ClinicalTrials.gg
WithdrawnNCT03191487ChimioPalUpdated Jun 19, 2017

Evaluation of a New Organization for Collecting Pre-chemotherapy Session Information

An interventional study of ChimioPal and Usual pathways in Colorectal Neoplasms, sponsored by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes. Withdrawn at 6 sites in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-06-19.

Sponsored by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Why this study was withdrawn
no Financial agreement
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
0
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The primary objective of this study is to compare an experimental organization for chemotherapy session planning based on early, standardized, and prioritized means of data transmission via secure e-mail (laboratory results) and the use of a smart phone (for clinical toxicity data) compared to the regular organization, in terms of the rate of prescriptions of chemotherapy prepared at the latest the day before a session and then administered in full (over a 6-month observation period) among colorectal cancer patients in need of cancer treatment in an outpatient setting.

Read the detailed description

Compare the two arms of the study in terms of:

A. each element contributing to the primary criterium;

B. the quality of chemotherapy related care;

C. logistics;

D. patient satisfaction with respect to support for chemotherapy care;

E. the feasibility and acceptability of the organization by patients will be assessed by the rate of optimal use of toxicity collection tools and patient satisfaction rates relative to the tool (experimental arm)

F. Comparison of the overall cost of care in both arms and estimated cost of the strategy

02

Conditions studied

  • Colorectal Neoplasms
03

In context

Colorectal Neoplasms

5,738 studies on the registry are indexed under Colorectal Neoplasms; 1,481 are open to participants now.

Browse Colorectal Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes is the lead sponsor of 594 studies on the registry; 89 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • The patient was informed about the implementation of the study, its objectives, constraints and patient rights
  • The patient has given his/her informed and signed consent
  • The patient must be insured or beneficiary of a health insurance plan
  • The patient is available for 6 months of follow-up
  • The patient is treated via anti-cancer chemotherapy for colorectal cancer
  • The patient is starting a new adjuvant or metastatic chemotherapy protocol with a follow-up in a day-clinic setting
  • The patient has already used a smartphone, or desires to learn how, or is accompanied by a person who can help the patient use a smartphone
  • The anticipated chemotherapy treatment corresponds to one of the following protocols: cetuximab, FOLFIRI, FOLFIRI-aflibercept, FOLFIRI-bevacizumab, FOLFIRI-cetuximab, FOLFIRI-panitumumab, Folfirinox, Folfirinox-bevacizumab, Folfoxiri, Folfoxiri-bevacizumab, FOLFOX 4 simplified, FOLFOX 4 simplified - bevacizumab, FOLFOX 4 simplified - cetuximab, FOLFOX 4 simplified - panitumumab, Irinotecan-cetuximab, LV5FU2 simplified, panitumumab, XELOX.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The patient is participating in another study, or has participated in another study within the past 3 months, that may influence the results or conclusions of the present trial
  • The patient is in an exclusion period determined by a previous study
  • The patient is under judicial protection, or is an adult under guardianship
  • The patient refuses to sign the consent
  • It is impossible to correctly inform the patient
  • The patient is pregnant, parturient, or breastfeeding
  • The planned chemotherapy regimen includes weekly treatment cycles
  • Patient who is incapable of using a smartphone either by himself/herself or via another helping person
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
0 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    ChimioPal

    Systematic collection of clinical and laboratory toxicities.

    Other: ChimioPal

  • Active comparator
    Standard

    The usual management and logistic pathways will be respected.

    Other: Usual pathways

Interventions

  • OtherChimioPal

    Systematic collection of clinical and laboratory toxicities (TXs) during the 2-4 days preceding a chemotherapy (CT) session (48H before a session (D-2 towards the end of the afternoon) and a maximum of 96h before sessions occurring on Mondays (D-4 towards the end of the afternoon). Clinical TX data will be collected via ChimioPal (a self-questionnaire administered by smartphone) and laboratory TX data will be collected via Apicrpyt (secure messaging service) or a fax-to-email service. Data flow management by a nurse dedicated to this activity in each centre will be implemented. If the results of the assessment do not authorize CT, additional assessments may be prescribed. If the experimental data transmission does not occur, the usual pathways will be implemented. Patient training on how to use a smart phone and the questionnaire will be performed by a nurse before the start of the first chemotherapy session, with reminders at the following sessions if required.

  • OtherUsual pathways

    In the standard arm, the usual management and logistic pathways will be respected. Only extra data collection is required by this study.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The rate of prescriptions for chemotherapy in the outpatient clinic prepared at the latest the day before a session (except for predefined, limited stability products) and administered in full, per patient, during a follow-up period of 6 months

    This criterion is aggregated per patient but its components are collected for each prescription, according to the following coding: * Prescription prepared in advance and administered in full: 1 * Prescription prepared in advance but not administered in full: 0 * Prescription not prepared in advance : 0 For each patient, the sum of the results for each prescription will be the numerator. The denominator is the number of prescriptions during 6 months follow-up for each patient. The limited stability products that will necessarily be prepared at the last minute are: * Aflibercept * Panitumumab * Raltitrexed

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. The number of prescriptions prepared in advance and administered in full

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. The number of prescriptions prepared in advance and not administered in full

    Time frame: 6 months

  3. The number of prescriptions not prepared in advance

    Time frame: 6 months

  4. Dose-intensity per patient over 6 months of follow-up

    Time frame: 6 months

  5. The number of chemotherapy session postponements that were anticipated, and the patient was not required to come in to the clinic

    Time frame: 6 months

  6. The number of chemotherapy session postponements that were not anticipated, and the patient was required to come in to the clinic

    Time frame: 6 months

  7. The number of pharmaceutical interventions* accepted by the doctor / the number of prescriptions prepared for the totality of sessions

    \*a pharmaceutical intervention = request for prescription verification following results/information

    Time frame: 6 months

  8. The number of chemotherapy sessions that really took place (c) during the 6 months of follow-up

    Time frame: 6 months

  9. The average number of days between chemotherapy sessions

    The average number of days of inter-session lag: ∑(days between 2 sessions-expected days between 2 sessions)/(c-1)

    Time frame: 6 months

  10. The waiting time (on average) for the patient in the outpatient clinic before administration of the treatment

    Time frame: 6 months

  11. the total period of time spent by the patient in the outpatient clinic

    Time frame: 6 months

  12. The number of prescriptions that were prepared and administered

    Time frame: 6 months

  13. The number of pouches that were prepared, not-administered, but recycled

    Time frame: 6 months

  14. The number of pouches prepared, not administered and destroyed

    Time frame: 6 months

  15. The average number of laboratory assessments required per chemotherapy session

    Time frame: 6 months

  16. Patient satisfaction vis-à-vis their chemotherapy care (Visual Analog Scale from 0.0 to 10.0)

    Time frame: 6 months

  17. Experimental arm per patient: The number Apicrypt transmissions / number of lab prescriptions

    Time frame: 6 months

  18. Experimental arm per patient: the number questionnaires filled out / the number of requested questionnaires

    Time frame: 6 months

  19. Experimental arm: Patient satisfaction vis-à-vis the ChimioPal tool (Visual Analog Scale from 0.0 to 10.0)

    Time frame: 6 months

  20. Overall costs

    The cost of pouches, consultations, examinations and transport will be estimated in both arms. Staff time, optimized due to the new organization, will be quantified. The point of view of health insurance and the establishment will be considered. Any gains will be weighed against the cost of the experimental strategy.

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Study locations

6 sites
  • Institut Sainte Catherine
    Avignon, 84918, France
  • Institut de Cancérologie Montpellier
    Montpellier, 34298, France
  • CHRU de Nîmes - Hôpital Universitaire Carémeau
    Nîmes, 30029, France
  • CHRU de Strasbourg - Hôpital de Hautepierre
    Strasbourg, 67098, France
  • CHRU de Toulouse - Hôpital de Rangueil
    Toulouse, 31059, France
  • IUCT-Oncopole
    Toulouse, 31100, France
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 19, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03191487
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 19, 2017
Start date
Apr 2018 (estimated)
Primary completion
Nov 2019 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 2019 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 19, 2017

Study contacts

Mireille Favier, PharmD
study director · Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is withdrawn, as verified in Jun 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion