ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03071211Updated Feb 4, 2019

Catheter Management After Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery

An interventional study of Plug-unplug catheter management and Continuous drainage catheter management in Urinary Retention Postoperative and Pelvic Organ Prolapse, sponsored by Hartford Hospital. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 89 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-02-04.

Sponsored by Hartford Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was Dec 2018, 7 years 10 months ago, and no results have been posted to the registry.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
96
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 89 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This is a randomized controlled trial comparing plug-unplug catheter management, continuous drainage catheter systems and patients that do not get discharged with catheters after inpatient pelvic reconstructive surgery.

Read the detailed description

This study will be a randomized controlled trial comparing plug-unplug (PUP) catheter management, continuous drainage (CD) catheter systems and patients that do not get discharged with catheters (reference) after pelvic reconstructive surgery. The primary objective of this study is to assess impact on activity. The secondary objectives are to compare the rate of urinary tract infection between the groups, duration of time (days) it takes for patients to resume normal voiding, impact on post-operative pain and satisfaction with surgery experience and post-operative recovery. The investigators hypothesize that patient activity/mobility one week after surgery between the two methods of managing the transurethral catheter will be different between arms. Subjects will be recruited at the Hartford Hospital Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery during preoperative consultation for pelvic reconstructive surgery with 1:1:1 assignment and randomization for PUP and CD groups only. Prior to surgery, baseline activity will be assessed using the Activity Assessment Scale, as well as postoperative expectations. Prior to hospital discharge, patients will undergo a postoperative voiding trial (PVT) per regular clinical practice. Upon failure of PVT, participants will be randomized 1:1 to one of two arms in which participants receive a catheter: PUP or CD. The investigator responsible for data collection will remain blinded to the treatment assignment throughout the study. Subjects who pass the PVT test and therefore do not require a catheter will be assigned to the reference arm (Arm C). Subjects will be followed after hospital discharge and assessed using the same pre- and post-operative questionnaires as participants randomized to the CD and PUP arms and will comprise the first 32 consenting patients who do not require a catheter.

Subjects randomized to CD will have a 16F transurethral catheter attached to a leg bag and receive teaching regarding home maintenance. Subjects randomized to PUP will have the same 16F transurethral catheter placed with a plastic plug and instructed to unplug and drain the catheter when they feel the urge to void, or at least every four hours throughout the day. Subjects in both groups will be provided a large bag for gravity-based drainage during the night. Subjects also will be encouraged to call the research team with any catheter-related questions or concerns including symptoms of urinary tract infection (UTI). Subjects with symptoms of UTI (e.g., dysuria, urgency, frequency, and/or hematuria) will be evaluated and treated per standard of care. All participants will then return for an office voiding trial (OVT) five to seven days after hospital discharge, following the same protocol as the PVT. At this time urinalysis will be obtained. Only those participants who endorse symptoms of UTI will have a urine specimen collected and sent for culture. This is in line with the current clinical practice by the investigators. Participants will be treated for UTI based on culture results or if there is high clinical suspicion at the time of office follow-up. Participants who fail the OVT will be discharged home with bladder drainage per standard of care and undergo routine follow-up until they pass a repeat voiding trial.

The subjects will complete a post-operative questionnaire assessing pain, impact on activity and satisfaction. Outcomes will be followed for up to six weeks after initial OVT if it is failed; however, no additional research-associated visits will be necessary from study participants beyond the initial office visit.

02

Conditions studied

  • Urinary Retention Postoperative
  • Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • pelvic organ prolapse
  • urinary catheters
03

In context

Pelvic Organ Prolapse

516 studies on the registry are indexed under Pelvic Organ Prolapse; 80 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 96 is above the median of 80 across 334 interventional studies indexed under Pelvic Organ Prolapse.

Browse Pelvic Organ Prolapse studies →

Lead sponsor

Hartford Hospital is the lead sponsor of 104 studies on the registry; 19 are open to participants now.

Of its 14 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 5 (36%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 89 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Female
  • Age 18-89
  • Inpatient surgery
  • surgery for pelvic organ prolapse with or without mid-urethral slings who fail initial voiding trial at the time of hospital discharge
  • willing/able to provide written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • male
  • age \< 18 or >89
  • unwilling or unable to provide written informed consent
  • undergoing outpatient surgery.
  • planned postoperative catheter use
  • discharged to a nursing facility or who are not candidates for the plug-unplug method for another reason (e.g., poor hand dexterity, paraplegia)
  • suprapubic catheter placement
  • procedures involving urethral bulking or Onabotulinum toxin A (Botox) injection
  • procedures involving planned urethral or bladder surgery (e.g., fistula excision, mesh excision, excision of urethral diverticulum)
  • procedures with only posterior vaginal repair
  • presence of a neurologic condition affecting urinary function
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
96 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Plug-unplug Group

    Participants randomized to plug-unplug catheter management. Participants plug and unplug catheters when they feel urge to void or at least every 4 hours during the day. Participants are given the option to use a large drainage bag for convenience overnight.

    Device: Plug-unplug catheter management

  • Active comparator
    Continuous Drainage Group

    Participants randomized to continuous drainage catheter management. Catheters are attached to a leg bag during the day and large drainage bag for convenience overnight.

    Device: Continuous drainage catheter management

  • No intervention
    Reference Group

    Participants that do not fail inpatient voiding trial and go home without a catheter.

Interventions

  • DevicePlug-unplug catheter management

    Transurethral catheter is plugged with a plastic cap and participants are taught to unplug during the day when they feel the urge to void or at least every 4 hours.

  • DeviceContinuous drainage catheter management

    Transurethral catheter is attached to a continuous drainage bag.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Activity Assessment Scale

    Participants complete this 18-question survey preoperatively and 3-5 days postoperatively.

    Time frame: Postoperative day 3-5

Secondary outcomes

  1. Preoperative expectations

    Patients complete a preoperative expectations survey prior to surgery.

    Time frame: At the time of consent

  2. Days until passing voiding trial

    Evaluate rates of passing voiding trial between arms

    Time frame: up to 6 weeks postoperatively

  3. Urinary Tract infection

    Rates of urinary tract infection between arms

    Time frame: up to 6 weeks postoperatively

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Hartford Hospital
    Hartford, Connecticut 06106, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Boyd SS, O'Sullivan DM, Tunitsky-Bitton E. A Comparison of Two Methods of Catheter Management After Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Nov;134(5):1037-1045. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003525. PubMed 31599826 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — At this time, it is undecided if IPD will be made available to other researchers at the end of this study.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 4, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03071211
Lead sponsor
Hartford Hospital
Responsible party
Sarah Boyd (Fellow physician, Hartford Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 6, 2017
Start date
Feb 26, 2017
Primary completion
Dec 7, 2018
Completion
Jan 31, 2019
Last update
Feb 4, 2019

Study contacts

Sarah S Boyd, MD
principal investigator · Hartford Hospital
Elena Tunitsky-Bitton, MD
principal investigator · Hartford Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion