CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03222609REFINEUpdated Jan 20, 2026Results posted

A Study Evaluating Tolerability and Efficacy of Navitoclax Alone or in Combination With Ruxolitinib in Participants With Myelofibrosis

A Phase 2 interventional study of Ruxolitinib and Navitoclax in Myelofibrosis (MF), sponsored by AbbVie. Completed at 91 sites in 14 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-01-20.

Sponsored by AbbVie · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
191
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a Phase 2 open-label, multicenter study evaluating tolerability and efficacy of navitoclax alone or when added to ruxolitinib in participants with myelofibrosis.

02

Conditions studied

  • Myelofibrosis (MF)

Keywords

  • Post-polycythemia vera MF (PPV-MF)
  • Post-essential thrombocythemia (PET-MF)
  • ruxolitinib
  • navitoclax
  • splenic volume
  • Primary Myelofibrosis
  • Jakafi
  • enlarged spleen
  • splenomegaly
  • ABT 263
  • bone marrow fibrosis
03

In context

Primary Myelofibrosis

418 studies on the registry are indexed under Primary Myelofibrosis; 116 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 191 is above the median of 44 across 347 interventional studies indexed under Primary Myelofibrosis.

Browse Primary Myelofibrosis studies →

Lead sponsor

AbbVie is the lead sponsor of 953 studies on the registry; 136 are open to participants now.

Of its 350 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 210 (60%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Participants with documented diagnosis of intermediate-2 or high-risk primary Myelofibrosis, Post Polycythemia Vera Myelofibrosis or Post-essential Thrombocythemia Myelofibrosis.
  • Participant must be ineligible due to age, comorbidities, or unfit for unrelated or unmatched donor transplantation or unwilling to undergo stem cell transplantation at time of study entry.
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) of 0, 1, or 2.
  • Prior treatment must meet at least one of the following criteria:

    • Prior or current treatment with ruxolitinib and no prior treatment with a Bromodomain and Extra-Terminal motif (BET) proteins inhibitor or another Janus Kinase 2 (JAK-2) inhibitor, and meet all of the following criteria:

      • Ruxolitinib treatment must meet at least one of the following criteria:

        • Ruxolitinib treatment for >=24 weeks with lack of efficacy defined as a lack of spleen response (refractory) or a loss of spleen or symptom response (relapsed)
        • Ruxolitinib treatment for \<24 weeks with documented disease progression on spleen measurements while on ruxolitinib as defined in the protocol:
        • Ruxolitinib treatment for >=28 days with intolerance defined as new red blood cell transfusion requirement (at least 2 units/month for 2 months) while receiving a total daily ruxolitinib dose of >=30 mg but unable to reduce dose further due to lack of efficacy.
      • If receiving ruxolitinib at the time of screening, must currently be on a stable dose >=10 mg twice daily of ruxolitinib for >=4 weeks prior to the 1st dose of navitoclax.
      • Participant has at least 2 symptoms each with a score >=3 or a total score of >=12, as measured by the Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form (MFSAF) v4.0 on at least 4 out of 7 days during screening prior to study drug dosing; OR
    • Prior treatment with a JAK-2 inhibitor and meet one of the following criteria:

      • Prior treatment with a JAK-2 inhibitor for at least 12 weeks
      • Prior treatment with a JAK-2 inhibitor for >=28 days complicated by either development of red blood cell transfusion requirement (at least 2 units/month for 2 months) OR Grade >= 3 adverse events of thrombocytopenia, anemia, hematoma and/or hemorrhage while on JAK-2 inhibitor treatment; OR
    • No prior treatment with a JAK-2 or BET inhibitor.
  • Participant has splenomegaly as defined in the protocol.
  • Participant must meet the laboratory parameters (adequate bone marrow, renal and hepatic function) as defined in the protocol.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Splenic irradiation within 6 months prior to screening, or prior splenectomy.
  • Leukemic transformation (> 10% blasts in peripheral blood or bone marrow aspirate/biopsy).
  • Participant is currently on medications that interfere with coagulation (including warfarin) or platelet function within 3 days prior to the first dose of study drug or during the study treatment period with the exception of low dose aspirin (up to 100 mg/day) and low-molecular-weight heparin.
  • Prior therapy with a BH3 mimetic compound or stem cell transplantation.
  • Participant has received strong CYP3A inhibitors (e.g., ketoconazole, clarithromycin) or moderate CYP3A inhibitors (e.g., fluconazole) within 14 days prior to the administration of the first dose of study drug.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
191 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Navitoclax + ruxolitinib (Cohort 1a)

    Participants must have received ruxolitinib for at least 12 weeks and on stable dose of ≥10 mg tablets orally twice daily (BID) for ≥8 weeks prior to the 1st dose of navitoclax. Navitoclax tablets are administered once daily (QD) at a starting dose of 50 mg. This was increased after approximately ≥7 days to next dose level if platelet count is ≥75 × 10\^9/L up to a maximum dose of navitoclax 300 mg QD. Participants continued their treatment until the end of clinical benefit, unacceptable toxicity, or they met other protocol criteria for discontinuation (whichever occurred first).

    Drug: Ruxolitinib · Drug: Navitoclax

  • Experimental
    Navitoclax + ruxolitinib (Cohort 1b)

    Those receiving ruxolitinib at Screening must be on a stable dose ≥10 mg tablets orally twice daily (BID) for ≥ 4 weeks prior to 1st dose of navitoclax. Those not receiving ruxolitinib at Screening received 10 mg ruxolitinib BID starting on Day 1. Navitoclax tablets were administered orally once daily (QD) per Baseline platelet count (\>150 × 10\^9/L starting dose of 200 mg; ≤150 × 10\^9/L starting dose of 100 mg, which could be increased to 200 mg QD after 7 days provided platelet count is ≥75 × 10\^9/L). Navitoclax didn't exceed 200 mg QD for first 24 weeks of treatment. After Week 24 disease assessment, navitoclax dose was increased to 300 mg QD at discretion of the Investigator for those with suboptimal spleen response defined as failure to achieve spleen volume reduction of at least 10% per imaging. Participants continued their treatment until the end of clinical benefit, unacceptable toxicity, or they met other protocol criteria for discontinuation (whichever occurred first).

    Drug: Ruxolitinib · Drug: Navitoclax

  • Experimental
    Navitoclax (Cohort 2)

    Participants must have received prior treatment with a Janus Kinase 2 (JAK-2) inhibitor. Those with Baseline platelet count \>150 × 10\^9/L initiated navitoclax film-coated tablets orally once daily (QD) at the starting dose of 200 mg. Those with a Baseline platelet count ≤150 × 10\^9/L initiated navitoclax film-coated tablets orally once daily (QD) at the starting dose of 100 mg, which could be increased to 200 mg once daily after 7 days provided the platelet count is ≥75 × 10\^9/L. Navitoclax didn't exceed 200 mg QD for the first 24 weeks of treatment. After Week 24 disease assessment, navitoclax dose may be increased to 300 mg QD at discretion of the Investigator for those with suboptimal spleen response defined as failure to achieve spleen volume reduction of at least 10% per imaging. Participants continued their treatment until the end of clinical benefit, unacceptable toxicity, or they met other protocol criteria for discontinuation (whichever occurred first).

    Drug: Navitoclax

  • Experimental
    Navitoclax + ruxolitinib (Cohort 3)

    Prior treatment with a Janus Kinase 2 (JAK-2) or Bromodomain and Extra-Terminal motif (BET) proteins inhibitor was prohibited. Ruxolitinib tablets administered orally twice daily (BID) based on Baseline platelet count as per the local approved label. Navitoclax tablets were administered orally once daily (QD) per Baseline platelet count (\>150 × 10\^9/L starting dose of 200 mg; ≤150 × 10\^9/L starting dose of 100 mg, which could be increased to 200 mg QD after 7 days provided platelet count is ≥75 × 10\^9/L). Navitoclax didn't exceed 200 mg QD for first 24 weeks of treatment. After Week 24 disease assessment, navitoclax dose may be increased to 300 mg QD at discretion of Investigator for those with suboptimal spleen response defined as failure to achieve spleen volume reduction of at least 10% per imaging. Participants continued their treatment until the end of clinical benefit, unacceptable toxicity, or they met other protocol criteria for discontinuation (whichever occurred first).

    Drug: Ruxolitinib · Drug: Navitoclax

Interventions

  • DrugRuxolitinib

    Tablet; Oral

    Also known as: Jakafi

  • DrugNavitoclax

    Film-coated tablet; Oral

    Also known as: ABT-263

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With ≥ 35% Reduction From Baseline in Spleen Volume at Week 24

    Reduction in spleen volume is measured by magnetic resonance imaging/computerized tomography (MRI/CT).

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥ 50% Reduction From Baseline in Total System Score (TSS) at Week 24

    TSS is assessed by the Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form (MFSAF) version 4.0. Participants complete a symptom diary and rate the following seven MF symptoms: fatigue, night sweats, abdominal discomfort, pruritus, pain under the ribs on the left side, early satiety, and bone pain daily using a scale from 0 (absent) to 10 (worst imaginable), and the scores are averaged over 7 days, with a minimum of 4 days required to calculate the average score. Participants for whom a valid average score cannot be calculated either at baseline or post-baseline are considered non-responders. The TSS reflects the sum of the scores of these symptoms, for a maximum possible score of 70 (i.e., most severe symptom experience).

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

  2. Percentage of Participants Achieving Anemia Response

    For a participant who is transfusion independent (TI) at Baseline with hemoglobin value \< 10 g/dL, anemia response is achieved if the post-Baseline hemoglobin level increases by ≥2 g/dL without receiving packed red blood cells (PRBC) transfusion (for any reason) within 2 weeks and without any erythropoietin or mimetics within the last 4 weeks prior to the increase in hemoglobin level by ≥2g/dL was observed. Hemoglobin values more than 30 days after the last dose of study treatment or after the start of post-study treatment or disease progression, whichever is earlier, will not be considered in the analysis of anemia response. For a participant who is transfusion dependent (TD) at Baseline, anemia response is defined as a period of at least 12 consecutive weeks without PRBC transfusion at any time after the first dose of study drug and on or prior to 30 days post last dose of study drug, the start of post-study treatment, disease progression or death, whichever occurs earlier.

    Time frame: Up to 254 weeks

  3. Percentage of Participants With ≥ 1 Grade Reduction From Baseline in Fibrosis Grade At Any Time

    Bone marrow grading is assessed according to the European Consensus Grading System. The 4-point grading scale ranges from MF-0, which corresponds to normal bone marrow, to MF-3, diffuse and dense increase in reticulin with extensive intersections with coarse bundles of collagen, often associated with significant osteosclerosis.

    Time frame: Up to 254 weeks

  4. Time to First Reduction in Fibrosis Grade

    Grade of bone marrow fibrosis was assessed by investigators according to the European Consensus Grading System. The 4-point grading scale ranges from MF-0, which corresponds to normal bone marrow, to MF-3, diffuse and dense increase in reticulin with extensive intersections with coarse bundles of collagen, often associated with significant osteosclerosis. The time to first achieving a reduction of at least 1 grade in bone marrow fibrosis from Baseline was summarized.

    Time frame: Up to 254 weeks

07

Results

Posted Mar 12, 2025

Participant flow

This trial was conducted at 57 sites in 13 countries./territories.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneNavitoclax + Ruxolitinib (Cohort 1a)Navitoclax + Ruxolitinib (Cohort 1b)Navitoclax (Cohort 2)Navitoclax + Ruxolitinib (Cohort 3)
Started34913432
Completed0000
Not completed34913432
Withdrew: Withdrew consent3942
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up2210
Withdrew: Death20381810
Withdrew: Other, not specified9421120

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of Participants With ≥ 35% Reduction From Baseline in Spleen Volume at Week 24

Reduction in spleen volume is measured by magnetic resonance imaging/computerized tomography (MRI/CT).

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With ≥ 35% Reduction From Baseline in Spleen Volume at Week 24
percentage of participantsNavitoclax + Ruxolitinib (Cohort 1a)Navitoclax + Ruxolitinib (Cohort 1b)Navitoclax (Cohort 2)Navitoclax + Ruxolitinib (Cohort 3)
Percentage of Participants With ≥ 35% Reduction From Baseline in Spleen Volume at Week 2426.47 (12.88 to 44.36)21.98 (13.97 to 31.88)11.76 (3.30 to 27.45)62.50 (43.69 to 78.90)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving ≥ 50% Reduction From Baseline in Total System Score (TSS) at Week 24

TSS is assessed by the Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form (MFSAF) version 4.0. Participants complete a symptom diary and rate the following seven MF symptoms: fatigue, night sweats, abdominal discomfort, pruritus, pain under the ribs on the left side, early satiety, and bone pain daily using a scale from 0 (absent) to 10 (worst imaginable), and the scores are averaged over 7 days, with a minimum of 4 days required to calculate the average score. Participants for whom a valid average score cannot be calculated either at baseline or post-baseline are considered non-responders. The TSS reflects the sum of the scores of these symptoms, for a maximum possible score of 70 (i.e., most severe symptom experience).

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥ 50% Reduction From Baseline in Total System Score (TSS) at Week 24
percentage of participantsNavitoclax + Ruxolitinib (Cohort 1a)Navitoclax + Ruxolitinib (Cohort 1b)Navitoclax (Cohort 2)Navitoclax + Ruxolitinib (Cohort 3)
Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥ 50% Reduction From Baseline in Total System Score (TSS) at Week 2420.59 (8.70 to 37.90)25.27 (16.75 to 35.47)8.82 (1.86 to 23.68)34.38 (18.57 to 53.19)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving Anemia Response

For a participant who is transfusion independent (TI) at Baseline with hemoglobin value \< 10 g/dL, anemia response is achieved if the post-Baseline hemoglobin level increases by ≥2 g/dL without receiving packed red blood cells (PRBC) transfusion (for any reason) within 2 weeks and without any erythropoietin or mimetics within the last 4 weeks prior to the increase in hemoglobin level by ≥2g/dL was observed. Hemoglobin values more than 30 days after the last dose of study treatment or after the start of post-study treatment or disease progression, whichever is earlier, will not be considered in the analysis of anemia response. For a participant who is transfusion dependent (TD) at Baseline, anemia response is defined as a period of at least 12 consecutive weeks without PRBC transfusion at any time after the first dose of study drug and on or prior to 30 days post last dose of study drug, the start of post-study treatment, disease progression or death, whichever occurs earlier.

Time frame:
Up to 254 weeks
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving Anemia Response
percentage of participantsNavitoclax + Ruxolitinib (Cohort 1a)Navitoclax + Ruxolitinib (Cohort 1b)Navitoclax (Cohort 2)Navitoclax + Ruxolitinib (Cohort 3)
Baseline transfusion independent with Baseline HGB <10 g/dL28.57 (3.67 to 70.96)23.68 (11.44 to 40.24)52.94 (27.81 to 77.02)38.46 (13.86 to 68.42)
Baseline transfusion dependent50.00 (6.76 to 93.24)16.67 (2.09 to 48.41)37.50 (8.52 to 75.51)100 (15.81 to 100.00)
Overall36.36 (10.93 to 69.21)22.00 (11.53 to 35.96)48.00 (27.80 to 68.69)46.67 (21.27 to 73.41)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With ≥ 1 Grade Reduction From Baseline in Fibrosis Grade At Any Time

Bone marrow grading is assessed according to the European Consensus Grading System. The 4-point grading scale ranges from MF-0, which corresponds to normal bone marrow, to MF-3, diffuse and dense increase in reticulin with extensive intersections with coarse bundles of collagen, often associated with significant osteosclerosis.

Time frame:
Up to 254 weeks
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With ≥ 1 Grade Reduction From Baseline in Fibrosis Grade At Any Time
percentage of participantsNavitoclax + Ruxolitinib (Cohort 1a)Navitoclax + Ruxolitinib (Cohort 1b)Navitoclax (Cohort 2)Navitoclax + Ruxolitinib (Cohort 3)
Week 2423.08 (8.97 to 43.65)24.07 (13.49 to 37.64)40.00 (16.34 to 67.71)30.43 (13.21 to 52.92)
Anytime during the post-Baseline period41.94 (24.55 to 60.92)41.56 (30.43 to 53.36)40.91 (20.71 to 63.65)48.15 (28.67 to 68.05)
SecondaryTime to First Reduction in Fibrosis Grade

Grade of bone marrow fibrosis was assessed by investigators according to the European Consensus Grading System. The 4-point grading scale ranges from MF-0, which corresponds to normal bone marrow, to MF-3, diffuse and dense increase in reticulin with extensive intersections with coarse bundles of collagen, often associated with significant osteosclerosis. The time to first achieving a reduction of at least 1 grade in bone marrow fibrosis from Baseline was summarized.

Time frame:
Up to 254 weeks
Reported as:
Median · weeks
Time to First Reduction in Fibrosis Grade
weeksNavitoclax + Ruxolitinib (Cohort 1a)Navitoclax + Ruxolitinib (Cohort 1b)Navitoclax (Cohort 2)Navitoclax + Ruxolitinib (Cohort 3)
Time to First Reduction in Fibrosis Grade24.1 (11.1 to 107.1)24.1 (9.3 to 97.1)12.4 (11.9 to 48.1)12.3 (7.0 to 96.1)

Adverse events

Collected over All-cause mortality and adverse events tables include events reported from the time of informed consent to the end of the study. Median time on follow-up was for 76.1 months for Navitoclax + ruxolitinib (Cohort 1a); 41.9 months for Navitoclax + ruxolitinib (Cohort 1b); 40.2 months for Navitoclax (Cohort 2); and 44.2 months for Navitoclax + ruxolitinib (Cohort 3).. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Navitoclax + Ruxolitinib (Cohort 1a)20/34 (58.8%)21/34 (61.8%)34/34 (100%)
Navitoclax + Ruxolitinib (Cohort 1b)39/91 (42.9%)35/91 (38.5%)91/91 (100%)
Navitoclax (Cohort 2)18/34 (52.9%)18/34 (52.9%)34/34 (100%)
Navitoclax + Ruxolitinib (Cohort 3)10/32 (31.3%)12/32 (37.5%)32/32 (100%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 121
Most frequent serious events
EventNavitoclax + Ruxolitinib (Cohort 1a)Navitoclax + Ruxolitinib (Cohort 1b)Navitoclax (Cohort 2)Navitoclax + Ruxolitinib (Cohort 3)
PNEUMONIAInfections and infestations6/342/910/340/32
ASCITESGastrointestinal disorders0/340/913/340/32
MULTIPLE ORGAN DYSFUNCTION SYNDROMEGeneral disorders3/341/910/340/32
ATRIAL FIBRILLATIONCardiac disorders1/340/910/342/32
ANAEMIABlood and lymphatic system disorders1/341/912/340/32
LEUKOCYTOSISBlood and lymphatic system disorders0/340/912/340/32
SPLENIC INFARCTIONBlood and lymphatic system disorders2/340/910/340/32
PYREXIAGeneral disorders2/341/910/341/32
COVID-19Infections and infestations2/344/912/340/32
MYCOBACTERIAL INFECTIONInfections and infestations2/340/910/340/32
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 132
Most frequent other events
EventNavitoclax + Ruxolitinib (Cohort 1a)Navitoclax + Ruxolitinib (Cohort 1b)Navitoclax (Cohort 2)Navitoclax + Ruxolitinib (Cohort 3)
THROMBOCYTOPENIABlood and lymphatic system disorders30/3445/9110/3418/32
DIARRHOEAGastrointestinal disorders27/3447/9115/3418/32
FATIGUEGeneral disorders24/3417/919/349/32
ANAEMIABlood and lymphatic system disorders11/3447/9113/3421/32
NAUSEAGastrointestinal disorders15/3426/9112/3410/32
PLATELET COUNT DECREASEDInvestigations1/3437/9110/3412/32
CONTUSIONInjury, poisoning and procedural complications13/349/912/343/32
COVID-19Infections and infestations5/3422/918/3412/32
NEUTROPENIABlood and lymphatic system disorders4/3413/916/3410/32
UPPER RESPIRATORY TRACT INFECTIONInfections and infestations10/346/914/343/32

Baseline characteristics

Full Analysis Set (FAS): all participants who take at least one dose of navitoclax

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Navitoclax + Ruxolitinib (Cohort 1a)Navitoclax + Ruxolitinib (Cohort 1b)Navitoclax (Cohort 2)Navitoclax + Ruxolitinib (Cohort 3)Total
Mean67.4 ± 10.3866.5 ± 9.2669.0 ± 6.5668.0 ± 10.1067.4 ± 9.18
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Navitoclax + Ruxolitinib (Cohort 1a)Navitoclax + Ruxolitinib (Cohort 1b)Navitoclax (Cohort 2)Navitoclax + Ruxolitinib (Cohort 3)Total
Female1134141271
Male23572020120
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Navitoclax + Ruxolitinib (Cohort 1a)Navitoclax + Ruxolitinib (Cohort 1b)Navitoclax (Cohort 2)Navitoclax + Ruxolitinib (Cohort 3)Total
Hispanic or Latino274619
Not Hispanic or Latino32843026172
Unknown or Not Reported00000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Navitoclax + Ruxolitinib (Cohort 1a)Navitoclax + Ruxolitinib (Cohort 1b)Navitoclax (Cohort 2)Navitoclax + Ruxolitinib (Cohort 3)Total
American Indian or Alaska Native00000
Asian0153018
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander00000
Black or African American20125
White32763029167
More than one race00011
Unknown or Not Reported00000
08

Study locations

91 sites
  • UAB Comprehensive Cancer Cente /ID# 165464
    Birmingham, Alabama 35217, United States
  • TOI Clinical Research /ID# 222546
    Cerritos, California 90703-2679, United States
  • City of Hope /ID# 221395
    Duarte, California 91010, United States
  • Moores Cancer Center at UC San Diego /ID# 164084
    La Jolla, California 92093, United States
  • Long Beach Memorial Medical Ct /ID# 230148
    Long Beach, California 90806-1701, United States
  • University of Southern California /ID# 164095
    Los Angeles, California 90033, United States
  • Colorado Blood Cancer Institute /ID# 224250
    Denver, Colorado 80218, United States
  • Baptist MD Anderson Cancer Center - Jacksonville /ID# 222548
    Jacksonville, Florida 32207-8432, United States
  • Mayo Clinic /ID# 164201
    Jacksonville, Florida 32224, United States
  • Moffitt Cancer Center /ID# 164082
    Tampa, Florida 33612-9416, United States
  • University of Chicago Medicine /ID# 164115
    Chicago, Illinois 60637-1426, United States
  • Mid Illinois Hematology & Oncology Associates, Ltd /ID# 230536
    Normal, Illinois 61761, United States
  • Indiana Blood & Marrow Transpl /ID# 165075
    Indianapolis, Indiana 46237, United States
  • Duplicate_American Oncology Partners of Maryland, PA /ID# 231299
    Bethesda, Maryland 20817, United States
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute /ID# 162675
    Boston, Massachusetts 02215, United States
  • University of Massachusetts - Worcester /ID# 222547
    Worcester, Massachusetts 01655, United States
  • Henry Ford Hospital /ID# 162682
    Detroit, Michigan 48202, United States
  • Ascension Providence Southfield Cancer Center /ID# 223876
    Southfield, Michigan 48075-3707, United States
  • MidAmerica Division, Inc. /ID# 222058
    Kansas City, Missouri 64132, United States
  • Weill Cornell Medical College /ID# 162679
    New York, New York 10065, United States
  • The Ohio State University /ID# 217402
    Columbus, Ohio 43210-1280, United States
  • Bend Memorial Clinic /ID# 224184
    Bend, Oregon 97701, United States
  • West Penn Hospital /ID# 222618
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15224-1722, United States
  • Duplicate_Medical University of South Carolina /ID# 222597
    Charleston, South Carolina 29425, United States
  • Prairie Lakes Healthcare System /ID# 224358
    Watertown, South Dakota 57201, United States
  • Tennessee Oncology-Nashville Centennial /ID# 221410
    Nashville, Tennessee 37203-1632, United States
  • Texas Oncology - West Texas /ID# 224784
    Abilene, Texas 79606, United States
  • Texas Oncology- Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center /ID# 225159
    Dallas, Texas 75246-2003, United States
  • Oncology Consultants /ID# 230930
    Houston, Texas 77030-3306, United States
  • MD Anderson Cancer Center at Texas Medical Center /ID# 162683
    Houston, Texas 77030-4000, United States
  • University of Texas Health San Antonio MD Anderson Cancer Center /ID# 164094
    San Antonio, Texas 78229, United States
  • Utah Cancer Specialists Salt Lake Clinic /ID# 222806
    Salt Lake City, Utah 84106, United States
  • University of Utah /ID# 164116
    Salt Lake City, Utah 84112-5500, United States
  • The Kinghorn Cancer Centre /ID# 214657
    Darlinghurst, New South Wales 2010, Australia
  • Barwon Health /ID# 222430
    Geelong, Victoria 3220, Australia
  • Peter MacCallum Cancer Ctr /ID# 218352
    Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia
  • The Alfred Hospital /ID# 215545
    Melbourne, Victoria 3004, Australia
  • Fiona Stanley Hospital /ID# 216809
    Murdoch, Western Australia 6150, Australia
  • Duplicate_University of Alberta Hospital - Division of Hematology /ID# 217698
    Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2B7, Canada
  • University Health Network_Princess Margaret Cancer Centre /ID# 214483
    Toronto, Ontario M5G 2M9, Canada
  • McGill University Health Center Research Institute /ID# 223976
    Montreal, Quebec H4A 3J1, Canada
  • Clinical Hospital Dubrava /ID# 230504
    Zagreb, City of Zagreb 10000, Croatia
  • Klinicka bolnica Merkur /ID# 230599
    Zagreb, City of Zagreb 10000, Croatia
  • Klinicki bolnicki centar Zagreb /ID# 230602
    Zagreb, City of Zagreb 10000, Croatia
  • Klinicki Bolnicki Centar (KBC) Split /ID# 230601
    Split, Split-Dalmatia County 21000, Croatia
  • General Hospital of Athens Laiko /ID# 230394
    Athens, Attica 11527, Greece
  • Duplicate_University General Hospital Attikon /ID# 230395
    Athens, Attica 12462, Greece
  • Szabolcs-Szatmar-Bereg Varmegyei Oktatokorhaz /ID# 230585
    Nyíregyháza, Szabolcs-Szatmár-Bereg 4400, Hungary
  • Semmelweis Egyetem /ID# 230518
    Budapest, 1085, Hungary
  • Duplicate_Del-pesti Centrumkorhaz Orszagos Hematologiai es Infektologiai Intezet /ID# 230306
    Budapest, 1097, Hungary
  • Hadassah Medical Center-Hebrew University /ID# 230310
    Jerusalem, Jerusalem 91120, Israel
  • Galilee Medical Center /ID# 230397
    Nahariya, Northern District 2210001, Israel
  • Assuta Ashdod Medical Center /ID# 230396
    Ashdod, Southern District 7747629, Israel
  • Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center /ID# 230311
    Tel Aviv, Tel Aviv 6423906, Israel
  • IRCCS AOU di Bologna - Policlinico Sant'Orsola-Malpighi /ID# 230012
    Bologna, Emilia-Romagna 40138, Italy
  • Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi /ID# 214555
    Florence, Firenze 50134, Italy
  • Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS-Università Cattolica /ID# 214553
    Rome, Roma 00168, Italy
  • ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII /ID# 214900
    Bergamo, 24127, Italy
  • ASST degli Spedali Civili di Brescia /ID# 230420
    Brescia, 25123, Italy
  • AOU Policlinico G. Rodolico - San Marco /ID# 214549
    Catania, 95123, Italy
  • Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Bianchi - Melacrino - Morelli P.O. Riuniti /ID# 230011
    Reggio Calabria, 89125, Italy
  • ASST Sette Laghi - Ospedale Di Circolo E Fondazione Macchi Varese /ID# 214551
    Varese, 21100, Italy
  • Fujita Health University Hospital /ID# 221539
    Toyoake, Aichi-ken 470-1192, Japan
  • Aomori Prefectural Central Hospital /ID# 221773
    Aomori, Aomori 030-8553, Japan
  • Kyushu University Hospital /ID# 222691
    Fukuoka, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan
  • Sapporo Hokuyu Hospital /ID# 222693
    Sapporo, Hokkaido 003-0006, Japan
  • Kansai Medical University Hospital /ID# 222690
    Hirakata-shi, Osaka 573-1191, Japan
  • Kindai University Hospital /ID# 222689
    Osakasayama-shi, Osaka 589-8511, Japan
  • Duplicate_Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center /ID# 222332
    Koshigaya-shi, Saitama 343-8555, Japan
  • Juntendo University Hospital /ID# 221484
    Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8431, Japan
  • Nippon Medical School Hospital /ID# 222692
    Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8602, Japan
  • University of Yamanashi Hospital /ID# 221700
    Chuo-shi, Yamanashi 409-3821, Japan
  • VA Caribbean Healthcare System /ID# 222416
    San Juan, 00921-3201, Puerto Rico
  • Hospital del Centro Comprensivo de Cancer de la UPR /ID# 222544
    San Juan, 00927, Puerto Rico
  • Seoul National University Hospital /ID# 230380
    Seoul, Seoul Teugbyeolsi 03080, South Korea
  • Samsung Medical Center /ID# 230381
    Seoul, Seoul Teugbyeolsi 06351, South Korea
  • Hospital Universitario Germans Trias i Pujol /ID# 214704
    Badalona, Barcelona 08916, Spain
  • Duplicate_CLINICA UNIVERSIDAD DE NAVARRA-Pamplona /ID# 230718
    Pamplona, Navarre 31008, Spain
  • Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron /ID# 222415
    Barcelona, 08035, Spain
  • Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Maranon /ID# 214676
    Madrid, 28007, Spain
  • CLINICA UNIVERSIDAD DE NAVARRA-Madrid /ID# 230719
    Madrid, 28027, Spain
  • Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre /ID# 214710
    Madrid, 28041, Spain
  • Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria /ID# 214709
    Málaga, 29010, Spain
  • Hospital Regional Universitario de Malaga /ID# 230858
    Málaga, 29011, Spain
  • Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital /ID# 230371
    Kaohsiung City, Kaohsiung 833, Taiwan
  • National Cheng Kung University Hospital /ID# 230372
    Tainan, 704, Taiwan
  • Guys and St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust /ID# 164110
    London, Greater London SE1 9RT, United Kingdom
  • Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust /ID# 214503
    Oxford, Oxfordshire OX3 9DU, United Kingdom
  • Belfast Health and Social Care Trust /ID# 216991
    Belfast, BT9 7AB, United Kingdom
  • The Christie Hospital /ID# 164111
    Manchester, M20 4BX, United Kingdom
  • Aneurin Bevan University Health Board /ID# 230332
    Newport, NP18 3XQ, United Kingdom
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Passamonti F, Foran JM, Tandra A, De Stefano V, Fox ML, Mattour A, McMullin MF, Perkins AC, Rodriguez-Macias G, Sibai HA, Polepally AR, Sun Y, Chopra AS, Harb JG, Qin Q, Potluri J, How J. Preliminary Safety and Efficacy of Navitoclax Plus Ruxolitinib in Janus Kinase Inhibitor-Naive Patients With Myelofibrosis From the Multicenter, Open-Label, Phase 2 Study (REFINE). Hematol Oncol. 2026 Mar;44(2):e70180. doi: 10.1002/hon.70180. PubMed 41846295 ↗
  • Pemmaraju N, Somervaille TCP, Palandri F, Harrison C, Komrokji RS, Perkins A, Ayala Diaz RM, Lavie D, Tomita A, Feng Y, Qin Q, Harb J, Polepally AR, Potluri J, Garcia JS. Addition of navitoclax to ruxolitinib for patients with myelofibrosis with progression or suboptimal response. Blood Neoplasia. 2024 Nov 2;2(1):100056. doi: 10.1016/j.bneo.2024.100056. eCollection 2025 Feb. PubMed 40454409 ↗
  • Pemmaraju N, Garcia JS, Potluri J, Harb JG, Sun Y, Jung P, Qin QQ, Tantravahi SK, Verstovsek S, Harrison C. Addition of navitoclax to ongoing ruxolitinib treatment in patients with myelofibrosis (REFINE): a post-hoc analysis of molecular biomarkers in a phase 2 study. Lancet Haematol. 2022 Jun;9(6):e434-e444. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(22)00116-8. Epub 2022 May 13. PubMed 35576960 ↗
  • Harrison CN, Garcia JS, Somervaille TCP, Foran JM, Verstovsek S, Jamieson C, Mesa R, Ritchie EK, Tantravahi SK, Vachhani P, O'Connell CL, Komrokji RS, Harb J, Hutti JE, Holes L, Masud AA, Nuthalapati S, Potluri J, Pemmaraju N. Addition of Navitoclax to Ongoing Ruxolitinib Therapy for Patients With Myelofibrosis With Progression or Suboptimal Response: Phase II Safety and Efficacy. J Clin Oncol. 2022 May 20;40(15):1671-1680. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.02188. Epub 2022 Feb 18. PubMed 35180010 ↗

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Oct 4, 2021
  • Statistical analysis plan · Jan 31, 2023

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — AbbVie is committed to responsible data sharing regarding the clinical trials we sponsor. This includes access to anonymized, individual and trial-level data (analysis data sets), as well as other information (e.g., protocols, analyses plans, clinical study reports), as long as the trials are not part of an ongoing or planned regulatory submission. This includes requests for clinical trial data for unlicensed products and indications.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Csr

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 20, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03222609
Lead sponsor
AbbVie
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 19, 2017
Start date
Oct 31, 2017
Primary completion
Mar 28, 2022
Completion
Jan 29, 2025
Results posted
Mar 12, 2025
Last update
Jan 20, 2026

Study contacts

ABBVIE INC.
study director · AbbVie

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Other studies from this sponsor

AbbVie

Start the discussion