CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT03196258SPOC_CBTUpdated Feb 24, 2020

Cognitive Behavioural Therapy to Reduce Persistent Post-Surgical Pain After Fracture

An interventional study of Cognitive behavioural therapy in Pain, Postoperative, Fractures, Closed and Fractures, Open, sponsored by McMaster University. Terminated at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-02-24.

Sponsored by McMaster University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Why this study was terminated
Feasibility issues with the study treatment (in-person CBT) resulted in the study ending earlier than anticipated.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
8
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Psychological factors such as stress, distress, anxiety, depression, and poor coping strategies may be associated with ongoing pain following injuries such as fractures. In order to study this relationship, researchers at McMaster University have developed the Somatic Pre-Occupation and Coping (SPOC) questionnaire, which identifies illness beliefs that may help to predict which patients are at risk for ongoing pain, reduced quality of life, and delays in returning to work and leisure activities after a fracture requiring surgical treatment. Previous research using the SPOC questionnaire suggests the possibility that fracture patients with illness beliefs that put them at risk for developing ongoing pain could be identified early in the treatment process. These patients may benefit from cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) which is designed to modify such thoughts with the goal of reducing ongoing pain and improving quality of life. The goal of this study is to determine if CBT is effective in reducing ongoing pain and improving quality of life in fracture patients who show illness beliefs that may place them at risk for developing ongoing pain.

Read the detailed description

In North America, chronic non-cancer pain affects approximately 30% of the population, with similar rates in Europe and Australia. Surgery and trauma are frequently cited as triggering events responsible for the development of chronic pain. A survey of 5,130 patients attending 10 outpatient clinics located throughout North Britain found that 41% attributed their chronic pain to a traumatic event or surgery. The presence of persistent pain can have a major impact on patients' quality of life, including their ability to return to work and their daily activities.

The relationship between psychological factors, behaviors, and cognitive processes and the sensation of pain is well documented. Stress, distress, anxiety, depression, catastrophizing, fear-avoidance behaviors, and poor coping strategies appear to have a significant positive relationship with both acute and chronic pain. Evidence suggests that these psychological factors can cause alterations along the spinal and supraspinal pain pathways which influence the perception of pain. Previous studies suggest that patients' beliefs and expectations may be associated with clinical outcomes, including self-reported pain.

Clinical outcomes following operatively managed fractures of the extremities are variable and many patients continue to experience persistent pain and disability one-year after surgery and beyond. In a recent trial involving patients with open extremity fractures, 65% of patients reported moderate to very severe pain and 35% reported moderate to extreme pain interference at one-year. A systematic review of 20 observational studies of traumatic tibial fracture repairs found the mean incidence of persistent post-surgical pain (PPSP) was 47.4% (range: 10% to 86%) at an average of 23.9 months after surgery. Although several risk factors for PPSP have been identified, many, such as younger age and female gender, are non-modifiable and thus not amendable to direct intervention.

The effect of patients' beliefs and expectations on their recovery following traumatic injuries is an under-investigated area. In response to this gap, Busse et al. developed and evaluated the Somatic Pre-Occupation and Coping (SPOC) questionnaire to identify unhelpful illness beliefs that are predictive of poorer functional outcomes post-fracture. This self-administered questionnaire identified unhelpful illness beliefs among approximately one third of patients with operatively managed extremity fractures. Furthermore, high somatic pre-occupation and poor coping at 6-weeks post-fracture (as measured by the SPOC questionnaire) were found to be strongly associated with PPSP, functional limitations, unemployment, and reduced quality of life 1 year after fracture fixation. This suggests the possibility that fracture patients who exhibit unhelpful illness beliefs can be identified and targeted for concurrent therapy designed to modify such cognitions and improve prognosis. At present, however, there are no approaches that have been shown effective for improving recovery among high-risk patients.

The findings from the FLOW trial highlight the importance of patient beliefs in recovery from orthopaedic trauma. A number of systematic reviews have shown patients' perceptions regarding their illness experience can be modified, and that such efforts can improve outcomes. Moss-Morris and colleagues explored the effect of CBT among patients attending a multidisciplinary chronic pain clinic and found that changes in cognitive processes accounted for 26% of the variation in improved health-related quality of life scores. Collectively, these findings suggest that targeting and modifying unhelpful beliefs through CBT may provide an effective strategy to improve outcomes among high-risk trauma patients.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pain, Postoperative
  • Fractures, Closed
  • Fractures, Open

Keywords

  • fracture
  • persistent pain
  • cognitive behavioural therapy
  • post surgical pain
  • health-related quality of life
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

The inclusion criteria are:

  1. Adult men or women aged 18 years and older.
  2. Acute open or closed fracture(s) of the appendicular skeleton. Patients with multiple fractures may be included.
  3. Fracture treated operatively with internal fixation.
  4. Screened for eligibility within 6 weeks of their fracture.
  5. Cognitive ability and language skills required to participate in the CBT intervention (in the judgement of site research personnel).
  6. Able to start the CBT within 8 weeks of their fracture surgery.
  7. Provision of informed consent.
  8. Screen positive for unhelpful illness beliefs (SPOC scores ≥74), as assessed at 6 weeks' post-surgical fixation.

The exclusion criteria are:

  1. Fragility fracture.
  2. Stress fracture.
  3. Concomitant injury which, in the opinion of the attending surgeon, is likely to impair function for as long as or longer than the patient's extremity fracture.
  4. Active psychosis.
  5. Active suicidality.
  6. Active substance use disorder that, in the judgement of the treating surgeon, would interfere in the patient's ability to partake in the CBT and/or the study.
  7. Already participating in, or planning to start other psychological treatments (including CBT) within the duration of the study (12 months).
  8. Anticipated problems with the patient attending CBT sessions and/or returning for follow-up.
  9. Incarceration.
  10. Other reason to exclude the patient, as specified.
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
8 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    intervention - CBT

    Participants in this arm will receive 6 weekly one-on-one, 1-hour sessions of Cognitive Behavioural Therapy session (intervention) in addition to receiving standard of care treatment for their fracture(s).

    Behavioral: Cognitive behavioural therapy

  • No intervention
    control

    Participants in the control arm of the study will receive standard of care treatment for their fracture(s) but will not receive any Cognitive Behavioral Therapy.

Interventions

  • BehavioralCognitive behavioural therapy

    Participants who are randomized to the CBT intervention are required to start CBT within 8 weeks of their fracture surgery. The CBT intervention will consist of 6 weekly one-on-one, 1-hour sessions that will focus on addressing maladaptive beliefs related to pain and recovery as well as teaching skills to enhance coping and management of pain symptoms. The specific focus of CBT sessions will be informed by each individual patient's responses on the SPOC questionnaire. All other aspects of post-operative care will be at the discretion of participant's surgeon

    Also known as: CBT

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The prevalence of Persistent Post-Surgical Pain at 12 months' post-fracture

    The primary outcomes are 1) PPSP according to the World Health Organization's (WHO) proposed definition, and 2) the prevalence of moderate to severe pain interference over 12 months post-fracture as assessed by an individual item from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). The WHO's definition requires 4 criteria for the diagnosis of PPSP: 1) Pain that began after surgery or a tissue trauma is experienced; 2) The pain is in an area of preceding surgery or tissue trauma, 3) The pain persisted for at least two months after the initiating event, and 4) The pain is not better explained by an infection, a malignancy, a pre-existing pain condition or any other alternative cause.

    Time frame: 12 months post-fracture

Secondary outcomes

  1. Short Form 12 (SF-12)

    General health related quality of life will be assessed by the SF-12. The SF-12 is an established, reliable and validated health status measure.It is a self-administered, 12-item questionnaire that measures health-related quality of life in 8 domains related to physical, social, mental, and emotional functioning, bodily pain, and general health. Both physical and mental summary scores can be obtained. Each domain is scored separately from 0 (lowest level) to 100 (highest level).

    Time frame: 1 year

  2. Return to Function questionnaire

    Return to function will be measured by when participants' return to work, household activities, and leisure activities, as well as when they achieve 80% of their pre-injury function. The return to function outcome will be assessed using the Return to Function questionnaire.

    Time frame: 1 year

  3. PROMIS-Physical Function 28

    HRQL will also be assessed by the PROMIS-PF28, as recent research suggests it may be more sensitive to change than the SF-12. The PROMIS-PF is a standard for patient-reported outcomes research and practice and recommended for initial outcome assessment. Studies continue to support its construct validity and feasibility. The PROMIS-PF includes seven HRQoL domains: Physical Functioning, Anxiety, Depression, Fatigue, Sleep Disturbance, Social Functioning, and Pain. The PROMIS-Physical Function 28 will be used to assess seven health quality of life domains.

    Time frame: 1 year

Other outcomes

  1. Exploratory outcome 1: Fracture healing complications

    fracture healing complications as assessed by the treating surgeon (including wound healing problems, infection (superficial and deep), hardware failure, hardware breakage, and non-union),

    Time frame: 1 year

  2. Exploratory outcome 2: time to fracture healing

    time to clinical fracture healing, as assessed by the treating surgeon. To determine if CBT versus usual care reduces the incidence of fracture healing complications within 12-months post-fracture

    Time frame: 1 year

  3. Exploratory outcome 3: opioid use

    Patient-reported use of opioid class medications. ) to determine if CBT versus usual care reduces the proportion of participants taking opioid class medications at 6 months and 12 months.

    Time frame: 1 year

06

Study locations

1 site
  • St. Joseph Hospital
    Hamilton, Ontario L8N4A6, Canada
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Moulin DE, Clark AJ, Speechley M, Morley-Forster PK. Chronic pain in Canada--prevalence, treatment, impact and the role of opioid analgesia. Pain Res Manag. 2002 Winter;7(4):179-84. doi: 10.1155/2002/323085. PubMed 12518174 ↗
  • Johannes CB, Le TK, Zhou X, Johnston JA, Dworkin RH. The prevalence of chronic pain in United States adults: results of an Internet-based survey. J Pain. 2010 Nov;11(11):1230-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2010.07.002. Epub 2010 Aug 25. PubMed 20797916 ↗
  • Blyth FM, March LM, Brnabic AJ, Jorm LR, Williamson M, Cousins MJ. Chronic pain in Australia: a prevalence study. Pain. 2001 Jan;89(2-3):127-34. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3959(00)00355-9. PubMed 11166468 ↗
  • Breivik H, Collett B, Ventafridda V, Cohen R, Gallacher D. Survey of chronic pain in Europe: prevalence, impact on daily life, and treatment. Eur J Pain. 2006 May;10(4):287-333. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2005.06.009. Epub 2005 Aug 10. PubMed 16095934 ↗
  • Elliott AM, Smith BH, Penny KI, Smith WC, Chambers WA. The epidemiology of chronic pain in the community. Lancet. 1999 Oct 9;354(9186):1248-52. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(99)03057-3. PubMed 10520633 ↗
  • Crombie IK, Davies HT, Macrae WA. Cut and thrust: antecedent surgery and trauma among patients attending a chronic pain clinic. Pain. 1998 May;76(1-2):167-71. PubMed 9696470 ↗
  • Linton SJ. A review of psychological risk factors in back and neck pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 May 1;25(9):1148-56. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200005010-00017. PubMed 10788861 ↗
  • Wiech K, Tracey I. The influence of negative emotions on pain: behavioral effects and neural mechanisms. Neuroimage. 2009 Sep;47(3):987-94. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.05.059. Epub 2009 May 28. PubMed 19481610 ↗
  • Mondloch MV, Cole DC, Frank JW. Does how you do depend on how you think you'll do? A systematic review of the evidence for a relation between patients' recovery expectations and health outcomes. CMAJ. 2001 Jul 24;165(2):174-9. Erratum In: CMAJ 2001 Nov 13;165(10):1303. PubMed 11501456 ↗
  • Ebrahim S, Malachowski C, Kamal El Din M, Mulla SM, Montoya L, Bance S, Busse JW. Measures of patients' expectations about recovery: a systematic review. J Occup Rehabil. 2015 Mar;25(1):240-55. doi: 10.1007/s10926-014-9535-4. PubMed 25100443 ↗
  • Sprague S, Leece P, Bhandari M, Tornetta P 3rd, Schemitsch E, Swiontkowski MF; S.P.R.I.N.T. Investigators. Limiting loss to follow-up in a multicenter randomized trial in orthopedic surgery. Control Clin Trials. 2003 Dec;24(6):719-25. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2003.08.012. PubMed 14662277 ↗
  • Montes A, Roca G, Sabate S, Lao JI, Navarro A, Cantillo J, Canet J; GENDOLCAT Study Group. Genetic and Clinical Factors Associated with Chronic Postsurgical Pain after Hernia Repair, Hysterectomy, and Thoracotomy: A Two-year Multicenter Cohort Study. Anesthesiology. 2015 May;122(5):1123-41. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000611. PubMed 25985024 ↗
  • Perkins FM, Kehlet H. Chronic pain as an outcome of surgery. A review of predictive factors. Anesthesiology. 2000 Oct;93(4):1123-33. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200010000-00038. No abstract available. PubMed 11020770 ↗
  • Busse JW, Bhandari M, Guyatt GH, Heels-Ansdell D, Kulkarni AV, Mandel S, Sanders D, Schemitsch E, Swiontkowski M, Tornetta P 3rd, Wai E, Walter SD; SPRINT Investigators & the Medically Unexplained Syndromes Study Group. Development and validation of an instrument to predict functional recovery in tibial fracture patients: the Somatic Pre-Occupation and Coping (SPOC) questionnaire. J Orthop Trauma. 2012 Jun;26(6):370-8. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31822421e2. PubMed 22011635 ↗
  • Reininga IH, Brouwer S, Dijkstra A, Busse JW, Ebrahim S, Wendt KW, El Moumni M. Measuring illness beliefs in patients with lower extremity injuries: reliability and validity of the Dutch version of the Somatic Pre-Occupation and Coping questionnaire (SPOC-NL). Injury. 2015 Feb;46(2):308-14. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.08.042. Epub 2014 Sep 16. PubMed 25441575 ↗
  • Bhandari M, Petrisor BA, Jeray KJ. Wound Irrigation in Initial Management of Open Fractures. N Engl J Med. 2016 May 5;374(18):1789-90. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1601157. No abstract available. PubMed 27144859 ↗
  • Brodke DJ, Saltzman CL, Brodke DS. PROMIS for Orthopaedic Outcomes Measurement. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2016 Nov;24(11):744-749. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-15-00404. PubMed 27661391 ↗
  • Werner MU, Kongsgaard UE. I. Defining persistent post-surgical pain: is an update required? Br J Anaesth. 2014 Jul;113(1):1-4. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeu012. Epub 2014 Feb 18. No abstract available. PubMed 24554546 ↗
  • Tan G, Jensen MP, Thornby JI, Shanti BF. Validation of the Brief Pain Inventory for chronic nonmalignant pain. J Pain. 2004 Mar;5(2):133-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2003.12.005. PubMed 15042521 ↗
  • Ware J Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996 Mar;34(3):220-33. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003. PubMed 8628042 ↗
  • Khan JS, Devereaux PJ, LeManach Y, Busse JW. Patient coping and expectations about recovery predict the development of chronic post-surgical pain after traumatic tibial fracture repair. Br J Anaesth. 2016 Sep;117(3):365-70. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew225. PubMed 27543531 ↗
  • Lin CA, Swiontkowski M, Bhandari M, Walter SD, Schemitsch EH, Sanders D, Tornetta P 3rd. Reaming Does Not Affect Functional Outcomes After Open and Closed Tibial Shaft Fractures: The Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial. J Orthop Trauma. 2016 Mar;30(3):142-8. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000497. Erratum In: J Orthop Trauma. 2016 Jun;30(6):e222. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000597. PubMed 26618662 ↗
  • Katsoulis E, Court-Brown C, Giannoudis PV. Incidence and aetiology of anterior knee pain after intramedullary nailing of the femur and tibia. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006 May;88(5):576-80. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.88B5.16875. No abstract available. PubMed 16645100 ↗
  • Kehlet H, Jensen TS, Woolf CJ. Persistent postsurgical pain: risk factors and prevention. Lancet. 2006 May 13;367(9522):1618-25. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68700-X. PubMed 16698416 ↗
  • MacKenzie EJ, Bosse MJ, Kellam JF, Pollak AN, Webb LX, Swiontkowski MF, Smith DG, Sanders RW, Jones AL, Starr AJ, McAndrew MP, Patterson BM, Burgess AR, Travison T, Castillo RC. Early predictors of long-term work disability after major limb trauma. J Trauma. 2006 Sep;61(3):688-94. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000195985.56153.68. PubMed 16967009 ↗
  • Wegener ST, Castillo RC, Haythornthwaite J, MacKenzie EJ, Bosse MJ; LEAP Study Group. Psychological distress mediates the effect of pain on function. Pain. 2011 Jun;152(6):1349-1357. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2011.02.020. Epub 2011 Mar 10. PubMed 21396777 ↗
  • Vranceanu AM, Bachoura A, Weening A, Vrahas M, Smith RM, Ring D. Psychological factors predict disability and pain intensity after skeletal trauma. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Feb 5;96(3):e20. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.00479. PubMed 24500592 ↗
  • Treede RD, Rief W, Barke A, Aziz Q, Bennett MI, Benoliel R, Cohen M, Evers S, Finnerup NB, First MB, Giamberardino MA, Kaasa S, Kosek E, Lavand'homme P, Nicholas M, Perrot S, Scholz J, Schug S, Smith BH, Svensson P, Vlaeyen JWS, Wang SJ. A classification of chronic pain for ICD-11. Pain. 2015 Jun;156(6):1003-1007. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000160. No abstract available. PubMed 25844555 ↗
  • Fries JF, Bruce B, Cella D. The promise of PROMIS: using item response theory to improve assessment of patient-reported outcomes. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2005 Sep-Oct;23(5 Suppl 39):S53-7. PubMed 16273785 ↗
  • Angst F, Aeschlimann A, Stucki G. Smallest detectable and minimal clinically important differences of rehabilitation intervention with their implications for required sample sizes using WOMAC and SF-36 quality of life measurement instruments in patients with osteoarthritis of the lower extremities. Arthritis Rheum. 2001 Aug;45(4):384-91. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(200108)45:43.0.CO;2-0. PubMed 11501727 ↗
  • Jenkinson C, Stewart-Brown S, Petersen S, Paice C. Assessment of the SF-36 version 2 in the United Kingdom. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1999 Jan;53(1):46-50. doi: 10.1136/jech.53.1.46. PubMed 10326053 ↗
  • Fixation using Alternative Implants for the Treatment of Hip fractures (FAITH) Investigators. Fracture fixation in the operative management of hip fractures (FAITH): an international, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2017 Apr 15;389(10078):1519-1527. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30066-1. Epub 2017 Mar 3. PubMed 28262269 ↗
  • Madden K, Scott T, McKay P, Petrisor BA, Jeray KJ, Tanner SL, Bhandari M, Sprague S. Predicting and Preventing Loss to Follow-up of Adult Trauma Patients in Randomized Controlled Trials: An Example from the FLOW Trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Jul 5;99(13):1086-1092. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.00900. PubMed 28678121 ↗
  • Zhang Y, Alyass A, Vanniyasingam T, Sadeghirad B, Florez ID, Pichika SC, Kennedy SA, Abdulkarimova U, Zhang Y, Iljon T, Morgano GP, Colunga Lozano LE, Aloweni FAB, Lopes LC, Yepes-Nunez JJ, Fei Y, Wang L, Kahale LA, Meyre D, Akl EA, Thabane L, Guyatt GH. A systematic survey of the methods literature on the reporting quality and optimal methods of handling participants with missing outcome data for continuous outcomes in randomized controlled trials. J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Aug;88:67-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.05.016. Epub 2017 Jun 1. PubMed 28579378 ↗
  • Thabane L, Mbuagbaw L, Zhang S, Samaan Z, Marcucci M, Ye C, Thabane M, Giangregorio L, Dennis B, Kosa D, Borg Debono V, Dillenburg R, Fruci V, Bawor M, Lee J, Wells G, Goldsmith CH. A tutorial on sensitivity analyses in clinical trials: the what, why, when and how. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Jul 16;13:92. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-92. PubMed 23855337 ↗
  • Sprague S, Petrisor BA, Jeray KJ, McKay P, Scott T, Heels-Ansdell D, Schemitsch EH, Liew S, Guyatt GH, Walter SD, Bhandari M. Factors Associated With Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Open Fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2018 Jan;32(1):e5-e11. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000993. PubMed 28799963 ↗
  • Archer KR, Abraham CM, Obremskey WT. Psychosocial Factors Predict Pain and Physical Health After Lower Extremity Trauma. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Nov;473(11):3519-26. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4504-6. PubMed 26282387 ↗
  • Sun X, Briel M, Walter SD, Guyatt GH. Is a subgroup effect believable? Updating criteria to evaluate the credibility of subgroup analyses. BMJ. 2010 Mar 30;340:c117. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c117. No abstract available. PubMed 20354011 ↗
  • Briggs AH, O'Brien BJ, Blackhouse G. Thinking outside the box: recent advances in the analysis and presentation of uncertainty in cost-effectiveness studies. Annu Rev Public Health. 2002;23:377-401. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.23.100901.140534. Epub 2001 Oct 25. PubMed 11910068 ↗
  • Briel M, Lane M, Montori VM, Bassler D, Glasziou P, Malaga G, Akl EA, Ferreira-Gonzalez I, Alonso-Coello P, Urrutia G, Kunz R, Culebro CR, da Silva SA, Flynn DN, Elamin MB, Strahm B, Murad MH, Djulbegovic B, Adhikari NK, Mills EJ, Gwadry-Sridhar F, Kirpalani H, Soares HP, Abu Elnour NO, You JJ, Karanicolas PJ, Bucher HC, Lampropulos JF, Nordmann AJ, Burns KE, Mulla SM, Raatz H, Sood A, Kaur J, Bankhead CR, Mullan RJ, Nerenberg KA, Vandvik PO, Coto-Yglesias F, Schunemann H, Tuche F, Chrispim PP, Cook DJ, Lutz K, Ribic CM, Vale N, Erwin PJ, Perera R, Zhou Q, Heels-Ansdell D, Ramsay T, Walter SD, Guyatt GH. Stopping randomized trials early for benefit: a protocol of the Study Of Trial Policy Of Interim Truncation-2 (STOPIT-2). Trials. 2009 Jul 6;10:49. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-10-49. PubMed 19580665 ↗
  • Montori VM, Devereaux PJ, Adhikari NK, Burns KE, Eggert CH, Briel M, Lacchetti C, Leung TW, Darling E, Bryant DM, Bucher HC, Schunemann HJ, Meade MO, Cook DJ, Erwin PJ, Sood A, Sood R, Lo B, Thompson CA, Zhou Q, Mills E, Guyatt GH. Randomized trials stopped early for benefit: a systematic review. JAMA. 2005 Nov 2;294(17):2203-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.17.2203. PubMed 16264162 ↗

Related links

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03196258
Lead sponsor
McMaster University
Collaborators
Hamilton Academic Health Sciences Organization, Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation, Unity Health Toronto
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 22, 2017
Start date
Oct 1, 2018
Primary completion
Jun 1, 2019
Completion
Dec 1, 2019
Last update
Feb 24, 2020

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Feb 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion