CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03145792Updated Mar 30, 2025

Online Coping Skills Counseling for Problem Gambling and Trauma

An interventional study of Seeking Safety and CBT for Pathological Gambling in Gambling Disorder, Trauma, Psychological and Problem Gambling, sponsored by University of Windsor. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-03-30.

Sponsored by University of Windsor · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
65
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This randomized controlled trial examines the efficacy of two behavioral therapies. Seeking Safety, which addresses co-occurring problem gambling (PG) and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), is being compared to Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for PG, which addresses only PG. Both models are delivered via telehealth.

Read the detailed description

Our key study question is whether an integrated focus on PG and PTSD (Seeking Safety; SS) offers a useful new option for clinical care compared to a purely problem gambling approach (Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for PG; CBT-PG). This question-the impact of integrated versus non-integrated treatment for co-occurring disorders-is one of the key issues in the field currently and has never been studied in relation to PG and PTSD.

Our aims are:

  1. To conduct an RCT of SS versus CBT-PG in a sample of 84 people with current PG and PTSD (full or subthreshold).
  2. To evaluate outcomes from baseline to end of treatment and 12 month followup on two primary variables (money lost gambling and number of gambling sessions) and several secondary variables.

Our hypotheses are: (a) SS will do no worse than CBT-PG on the primary PG outcomes as both treatments are designed to address addiction; i.e., both will show improvement from baseline to end of treatment and maintenance of gains through the followup. (b) SS will show superior results on trauma symptoms as SS is designed to address those, whereas CBT-PG is not.

02

Conditions studied

  • Gambling Disorder
  • Trauma, Psychological
  • Problem Gambling
  • Posttraumatic Stress Disorder
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18 and over
  • Recruited from the province of Manitoba, Canada
  • Meets criteria for PTSD (full or subthreshold) on the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS)
  • Meets gambling disorder criteria per the DSM-5 Diagnostic Interview of Gambling Severity

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current uncontrolled psychotic or bipolar I disorder
  • Suicidal or homicidal ideation with intent and/or plan
  • Currently engaging in or planning to engage in any manualized, formal, evidence-based PTSD therapy
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
65 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Seeking Safety

    Behavioral therapy for trauma and addiction.

    Behavioral: Seeking Safety

  • Active comparator
    CBT for Pathological Gambling

    Behavioral therapy for gambling problems.

    Behavioral: CBT for Pathological Gambling

Interventions

  • BehavioralSeeking Safety

    Seeking Safety (SS) is a present-focused, evidence-based cognitive-behavioral therapy for trauma and/or addiction. It offers safe coping skills and education relevant to both problem areas.

  • BehavioralCBT for Pathological Gambling

    Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Pathological Gambling (CBT-PG) is an evidence-based therapy for gambling problems. It focuses on cognitive correction, problem solving, social skills and relapse prevention.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Money spent gambling

    Change from baseline in amount of money spent gambling in the past month

    Time frame: 6-weeks (mid-treatment), 12-weeks (end-of-treatment), and 12-months

  2. Number of gambling sessions

    Change from baseline in number of days in the past month during which gambling occurred

    Time frame: 6-weeks (mid-treatment), 12-weeks (end-of-treatment), and 12-months

Secondary outcomes

  1. PTSD Checklist (PCL) scores

    Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms

    Time frame: 6-weeks (mid-treatment), 12-weeks (end-of-treatment), and 12-months

  2. Trauma Symptom Checklist 40

    Change in baseline in broad trauma-related symptoms

    Time frame: 6-weeks (mid-treatment), 12-weeks (end-of-treatment), and 12-months

  3. Brief Symptom Inventory-18 scores

    Change from baseline in general psychiatric symptoms

    Time frame: 6-weeks (mid-treatment), 12-weeks (end-of-treatment), and 12-months

  4. Brief Addiction Monitor scores

    Change from baseline in substance use and associated problems

    Time frame: 6-weeks (mid-treatment), 12-weeks (end-of-treatment), and 12-months

06

Study locations

1 site
  • Treatment Innovations
    Newton Center, Massachusetts 02459, United States
07

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03145792
Lead sponsor
University of Windsor
Collaborators
Manitoba Gambling Research Program, Treatment Innovations, University of Manitoba
Responsible party
David Ledgerwood (Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Windsor) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 9, 2017
Start date
Oct 1, 2016
Primary completion
Jun 2021
Completion
Jun 2021
Last update
Mar 30, 2025

Study contacts

David M Ledgerwood, PhD
principal investigator · University of Windsor
Lisa Najavits, PhD
study director · Treatment Innovations

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion