CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03155334Updated Jan 16, 2018

Understanding Evaluation of Patient Information Sheets by User Testing Method

An interventional study of PIS User Testing in MS (Multiple Sclerosis), sponsored by Fondazione Italiana Sclerosi Multipla. Status unknown at 2 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-01-16.

Sponsored by Fondazione Italiana Sclerosi Multipla · Not applicable, Interventional, and Basic science

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Jan 2018), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 3 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2017, registered May 2017).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this randomized, open label, crossover, single site study is to compare the PISs of two Multiple Sclerosis clinical trials to elucidate potential aspects of the given written information that could impact on the smooth running of the studies.

Read the detailed description

The participation to a clinical trial is based on two forms of information: the spoken information, usually given by a clinician during the enrolment meeting, and the written information, reported on the Participant Information Sheet (PIS). Numerous studies performed to improve and enhance informed consent, have used different methods to evaluate the quality of the given information such as: interview, checklist, questionnaire, readability formulae. Even if these tools can be useful, they show evident limits in detecting the real efficacy of the proposed consent form in terms of the patient's comprehension.

User Testing (UT) is a method originally developed in the 1990 in Australia, to assess how a text about medicinal products performs with its intended users and not just its content.

Generally, the UT is based on an iterative 4-step process in a cohort of participants (the target group):

  • individual reading of the text;
  • individual questionnaire for a quantitative and qualitative evaluation;
  • a brief semi-structured interview to each participant;
  • a text revision to address any problems identified from participant feedback; Then the revised document is tested again with a second cohort and this iterative process continues until all issues with the document are resolved. However, a methodological issue not yet explored is whether the UT could be used to compare two different PISs, in order to elucidate aspects that could be involved in improving or worsening the understanding of a PIS.

UT has been recently used to evaluate the PIS belonging to phase I and phase III clinical trials (CT) in Myeloid Leukemia, immunomodulatory therapy and for poor responders in vitro fertilization. To date, in no case the UT method has been tested in patients affected by chronic disease like Multiple Sclerosis (MS).

We want to apply the UT approach to highlight the critical issues and communication difficulties present in PISs used in MS clinical trials.

02

Conditions studied

  • MS (Multiple Sclerosis)

Keywords

  • Multiple Sclerosis; Patient Information Sheet; User Testing
03

In context

Multiple Sclerosis

3,460 studies on the registry are indexed under Multiple Sclerosis; 661 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is above the median of 50 across 2,342 interventional studies indexed under Multiple Sclerosis.

Browse Multiple Sclerosis studies →

Lead sponsor

Fondazione Italiana Sclerosi Multipla is the lead sponsor of 8 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria: PwMS (60%) and Caregivers (40%):

for PwMS:

  • 18 years or older;
  • MS diagnosis according to McDonald criteria;
  • Informed consent to the present study for caregivers:
  • 18 years or older;
  • in being a person who takes care of a PwMS;
  • Informed consent to the present study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • not having taken part in one of the following trials evaluated in the present study: A) Observational Study of the Prevalence of CCSVI in Multiple Sclerosis and in Other Neurodegenerative Diseases (PIS-A); B) BRAin VEnous DRainage Exploited Against Multiple Sclerosis (PIS-B).
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Other
    Prevalence of CCSVI in MS

    Subjects with prevalence of CCSVI in Multiple Sclerosis and in Other Neurodegenerative Diseases - PIS User Testing

    Other: PIS User Testing

  • Other
    BVD Exploited Against MS

    Subjects suffering from Brain venous drainage exploited against Multiple Sclerosis - PIS User Testing

    Other: PIS User Testing

Interventions

  • OtherPIS User Testing

    PIS User Testing based on an iterative 4-step process in a cohort of participants (the target group): * individual reading of the text; * individual questionnaire for a quantitative and qualitative evaluation; * a brief semi-structured interview to each participant; * a text revision to address any problems identified from participant feedback.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. percentage of found and understood-if-found items

    percentage

    Time frame: 1 day

Secondary outcomes

  1. understanding of the text expressed by subject

    Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

    Time frame: 1 day

07

Study locations

2 of 2 sites recruiting
  • Fondazione Italiana Sclerosi Multipla (FISM)
    Genova, Liguria, Italy
    • Stefano Lionetti, MD · Contact
    • Stefano Lionetti, MD · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
  • Opera Contract Research Organization SRL
    Timisoara, Timis 300209, Romania
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Raynor DK. User testing in developing patient medication information in Europe. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2013 Sep-Oct;9(5):640-5. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2013.02.007. Epub 2013 Apr 10. PubMed 23583081 ↗
  • Knapp P, Raynor DK, Silcock J, Parkinson B. Performance-based readability testing of participant materials for a phase I trial: TGN1412. J Med Ethics. 2009 Sep;35(9):573-8. doi: 10.1136/jme.2008.026708. PubMed 19717698 ↗
  • Knapp P, Raynor DK, Silcock J, Parkinson B. Performance-based readability testing of participant information for a Phase 3 IVF trial. Trials. 2009 Sep 1;10:79. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-10-79. PubMed 19723335 ↗
  • Knapp P, Raynor DK, Silcock J, Parkinson B. Can user testing of a clinical trial patient information sheet make it fit-for-purpose?--a randomized controlled trial. BMC Med. 2011 Jul 21;9:89. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-9-89. PubMed 21777435 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 16, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03155334
Lead sponsor
Fondazione Italiana Sclerosi Multipla
Collaborators
Opera CRO, a TIGERMED Group Company
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 16, 2017
Start date
Jan 31, 2017
Primary completion
Feb 20, 2018 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 30, 2018 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 16, 2018

Study contacts

Dionisio Barattini, MD
Contact
barattini@operacro.ro
+393355437574
Mario Alberto Battaglia, Prof.
study director · Fondazione Italiana Sclerosi Multipla (FISM), Genova , (Italy)

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Jan 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion