ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06083584ROSAUpdated Oct 22, 2026

Development of Targeted RNA-Seq for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Diagnosis

An observational study in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, sponsored by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes. Recruiting at 7 sites in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-22.

Sponsored by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Nov 2023; still recruiting 2 years 11 months later.
Updated Oct 22, 2026Eligibility revisedGo to Updates ↓
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
192
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Genetic diagnosis of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) could identify the origin of the disease, potentially allowing the patient to pursue targeted/gene therapy. However, many familial forms of ALS are genetically undiagnosed, either because no variant has been detected in the genes of interest, or because the detected variant(s) have uncertain significance. Currently, molecular diagnosis takes place in two stages: 1) Search for the GGGGCC expansion in the C9ORF72 gene by RP-PCR; 2) Analysis of the coding regions by high-throughput sequencing of a panel of 30 genes involved in ALS.

Many of these variants of uncertain significance affect splicing. Their impact can be predicted using in silico tools, but only an analysis of the patient's RNA can confirm their pathogenic nature. Currently, the analysis of transcripts is only done a posteriori, when a variant predicted to impact splicing is detected on the patient's DNA. RT-PCR followed by Sanger sequencing then verifies the impact of the splice variants. This method confirmed the impact of certain splice variants in patients. However, this method is time-consuming and requires custom development, and is mutation/gene/patient-dependent. In contrast, high-throughput RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) simultaneously analyzes the splicing of numerous genes, with a global approach, applicable to all patients. This approach avoids the custom design of primers, which can be biased by the interpretation of splicing predictions, while RNA-Seq systematically captures and sequences all the transcripts. Finally, RNA-Seq provides additional information compared to DNA sequencing such as the detection of exon skipping, intron inclusion, and the creation of fusion transcripts.

In the GTEx project (GTEx Consortium, 2013), expression levels of human genome transcripts were quantified by RNA-Seq. Using these results, the study investigators measured expression of transcripts of known ALS genes in whole blood. Applying a threshold value of 0.5 transcripts per million reads (TPM), 25 of the 30 ALS genes currently analyzed by NGS in routine diagnostics at Nîmes University Hospital could be eligible for a complete analysis by RNA-Seq. None of the French laboratories carrying out genetic analyzes of ALS has yet developed RNA-Seq as a routine diagnostic tool. The study laboratory receives more than 600 requests for genetic diagnosis of ALS patients per year. The aim of this study is therefore to develop a global method for analyzing RNA transcripts of ALS genes to categorize the mutations to improve the diagnostic management of patients.

02

Conditions studied

  • Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
03

In context

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

978 studies on the registry are indexed under Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis; 277 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 192 is above the median of 108 across 265 observational studies indexed under Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.

Browse Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis studies →

Lead sponsor

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes is the lead sponsor of 595 studies on the registry; 90 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients will be recruited during a consultation for a clinical diagnosis of ALS for which a request for a genetic diagnosis has been made in one of the prescribing centers: CHU Lyon, Montpellier University Hospital, Marseille University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital, Bordeaux University Hospital, Toulouse University Hospital.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Have a prescription for a genetic diagnosis of ALS (or familial hypercholesterolemia for the control cohort)
  • Have given their for the genetic study and the biobank
  • The patient must be a member or beneficiary of a health insurance plan

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The patient is under safeguard of justice or state guardianship
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
192 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Positive controls

    6 patients already in database. The 6 confirmed splicing mutations are: DCTN1 (NM\_004082.5): c.3209G\>T, OPTN (NM\_001008211.1) : c.1613-7T\>G, FUS (NM\_004960.4) : c.764+8T\>A, GRN (NM\_002087.4): c.835+1G\>A, GRN (NM\_002087.4): c.709-3C\>G, SPG11 (NM\_025137.4): c.3039-5T\>G

    Other: RNA sequencing

  • Negative controls

    30 patients with familial hypercholesterolemia. The absence of splicing anomalies in the SLA genes after confirmation by RT-PCR followed by Sanger sequencing of the absence of anomalies for the 6 variants listed above for each of the 30 individuals.

    Other: RNA sequencing

  • Exploratory cohort

    156 ALS: 20 ALS patients with splice variants predicted to be deleterious by in silico prediction software; 136 panel-analysis-negative ALS patients (priority will be given to familial ALS)

    Other: RNA sequencing

Interventions

  • OtherRNA sequencing

    RNA-Seq (Sureselect XT HS2 RNA) from patient blood sample

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Concordance between the RNA-Seq results (index text) versus RT-PCR followed by Sanger sequencing (reference technique) on positive plus negative controls

    Sashimi Plot visualized in Integrative Genomics Viewer

    Time frame: Day 0

Secondary outcomes

  1. Frequency of splicing anomalies detected in ALS patients in the "exploratory cohort" versus negative controls.

    Frequency

    Time frame: Day 0

07

Study locations

7 of 7 sites recruiting
08

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Nov 2023 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for May 2027, 42 months after the start.

Of 127 non-industry observational studies under Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, half reached primary completion within 67 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 30 and three quarters within 125. This study's planned 42 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 136 studies reached it within 64 months; a quarter within 29 and three quarters within 114.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 9, 2023
First posted
Oct 16, 2023
StartActual
Nov 22, 2023
Primary completionEst.
May 2027
CompletionEst.
May 2027
Last update
Oct 22, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Eligibility
Revised
Oct 22, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 22, 2026
    Eligibility Revised
    + 6 other changes: index terms, verification date, oversight details, arm descriptions, site details and data sharing statement

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06083584
Collaborators
Association pour la Recherche sur la Sclérose Latérale Amyotrophique et autres maladies du motoneurones
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 16, 2023
Start date
Nov 22, 2023
Primary completion
May 2027 (estimated)
Completion
May 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 22, 2026

Study contacts

Claire Guissart
Contact
claire.guissart@chu-nimes.fr
04 66 68 32 07
Claire Guissart
principal investigator · CHU de Nimes

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion