CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03085563Updated May 10, 2022Results posted

A Comparison of Intranasal Midazolam and Nitrous Oxide (N2O) Minimal Sedation for Minor Procedures in a Pediatric Emergency Department

A Phase 4 interventional study of Nitrous Oxide and Midazolam in Conscious Sedation, Simple Lacerations Less Than 4 cm and Lumbar Punctures, sponsored by University of Colorado, Denver. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 2 Years to 17 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-05-10.

Sponsored by University of Colorado, Denver · Phase 4, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
63
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
2 Years to 17 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The objective of this project is to compare the sedative effects of intranasal midazolam versus inhaled nitrous oxide (N2O) for minor procedures in the pediatric emergency department. The primary outcome will be length of stay (LOS) in the emergency department (ED) stay for minor procedures. Secondarily the investigators will compare patient/family and provider satisfaction while using either intranasal midazolam or N2O for minimal sedation. The investigators hypothesize that the total length of stay for children undergoing minor procedures in the ED will be lower for N2O, as compared to intranasal midazolam. The investigators also hypothesize that patient/family and provider satisfaction will be higher with N2O and adverse effects will not differ between N2O and intranasal midazolam. Patients will receive either intranasal midazolam or N2O for minor procedures. Following the enrollment period, data will be analyzed and the two will be compared. Total length of stay, patient/family and provider satisfaction will be studied.

02

Conditions studied

  • Conscious Sedation
  • Simple Lacerations Less Than 4 cm
  • Lumbar Punctures
  • Minor Incision Drainage of Abscesses Not Requiring Extensive Debridement

Browse trials for

03

In context

Lacerations

133 studies on the registry are indexed under Lacerations; 29 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 63 is below the median of 79 across 106 interventional studies indexed under Lacerations.

Browse Lacerations studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Colorado, Denver is the lead sponsor of 1,499 studies on the registry; 315 are open to participants now.

Of its 139 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 89 (64%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
2 Years to 17 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patients ≥2 years of age and \<18 years of age, and
  2. Parent/legal guardian age ≥18 years of age to \<80 years of age
  3. Patients with an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status Classification System level 1, 2, and 3
  4. Patients requiring anxiolysis and mild sedation for minor procedures

    1. Minor procedures will include simple lacerations less than 4 cm
    2. Lumbar punctures
    3. Minor incision
    4. Drainage of abscesses that do not require extensive debridement
  5. Must receive the standard of care dosing for either nitrous oxide or intranasal midazolam.

    1. Nitrous oxide up to 70% nitrous concentration will be allowed
    2. Intranasal Midazolam 0.4mg/kg with a max dose of 10mg

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Nasal injury, nasal obstruction or significant congestion
  2. Laceration that involves the nose and ears or come into contact with the scavenger device or nitrous oxide tubing
  3. Allergy to benzodiazepines
  4. Benzodiazepine dosing for any reason 24 hours prior to procedure
  5. Excessive Epistaxis
  6. Facial or nasal deformity
  7. Copious mucous
  8. Recent (less than 1 week) tympanic membrane graft or middle ear surgery
  9. Recent bleomycin therapy
  10. Patients known to be pregnant at time of enrollment
  11. Patients with severe behavior problems, personality disorders or other mind-altering conditions as determined by administering provider.
  12. Closed space situations such as:

    1. pneumothorax,
    2. air embolus,
    3. pneumocephalus, or
    4. craniotomy in the last 3 weeks,
    5. intraocular surgery with retained gas,
    6. pulmonary bullae,
    7. severe emphysema, or
    8. bowel obstruction.
  13. Patients with significant co-morbidities:

    1. severe pulmonary disease,
    2. cardiac disease,
    3. hematologic diseases associated with B12 deficiency,
    4. sickle cell disease.
  14. Patients with acute otitis media and/or sinusitis
  15. History of paradoxical reaction to nitrous oxide
  16. Known Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA+) patients
  17. Co-administration of additional sedation or analgesic medications
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
63 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Nitrous Oxide

    Nitrous oxide will be delivered in one of two ways, using the titration method or rapid infusion method.

    Drug: Nitrous Oxide

  • Active comparator
    Intranasal Midazolam

    Intranasal midazolam with mucosal atomizer device administration will follow the Children's Hospital Colorado (CHCO) established policy 'Intranasal Administration (atomization) of Medications'.

    Drug: Midazolam

Interventions

  • DrugNitrous Oxide

    Nitrous oxide will be delivered in one of two ways, using the titration method or rapid infusion method. Which ever method is used will be recorded. When using the titration method, starting at 20%, nitrous oxide will be added in 10% increments every 60 seconds until the ideal level of sedation has been met (not to exceed 70% nitrous oxide). Using the rapid infusion method, after the proper flow rate has been achieved with oxygen, the flowmeter will be increased to obtain 50% concentration of nitrous oxide. After 2-3 minutes if the patient does not have adequate sedation, nitrous oxide concentration will be increased to 70%.

    Also known as: N2O

  • DrugMidazolam

    Intranasal midazolam with mucosal atomizer device administration will follow the Children's Hospital Colorado (CHCO) established policy 'Intranasal Administration (atomization) of Medications'. As per standard of care, each patient will receive a standardized dose of 0.4mg/kg (maximum dose of 10mg) of intranasal midazolam with the mucosal atomizer device for all procedures.

    Also known as: Versed

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. ED Length of Stay After Intranasal Midazolam or Nitrous Oxide Administration

    The total length of Emergency Department (ED) stay will be defined as time from intranasal midazolam or nitrous oxide administration to time of discharge readiness, collected by the research assistants. Additional time periods measured will include: time from anxiolytic/sedative given to time of procedure completion, and total time for recovery.

    Time frame: From administration of intranasal midazolam or nitrous oxide, assessed over an estimated time of 2 hours.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Patient/Parent and Provider Satisfaction With Sedation and Anxiolytic/Sedative.

    Patient/parent satisfaction will be assessed for all patients; child satisfaction will be assessed for patients over 12 years of age. Satisfaction will be measured on a scale of 1 to 5 (1 being not satisfied and 5 being very satisfied). Specifically, parents (and children when applicable) will be asked "how satisfied with the means of sedation were you for the procedure performed". Research assistants will then ask the ED providers on a scale of 1 to 5 (1 being not satisfied and 5 being very satisfied) "how satisfied with the means of sedation were you for the procedure performed".

    Time frame: Time of discharge, Approximately 2 hours

  2. Adverse Events.

    Number of adverse events observed. Adverse events will be classified and defined as hypoxia, need for administration of reversal agent, nausea, vomiting, paradoxical reaction, airway obstruction, laryngospasm, inadequate sedation, allergic reaction, and cardiac arrest.

    Time frame: Time of discharge, Approximately 2 hours

07

Results

Posted May 10, 2022

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneNitrous OxideIntranasal Midazolam
Started1941
Completed1941
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryED Length of Stay After Intranasal Midazolam or Nitrous Oxide Administration

The total length of Emergency Department (ED) stay will be defined as time from intranasal midazolam or nitrous oxide administration to time of discharge readiness, collected by the research assistants. Additional time periods measured will include: time from anxiolytic/sedative given to time of procedure completion, and total time for recovery.

Time frame:
From administration of intranasal midazolam or nitrous oxide, assessed over an estimated time of 2 hours.
Reported as:
Median · minutes
ED Length of Stay After Intranasal Midazolam or Nitrous Oxide Administration
minutesNitrous OxideIntranasal Midazolam
Time from intranasal midazolam or nitrous oxide administration to time of discharge readiness24.5 (15.5 to 33.5)18.5 (16 to 34)
Time from anxiolytic/sedative given to time of procedure completion9 (3 to 19)10 (6 to 16)
Total time for recovery15.5 (12.5 to 17.5)8.5 (7 to 18)
SecondaryPatient/Parent and Provider Satisfaction With Sedation and Anxiolytic/Sedative.

Patient/parent satisfaction will be assessed for all patients; child satisfaction will be assessed for patients over 12 years of age. Satisfaction will be measured on a scale of 1 to 5 (1 being not satisfied and 5 being very satisfied). Specifically, parents (and children when applicable) will be asked "how satisfied with the means of sedation were you for the procedure performed". Research assistants will then ask the ED providers on a scale of 1 to 5 (1 being not satisfied and 5 being very satisfied) "how satisfied with the means of sedation were you for the procedure performed".

Time frame:
Time of discharge, Approximately 2 hours
Reported as:
Median · score on a scale
Patient/Parent and Provider Satisfaction With Sedation and Anxiolytic/Sedative.
score on a scaleNitrous OxideIntranasal Midazolam
Parent/Patient5 (5 to 5)5 (4 to 5)
Provider5 (4 to 5)4.5 (4 to 5)
SecondaryAdverse Events.

Number of adverse events observed. Adverse events will be classified and defined as hypoxia, need for administration of reversal agent, nausea, vomiting, paradoxical reaction, airway obstruction, laryngospasm, inadequate sedation, allergic reaction, and cardiac arrest.

Time frame:
Time of discharge, Approximately 2 hours
Reported as:
Number · Adverse Events
Adverse Events.
Adverse EventsNitrous OxideIntranasal Midazolam
hypoxia03
need for administration of reversal agent00
nausea, vomiting00
paradoxical reaction01
airway obstruction00
laryngospasm00
inadequate sedation00
allergic reaction00
cardiac arrest00

Adverse events

Collected over 1 day. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Nitrous Oxide0/19 (0%)0/19 (0%)0/19 (0%)
Intranasal Midazolam0/41 (0%)0/41 (0%)4/41 (9.8%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventNitrous OxideIntranasal Midazolam
hypoxiaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/193/41
paradoxical reactionNervous system disorders0/191/41

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Nitrous OxideIntranasal MidazolamTotal
<=18 years194160
Between 18 and 65 years000
>=65 years000
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Nitrous OxideIntranasal MidazolamTotal
Female121325
Male72835
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)Nitrous OxideIntranasal MidazolamTotal
Count of participants——0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Nitrous OxideIntranasal MidazolamTotal
United States194160
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Children's Hospital Colorado
    Aurora, Colorado 80045, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Aug 24, 2017

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 10, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03085563
Lead sponsor
University of Colorado, Denver
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 21, 2017
Start date
May 24, 2017
Primary completion
Nov 8, 2018
Completion
Nov 8, 2018
Results posted
May 10, 2022
Last update
May 10, 2022

Study contacts

Paul A Szefler, MD
principal investigator · University of Colorado, Denver

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion