ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03154177PTBi RwandaUpdated Jun 25, 2019

Group Antenatal/Postnatal Care in Rwanda

An interventional study of Group ANC/PNC and Ultrasound+Pregnancy Testing in Pregnancy Complications, Preterm Birth and Preterm Labor, sponsored by University of California, San Francisco. Completed at 2 sites in Rwanda. Open to female participants aged 13 Years to 64 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-06-25.

Sponsored by University of California, San Francisco · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
26,381
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
13 Years to 64 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The focus of this work is to improve antenatal care (ANC) and postnatal care (PNC) at the health center level in five districts in Rwanda (Bugesera, Burera, Nyamasheke, Nyarugenge, and Rubavu). 36 health centers in these districts are included in this cluster randomized control trial (RCT) of group ANC and PNC care to measure this alternative model's effects on gestational age at birth, survival of preterm and low birth weight infants at 42 days of life, and ANC and PNC coverage. To improve antenatal assessment of gestational age, nurses will be trained in obstetric ultrasound at 18 health centers. These facilities will also incorporate pregnancy testing with urine dipstick to be performed by community health workers in charge of maternal health to facilitate early entry into ANC. This trial will test the hypothesis that women who participate in this alternative model of group ANC will experience increased gestational age at birth, as compared to women who receive standard focused ANC. This study is a collaboration with the University of Rwanda, the Rwandan Ministry of Health (MOH), the Rwanda Biomedical Center, and UCSF.

The group care model used in this study is Rwanda-specific model developed by a Rwandan technical working group. The model includes an individual clinical visit for the first antenatal visit, followed by three group visits spaced about 8 weeks apart throughout pregnancy and a postnatal group visit at approximately 6 weeks after birth. Women will be grouped into stable groups of approximately 8-12 women with similar due dates. A community health worker (CHW) and a health center nurse will work together as co-facilitators to lead each of the groups. Each group visit includes clinical assessment, education, and treatments as appropriate for the women who attend. The model is founded on facilitative leadership of the groups, in which the co-facilitators allow women's experiences and interests to drive the content and women are encouraged to help one another cope with obstacles to optimal health. Facilitators will be supported by master trainers who will visit health centers to observe group sessions and offer supportive feedback.

Data collected in this trial will include measures of the satisfaction of both women and providers with the group care, content of care differences between standard and group care, and perinatal outcomes such as gestational age at delivery and 42-day preterm and low birth weight infant survival.

Read the detailed description

This study aims to determine the effect of a group care model, which incorporates both group care antenatal (ANC) and postnatal care (PNC), on the following:

  1. Gestational age (GA) at birth;
  2. Adherence to the recommended four ANC and one facility-based PNC visits; and
  3. Mortality at 42 days among preterm and low birth weight infants.

In this cluster RCT at the health center level, facilities will be pair-matched based on factors affecting GA at delivery such as monthly ANC enrollment, quality of ANC and PNC delivery, potential lost-to-follow-up (LTFU) rate, and additional criteria pertaining to facility capacity. Within each pair, a facility will be randomly chosen to implement the intervention, group ANC and PNC, while the control facility will continue to provide standard ANC and PNC. Pairs will then be further matched with other pairs into quadruples (to the extent possible), within which one pair will be assigned to additionally implement ultrasound at the health center level and early pregnancy testing at the community level. Overall, each facility will have one of the following assignments:

  • Arm 1: Standard ANC and PNC care only
  • Arm 2: Standard ANC and PNC care, with the addition of early pregnancy testing and ultrasound
  • Arm 3: Group ANC and PNC only
  • Arm 4: Group ANC and PNC care, with the addition of early pregnancy testing and ultrasound

This design will allow a primary analysis on the difference between group care and standard care and will also make it possible to assess the effect of early pregnancy testing in the community and obstetric ultrasound at the health center on early entry into ANC and number of visits attended.

The Rwanda group ANC/PNC model was developed by a Technical Working Group of representatives from maternal-child health stakeholders in Rwanda. Key characteristics:

  1. Women sit in a circle in a group space where confidentiality and mutual respect are prioritized. Key messages consistent with Rwanda's ANC/PNC packages are delivered through facilitated discussion; women speak more than the facilitators.
  2. Women and newborns receive the routine assessments, screening, and treatments described in the Rwanda guidelines, as well as treatments indicated for special conditions. Health assessments are conducted at the start of the visit, and women participate as much as possible in their own self-assessments. Individual consultations with facilitators are conducted in a semi-private area.
  3. Two co-facilitators lead each group visit (one midwife/nurse and one CHW). Co-facilitators "debrief" after every group visit in a continuous learning and quality improvement process. The group care co-facilitators are trained and supported by 6 Rwandan Master Trainers.
  4. Women can return to the health facility at any time for evaluation of danger signs or other concerns. Referrals to the district hospital are done per current national guidelines.

Both control and intervention sites, as well as district hospitals that may receive referrals from our study sites, will receive the initial intervention of data strengthening and training around data use activities so as to improve the quality of data being collected and strengthen outcome measurement within all facilities involved in the study

Additionally, in order to evaluate other secondary outcomes, data will also be collected through: (1) questionnaires administered to a random sample of ANC and PNC participants and all providers at baseline and different time points throughout the study; (2) observations and debriefs of group care sessions; (3) qualitative research around acceptability of the group model from participants and providers; (4) cost-effectiveness analysis of the group care model.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pregnancy Complications
  • Preterm Birth
  • Preterm Labor
  • Stillbirth
  • Low Birth Weight
  • Neonatal Mortality
03

In context

Pregnancy Complications

445 studies on the registry are indexed under Pregnancy Complications; 118 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 26,381 is above the median of 148 across 224 interventional studies indexed under Pregnancy Complications.

Browse Pregnancy Complications studies →

Lead sponsor

University of California, San Francisco is the lead sponsor of 2,164 studies on the registry; 368 are open to participants now.

Of its 267 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 199 (75%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
13 Years to 64 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Eligibility criteria

Individual inclusion Criteria:

Women receiving ANC and PNC care

  • all women who enroll in ANC -including pregnant adolescents
  • primary data analysis will be restricted to those women in the intervention and control facilities who present for ANC 1 before 24 weeks gestation and have attended more than 1 ANC visit at the health facility.

Providers • Currently provide antenatal or postnatal care

Individual exclusion Criteria:

Women receiving ANC and PNC care

  • women who present for ANC 1 after 24 weeks gestation
  • women who do not attend more than 1 ANC at the health facility will be excluded from the primary analysis

Providers

  • Providers that do not provide antenatal or postnatal care

Site-level exclusion criteria:

  • sites that have less than 2 ANC providers.

Site-level inclusion criteria:

  • Study sites that have at least 2 ANC providers were included in the final selection of 36 sites. The following are study sites by district:

Nyamasheke District Nyamasheke Kibingo Mugera Mwezi Karengera Kibogora Gisakura Yove

Nyarugenge District Cor-unum Biryogo Rugarama Kabusunzu

Rubavu District Murara Nyakiriba Busasamana Karambo Gisenyi Kigufi Mudende

Bugesera District Ruhuha Gakurazo Gashora Ngeruka Kamabuye Nyamata Ntarama Juru Mayange Nzangwa Nyarugenge

Burera District Cyanika Kirambo Ndongozi Gitare Gahunga Mucaca

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Factorial assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
26,381 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Standard ANC and PNC care only

    Standard care offered following national guidelines of ANC and PNC.

  • Other
    Standard Care + Ultrasound+Pregnancy Testing

    Standard care in combination with early pregnancy testing and ultrasound.

    Procedure: Ultrasound+Pregnancy Testing

  • Experimental
    Group ANC and PNC only

    Health facilities randomized to provide group ANC/PNC.

    Behavioral: Group ANC/PNC

  • Experimental
    Group Care + Ultrasound+Pregnancy Testing

    Group ANC and PNC care, in combination with early pregnancy testing and ultrasound.

    Behavioral: Group ANC/PNC · Procedure: Ultrasound+Pregnancy Testing

Interventions

  • BehavioralGroup ANC/PNC

    The primary intervention is group antenatal and postnatal care wherein women receive their care in a group with other women with similar due dates. After an initial individual visit all care is given in groups although the majority of the time is dedicated to facilitated discussion and women can come for additional acute care if needed. Group antenatal care will be three group visits between 20 and 40 weeks gestation and group postnatal care will be one group visit and approximately 6 weeks post delivery.

  • ProcedureUltrasound+Pregnancy Testing

    Half of all study sites will receive early pregnancy testing, conducted by community health workers at community level and ultrasound for gestational age dating and early screening at the health center. The primary analysis will not assess the effectiveness of this intervention.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Gestational Age

    Average gestational age at delivery among women who enroll in ANC before 24 weeks of gestation and had at least 2 ANC visits at that facility.

    Time frame: within the first 3 days after delivery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Preterm birth rate

    Proportion of preterm deliveries among mothers enrolled in ANC

    Time frame: At delivery

  2. Preterm 28-day and 42-day mortality rate

    28-day and 42-day mortality rate among preterm infants whose mother enrolled in ANC

    Time frame: 28 days and 42 days post delivery

  3. Women who adhered to four ANC visits

    Proportion of women who adhered to four ANC visits among all mothers who have received at least one ANC visit at facility.

    Time frame: From the day of first ANC visit at the health center until the day of delivery

  4. Adherence to 6 week postnatal visit

    Proportion of women who adhered to the 6-week PNC visit at the health center among those who attended at least 2 ANC at the facility.

    Time frame: 42 days post delivery

  5. 1st ANC visit during the first trimester

    Proportion of women with 1st ANC visit during the first trimester among those who have at least one ANC visit.

    Time frame: up to 14 weeks gestation

  6. High-risk Women

    Proportion of women identified during ANC as being high-risk

    Time frame: From the day of first ANC visit at the health center until the day of delivery

  7. C-section deliveries

    Proportion of pregnancies resulting in C-section deliveries among those enrolled in ANC at facility.

    Time frame: At Delivery

  8. Newborns with neonatal morbidities, specifically, jaundice, rapid breathing, fever, pneumonia, hypothermia, and/or cord infection

    Proportion of newborns with neonatal morbidities, specifically, jaundice, rapid breathing, fever, pneumonia, hypothermia, and/or cord infection, among all those whose mother received ANC at facility, and among all those who received PNC at facility.

    Time frame: 28 days post delivery

Other outcomes

  1. Cost-effectiveness

    Costs of ANC delivery and program costs will be collected prospectively, and costs associated with each adverse outcome that may be potentially averted will be calculated. Effectiveness measures will be: number of deliveries conducted by skilled health workers; total number of ANC visits, first ANC visit before 16 weeks and 4 standard ANC visits completed; and number of preterm births prevented.

    Time frame: Costs will be measured prospectively from baseline through the end of the intervention once sample size is achieve--approximately 18 months from baseline.

  2. Qualitative assessment of group care feasibility and acceptability to women and providers

    Qualitative work (in-depth interviews and focus group discussions) with women and providers to inform any fine tuning to the model will be conducted at 9 and 18 months after implementation.

    Time frame: up to 18 months

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Rwanda Biomedical Center
    Kigali, Rwanda
  • University of Rwanda
    Kigali, Rwanda
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Lincetto O, Mothebesoane-Anoh S, Gomez P, Munjanja S. Antenatal care. Chapter 2. Opportunities for Africa's Newborns.
  • Bhutta ZA, Das JK, Bahl R, Lawn JE, Salam RA, Paul VK, Sankar MJ, Blencowe H, Rizvi A, Chou VB, Walker N; Lancet Newborn Interventions Review Group; Lancet Every Newborn Study Group. Can available interventions end preventable deaths in mothers, newborn babies, and stillbirths, and at what cost? Lancet. 2014 Jul 26;384(9940):347-70. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60792-3. Epub 2014 May 19. PubMed 24853604 ↗
  • National Institute of Statistics of Rwanda. (2015). Demographic and Health Survey 2014-2015: Key Findings.
  • Ickovics JR, Kershaw TS, Westdahl C, Magriples U, Massey Z, Reynolds H, Rising SS. Group prenatal care and perinatal outcomes: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Aug;110(2 Pt 1):330-9. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000275284.24298.23. PubMed 17666608 ↗
  • Catling CJ, Medley N, Foureur M, Ryan C, Leap N, Teate A, Homer CS. Group versus conventional antenatal care for women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Feb 4;2015(2):CD007622. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007622.pub3. PubMed 25922865 ↗
  • Maternal Health Task Force, Harvard School of Public Health, et al. Group Care. Innovative Methods 2014.
  • Prost A, Colbourn T, Seward N, Azad K, Coomarasamy A, Copas A, Houweling TA, Fottrell E, Kuddus A, Lewycka S, MacArthur C, Manandhar D, Morrison J, Mwansambo C, Nair N, Nambiar B, Osrin D, Pagel C, Phiri T, Pulkki-Brannstrom AM, Rosato M, Skordis-Worrall J, Saville N, More NS, Shrestha B, Tripathy P, Wilson A, Costello A. Women's groups practising participatory learning and action to improve maternal and newborn health in low-resource settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2013 May 18;381(9879):1736-46. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60685-6. PubMed 23683640 ↗
  • Sayinzoga F, Lundeen T, Musange SF, Butrick E, Nzeyimana D, Murindahabi N, Azman-Firdaus H, Sloan NL, Benitez A, Phillips B, Ghosh R, Walker D. Assessing the impact of group antenatal care on gestational length in Rwanda: A cluster-randomized trial. PLoS One. 2021 Feb 2;16(2):e0246442. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246442. eCollection 2021. PubMed 33529256 ↗
  • Musange SF, Butrick E, Lundeen T, Santos N, Azman Firdaus H, Benitez A, Nzeyimana D, Kayiramirwa Murindahabi N, Nyiraneza L, Sayinzoga F, Ndahindwa V, Ngabo F, Condo J, Walker D. Group antenatal care versus standard antenatal care and effect on mean gestational age at birth in Rwanda: protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial. Gates Open Res. 2019 Sep 27;3:1548. doi: 10.12688/gatesopenres.13053.1. eCollection 2019. PubMed 31656954 ↗
  • Lundeen T, Musange S, Azman H, Nzeyimana D, Murindahabi N, Butrick E, Walker D. Nurses' and midwives' experiences of providing group antenatal and postnatal care at 18 health centers in Rwanda: A mixed methods study. PLoS One. 2019 Jul 11;14(7):e0219471. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219471. eCollection 2019. PubMed 31295335 ↗
  • Musabyimana A, Lundeen T, Butrick E, Sayinzoga F, Rwabufigiri BN, Walker D, Musange SF. Before and after implementation of group antenatal care in Rwanda: a qualitative study of women's experiences. Reprod Health. 2019 Jun 27;16(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s12978-019-0750-5. PubMed 31248425 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — Data from the study will be shared, but the extent to which individual participant data can be shared is yet to be determined. This will be done to the extent possible, conforming to any partner requirements or Rwanda IRB requirements.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from May 2017 to primary completion in May 2019, 24 months.

Of 133 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Pregnancy Complications, half reached primary completion within 29 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 48. This study's 24 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 133 studies reached it within 29 months; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 48.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 14, 2017
First posted
May 16, 2017
StartActual
May 15, 2017
Primary completionActual
May 31, 2019
CompletionActual
May 31, 2019
Last update
Jun 25, 2019
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 25, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03154177
Collaborators
University of Rwanda, Rwanda Biomedical Centre, Ministry of Health, Rwanda
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 16, 2017
Start date
May 15, 2017
Primary completion
May 31, 2019
Completion
May 31, 2019
Last update
Jun 25, 2019

Study contacts

Dilys Walker, MD
principal investigator · University of California, San Francisco
Sabine F Musange, MD, MSc
principal investigator · University of Rwanda

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion