CClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT03243552ACEP4Updated Jun 28, 2023

Proof of Mechanism Study for the Treatment of Social Anhedonia in ASD

A Phase 2 interventional study of L-DOPA versus Placebo and Social Skills Training in ASD, sponsored by University of California, Los Angeles. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 13 Years to 30 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-06-28.

Sponsored by University of California, Los Angeles · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Dec 2023, 2 years 10 months ago, but the record still lists the study as active, not recruiting.
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
56
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
13 Years to 30 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This project will use the experimental medicine approach of a Phase IIa Proof of Mechanism 16-week, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial of L-DOPA versus placebo administration in combination with a 16 week social skills training group in order to: 1) identify differences in social reward processes in adolescent and young adult ASD participants versus healthy controls as measured by fMRI activation in reward circuitry; 2) provide evidence of dopaminergic moderating effects on social reward components in ASD with greater pre- to post-treatment changes expected in the subjects randomized to L-DOPA versus placebo; 3) examine the hypothesis that baseline readouts of putative dopamine signaling (wanting activation responses) will predict the extent of fMRI reward-related activation changes pre- to post-treatment; and, 4) examine the proposed relationship between pre- to post- L-DOPA fMRI reward changes and changes in individual self-report ratings of social wanting and ratings of videotaped positive affect in a structured interaction with an examiner. The study will enroll 56 participants with DSM-5 ASD between the ages of 13-30 years of age and 18 healthy control participants without histories of psychopathology for baseline comparisons.

Read the detailed description

Participants will comprise two groups: 1) 56 (male and female) adolescents and young adults likely to meet inclusion/exclusion confirmed by study assessment who will be outpatients, ages 13 to 30 years, inclusive; and 2) 18 (male and female) healthy adolescents and young adults without any history of significant psychiatric disorders or treatment, who will be ambulatory, and will reflect the racial, ethnic, and socio-economic composition of Los Angeles, and will be recruited without regard to gender, race, or ethnic background.

Healthy control adolescents (and parents) and young adults who meet all inclusion and exclusion criteria, will undergo a one-day 4-5 hour research evaluation of current functioning and behavior, cognitive function, including intellectual testing, urine drug screen, completion of questionnaires about possible psychological symptoms, perform brief tests to measure reward response, and complete a research Magnetic Resonance Imaging scan. Healthy control will not receive any interventions or medication.

All eligible ASD participants will be enrolled concurrently in a 16-week, structured, group-based, social skills training program (PEERS®). After screening evaluations, eligible subjects will undergo baseline MRI scanning and behavioral assessments (self- and parent-report measures, videotaped interaction) and then randomized in a blocked schedule to yield 1:1 L-DOPA: placebo assignment, before beginning weekly social skills training. Medication administration will begin simultaneously with social skills training, and subjects will be seen weekly for the 1st 8 weeks, then biweekly for the final 4 weeks for safety assessments, dose titration, and compliance checks. During the 16-week study period, primary behavioral assessments will be repeated at Week 8 and at end of study on Week 16. A second MRI scan will be obtained within + 4 days of last social skills session. A follow-up safety phone call to assess post-study condition will be performed 30 days after completion of double-blind. The rich set of behavioral observations obtained across the 16 weeks will allow the possible identification of early clinical efficacy changes associated with L-DOPA administration, which could add further support for investigating this mechanism in future studies. Results from the project should inform reseacher's understanding of determinants of social dysfunction in ASD and may support further investigation of treatments modulating central nervous system dopamine function as a therapeutic strategy to enhance social functioning in ASD.

02

Conditions studied

  • ASD

Browse trials for

03

In context

Anhedonia

119 studies on the registry are indexed under Anhedonia; 44 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 56 is below the median of 70 across 99 interventional studies indexed under Anhedonia.

Browse Anhedonia studies →

Lead sponsor

University of California, Los Angeles is the lead sponsor of 1,142 studies on the registry; 192 are open to participants now.

Of its 91 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 66 (73%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
13 Years to 30 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • ages 13 - 30 years inclusive;
  • meets diagnostic criteria for ASD by clinical evaluation and ADOS;
  • estimated FS IQ >70; 4) English reading ability of 6th grade;
  • ability to participate and complete protocol expectations (fMRI scan, testing) in the examining clinician's judgment; and
  • planned enrollment and acceptance for the UCLA PEERS® adolescent or young adult social skills training program.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • significant perceptual deficits;
  • need for continuation or anticipated of use of prohibited dopamine-modifying medications (stimulants, antipsychotics);
  • presence of serious behavioral comorbidity such as aggression, major depressive disorder requiring additional intervention, or self-injurious behavior, or current of past history of suspected psychotic disorder;
  • history of tic disorder;
  • presence of significant medical illness which may impact CNS function.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
56 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    L-DOPA versus Placebo

    L-DOPA or placebo (1:1 randomization). Dosing will begin at 25mg carbidopa/100mg L-DOPA in 3 divided doses, with a fixed-flexible titration schedule, allowing dose increases once per week of 100mg L-DOPA. Maximum dose is 600mg/d.

    Drug: L-DOPA versus Placebo · Behavioral: Social Skills Training

  • Experimental
    Social Skills

    All participants will receive 16-week manualized social skills training.

    Drug: L-DOPA versus Placebo · Behavioral: Social Skills Training

Interventions

  • DrugL-DOPA versus Placebo

    Participants will be randomized in a blocked schedule to yield 1:1 L-DOPA: placebo assignment.

  • BehavioralSocial Skills Training

    ASD participants will be enrolled concurrently in a 16-week manualized, structured, group-based, social skills training program (PEERS).

    Also known as: PEERS

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in fMRI: Social Reward Task from Baseline to week 16 (4 months)

    BOLD Activation: VS, ACC, OFC, Amygdala, Hippocampus (same units of measure)

    Time frame: Baseline, week 16

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change on Anticipatory and Consummatory Interpersonal Pleasure Scale Adolescent (ACIPS-A)

    Total Score (change in score by timepoint; before treatment, midpoint, end)

    Time frame: Baseline, week 8 (midpoint), week 16 (4 month/end of study)

  2. Change on Anticipatory and Consummatory Interpersonal Pleasure Scale (ACIPS)

    Total Score (change in score by timepoint; before treatment, midpoint, end)

    Time frame: Baseline, week 8 (midpoint), week 16 (4 month/end of study)

  3. Change on Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL)

    T Scores of Syndrome Scales for ages 18 or under

    Time frame: Baseline, week 16 (4 month/end of study)

  4. Change on Youth Self Report (YSR)

    T Scores of Syndrome Scales for ages 18 or under

    Time frame: Baseline, week 16 (4 month/end of study)

  5. Change on Adult Behavior Checklist (ABCL)

    T Scores of Syndrome Scales for ages 18 or over

    Time frame: Baseline, week 16 (4 month/end of study)

  6. Change on SRS Self Report

    Social Anhedonia

    Time frame: Baseline, week 8 (midpoint), week 16 (4 month/end of study)

  7. Change on SRS Parent Report

    Social Anhedonia

    Time frame: Baseline, week 8 (midpoint), week 16 (4 month/end of study)

  8. change on Social Communication Interaction Test (SCIT)

    6 subscales and total score (0-30)

    Time frame: Baseline, week 8 (midpoint), week 16 (4 month/end of study)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University of California, Los Angeles
    Los Angeles, California 90095, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 28, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03243552
Lead sponsor
University of California, Los Angeles
Collaborators
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
Responsible party
James McCracken (Principal Investigator, University of California, Los Angeles) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 9, 2017
Start date
Jun 1, 2017
Primary completion
Dec 2023 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2023 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 28, 2023

Study contacts

James T McCracken, MD
principal investigator · University of California, Los Angeles

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Jun 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion