CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT03153956Updated Mar 24, 2020Results posted

Efficacy of AposTherapy® in Knee OA

An interventional study of Calibrated AposTherapy® and Non-Calibrated Sham Apos Therapy Device in Osteoarthritis, Knee, sponsored by NYU Langone Health. Terminated at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 45 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-03-24.

Sponsored by NYU Langone Health · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Halt in funding

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 2 years after the study started (first participant enrolled Apr 2015, registered May 2017).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
77
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
45 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

A prospective, interventional, randomized, double-arm clinical evaluation study to examine the efficacy of AposTherapy® versus a control group, in the short-term at 6 months and in the long-term at 12 months post-treatment, with the primary efficacy assessment based on improvement in knee pain score and improvement in function in patients following diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis (OA).

02

Conditions studied

  • Osteoarthritis, Knee

Keywords

  • AposTherapy® System
  • Osteoarthritis
  • Total knee arthroplasties
  • Degenerative joint disease
03

In context

Osteoarthritis

4,398 studies on the registry are indexed under Osteoarthritis; 582 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 77 is close to the median of 70 across 3,440 interventional studies indexed under Osteoarthritis.

Browse Osteoarthritis studies →

Lead sponsor

NYU Langone Health is the lead sponsor of 1,391 studies on the registry; 254 are open to participants now.

Of its 227 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 191 (84%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
45 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients suffering from symptomatic unilateral or bilateral knee OA at the medial compartment for at least six months;
  • Fulfilling the ACR clinical criteria;
  • Having radiographically assessed OA of the knee with a Kellgren-Lawrence grade more than or equal to grade 2; and,
  • Having VAS-Pain ≥ 3, on a scale between 0-10.
  • Patients who have a shoe size between US 4 and US 12

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients suffering from acute septic arthritis.
  • Patients who received a corticosteroid injection within 3 months of the study.
  • Patients who received hyaluronic acid (HA) injections within 6 months of the study
  • Patients suffering from avascular necrosis of the knee.
  • Patients with a history of knee buckling or recent knee injury.
  • Patients who have had a joint replacement or other major surgery to the knee, hip or ankle (ipsilateral or contralateral side).
  • Patients suffering from neuropathic arthropathy.
  • Patients with an increased tendency to fall.
  • Patients exhibiting a lack of physical or mental ability to perform or comply with the study procedure.
  • Patients with a history of pathological osteoporotic fracture.
  • Patients suffering from symptomatic degenerative arthritis in lower limb joints other than the knees.
  • Patients with referred pain in the knees from primary back or hip joint pain.
  • Patients with neurological deficits to the lower extremity (ex. foot drop)
  • Patients whose shoe size is less than US 4 and greater than US 12
  • Patients who have had arthroscopy within 6 months of the study
  • Patients with inflammatory arthropathy
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
77 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Active Treatment Arm

    Personally calibrated bio-mechanical device

    Device: Calibrated AposTherapy®

  • Placebo comparator
    Control Arm

    sham-placebo device (similar shoes without bio-mechanical elements).

    Device: Non-Calibrated Sham Apos Therapy Device

Interventions

  • DeviceCalibrated AposTherapy®

    a biomechanical device including 2 hemispheric biomechanical elements attached to a platform in a form of a shoe. the biomechanical device is calibrated to each patient by a physiotherapist specialized with the treatment methodology.

  • DeviceNon-Calibrated Sham Apos Therapy Device

    The comparator group will receive a non-calibrated sham device.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Western Ontario and McMaster University (WOMAC) Total Score

    WOMAC evaluates the condition of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee and hip, including pain, stiffness, and physical functioning of the joints. In this study, WOMAC scores were recomputed as the sum within sub-scales (pain score is the sum of questions 1-5; stiffness is the sum of questions 6-7; functional score is the sum of questions 8-24). The total score is reported as the sum of the pain, stiffness, and functional sub-scores for all participants. The total score range is 0-1292. Higher scores on the WOMAC indicate worse pain, stiffness, and functional limitations.

    Time frame: screening, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Visual Analog Score (VAS) Score

    The visual analogue scale or visual analog scale (VAS) is a psychometric response scale which can be used in questionnaires. It is a measurement instrument for subjective characteristics or attitudes that cannot be directly measured.

    Time frame: 12 Months

  2. Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Total Score

    The Short Form (36) Health Survey is a 36-item, patient-reported survey of patient health. The survey consists eight scaled scores; the scores are weighted sums of the questions in each section. Scores range from 0-100, with lower scores = more disability and higher scores = less disability. Therefore, higher scores represent better health.

    Time frame: screening, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months

07

Results

Posted Mar 24, 2020

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneActive Treatment ArmControl Arm
Started3938
Completed3938
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryWestern Ontario and McMaster University (WOMAC) Total Score

WOMAC evaluates the condition of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee and hip, including pain, stiffness, and physical functioning of the joints. In this study, WOMAC scores were recomputed as the sum within sub-scales (pain score is the sum of questions 1-5; stiffness is the sum of questions 6-7; functional score is the sum of questions 8-24). The total score is reported as the sum of the pain, stiffness, and functional sub-scores for all participants. The total score range is 0-1292. Higher scores on the WOMAC indicate worse pain, stiffness, and functional limitations.

Time frame:
screening, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Western Ontario and McMaster University (WOMAC) Total Score
score on a scaleActive Treatment ArmControl Arm
WOMAC Total score - screen1062.7 ± 545.96975.1 ± 580.87
WOMAC Total score - 3 months548.8 ± 440.22601.1 ± 467.39
WOMAC Total Score - 6 months420.2 ± 391.7524.8 ± 448.83
WOMAC Total Score - 9 months—280.2 ± 194.84
WOMAC Total Score - 12 months396.5 ± 324.99433 ± 352.32
SecondaryVisual Analog Score (VAS) Score

The visual analogue scale or visual analog scale (VAS) is a psychometric response scale which can be used in questionnaires. It is a measurement instrument for subjective characteristics or attitudes that cannot be directly measured.

Time frame:
12 Months

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryShort-Form 36 (SF-36) Total Score

The Short Form (36) Health Survey is a 36-item, patient-reported survey of patient health. The survey consists eight scaled scores; the scores are weighted sums of the questions in each section. Scores range from 0-100, with lower scores = more disability and higher scores = less disability. Therefore, higher scores represent better health.

Time frame:
screening, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Total Score
score on a scaleActive Treatment ArmControl Arm
SF-36 total score - screening55.6 ± 15.0356.6 ± 16.77
SF-36 total score - 3 months64.6 ± 16.863.0 ± 17.09
SF-36 total score - 6 months69.7 ± 14.868 ± 17.21
SF-36 total score - 9 months—74.5 ± 6.37
SF-36 total score - 12 month71 ± 9.7766.6 ± 15.38

Adverse events

Collected over 12 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Active Treatment Arm0/39 (0%)0/39 (0%)0/39 (0%)
Control Arm0/38 (0%)0/38 (0%)0/38 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Active Treatment ArmControl ArmTotal
Mean62 ± 961 ± 8.261 ± 8.6
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Active Treatment ArmControl ArmTotal
Female272754
Male121123
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)Active Treatment ArmControl ArmTotal
Count of participants——0
08

Study locations

1 site
  • New York University School of Medicine
    New York, New York 10016, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Jun 23, 2015

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 24, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03153956
Lead sponsor
NYU Langone Health
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 15, 2017
Start date
Apr 16, 2015
Primary completion
Nov 15, 2018
Completion
Nov 15, 2018
Results posted
Mar 24, 2020
Last update
Mar 24, 2020

Study contacts

Dennis Cardone, DO
principal investigator · NYU Langone Health

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Mar 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion