CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT03112720Updated Jun 22, 2023Results posted

Therapeutic Epidural Patch Versus Pain Block in the Midface for Headache

A Phase 3 interventional study of Epidural Blood Patch and Sphenopalatine Ganglion Block in Postdural Puncture Headache, sponsored by Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey. Terminated at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 13 Years to 92 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-06-22.

Sponsored by Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
no enrollment after covid pandemic
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
8
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
13 Years to 92 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to compare a pain block in the midface, versus the traditional, more invasive, therapeutic epidural patch for the treatment of headaches

Read the detailed description

The sphenopalatine nerve block has been used to treat headaches. Patients have headaches after epidural access from post dural puncture. We need to know if sphenopalatine nerve block will help the patient with the headache.

02

Conditions studied

  • Postdural Puncture Headache
03

In context

Post-Dural Puncture Headache

125 studies on the registry are indexed under Post-Dural Puncture Headache; 25 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 8 is below the median of 80 across 82 interventional studies indexed under Post-Dural Puncture Headache.

Browse Post-Dural Puncture Headache studies →

Lead sponsor

Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey is the lead sponsor of 496 studies on the registry; 130 are open to participants now.

Of its 38 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 30 (79%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
13 Years to 92 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Males and females ages 13-92
  • Subjects have medical diagnosis of PDPH and require treatment
  • Subjects who signed consent/assent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • \<13 years of age
  • Pregnancy
  • Subjects with heart failure
  • Subjects already being treated with lidocaine patch or other vehicle for chronic pain
  • Non-english speaking subjects
  • Subjects with platelets \<100,000
  • Subjects that are septic
  • Subjects with an allergy to lidocaine
  • Subjects with known nasal polyps
  • Subjects with recent neurological event
  • Subjects on anticoagulant therapy
  • Subjects that received prior therapy with SPG block or EBP
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
8 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Epidural blood patch

    20ml of sterile blood is obtained from the patients arm and placed in the epidural space using standard sterile epidural access.

    Device: Epidural Blood Patch

  • Experimental
    Sphenopalatine Ganglion Block

    Cotton tip applicators are used to deliver lidocaine to the posterior nares in the area of skin overlying the Sphenopalatine gangion

    Drug: Sphenopalatine Ganglion Block

Interventions

  • DeviceEpidural Blood Patch

    A device: 17 gauge Tuohy needle will be placed to the epidural space using the loss of resistance technique. Once positioned a sterile stylet will be replaced within the needle to maintain the sterility of the epidural space. A tourniquet may be used to identify a peripheral venous site, which will be sterilely prepped with betadine x3 and then chloraprep. Venipuncture will be performed with a device: 20gauge or larger needle. 20mL of blood will be aspirated in a sterile system into an appropriately sized syringe. After sterile transfer, this autologous blood will be slowly injected into the epidural space.

  • DrugSphenopalatine Ganglion Block

    The drug: 5% lidocaine ointment, a local anesthetic, will be applied to the end of a device: long channeled cotton tipped applicator inserted into both nares and placed over the mucosa in the area of posterior aspect of the middle ethmoid, toward the presumed anatomic location of the sphenopalatine ganglion, evidenced by a slight resistance at the appropriate depth. 5mL of drug: 1% lidocaine solution will then be injected into the hollow shaft of the device: applicator and allowed to topically anesthetize the ganglion by gravity flow for 30 minutes.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Headaches With a VAS Score >8/10 Prior to Initiation of Either Therapy

    Outcome measure will entail recording patient self-reported pain scores to quantify the level of headache pain using the Visual analog scale, meaning 0 - No pain, 1-3 - Mild Pain, 4-6 - Moderate Pain, 7-10 - Severe Pain, by way of in person assessment by pain questionnaire just prior to initiation of either therapy (Epidural blood patch vs Sphenopalatine Ganglion Block).

    Time frame: Prior to initiation of therapy (Epidural blood patch vs Sphenopalatine Ganglion Block).

  2. Number of Participants With a Headache Vas 8/10 at 30 Minutes Following Either Therapy.

    Self-reported pain scores to quantify the level of headache pain using the Visual analog scale (as defined within the description of outcome 1 above) by way of in person assessment by pain questionnaire at 30 minutes following either therapy (Epidural blood patch vs Sphenopalatine Ganglion Block).

    Time frame: At 30 minutes following either therapy.

  3. Number of Participants With a Headache Vas 8/10 at 60 Minutes Following Either Therapy.

    Self-reported pain scores to quantify the level of headache pain using the Visual analog scale (as defined within the description of outcome 1 above) by way of in person assessment by pain questionnaire at 60 minutes following either therapy (Epidural blood patch vs Sphenopalatine Ganglion Block).

    Time frame: At 60 minutes following either therapy.

07

Results

Posted Jun 22, 2023

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneEpidural Blood Patch GroupSphenopalatine Ganglion Block Group
Started53
Completed53
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Headaches With a VAS Score >8/10 Prior to Initiation of Either Therapy

Outcome measure will entail recording patient self-reported pain scores to quantify the level of headache pain using the Visual analog scale, meaning 0 - No pain, 1-3 - Mild Pain, 4-6 - Moderate Pain, 7-10 - Severe Pain, by way of in person assessment by pain questionnaire just prior to initiation of either therapy (Epidural blood patch vs Sphenopalatine Ganglion Block).

Time frame:
Prior to initiation of therapy (Epidural blood patch vs Sphenopalatine Ganglion Block).
Reported as:
Number · headache with VAS >8/10
Number of Headaches With a VAS Score >8/10 Prior to Initiation of Either Therapy
headache with VAS >8/10Epidural Blood Patch GroupSphenopalatine Ganglion Block Group
Number of Headaches With a VAS Score >8/10 Prior to Initiation of Either Therapy11
PrimaryNumber of Participants With a Headache Vas 8/10 at 30 Minutes Following Either Therapy.

Self-reported pain scores to quantify the level of headache pain using the Visual analog scale (as defined within the description of outcome 1 above) by way of in person assessment by pain questionnaire at 30 minutes following either therapy (Epidural blood patch vs Sphenopalatine Ganglion Block).

Time frame:
At 30 minutes following either therapy.
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With a Headache Vas 8/10 at 30 Minutes Following Either Therapy.
ParticipantsEpidural Blood Patch GroupSphenopalatine Ganglion Block Group
Number of Participants With a Headache Vas 8/10 at 30 Minutes Following Either Therapy.11
PrimaryNumber of Participants With a Headache Vas 8/10 at 60 Minutes Following Either Therapy.

Self-reported pain scores to quantify the level of headache pain using the Visual analog scale (as defined within the description of outcome 1 above) by way of in person assessment by pain questionnaire at 60 minutes following either therapy (Epidural blood patch vs Sphenopalatine Ganglion Block).

Time frame:
At 60 minutes following either therapy.
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With a Headache Vas 8/10 at 60 Minutes Following Either Therapy.
ParticipantsEpidural Blood Patch GroupSphenopalatine Ganglion Block Group
Number of Participants With a Headache Vas 8/10 at 60 Minutes Following Either Therapy.10
Statistical analysis
  • Epidural Blood Patch Group vs Sphenopalatine Ganglion Block Group · Chi-squared · p = <0.01 · Odds ratio (or): 1.5

Adverse events

Collected over 48 hours. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Epidural Blood Patch Group0/5 (0%)0/5 (0%)0/5 (0%)
Sphenopalatine Ganglion Block Group0/3 (0%)0/3 (0%)0/3 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Epidural Blood PatchSphenopalatine Ganglion BlockTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years538
>=65 years000
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Epidural Blood PatchSphenopalatine Ganglion BlockTotal
Mean30.4 (27 to 33)24.3 (23 to 34)29.25 (23 to 34)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Epidural Blood PatchSphenopalatine Ganglion BlockTotal
Female538
Male000
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)Epidural Blood PatchSphenopalatine Ganglion BlockTotal
Count of participants——0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Epidural Blood PatchSphenopalatine Ganglion BlockTotal
United States538
08

Study locations

2 sites
  • New Jersey Pain Center
    New Brunswick, New Jersey 08901, United States
  • RWJUH/Barnabus
    New Brunswick, New Jersey 08901, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Oct 5, 2021
  • Informed consent form · Oct 13, 2021

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 22, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03112720
Lead sponsor
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Collaborators
New Jersey Medical School
Responsible party
William Grubb, M.D. (Clinical Associate Professor, Anesthesia, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 13, 2017
Start date
Sep 2016
Primary completion
Sep 2020
Completion
Sep 2020
Results posted
Jun 22, 2023
Last update
Jun 22, 2023

Study contacts

William Grubb, DDS, MD
principal investigator · Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Jun 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion