An interventional study of Magnetically Enhanced Diffusion (MED) and MED Workstation Magnet Sham Control in Stroke, Acute, Stroke, Ischemic and Infarction, Middle Cerebral Artery, sponsored by Pulse Therapeutics. Suspended at 2 sites in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-01-28.
Sponsored by Pulse Therapeutics · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
The objective of the MEDIS study is to determine if subjects experiencing an Acute Ischaemic Stroke due to large vessel occlusion, treated with IV tPA combined with the MED procedure have a greater likelihood of recanalisation 30-90 minutes after the completion of tPA infusion than subjects treated with IV tPA (plus sham device). Safety of the MED System Procedure will be evaluated by the incidence of symptomatic PH-2 haemorrhagic transformation within 24 hours following the procedure. Lastly, a health economics study will be conducted to estimate health care costs for each treatment.
The study is a global, multicentre prospective, randomised, single blind, blinded endpoint study comparing rates of early recanalisation (defined by mAOL) in Acute Ischaemic Stroke (AIS) subjects with visible occlusion who are treated with either IV tPA plus sham device or IV tPA in combination with the MED System procedure.
The study population will be randomised 1:1 into two arms:
The ETG will receive IV tPA and the complete MED System procedure consisting of MED MicroBeads and the MED Workstation magnet procedure. The SCG will not receive MED MicroBeads while the MED Workstation will be activated as a Sham control. Subjects will be blinded to treatment arm. Stratification will be performed based upon baseline age and location of the occlusion (Middle Cerebral Artery segments M1, M2, or Carotid Terminus).
Exclusion Criteria:
Imaging Exclusion Criteria:
The Experimental Treatment will receive the complete MED System Procedure consisting of MED MicroBeads and the MED Workstation magnet procedure for 60 minutes in addition to IV tissue plasminogen activator (tPA or Alteplase).
Device: Magnetically Enhanced Diffusion (MED)
The MED Workstation Magnet Sham Comparator will not receive MED MicroBeads while the MED Workstation Magnet will be activated as a Sham control for 60 minutes in addition to IV tissue plasminogen activator (tPA or Alteplase).
Device: MED Workstation Magnet Sham Control
Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke with IV tPA and the adjunctive Magnetically Enhanced Diffusion (MED) System Procedure.
Also known as: MED Workstation, MED MicroBeads
Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke with IV tPA and Sham use of the MED Workstation only, without the injection of MED MicroBeads.
Primary Performance: Early Recanalisation 60 +/- 30 minutes after IV tPA completion
Early recanalisation (Arterial Occlusive Lesion \[mAOL\] score) assessed from a blinded evaluation of Computed Tomographic Angiography (CTA) imaging of the primary lesion 60+/- 30 minutes after completion of tPA infusion. An ordinal shift analysis of the mAOL score distribution between the Sham Control and MED System Procedure arms will be conducted.
Time frame: 60 +/- 30 minutes after completion of IV tPA administration.
Primary Safety: Incidence of Symptomatic Type 2 Parenchymal (PH-2) Haemorrhagic Transformation
Incidence of symptomatic PH-2 haemorrhagic transformation at 24 ± 6 hours post randomisation as determined by NCCT combined with a neurological deterioration that includes an increase of 4 points or more on the NIHSS from baseline or the lowest NIHSS value between baseline and 24 hours, or leading to death.
Time frame: 24 ± 6 Hours after treatment
Secondary Clinical Performance Endpoint: Neurological outcome mRS at 90 days
Neurological outcome as defined by modified Rankin score (mRS) at 90 days.
Time frame: 90 days after randomisation
Secondary Technical Clinical Performance Endpoint: Cerebral Infarct volume at 24 Hours
Volume of cerebral infarction as measured by Non-Contrast Computed Tomography (NCCT) at 24 ± 6 hours post randomisation.
Time frame: 24 ± 6 hours after randomisation
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is suspended, as verified in Jan 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Pulse Therapeutics