated symptom questionnaire pertaining to gastrointestinal symptom related anxiety in patients with irritable bowel syndrome.

    Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks (post-elimination diet), 7 weeks (post-reintroduction phase)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • UCLA
    Los Angeles, California 90095, United States
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 11, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03245645
Lead sponsor
University of California, Los Angeles
Responsible party
Lin Chang, MD (Director, Digestive Health and Nutrition Clinic, University of California, Los Angeles) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 10, 2017
Start date
Mar 24, 2017
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2021
Completion
Jun 30, 2023
Last update
Jul 11, 2023

Study contacts

Lin Chang, MD
principal investigator · University of California, Los Angeles

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion