CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03139669HPVhometestUpdated Sep 24, 2024Results posted

Cultural Acceptability and Feasibility of HPV Cervical Self Collection Aided by Lay Navigators

An interventional study of Viba collection brush in Human Papilloma Virus, sponsored by University of Virginia. Completed. Open to female participants aged 30 Years to 65 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-09-24.

Sponsored by University of Virginia · Not applicable, Interventional, and Screening

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
45
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
30 Years to 65 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Invasive cervical cancer incidence and mortality can be dramatically reduced through early detection and treatment, but many women do not complete screening at recommended intervals. Many low-income women in Virginia remain uninsured and are at significant risk of being medically underserved and failing to complete regular cervical cancer screening. At-home self-collection of specimens for HPV testing is an innovative approach that may increase access to cervical cancer screening in populations that do not participate in traditional clinic-based screening. The proposed community based participatory study aims to determine whether offering at-home self-collection for HPV testing through a lay navigator network is an acceptable and feasible method to increase access to cervical cancer screening for under-screened women in the Tobacco Footprint in rural far Southwest Virginia (Health Districts 1, 2 and 3). The procedures will be recruitment of under-screened women in Health Districts 1, 2 and 3 of Southwest Virginia to complete HPV testing using self-collection kits distributed by lay navigators. Regardless of HPV positivity, all women will be provided with information about cervical cancer screening (locations, cost, etc.), and will be encouraged to complete Pap screening by a clinician.

Read the detailed description

The catchment area for the University of Virginia Health System and Emily Couric Clinical Cancer Center (EC4) extends throughout Southwest Virginia and into neighboring West Virginia, encompassing a portion of Appalachia. State-wide incidence of cervical cancer was 6.6 cases per 100,000 from 2005-2009, but variation exists county by county: Cumberland (Health District 2), Roanoke, and Southside were among those with the highest incidence. The significant decrease in cervical cancer incidence and mortality rates in the US and in Virginia since 1950 is directly attributed to increased early detection and screening. The Virginia Department of Health's Comprehensive Cancer Control Program found that patient level barriers to screening for women in this region include lower education, lower income, and lack of health insurance. Systems-level barriers in this region include decreased access to screening services, financial barriers, and transportation barriers. This study will assess a novel approach to addressing patient level and systems-level barriers to accessing cervical cancer screening in Virginia Health Districts 1, 2 and 3, and utilizes an innovative technology (self-collection for HPV testing) and delivery model (distributed by lay navigators).

Self-collection for HPV testing paired with a community health worker program is a model that has been found to have great utility in accessing at risk women in several rural and remote areas around the world. Community health workers often have training in a variety of health issues and conditions. Patient navigators trained in cervical cancer screening and treatment specifically have been utilized to understand patient barriers to in-clinic screening. The lay navigator program the investigators will work with in Virginia Health Districts 1, 2 and 3 involves cancer-specific training (including but not limited to cervical cancer training), and training on facilitating access to screening and treatment resources available in Health Districts 1, 2 and 3, as well as at the University of Virginia Health System. Lay navigators are therefore uniquely poised to provide education to women around the use of HPV self-collection, and to navigate women to in-clinic Pap screening, treatment, and support services as needed.

Reach of Current Lay Navigators Trained using the "Understanding Cancer" curriculum (developed by partners listed above), lay navigators in Russell County (Cumberland Health District) reported 312 encounters between 2/10/14 and 12/17/14 classified as "preventative" specific to breast cancer. Between 1/23/14 and 9/24/14, navigators across Lenowisco Health District provided 233 cancer-related encounters, including navigation services for 4 women diagnosed with cervical cancer. The lay navigator program has the potential to be a rich resources for community based research in Southwest Virginia.

Protocol Development Dr. Mitchell was a Co-I on the NCI-funded project P30CA044579 (PI: Thomas Loughran, MD, 2014-2015). Through this work, the investigators developed a list of key stakeholders, which will be consulted in Phases I and II of this study. Additionally, the community advisory board (CAB) of the Cancer Center Without Walls initiative will be consulted throughout protocol development.

Dr. Mitchell developed a collaboration with Dr. Jennifer S. Smith, Associate Professor of Epidemiology at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Dr. Smith and her research team have extensive experience and expertise with HPV screening and prevention, specifically exploring delivery models for HPV self-collection in medically underserved areas of North Carolina. Dr. Smith and the research team have conducted multiple previous studies assessing the acceptability, feasibility, and validity of HPV self-collection. Through these studies, the investigators have identified brush designs that are minimally invasive, well-accepted, and effective for self-collection and sample preservation media that is non-toxic, safe for mailing, and stable at a range of temperatures; and have developed well-validated, field-tested illustrated instructions for self-collection that are comprehensible to low-literacy women.

02

Conditions studied

  • Human Papilloma Virus

Browse trials for

03

In context

Papilloma

234 studies on the registry are indexed under Papilloma; 28 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 45 is below the median of 100 across 159 interventional studies indexed under Papilloma.

Browse Papilloma studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Virginia is the lead sponsor of 653 studies on the registry; 134 are open to participants now.

Of its 60 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 41 (68%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
30 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • 30-65 years old
  • Female
  • Live in southwest VA
  • Not pregnant-self reported

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of Papanicolaou test in the last 3 years
  • History of hysterectomy or pelvic radiation
  • Co-testing (pap test and HPV test at the same time) in the last 5 years
  • English speaking
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Screening
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
45 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    HPV home testing kit

    The procedures will be recruitment of under-screened women in Health Districts 1, 2 and 3 of Southwest Virginia to complete HPV home testing using self-collection kits distributed by lay navigators. Regardless of HPV positivity, all women will be provided with information about cervical cancer screening (locations, cost, etc.), and will be encouraged to complete Pap screening by a clinician.

    Device: Viba collection brush

Interventions

  • DeviceViba collection brush

    HPV home collection kit using the viba collection brush to collect cervical cells for HPV DNA testing.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Acceptability of At-home Self-collection for HPV Testing Among Under-screened Women in Southwest Virginia.

    ACCEPTABILITY was measured through: uptake of self-collection kit (yes/n).

    Time frame: 1 month

Secondary outcomes

  1. Feasibility of Utilizing Lay Navigators to Offer At-home HPV Self-collection as a Strategy to Increase Cervical Cancer Screening Among Under-screened Women in Southwest Virginia.

    FEASIBILITY was measured by: uptake of self-collection kits (y/n), and whether that sample was sufficient for processing a result. If acceptability (uptake) was high but sufficiency of sample collection was low, there would be decreased feasibility of this approach.

    Time frame: 1 month

07

Results

Posted Sep 24, 2024

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneHPV Home Testing Kit
Started45
Completed45
Not completed0

Outcome measures

PrimaryAcceptability of At-home Self-collection for HPV Testing Among Under-screened Women in Southwest Virginia.

ACCEPTABILITY was measured through: uptake of self-collection kit (yes/n).

Time frame:
1 month
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Acceptability of At-home Self-collection for HPV Testing Among Under-screened Women in Southwest Virginia.
ParticipantsHPV Home Testing Kit
Acceptability of At-home Self-collection for HPV Testing Among Under-screened Women in Southwest Virginia.45
SecondaryFeasibility of Utilizing Lay Navigators to Offer At-home HPV Self-collection as a Strategy to Increase Cervical Cancer Screening Among Under-screened Women in Southwest Virginia.

FEASIBILITY was measured by: uptake of self-collection kits (y/n), and whether that sample was sufficient for processing a result. If acceptability (uptake) was high but sufficiency of sample collection was low, there would be decreased feasibility of this approach.

Time frame:
1 month
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Feasibility of Utilizing Lay Navigators to Offer At-home HPV Self-collection as a Strategy to Increase Cervical Cancer Screening Among Under-screened Women in Southwest Virginia.
ParticipantsHPV Home Testing Kit
HPV self-collection kit uptake, sufficient sample to process a result42
HPV self-collection kit uptake, insufficient sample collected to process a result3

Adverse events

Collected over 1 year. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
HPV Home Testing Kit0/45 (0%)0/45 (0%)0/45 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)HPV Home Testing Kit
<=18 years0
Between 18 and 65 years45
>=65 years0
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)HPV Home Testing Kit
Median44.8 (31 to 62)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)HPV Home Testing Kit
Female45
Male0
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)HPV Home Testing Kit
Smoking Status (Current Smoker)
Smoking Status (Current Smoker)(Participants)HPV Home Testing Kit
Current Smoker28
Non-Smoker17
Seen healthcare provider in last year (yes/no)
Seen healthcare provider in last year (yes/no)(Participants)HPV Home Testing Kit
Have seen a healthcare provider in the last year30
Have not seen a healthcare provider in the last year11
Missing4
08

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

09

References and documents

Publications

  • Ackerson K, Gretebeck K. Factors influencing cancer screening practices of underserved women. J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2007 Nov;19(11):591-601. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7599.2007.00268.x. PubMed 17970859 ↗
  • Arbyn M, Sasieni P, Meijer CJ, Clavel C, Koliopoulos G, Dillner J. Chapter 9: Clinical applications of HPV testing: a summary of meta-analyses. Vaccine. 2006 Aug 31;24 Suppl 3:S3/78-89. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.05.117. PubMed 16950021 ↗
  • Arbyn M, Verdoodt F, Snijders PJ, Verhoef VM, Suonio E, Dillner L, Minozzi S, Bellisario C, Banzi R, Zhao FH, Hillemanns P, Anttila A. Accuracy of human papillomavirus testing on self-collected versus clinician-collected samples: a meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2014 Feb;15(2):172-83. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70570-9. Epub 2014 Jan 14. PubMed 24433684 ↗
  • Racey CS, Withrow DR, Gesink D. Self-collected HPV testing improves participation in cervical cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Can J Public Health. 2013 Feb 11;104(2):e159-66. doi: 10.1007/BF03405681. PubMed 23618210 ↗
  • Gravitt PE, Belinson JL, Salmeron J, Shah KV. Looking ahead: a case for human papillomavirus testing of self-sampled vaginal specimens as a cervical cancer screening strategy. Int J Cancer. 2011 Aug 1;129(3):517-27. doi: 10.1002/ijc.25974. PubMed 21384341 ↗
  • Balasubramanian A, Kulasingam SL, Baer A, Hughes JP, Myers ER, Mao C, Kiviat NB, Koutsky LA. Accuracy and cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer screening by high-risk human papillomavirus DNA testing of self-collected vaginal samples. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2010 Jul;14(3):185-95. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0b013e3181cd6d36. PubMed 20592553 ↗
  • Kobetz E, Kish JK, Campos NG, Koru-Sengul T, Bishop I, Lipshultz H, Barton B, Barbee L. Burden of Human Papillomavirus among Haitian Immigrants in Miami, Florida: Community-Based Participatory Research in Action. J Oncol. 2012;2012:728397. doi: 10.1155/2012/728397. Epub 2012 Mar 15. PubMed 22619675 ↗
  • Mandigo M, Frett B, Laurent JR, Bishop I, Raymondville M, Marsh S, Kobetz E. Pairing community health workers with HPV self-sampling for cervical cancer prevention in rural Haiti. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015 Mar;128(3):206-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2014.09.016. Epub 2014 Nov 11. PubMed 25468050 ↗
  • Ely GE, White C, Jones K, Feltner F, Gomez M, Shelton B, Slone S, Van Meter E, Desimone C, Schoenberg N, Dignan M. Cervical cancer screening: exploring Appalachian patients' barriers to follow-up care. Soc Work Health Care. 2014;53(2):83-95. doi: 10.1080/00981389.2013.827149. PubMed 24483330 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Aug 27, 2019
  • Informed consent form · Jun 28, 2016

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 24, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03139669
Lead sponsor
University of Virginia
Responsible party
Emma McKim Mitchell (PhD, University of Virginia) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 4, 2017
Start date
Jul 2016
Primary completion
Aug 29, 2019
Completion
Aug 29, 2019
Results posted
Sep 24, 2024
Last update
Sep 24, 2024

Study contacts

Emma Mitchell, PhD
principal investigator · Faculty

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion