CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03213509Updated Oct 17, 2019Results posted

Verbal Autopsy of Maternal Deaths, Stillbirths, and Neonatal Deaths in BetterBirth

An observational study in Perinatal Death, Neonatal Death and Stillbirth, sponsored by Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH). Completed at 1 site in India. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-10-17.

Sponsored by Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH) · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
170
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to conduct Verbal Autopsies of deaths ( stillbirths and neonatal deaths together) identified in the BetterBirth trial to identify their potential causes, timing, and social determinants.

Read the detailed description

In order to be included in this study, one must be the mother or family member of an individual who was enrolled in the BetterBirth Trial and died. Women who did not consent to follow-up in the BetterBirth study will be excluded.

We identified these families by using data from the BetterBirth Trial, in which there was a perinatal death where one or more pause points was observed by BetterBirth staff (FADA) at 2 months or 6 months post-intervention launch. Our analyses focus on data surrounding the perinatal deaths.

Respondents for the neonatal deaths and stillbirths include mother or the family members of the baby. Mothers had consented to follow-up as part of the BetterBirth Trial.

These individuals will be initially contacted by telephone. Individuals will be asked to participate in verbal autopsy, and, if they agree, a date and time for the interview will be determined. A data collector from CEL or PSI will visit the participant's home on an agreed-upon date and written consent will be obtained. In the event that participants cannot be reached by phone, study staff members will attempt to make contact via Accredited Social Health Activists (ASHAs), who are appointed by the National Rural Health Mission and act as conduits between patients and the health system. The data collector will attempt to call the relevant ASHA worker and request her assistance in establishing contact with the mother. The ASHA will be asked to provide a telephone number at which the mother can be reached, if possible.

Final attempts at contact will be made via home visit if participants cannot be reached either via telephone or with ASHA engagement. Individuals who are reached at home will be introduced to the study and asked to participate using the appropriate recruitment script. For those individuals who agree to participate, data collectors will schedule a time to return to participants' homes for interviews to be conducted. (Note: Home visits are a culturally acceptable practice in this context; for example, home visits were used in the BetterBirth Trial for collection of 7-day outcomes of mothers and newborns.)

Data will be collected using the WHO standard tools for conducting stillbirth or neonatal verbal autopsies, modified for the local context. A section on social autopsy will also be incorporated in the existing study instrument. These tools are standardized and adapted to use in these settings and have been implemented before in other studies in similar communities in U.P. (example: "AMANHI" and "Impact of topical application of cold-pressed sunflower seed oil with improved massage practices on neonatal mortality: a cluster randomized controlled trial in rural North India"). A team of specially trained data collectors (given the sensitive nature of the verbal autopsy questionnaire) will collect the data on existing Android based data collection platform.

Data will be collected by specially trained data collectors. They will collect the data at participants' homes. Participants will include the mother (in case of neonatal death) and any additional person who was present during the events that led to the death. Additional interviewees may include the delivered mother's husband, mother, mother-in-law, other family member, neighbor, etc. The delivered mother will be asked which individuals, if any, should be included in the interview. The mother and the individuals they indicate will be consented individually but interviewed together.

Each interview will take approximately 60 minutes.

A team of specially trained data collectors will be hired. Data will be collected on tablets using a data collection platform that has in-built checks of missing values, range checks, skip patterns etc. to minimize the error in data collection. A GPS monitoring of location of interview will be conducted. The data will be checked at an aggregate level for heaping, interviewer-specific patterns, etc. Forms identified with errors will be sent back for verification and re-entry, but audit-trail will be captured to ensure that the full trail from original data and changes will be maintained with timestamp, GPS and user information. On-site quality assurance would involve both real-time data checks as well as GPS verification of the location of data collection. Data access will be restricted by users, with different privileges for data collectors, supervisors and study investigators. All personal identification information including names, etc. will be encrypted, and only a unique identification number to identify individuals will be made available for analysis. Data will be hosted over a secured network.

Every case will be coded for assigning underlying cause of death, antecedent causes and timing of death by trained and certified physicians. A WHO standard software and coding protocol will be used by these physicians to assign causes of death. The data collected through tablets will be sent to the central server. The narratives of every case will be collected on paper and a scan of the narrative will be sent along with the data. This entire data will be uploaded on the physician coding software from which the verbal autopsy cases will be allotted to physicians for coding. Each case will be independently coded by two physicians and in case of mismatch in the underlying cause of death between the two physicians, a third physician will independently code for the cause of death. Finally, if none of the three underlying causes of death match, a higher level physician arbitrator will resolve the case - this will be done to minimize unclassified deaths. A physician coordinator, who has extensive prior experience of coding verbal autopsy data will oversee the entire process and resolve issues with the help of supervisors of the data collection team. All the cases will be de-identified before uploading on the software for coding.

The verbal autopsy findings will be helpful to understand the result of the BetterBirth Trial. In addition, the findings will inform future investigations of maternal and newborn harm, especially those further upstream in health system and policy design.

02

Conditions studied

  • Perinatal Death
  • Neonatal Death
  • Stillbirth
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Respondents for the neonatal deaths and stillbirths include mother, family members, or community members of the baby. Mothers had consented to follow-up as part of the BetterBirth Trial.

Inclusion criteria

  • Mother, family members, and community members of deceased babies who enrolled in the BetterBirth Trial

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Mothers and family members members who did not consent to follow-up in the BetterBirth Trial
04

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
170 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Perinatal Death With Pause Point(s) Observed, Intervention Arm

    Any perinatal death where one or more pause points was observed by BetterBirth staff (FADA) at 2 months or 6 months post-intervention launch, in the intervention arm of the BetterBirth Trial. The study involves administering verbal and social autopsies to the mother or family member of a baby who is in this cohort.

    Other: Interview (Social and Verbal Autopsy)

  • Perinatal Death With Pause Point(s) Observed, Control Arm

    Any perinatal death where one or more pause points was observed by BetterBirth staff (FADA) at 2 months or 6 months post-intervention launch, in the control arm of the BetterBirth Trial. The study involves administering verbal and social autopsies to the mother or family member of a baby who is in this cohort.

    Other: Interview (Social and Verbal Autopsy)

Interventions

  • OtherInterview (Social and Verbal Autopsy)

    Verbal autopsy is a technique used to determine the cause of death by asking caregivers, friends or family members about signs and symptoms exhibited by the deceased in the period before death. This is usually done using a standardized questionnaire that collects details on signs, symptoms, complaints and any medical history or events. The cause of death, or the sequence of causes that led to death, are assigned based on the data collected by this questionnaire and on any other available information. The social autopsy tool is used in conjunction with the verbal autopsy tool to explore the non-biological factors contributing to a death, including the social, behavioural and health systems determinants of maternal and child deaths.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Cause of Death

    Cause of perinatal mortality

    Time frame: Early post-natal period (up to 7 days post-partum)

  2. Cause of Stillbirth

    Cause of Stillbirth

    Time frame: Early post-natal period (up to 7 days post-partum)

  3. Cause of Early Neonatal Death

    Cause of Early Neonatal Death

    Time frame: Early post-natal period (up to 7 days post-partum)

Other outcomes

  1. Sex of Babies Who Suffered Perinatal Mortality

    This measure refers to the sex of the babies who suffered a perinatal mortality, and whose mother/family member was interviewed about the death via verbal autopsy

    Time frame: Within 7 days postpartum

06

Results

Posted Jun 5, 2019

Participant flow

Please note 170 cases were enrolled (ie, babies who suffered from perinatal mortality). Of these 170 cases, there were four sets of twins, both of whom died. This means that there were a total of 166 potential participants to interview via verbal autopsy (we asked for one interview in the case of twins).

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneParticipant Interviewed for Verbal Autopsy, Intervention ArmParticipant Interviewed for Verbal Autopsy, Control Arm
Started8090
Completed7685
Not completed45
Withdrew: Did not consent for verbal autopsy45

Outcome measures

PrimaryCause of Death

Cause of perinatal mortality

Time frame:
Early post-natal period (up to 7 days post-partum)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Cause of Death
ParticipantsPerinatal Death With Pause Point(s) Observed, Intervention ArmPerinatal Death With Pause Point(s) Observed, Control Arm
Stillbirth2035
Early Neonatal Death5650
PrimaryCause of Stillbirth

Cause of Stillbirth

Time frame:
Early post-natal period (up to 7 days post-partum)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Cause of Stillbirth
ParticipantsPerinatal Death With Pause Point(s) Observed, Intervention ArmPerinatal Death With Pause Point(s) Observed, Control Arm
Obstructed Labor312
Other Specific Perinatal Cause99
Other Obstetric Complication24
Antepartum Hemorrhage33
Other23
Unknown14
PrimaryCause of Early Neonatal Death

Cause of Early Neonatal Death

Time frame:
Early post-natal period (up to 7 days post-partum)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Cause of Early Neonatal Death
ParticipantsPerinatal Death With Pause Point(s) Observed, Intervention ArmPerinatal Death With Pause Point(s) Observed, Control Arm
Perinatal Asphyxia2626
Infection139
Pre-Term Birth Complications811
Other Specific Perinatal Cause12
Congenital Malformations30
Unknown52
Other pre-specifiedSex of Babies Who Suffered Perinatal Mortality

This measure refers to the sex of the babies who suffered a perinatal mortality, and whose mother/family member was interviewed about the death via verbal autopsy

Time frame:
Within 7 days postpartum
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Sex of Babies Who Suffered Perinatal Mortality
ParticipantsPerinatal Death With Pause Point(s) Observed, Intervention ArmPerinatal Death With Pause Point(s) Observed, Control Arm
Male4150
Female3535

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse event data were collected over the study period (July 3, 2017- August 27, 2017).. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Interview (Social and Verbal Autopsy)0/170 (0%)0/170 (0%)0/170 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Participant who consented to be interviewed (verbal autopsy) about a perinatal death where one or more pause points was observed by BetterBirth staff (FADA) at 2 months or 6 months post-intervention launch

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Participant Interviewed for Verbal Autopsy, Intervention ArmParticipant Interviewed for Verbal Autopsy, Control ArmTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years7384157
>=65 years101
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Participant Interviewed for Verbal Autopsy, Intervention ArmParticipant Interviewed for Verbal Autopsy, Control ArmTotal
Mean33 (19 to 68)31 (18 to 65)32 (18 to 68)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Participant Interviewed for Verbal Autopsy, Intervention ArmParticipant Interviewed for Verbal Autopsy, Control ArmTotal
FemaleNANANA
MaleNANANA
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)Participant Interviewed for Verbal Autopsy, Intervention ArmParticipant Interviewed for Verbal Autopsy, Control ArmTotal
Count of participants——0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)Participant Interviewed for Verbal Autopsy, Intervention ArmParticipant Interviewed for Verbal Autopsy, Control ArmTotal
India7484158
07

Study locations

1 site
  • Community Empowerment Labs
    Shivgarh, Uttar Pradesh 229308, India
08

References and documents

Study documents

  • Statistical analysis plan · Mar 30, 2018
  • Study protocol · Jan 30, 2018

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — A de-identified data repository will hold the verbal autopsy data collected, including all data fields collected. At the end of the study, de-identified data will be shared in a public domain.

09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03213509
Lead sponsor
Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH)
Collaborators
Community Empowerment Lab, Population Services International
Responsible party
Atul Gawande (Principal Investigator, Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH)) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 11, 2017
Start date
Jul 3, 2017
Primary completion
Aug 27, 2017
Completion
Aug 27, 2017
Results posted
Jun 5, 2019
Last update
Oct 17, 2019

Study contacts

Katherine Semrau, PhD
principal investigator · Ariadne Labs
Vishwajeet Kumar
principal investigator · Community Empowerment Lab
Arti Kumar
principal investigator · Community Empowerment Lab
Atul Gawande, MD, MPH
principal investigator · Ariadne Labs

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion