ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03065127Updated Apr 25, 2017

Investigating Therapies for Freezing of Gait

An interventional study of Cognitive Training and Cognitive Behavioural Therapy in Parkinson Disease and Gait Disorders, Neurologic, sponsored by Sun Life Financial Movement Disorders Research and Rehabilitation Centre. Status unknown at 1 site in Canada. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-04-25.

Sponsored by Sun Life Financial Movement Disorders Research and Rehabilitation Centre · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Apr 2017), so the status shown — last known as Active, not recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
17
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 10 studies in Parkinson Disease by Sun Life Financial Movement Disorders Research and Rehabilitation Centre — none open to participants now, none under way, none of them phase 3. Parkinson Disease · Sun Life Financial Movement Disorders Research and Rehabilitation Centre.

Enrollment
10th of 10
17 · median 57
Started
2017
the only one that year
No phase
10 of 10
none open now
Registered
6th of 10
by date

Among the 10 studies in Parkinson Disease by Sun Life Financial Movement Disorders Research and Rehabilitation Centre, this one is the 10th largest by enrollment, is the only one that started in 2017, is one of 10 with no phase, and was the 6th registered.

Parkinson Disease

4,573 studies on the registry are indexed under Parkinson Disease; 1,086 are open to participants now.

Browse Parkinson Disease studies →

Open to participants now

None of the 10 studies in Parkinson Disease by Sun Life Financial Movement Disorders Research and Rehabilitation Centre is open now.

Where they have run

Who these studies take

Of the 748 Parkinson Disease studies recruiting now, 311 (42%) set no upper age limit and 127 (17%) stop at 75 or younger; 63 take children under 18; 189 take healthy volunteers.

This study: all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Download CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: the 10 studies in Parkinson Disease by Sun Life Financial Movement Disorders Research and Rehabilitation Centre as a file.
02

Study summary

Freezing of gait (FOG) is arguably one of the most debilitating motor symptoms experienced by individuals with Parkinson's disease (PD). FOG may be caused by an overload of cognitive, limbic, and sensorimotor system activity in the basal ganglia. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to evaluate cognitive, limbic, and sensorimotor therapies in individuals with FOG. Participants in this study will undergo all three types of treatments in a randomized counterbalanced order. Each treatment will occur in 1 hour sessions, twice weekly for a period of 4 weeks.

Read the detailed description

Freezing of gait (FOG) is arguably one of the most debilitating motor symptoms experienced by individuals with Parkinson's disease (PD), and negatively impacts quality of life (Walton et al., 2015). Furthermore, advanced FOG does not respond well to treatments commonly used in Parkinson's disease (Nutt et al., 2011), therefore warranting the use of adjunct treatment options. The development of potential treatment strategies for FOG should focus on the underlying mechanism. The cross-talk model of FOG proposes that FOG may be caused by an overload of cognitive, limbic, and sensorimotor system activity in the basal ganglia, resulting in a depletion of dopaminergic resources, leading to FOG (Lewis \& Barker, 2009). Hence, based on the cross-talk model, treatments targeting the cognitive, sensorimotor and limbic systems independently may lead to a reduction in FOG episodes. Previous studies have demonstrated the efficacy of therapies targeting these domains in PD and healthy individuals, however, these have yet to be explored in FOG. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to evaluate cognitive, sensorimotor, and limbic therapies in individuals with FOG.

This study will employ a within-subjects design, in which participants will undergo all three treatments in a randomized counterbalanced order. Sessions for each type of treatment will occur for 1 hour, twice weekly for a period of 4 weeks. Participants will also undergo pre- and post-test assessments prior to and following each 4-week treatment period. The cognitive training will utilize the "Smartbrain Pro" computer software, which has previously demonstrated efficacy in individuals with Parkinson's disease (Paris et al., 2011). The sensorimotor training group will participate in proprioceptive training of the upper and lower limbs. This training will entail a target matching task, in which participants will produce active and self-defined movements while blindfolded (i.e. without visual feedback). The limbic training group will undergo cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) focusing solely on anxiety symptoms.

03

Conditions studied

  • Parkinson Disease
  • Gait Disorders, Neurologic
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Either gender
  • Diagnosed with idiopathic PD by a Neurologist
  • Self-reported FOG with the use of UPDRS-II (Question 14)
  • Confirmation of present FOG by a movement disorder specialist
  • Able to walk 10 meters, unassisted
  • Able to understand English instructions

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • A neurological disease other than PD
  • Peripheral neuropathy
  • Clinically diagnosed with dementia
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
17 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Cognitive Training

    Participants will independently complete cognitive exercises on the "Smartbrain Pro" computer software. These exercises aim to train different aspects of executive function. The difficulty level of each exercise will increase relative to each participant's progress. Sessions will last for one hour, occurring twice weekly for a period of 4 weeks.

    Behavioral: Cognitive Training

  • Experimental
    Cognitive Behavioural Therapy

    Participants will undergo one-on-one sessions of cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) working with a therapist to establish an individualized CBT plan which will focus on symptoms of anxiety. Participants will complete a total of eight one-hour sessions over 4 weeks.

    Behavioral: Cognitive Behavioural Therapy

  • Experimental
    Proprioceptive Training

    Participants will complete one-on-one sessions a target matching proprioceptive training protocol using their upper and lower limbs. For the upper limb target-reaching task, participants will be seated in front of a surface marked with ten targets. They will first visualize a specified target, then blindfolded and asked to reach towards that target with the blindfold on. The blindfold will then be removed allowing participants to view their performance relative to the target. This task will be repeated for the remaining targets on both sides and for both upper and lower limbs. Participants will complete a total of eight one-hour sessions over 4 weeks.

    Behavioral: Proprioceptive Training

Interventions

  • BehavioralCognitive Training

    Training the cognitive domain may be accomplished by training various cognitive and executive functions with guided practice focusing on specific skills (e.g. visuospatial processing, executive function, memory, language, and attention). Cognitive training has been demonstrated to be efficacious in several studies in individuals with PD. Given the potential cognitive contribution to FOG episodes, this type of therapy may alleviate FOG by potentially improving upon planning, set-shifting, and/or response inhibition.

  • BehavioralCognitive Behavioural Therapy

    CBT has been demonstrated to be effective in the remediation of anxiety in individuals with PD. This may be beneficial to individuals experiencing FOG, given the evidence that anxiety may provoke FOG. During periods of elevated anxiety (e.g. walking in a threatening environment), freezers will be able to more efficiently process this limbic load resulting in greater resources available for movement control.

  • BehavioralProprioceptive Training

    Currently, studies investigating proprioceptive training as a treatment in PD are limited. However, this type of training has potential by improving proprioceptive processing. It would be expected that due to this training, when sensorimotor processing is challenged during locomotion (e.g. by removing visual feedback and preventing compensation of proprioception deficits), freezers would experience less decrements to gait due to an enhanced ability to process sensorimotor demands.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Gait Assessment

    Participants will walk approximately 9.75 metres for 12 trials. Recording of kinematic data will be done with eight Optotrak® cameras (Northern Digital, NDI, Waterloo, Ontario). Spatiotemporal gait parameters will be analyzed from this assessment.

    Time frame: Change from Baseline at 4 weeks of first treatment phase

  2. Gait Assessment

    Participants will walk approximately 9.75 metres for 12 trials. Recording of kinematic data will be done with eight Optotrak® cameras (Northern Digital, NDI, Waterloo, Ontario). Spatiotemporal gait parameters will be analyzed from this assessment.

    Time frame: Change from Baseline at 4 weeks of second treatment phase

  3. Gait Assessment

    Participants will walk approximately 9.75 metres for 12 trials. Recording of kinematic data will be done with eight Optotrak® cameras (Northern Digital, NDI, Waterloo, Ontario). Spatiotemporal gait parameters will be analyzed from this assessment.

    Time frame: Change from Baseline at 4 weeks of third treatment phase

Secondary outcomes

  1. Stroop Test

    This test assesses inhibitory control and will be administered in a paper-based format.

    Time frame: Pre-intervention and Post-intervention at week 4 of first treatment phase

  2. Trail-making test

    This will also be administered in a paper-based format. This test will assess visuospatial function and set-shifting ability.

    Time frame: Pre-intervention and Post-intervention at week 4 of first treatment phase

  3. Stroop Test

    This test assesses inhibitory control and will be administered in a paper-based format.

    Time frame: Pre-intervention and Post-intervention at week 4 of second treatment phase

  4. Trail-making test

    This will also be administered in a paper-based format. This test will assess visuospatial function and set-shifting ability.

    Time frame: Pre-intervention and Post-intervention at week 4 of second treatment phase

  5. Stroop Test

    This test assesses inhibitory control and will be administered in a paper-based format.

    Time frame: Pre-intervention and Post-intervention at week 4 of third treatment phase

  6. Trail-making test

    This will also be administered in a paper-based format. This test will assess visuospatial function and set-shifting ability.

    Time frame: Pre-intervention and Post-intervention at week 4 of third treatment phase

  7. Passive Joint Angle Matching

    This task will be assessed in order to evaluate proprioceptive functioning.

    Time frame: Pre-intervention and Post-intervention at week 4 of first treatment phase

  8. Passive Joint Angle Matching

    This task will be assessed in order to evaluate proprioceptive functioning.

    Time frame: Pre-intervention and Post-intervention at week 4 of second treatment phase

  9. Passive Joint Angle Matching

    This task will be assessed in order to evaluate proprioceptive functioning.

    Time frame: Pre-intervention and Post-intervention at week 4 of third treatment phase

  10. Parkinson Anxiety Scale

    The Parkinson Anxiety Scale (PAS), which is a self-report questionnaire used to assess anxiety levels, will be administered to participants. This tool has demonstrated good concurrent validity in individuals with PD against other existing anxiety scales (Leentjens et al., 2014).

    Time frame: Pre-intervention and Post-intervention at week 4 of first treatment phase

  11. Parkinson Anxiety Scale

    The Parkinson Anxiety Scale (PAS), which is a self-report questionnaire used to assess anxiety levels, will be administered to participants. This tool has demonstrated good concurrent validity in individuals with PD against other existing anxiety scales (Leentjens et al., 2014).

    Time frame: Pre-intervention and Post-intervention at week 4 of second treatment phase

  12. Parkinson Anxiety Scale

    The Parkinson Anxiety Scale (PAS), which is a self-report questionnaire used to assess anxiety levels, will be administered to participants. This tool has demonstrated good concurrent validity in individuals with PD against other existing anxiety scales (Leentjens et al., 2014).

    Time frame: Pre-intervention and Post-intervention at week 4 of third treatment phase

  13. Unified Parkinson's disease Rating Scale Motor Subsection (UPDRS-III)

    A clinician administered assessment which evaluates individuals' motor symptom severity

    Time frame: Pre-intervention and Post-intervention at week 4 of first treatment phase

  14. Unified Parkinson's disease Rating Scale Motor Subsection (UPDRS-III)

    A clinician administered assessment which evaluates individuals' motor symptom severity

    Time frame: Pre-intervention and Post-intervention at week 4 of second treatment phase

  15. Unified Parkinson's disease Rating Scale Motor Subsection (UPDRS-III)

    A clinician administered assessment which evaluates individuals' motor symptom severity

    Time frame: Pre-intervention and Post-intervention at week 4 of third treatment phase

  16. New Freezing of Gait Questionnaire (NFOGQ)

    Participants will be asked to complete the New Freezing of Gait Questionnaire (NFOGQ) questionnaire developed by Nieuwboer and colleagues (2009). This provides a self-reported measure of frequency and duration of FOG episodes. This tool has been validated and proven to be highly reliable in individuals with PD, as well as assessing treatment interventions for FOG.

    Time frame: Pre-intervention and Post-intervention at week 4 of first treatment phase

  17. New Freezing of Gait Questionnaire (NFOGQ)

    Participants will be asked to complete the New Freezing of Gait Questionnaire (NFOGQ) questionnaire developed by Nieuwboer and colleagues (2009). This provides a self-reported measure of frequency and duration of FOG episodes. This tool has been validated and proven to be highly reliable in individuals with PD, as well as assessing treatment interventions for FOG.

    Time frame: Pre-intervention and Post-intervention at week 4 of second treatment phase

  18. New Freezing of Gait Questionnaire (NFOGQ)

    Participants will be asked to complete the New Freezing of Gait Questionnaire (NFOGQ) questionnaire developed by Nieuwboer and colleagues (2009). This provides a self-reported measure of frequency and duration of FOG episodes. This tool has been validated and proven to be highly reliable in individuals with PD, as well as assessing treatment interventions for FOG.

    Time frame: Pre-intervention and Post-intervention at week 4 of third treatment phase

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Sun Life Financial Movement Disorders Research and Rehabilitation Centre
    Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3C5, Canada
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Chow R, Tripp BP, Rzondzinski D, Almeida QJ. Investigating Therapies for Freezing of Gait Targeting the Cognitive, Limbic, and Sensorimotor Domains. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2021 Mar;35(3):290-299. doi: 10.1177/1545968321992331. Epub 2021 Feb 9. PubMed 33559531 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Feb 2017 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Aug 2017, 6 months after the start.

Of 1,291 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Parkinson Disease, half reached primary completion within 24 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 44. This study's planned 6 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 1,367 studies reached it within 25 months; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 44.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 9, 2017
First posted
Feb 27, 2017
StartActual
Feb 24, 2017
Primary completionEst.
Aug 2017
CompletionEst.
Aug 2017
Last update
Apr 25, 2017
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 25, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03065127
Lead sponsor
Sun Life Financial Movement Disorders Research and Rehabilitation Centre
Responsible party
Rebecca Chow (Primary Investigator, Sun Life Financial Movement Disorders Research and Rehabilitation Centre) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 27, 2017
Start date
Feb 24, 2017
Primary completion
Aug 2017 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 2017 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 25, 2017

Study contacts

Rebecca Chow, BSc
principal investigator · Sun Life Financial Movement Disorders Research and Rehabilitation Centre

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Apr 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion