An observational study in Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial and Coronary Artery Disease, sponsored by Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Ocidental. Status unknown at 6 sites in 4 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-05-11.
Sponsored by Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Ocidental · Observational
To test the feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of a new automated pressure derived resting index (Pd/Pamin), using FFR as gold standard, in de novo coronary lesions in which invasive physiological evaluation is warranted.
Coronary lesions with a potential indication for percutaneous coronary intervention or warranting invasive physiological interrogation (in the opinion of the investigator) will undergo PressureWire™ assessment under 2 conditions: rest and adenosine hyperemia. The measurements at rest (standard Pd/Pa and Pd/Pamin) will be repeated to assess test/retest repeatability. Subsequent treatment decisions will be made by the operator according to the standard practice based on the adenosine FFR value together with all other clinical information.
4,857 studies on the registry are indexed under Coronary Artery Disease; 890 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 100 is below the median of 320 across 1,687 observational studies indexed under Coronary Artery Disease.
Browse Coronary Artery Disease studies →Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Ocidental is the lead sponsor of 9 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Consecutive subjects scheduled for coronary angiography or PCI in whom operator decides to perform FFR will be approached for enrollment. Being a first-in-man study of a novel pressure index intended for future validation and use in a clinical setting, a full assessment of its range throughout the entire spectrum of lesion severity is warranted. As such, the protocol will allow for the inclusion of both less severe as well as of critical (>90%) lesions. Patients with either single or multiple vessel disease will be included.
Data on additional lesions may or may not be collected but will not be used in the study. Vessels with sequential stenosis and tandem lesions will be evaluated and treated according to routine clinical practice, but not included in the study data collected.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².
Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.
The share of blood the heart’s main pumping chamber (the left ventricle) pushes out with each beat, measured by an echocardiogram (heart ultrasound) or a MUGA scan. About 50–70% is normal.
A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.
Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)
GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².
Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction)
The share of blood the heart’s main pumping chamber (the left ventricle) pushes out with each beat, measured by an echocardiogram (heart ultrasound) or a MUGA scan. About 50–70% is normal.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Contraindication
A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Platelets
Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Prospective cohort of patients with stable or stabilized coronary artery disease and de novo coronary lesions, in whom functional evaluation is performed, according do standard clinical indications.
Diagnostic accuracy of Pd/Pamin vs FFR
Agreement will be tested using the established FFR 0.8 threshold as the binary reference standard.
Time frame: baseline
Discriminative power of Pd/Pamin and the best cut-off, taking FFR as gold
ROC analysis using FFR as reference
Time frame: baseline
Feasibility of Pd/Pamin measurements
Description of how often can Pd/Pamin can be measured accurately
Time frame: Baseline
Plan to share: No
This study is status unknown, as verified in May 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Ocidental