ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02476266Updated Mar 17, 2020

Two Resistance Training Protocols to Reduce the Risk of Falls in Parkinson's Disease

An interventional study of Resistance Training in Parkinson's Disease and Accidental Falls, sponsored by Sun Life Financial Movement Disorders Research and Rehabilitation Centre. Completed at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-03-17.

Sponsored by Sun Life Financial Movement Disorders Research and Rehabilitation Centre · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
53
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 10 studies in Parkinson Disease by Sun Life Financial Movement Disorders Research and Rehabilitation Centre — none open to participants now, none under way, none of them phase 3. Parkinson Disease · Sun Life Financial Movement Disorders Research and Rehabilitation Centre.

Enrollment
6th of 10
53 · median 57
Started
2015
with 3 others
No phase
10 of 10
none open now
Registered
4th of 10
by date

Among the 10 studies in Parkinson Disease by Sun Life Financial Movement Disorders Research and Rehabilitation Centre, this one is the 6th largest by enrollment, is one of 4 that started in 2015, is one of 10 with no phase, and was the 4th registered.

Parkinson Disease

4,573 studies on the registry are indexed under Parkinson Disease; 1,086 are open to participants now.

Browse Parkinson Disease studies →

Open to participants now

None of the 10 studies in Parkinson Disease by Sun Life Financial Movement Disorders Research and Rehabilitation Centre is open now.

Where they have run

Who these studies take

Of the 748 Parkinson Disease studies recruiting now, 311 (42%) set no upper age limit and 127 (17%) stop at 75 or younger; 63 take children under 18; 189 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years and older · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Download CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: the 10 studies in Parkinson Disease by Sun Life Financial Movement Disorders Research and Rehabilitation Centre as a file.
02

Study summary

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a chronic neurodegenerative disorder that is characterized by a multitude of symptoms. Impairments in balance, muscle deficits and increased risk of falls are commonly experienced in PD.The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of two different resistance training programs on improving balance and muscular strength to thereby reduce the risk of falls in those with PD. This study will randomize individuals to one of two groups, a power training group, or a strength training group. Both interventional groups will participate in 12 weeks of resistance training, two times per week for an hour each exercise session.

Read the detailed description

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disorder that results in multiple hallmark symptoms, such as balance impairments, postural instability and muscular deficits. These symptoms, in combination with a deficient sensory-perceptual integration system, put individuals with PD at a higher risk of falls and fractures, compared to healthy older adults. With the expected rise in PD diagnosis, this will place an unprecedented burden on the Canadian healthcare system due to increased hospitalizations, surgeries, placement into long term care facilities, and rehabilitation. Improving symptom severity and delaying disease progression through rehabilitation strategies that improve balance and muscular deficits, can decrease falling risk in individuals with PD, potentially alleviating the projected burden on the healthcare system. For these reasons it is imperative to have the ability to directly measure the degree to which individuals with PD are at risk of experiencing falls through objective techniques.

Purpose: Therefore the purpose of this study is to examine the effects of two different forms of resistance training (RT) to improve the muscular deficits experienced, as well to improve the balance impairments experienced as it has been suggested that RT is able to do this not only in healthy older adults but in those with PD as well. The two RT programs that will be investigated are a conventional strength training (ST) program and a high velocity strength training, known as power training (PT) program.

Objective/Aim: The objective of this study is to identify if ST or PT is a more effective rehabilitation program to improving muscle strength and power, balance measures and reducing the risk of falls. Due to the nature of the PT intervention it is hypothesized that these individuals will experience the greatest improvements in outcome measures.

Methods/Design: This study will be a double blind randomized controlled trial. Participants will be blinded to group allocation except for the control group, however those in the interventional group will only be informed that they are participating in a RT program. The primary investigator will only collect measures that are considered to be objective at follow up time points. Pre-intervention measures will all be collected prior to randomization into group allocations. The assessor of disease severity will also be blinded to group allocation.

Participants will be randomized to one of three groups: i) a control group (to account for normal disease progression for the duration of the intervention); ii) ST group and iii) PT group.

The intervention will be a total of 12 weeks long, where participants will come in two days per week for an hour long session each day, for a total of 24 session.

Participants randomized to the ST group will complete three sets of 8-10 repetitions at 70% of their one repetition maximum (1-RM), as determined during their pre-test. Those randomized to the PT group will complete three sets of 12-15 repetitions at 40% of their 1-RM, as determined during their pre-test. Both programs involve individualized exercise prescriptions based on the results of their predicted 1-RM. This program will be designed by a Canadian Society for Exercise Physiology Certified Exercise Physiologist, who has the knowledge and ability to safely test and prescribe exercise to individuals with chronic conditions. Both programs will be progressive in nature, in that as each individual is able to complete the last set, for two consecutive training sessions at the higher end of the range of repetitions (i.e. for the ST group 10 or more repetitions), the next session their weight will be increased by 5%. Upon completion participants will complete all outcome measures again. These measures will be completed during a wash out period at 3 months and 6 months post intervention to investigate the potential long term effects of these rehabilitation programs, and if either is more advantageous in the long term.

03

Conditions studied

  • Parkinson's Disease
  • Accidental Falls

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • resistance training
  • strength training
  • balance
  • muscle strength
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosed with idiopathic PD by a Neurologist
  • Able to stand two minutes, unassisted
  • Able to understand English instructions
  • Signed Physical Activity Readiness Medical Examination (PARmed-X) by physician

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • a neurological disease other than PD
  • peripheral neuropathy
  • physical impairments that would prevent participation in the muscular strength testing
  • uncontrolled hypertension
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
53 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Control

    Participants randomized to this group will come in for testing at pre-intervention, post-intervention, three month wash out and six month wash out. Participants will be asked to continue their activities of daily living. To account for any physical activity changes over the length of the study the Community Healthy Activities Model Program for Seniors (CHAMPS) questionnaire will be administered to all individuals. A control group is necessary to compare to show normal disease progression over the length of the study as well as to demonstrate that improvements in outcome measures are due to the interventions and not practice effects.

  • Active comparator
    Strength Training

    Individuals randomized to this program will complete three sets of eight to ten repetitions at 70% of their predicted 1-RM for each of the exercises mentioned above. The speed of the movements in this program will be two to three seconds each for the concentric and eccentric components. When participants are able to complete ten repetitions in their third set for two consecutive days, weight will be increased for the following session by 5% of the current weight that they are at in accordance with Canadian Society for Exercise Physiology (CSEP) and American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) guidelines. Participants will complete a total of 24 sessions over the course of 12 weeks, two times per week for an hour each session.

    Other: Resistance Training

  • Experimental
    Power Training

    Participants randomized to this program will complete three sets of 12 to 15 repetitions completed at 40% of predicted 1-RM for each exercises. The concentric part of the movement will be completed as fast as possible, whereas the eccentric component will be accomplished in two to three seconds. The load in this group is lower as it has been shown that by performing power training at lighter loads, the muscles are able to be activated, throughout the entire concentric component, while maintaining a consistent level of force. The progression will be determined through the same means as the conventional strength training group. Participants will complete a total of 24 sessions over 12 weeks, twice per week for an hour each session

    Other: Resistance Training

Interventions

  • OtherResistance Training

    Resistance training has been shown to improve balance and muscle weakness in those with PD as well as reducing the number of falls experienced, albeit not significantly. However to date no study has investigated forms of resistance training in the same study. To disentangle which form of resistance training might be more effective at reducing the risk of falls, improving balance and muscle strength, the proposed study will compare power training and conventional strength training.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Lean-and-Release Perturbation Technique.

    This measure will require participants to be in a forward static lean at a maximum lean angle of 20 degrees from the vertical. This measure will induce a fall like situation where participants will be required to respond to this "perturbation" as they would in a slip or a trip scenario in real life. Muscle activity will be collected through surface electromyography (sEMG) to measure muscular responses associated with the perturbation. Measurement of postural adjustments will be made on an electronic carpet. sEMG and postural adjustments will demonstrate participants' onset of muscular activation time, latency to stepping, movement speed, and stepping characteristics.

    Time frame: Change in muscle activity, compensatory postural responses from baseline to 12 weeks.

  2. Lean-and-Release Perturbation Technique.

    Time frame: Change in muscle activity, compensatory postural responses from 12 weeks to three month wash out

  3. Lean-and-Release Perturbation Technique.

    Time frame: Change in muscle activity, compensatory postural responses from 12 weeks to six month wash out

Secondary outcomes

  1. Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Motor Subsection (UPDRS III)

    Motor symptom severity as assessed by a movement disorders specialist

    Time frame: Change in motor severity from baseline to 12 weeks

  2. Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Motor Subsection (UPDRS III)

    Time frame: Change in motor severity from 12 weeks to three month wash out

  3. Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Motor Subsection (UPDRS III)

    Time frame: Change in motor severity from 12 weeks to six month wash out

  4. Gait Measurement

    This measures spatiotemporal gait parameters of individuals. This will allow measurement of key predictors of fall risk in PD, including step length, step time, step width, velocity, double support time, double support time percentage, step time variability, and step length variability. Participants will also perform a secondary digit-monitoring task while walking in the same well-lit open room. Participants will walk while simultaneously listening to an audio track of random numbers greater than zero and less than 10. For each trial that included this task, the participants are assigned two specific digits and will be instructed to silently count (without the use of manual aid) the number of times those two digits were announced by the audio track, separately. At the end of the trial the participants will be asked to inform the tester of the number of times they heard each digit.

    Time frame: Changes in gait measures from baseline to 12 weeks

  5. Gait Measurement

    This measures spatiotemporal gait parameters of individuals. This will allow measurement of key predictors of fall risk in PD, including step length, step time, step width, velocity, double support time, double support time percentage, step time variability, and step length variability. Participants will also perform a secondary digit-monitoring task while walking in the same well-lit open room. Participants will walk while simultaneously listening to an audio track of random numbers greater than zero and less than 10. For each trial that included this task, the participants are assigned two specific digits and will be instructed to silently count (without the use of manual aid) the number of times those two digits were announced by the audio track, separately. At the end of the trial the participants will be asked to inform the tester of the number of times they heard each digit.

    Time frame: Changes in gait measures from 12 weeks to three month wash out

  6. Gait Measurement

    This measures spatiotemporal gait parameters of individuals. This will allow measurement of key predictors of fall risk in PD, including step length, step time, step width, velocity, double support time, double support time percentage, step time variability, and step length variability. Participants will also perform a secondary digit-monitoring task while walking in the same well-lit open room. Participants will walk while simultaneously listening to an audio track of random numbers greater than zero and less than 10. For each trial that included this task, the participants are assigned two specific digits and will be instructed to silently count (without the use of manual aid) the number of times those two digits were announced by the audio track, separately. At the end of the trial the participants will be asked to inform the tester of the number of times they heard each digit.

    Time frame: Changes in gait measures from 12 weeks to six month wash out

  7. Balance Measurement

    The Biodex Balance System™ SD will be used to assess balance outcomes. Specifically participants will be asked to complete two static balance tasks: i) eyes open- participants will be required to stand quietly for thirty seconds looking straight ahead and ii) eyes closed- participants will be required to stand quietly for thirty seconds with their eyes closed. Centre of pressure excursion will be measured in the anterior-posterior and medial-lateral directions to give an indication of participants overall postural stability.

    Time frame: Changes in postural stability measures from baseline to 12 weeks

  8. Balance Measurement

    The Biodex Balance System™ SD will be used to assess balance outcomes. Specifically participants will be asked to complete two static balance tasks: i) eyes open- participants will be required to stand quietly for thirty seconds looking straight ahead and ii) eyes closed- participants will be required to stand quietly for thirty seconds with their eyes closed. Centre of pressure excursion will be measured in the anterior-posterior and medial-lateral directions to give an indication of participants overall postural stability.

    Time frame: Changes in postural stability measures from 12 weeks to three month wash out

  9. Balance Measurement

    The Biodex Balance System™ SD will be used to assess balance outcomes. Specifically participants will be asked to complete two static balance tasks: i) eyes open- participants will be required to stand quietly for thirty seconds looking straight ahead and ii) eyes closed- participants will be required to stand quietly for thirty seconds with their eyes closed. Centre of pressure excursion will be measured in the anterior-posterior and medial-lateral directions to give an indication of participants overall postural stability.

    Time frame: Changes in postural stability measures from 12 weeks to six month wash out

  10. Muscular Strength and Power Assessment

    Technogym Selection Leg Press used to assess muscular strength and power. Participants will be completing a submaximal muscular strength protocol (multiple repetition maximum), which can be used to predict a one repetition maximum (1-RM).

    Time frame: Changes in muscle strength measures from baseline to 12 weeks

  11. Muscular Strength and Power Assessment

    Technogym Selection Leg Press used to assess muscular strength and power. Participants will be completing a submaximal muscular strength protocol (multiple repetition maximum), which can be used to predict a one repetition maximum (1-RM).

    Time frame: Changes in muscle strength measures from 12 weeks to three month wash out

  12. Muscular Strength and Power Assessment

    Technogym Selection Leg Press used to assess muscular strength and power. Participants will be completing a submaximal muscular strength protocol (multiple repetition maximum), which can be used to predict a one repetition maximum (1-RM).

    Time frame: Changes in muscle strength measures from 12 weeks to six month wash out

  13. Timed Up and Go (TUG)

    A timed up and go test (TUG test) will be administered as an assessment of function. Briefly, participants will be asked to begin the test by sitting in a chair, then to get up out of the chair without use of their hands and walk three metres then turn around and walk back to the chair and sit in it. Gait characteristics will be measured (step time, step length, step variability, velocity, time spent in double support. This test will occur three times.

    Time frame: Changes in time and gait measures from baseline to 12 weeks

  14. Timed Up and Go (TUG)

    A timed up and go test (TUG test) will be administered as an assessment of function. Briefly, participants will be asked to begin the test by sitting in a chair, then to get up out of the chair without use of their hands and walk three metres then turn around and walk back to the chair and sit in it. Gait characteristics will be measured (step time, step length, step variability, velocity, time spent in double support. This test will occur three times.

    Time frame: Changes in time and gait measures from 12 weeks to three month wash out

  15. Timed Up and Go (TUG)

    A timed up and go test (TUG test) will be administered as an assessment of function. Briefly, participants will be asked to begin the test by sitting in a chair, then to get up out of the chair without use of their hands and walk three metres then turn around and walk back to the chair and sit in it. Gait characteristics will be measured (step time, step length, step variability, velocity, time spent in double support. This test will occur three times.

    Time frame: Changes in time and gait measures from 12 weeks to six month wash out

  16. Thirty Second Sit to Stand

    A thirty second sit to stand test will also be used as it is a functional measure of lower limb muscle strength. Participants will begin the test by sitting in a chair that is placed against a wall for safety. They will then be asked to go from a sitting position to a standing position as many times as possible in a thirty second time frame.

    Time frame: Change in number of sit to stands completed from baseline to 12 weeks

  17. Thirty Second Sit to Stand

    A thirty second sit to stand test will also be used as it is a functional measure of lower limb muscle strength. Participants will begin the test by sitting in a chair that is placed against a wall for safety. They will then be asked to go from a sitting position to a standing position as many times as possible in a thirty second time frame.

    Time frame: Change in number of sit to stands completed from 12 weeks to three month wash out

  18. Thirty Second Sit to Stand

    A thirty second sit to stand test will also be used as it is a functional measure of lower limb muscle strength. Participants will begin the test by sitting in a chair that is placed against a wall for safety. They will then be asked to go from a sitting position to a standing position as many times as possible in a thirty second time frame.

    Time frame: Change in number of sit to stands completed from 12 weeks to six month wash out

Other outcomes

  1. Parkinson's disease Quality of Life Questionnaire (PDQ-39)

    It is one of the most widely used questionnaires to assess the quality of life of individuals with Parkinson's disease. For the purposes of this study it is imperative to identify if those that are at a higher risk of falling have a lower quality of life rating, as has been reported in previous studies. It is important to observe if the proposed measure that is to be validated is correlated with quality of life ratings.

    Time frame: Change in score from baseline to 12 weeks

  2. CHAMPS Questionnaire

    This questionnaire is able to quantify the amount of physical activity that older adults complete. This questionnaire is being used to control for varying activity levels, as it is proposed that those that have lower levels of physical activity are at a greater risk of falls. It is a self-administered questionnaire that takes approximately 10 to 15 minutes to complete. As well this questionnaire is important to administer, as participants will be asked to come in over a period of time, it is necessary to control and account for changes in physical activity levels that might influence the other outcome measures in this study.

    Time frame: Changes in score from baseline to 12 weeks

  3. CHAMPS Questionnaire

    This questionnaire is able to quantify the amount of physical activity that older adults complete. This questionnaire is being used to control for varying activity levels, as it is proposed that those that have lower levels of physical activity are at a greater risk of falls. It is a self-administered questionnaire that takes approximately 10 to 15 minutes to complete. As well this questionnaire is important to administer, as participants will be asked to come in over a period of time, it is necessary to control and account for changes in physical activity levels that might influence the other outcome measures in this study.

    Time frame: Changes in score from 12 weeks three month wash out

  4. CHAMPS Questionnaire

    This questionnaire is able to quantify the amount of physical activity that older adults complete. This questionnaire is being used to control for varying activity levels, as it is proposed that those that have lower levels of physical activity are at a greater risk of falls. It is a self-administered questionnaire that takes approximately 10 to 15 minutes to complete. As well this questionnaire is important to administer, as participants will be asked to come in over a period of time, it is necessary to control and account for changes in physical activity levels that might influence the other outcome measures in this study.

    Time frame: Changes in score from 12 weeks six month wash out

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Sunlife Financial Movement Disorders Research and Rehabilitation Centre- Wilfrid Laurier University
    Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3C5, Canada
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Glendinning DS, Enoka RM. Motor unit behavior in Parkinson's disease. Phys Ther. 1994 Jan;74(1):61-70. doi: 10.1093/ptj/74.1.61. PubMed 8265729 ↗
  • Stolze H, Klebe S, Baecker C, Zechlin C, Friege L, Pohle S, Deuschl G. Prevalence of gait disorders in hospitalized neurological patients. Mov Disord. 2005 Jan;20(1):89-94. doi: 10.1002/mds.20266. PubMed 15390043 ↗
  • Wielinski CL, Erickson-Davis C, Wichmann R, Walde-Douglas M, Parashos SA. Falls and injuries resulting from falls among patients with Parkinson's disease and other parkinsonian syndromes. Mov Disord. 2005 Apr;20(4):410-415. doi: 10.1002/mds.20347. PubMed 15580552 ↗
  • Newton RU, Murphy AJ, Humphries BJ, Wilson GJ, Kraemer WJ, Hakkinen K. Influence of load and stretch shortening cycle on the kinematics, kinetics and muscle activation that occurs during explosive upper-body movements. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1997;75(4):333-42. doi: 10.1007/s004210050169. PubMed 9134365 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Aug 2015, a primary completion of Jun 2016 and a completion of Sep 2016. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 16, 2015
First posted
Jun 19, 2015
Start
Aug 2015
Primary completionActual
Jun 2016
CompletionActual
Sep 2016
Last update
Mar 17, 2020
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 17, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02476266
Lead sponsor
Sun Life Financial Movement Disorders Research and Rehabilitation Centre
Responsible party
Brittany Intzandt (Graduate Student, Sun Life Financial Movement Disorders Research and Rehabilitation Centre) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 19, 2015
Start date
Aug 2015
Primary completion
Jun 2016
Completion
Sep 2016
Last update
Mar 17, 2020

Study contacts

Brittany Intzandt, BSc
study director · Wilfrid Laurier University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion