CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT03158298BilharziaUpdated Apr 14, 2022Results posted

Seropositivity and Adverse Birth Events in Migrants From Bilharzia-endemic Areas

An observational study in Schistosomiasis, sponsored by Jena University Hospital. Terminated at 1 site in Germany. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-04-14.

Sponsored by Jena University Hospital · Observational

Why this study was terminated
due to lack of recruitment
Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
82
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The study intends to examine the association between schistosomiasis seropositivity and adverse pregnancy outcomes.

It aims at the verification of the hypothesis that in pregnant women originating from endemic areas for schistosomiasis, positive serology is associated with reduced Infant birth weight.

Read the detailed description

Schistosomiasis is a widespread helminthic infection, with an estimated 249 million people in 78 countries requiring preventive treatment each year. This infection has a significant association with morbidity worldwide. Earlier studies performed in endemic Areas showed that the reproductive tract was affected in more than 60% of the women who excreted S. haematobium ova in urine. Transplacental transmission has not been observed, but schistosomiasis of the pregnant uterus has been reported and placental schistosomiasis has been associated with stillbirth. Placental schistosomiasis (i.e. detection of schistosomiasis eggs in placental tissue) has been reported occasionally. Schistosomiasis has been postulated to be associated with premature delivery and low birth weight; however, existing data are inconsistent.

Migration to the European Union was estimated at 1.7 million people in 2012. Migrants were predominantly from Africa and Asia. In these areas schistosomiasis has an estimated prevalence of 10-20%. While a large number of migrants from schistosomiasis-endemic areas enter Europe and receive Access to health care, many of them are unaware of helminthic infections they may have been exposed to, and their potential outcomes.

Treatment of schistosomiasis during pregnancy is a matter of debate. The German society for tropical medicine recommends treatment with praziquantel only after the completion of pregnancy. Conversely, the South African Medicines Formulary suggests that pregnant women should be offered treatment individually and that they should not necessarily be excluded during treatment campaigns. By quantifying the effects of Schistosoma infection on pregnancy outcomes this study will help clinicians in deciding on the question of treatment during pregnancy.

The aim of the study is to examine the association of maternal schistosomiasis on adverse birth outcomes (as defined by low birth weight, premature delivery or stillbirth) in migrants to Europe from schistosomiasis endemic areas.

02

Conditions studied

  • Schistosomiasis

Browse trials for

03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Pregnant women aged above 18, who migrated to Europe from geographic regions with endemic schistosomiasis

Inclusion criteria

  • Pregnancy
  • Immigration from a country/geographic area with declared endemic schistosomiasis according to World Health Organization criteria
  • Signed informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Placenta pathology of any cause
  • Any medical condition affecting fetal growth
04

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
82 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples without dna

Interventions

  • OtherSpecimen collection

    Maternal blood sample of 10 ml collected by venepuncture upon delivery

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Schistosoma Serology

    Presence of Schistosoma antibodies in maternal serum

    Time frame: 6 month after delivery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Birth Weight

    Infant birth weight

    Time frame: 1 hour upon delivery

  2. Preterm Birth

    Onset of delivery at a gestational age below 37 weeks

    Time frame: 24 hours before delivery

  3. Intrauterine Growth Restriction

    Fetal weight below the 10th percentile for the estimated gestational age

    Time frame: 48 hours after delivery

  4. Stillbirth

    Fetus delivered without signs of life at gestational age between 20 and 28 weeks

    Time frame: At delivery

06

Results

Posted Apr 14, 2022
Limitations and caveats
Early termination leading to small numbers of subjects analyzed

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneStudy Group
Started82
Completed82
Not completed0

Outcome measures

PrimarySchistosoma Serology

Presence of Schistosoma antibodies in maternal serum

Time frame:
6 month after delivery
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Schistosoma Serology
ParticipantsStudy Group
Schistosoma Serology0
SecondaryBirth Weight

Infant birth weight

Time frame:
1 hour upon delivery
Reported as:
Mean · gramm
Birth Weight
grammStudy Group
Birth Weight3273 ± 573
SecondaryPreterm Birth

Onset of delivery at a gestational age below 37 weeks

Time frame:
24 hours before delivery
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Preterm Birth
ParticipantsStudy Group
Preterm Birth5
SecondaryIntrauterine Growth Restriction

Fetal weight below the 10th percentile for the estimated gestational age

Time frame:
48 hours after delivery
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Intrauterine Growth Restriction
ParticipantsStudy Group
Intrauterine Growth Restriction7
SecondaryStillbirth

Fetus delivered without signs of life at gestational age between 20 and 28 weeks

Time frame:
At delivery
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Stillbirth
ParticipantsStudy Group
Stillbirth0

Adverse events

Collected over adverse event data collection was not applicable to our study. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Study Group———

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Study Group
<=18 years0
Between 18 and 65 years82
>=65 years0
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Study Group
Female30
Male52
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Study Group
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian42
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American40
White0
More than one race0
Unknown or Not Reported0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Study Group
Germany82
Schistosomiasis Serology
Schistosomiasis Serology(participants)Study Group
Number82
gestational age
gestational age(weeks)Study Group
Median39.71 ± 2.43
birth weight
birth weight(g)Study Group
Median3318 ± 623
07

Study locations

1 site
  • University Hospital Jena
    Jena, Thuringia 07747, Germany
08

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Oct 2, 2015
  • Informed consent form · Jan 5, 2016

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03158298
Lead sponsor
Jena University Hospital
Collaborators
Technical University of Munich, Charite University, Berlin, Germany, University Hospital in Halle
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 18, 2017
Start date
Jun 1, 2017
Primary completion
Oct 31, 2018
Completion
Oct 11, 2019
Results posted
Apr 14, 2022
Last update
Apr 14, 2022

Study contacts

Benjamin Schleenvoigt, M.D.
principal investigator · Center for Infectious Diseases and Infection Control, Jena University Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Apr 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion